Influence of Optical Defocus on Peripheral Vision

Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 52; no. 1; p. 318
Main Authors Rosén, Robert, Lundström, Linda, Unsbo, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 05.01.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1552-5783
0146-0404
1552-5783
DOI10.1167/iovs.10-5623

Cover

Abstract Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study was conducted to bridge this gap by systematically studying the sensitivity to optical defocus in a wide range of peripheral visual tasks. The spatial frequency threshold for detection and resolution in high and low contrast with stationary and drifting gratings were measured off-axis (20° nasal visual field) in five subjects with a peripheral optical correction that was varied systematically ±4 D. All visual tasks, except high-contrast resolution, were sensitive to optical defocus, particularly low-contrast resolution with an increase of up to 0.227 logMAR/D. The two myopic subjects exhibited a very low sensitivity to defocus by negative lenses for low-contrast tasks, whereas all subjects were equally affected by myopic defocus. Contrary to expectations, drifting gratings made little difference overall. Optical defocus as low as 1 D has a large impact on most peripheral visual tasks, with high-contrast resolution being the exception. Since the everyday visual scenery consists of objects at different contrast levels, it is understandable that persons with central visual field loss are helped by correction of peripheral refractive errors. The asymmetry in sensitivity to peripheral optical defocus in low-contrast tasks that was experienced by the myopic subjects in this study merits further investigation.
AbstractList Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study was conducted to bridge this gap by systematically studying the sensitivity to optical defocus in a wide range of peripheral visual tasks.PURPOSEPeripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study was conducted to bridge this gap by systematically studying the sensitivity to optical defocus in a wide range of peripheral visual tasks.The spatial frequency threshold for detection and resolution in high and low contrast with stationary and drifting gratings were measured off-axis (20° nasal visual field) in five subjects with a peripheral optical correction that was varied systematically ±4 D.METHODSThe spatial frequency threshold for detection and resolution in high and low contrast with stationary and drifting gratings were measured off-axis (20° nasal visual field) in five subjects with a peripheral optical correction that was varied systematically ±4 D.All visual tasks, except high-contrast resolution, were sensitive to optical defocus, particularly low-contrast resolution with an increase of up to 0.227 logMAR/D. The two myopic subjects exhibited a very low sensitivity to defocus by negative lenses for low-contrast tasks, whereas all subjects were equally affected by myopic defocus. Contrary to expectations, drifting gratings made little difference overall.RESULTSAll visual tasks, except high-contrast resolution, were sensitive to optical defocus, particularly low-contrast resolution with an increase of up to 0.227 logMAR/D. The two myopic subjects exhibited a very low sensitivity to defocus by negative lenses for low-contrast tasks, whereas all subjects were equally affected by myopic defocus. Contrary to expectations, drifting gratings made little difference overall.Optical defocus as low as 1 D has a large impact on most peripheral visual tasks, with high-contrast resolution being the exception. Since the everyday visual scenery consists of objects at different contrast levels, it is understandable that persons with central visual field loss are helped by correction of peripheral refractive errors. The asymmetry in sensitivity to peripheral optical defocus in low-contrast tasks that was experienced by the myopic subjects in this study merits further investigation.CONCLUSIONSOptical defocus as low as 1 D has a large impact on most peripheral visual tasks, with high-contrast resolution being the exception. Since the everyday visual scenery consists of objects at different contrast levels, it is understandable that persons with central visual field loss are helped by correction of peripheral refractive errors. The asymmetry in sensitivity to peripheral optical defocus in low-contrast tasks that was experienced by the myopic subjects in this study merits further investigation.
PURPOSE. Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study was conducted to bridge this gap by systematically studying the sensitivity to optical defocus in a wide range of peripheral visual tasks. METHODS. The spatial frequency threshold for detection and resolution in high and low contrast with stationary and drifting gratings were measured off-axis (20 nasal visual field) in five subjects with a peripheral optical correction that was varied systematically +/- 4 D. RESULTS. All visual tasks, except high-contrast resolution, were sensitive to optical defocus, particularly low-contrast resolution with an increase of up to 0.227 logMAR/D. The two myopic subjects exhibited a very low sensitivity to defocus by negative lenses for low-contrast tasks, whereas all subjects were equally affected by myopic defocus. Contrary to expectations, drifting gratings made little difference overall. CONCLUSIONS. Optical defocus as low as 1 D has a large impact on most peripheral visual tasks, with high-contrast resolution being the exception. Since the everyday visual scenery consists of objects at different contrast levels, it is understandable that persons with central visual field loss are helped by correction of peripheral refractive errors. The asymmetry in sensitivity to peripheral optical defocus in low-contrast tasks that was experienced by the myopic subjects in this study merits further investigation.
Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss seem to benefit from peripheral correction, and animal studies suggest a role for peripheral vision in the development of myopia. This study was conducted to bridge this gap by systematically studying the sensitivity to optical defocus in a wide range of peripheral visual tasks. The spatial frequency threshold for detection and resolution in high and low contrast with stationary and drifting gratings were measured off-axis (20° nasal visual field) in five subjects with a peripheral optical correction that was varied systematically ±4 D. All visual tasks, except high-contrast resolution, were sensitive to optical defocus, particularly low-contrast resolution with an increase of up to 0.227 logMAR/D. The two myopic subjects exhibited a very low sensitivity to defocus by negative lenses for low-contrast tasks, whereas all subjects were equally affected by myopic defocus. Contrary to expectations, drifting gratings made little difference overall. Optical defocus as low as 1 D has a large impact on most peripheral visual tasks, with high-contrast resolution being the exception. Since the everyday visual scenery consists of objects at different contrast levels, it is understandable that persons with central visual field loss are helped by correction of peripheral refractive errors. The asymmetry in sensitivity to peripheral optical defocus in low-contrast tasks that was experienced by the myopic subjects in this study merits further investigation.
Author Rosén, Robert
Lundström, Linda
Unsbo, Peter
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Rosén
  fullname: Rosén, Robert
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Linda
  surname: Lundström
  fullname: Lundström, Linda
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Unsbo
  fullname: Unsbo, Peter
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-29719$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNptkD1PwzAQhi1UBLSwMaNsLKT4nKSOx4ryUalSGaCr5TgXMKRxsBMQ_55E_YCByefTc6_uniEZVLZCQs6BjgEm_NrYTz8GGiYTFh2QE0gSFiY8jQZ_6mMy9P6NUgbA6BE5ZjQFoAmcEJhXRdlipTGwRbCsG6NVGcywsLr1ga2CR3SmfkXXdVfGG1udksNClR7Ptu-IPN_dPt08hIvl_fxmugh1JKImBKSUcpHwJBdCxzEoATxiacYwnmiNE65YnimmlM4j4EWcMiUylXKdJypFEY3I1SbXf2HdZrJ2Zq3ct7TKyJlZTaV1L_K9eZVMcOjxyw1eO_vRom_k2niNZakqtK2XKWOCAudxR15syTZbY74P3knpALYBtLPeOyykNo1qutsbp0wpgcrevOzN95_e_O-6-6Fd7r_4D2f1hEU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_90181_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2011_06_011
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0234380
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_419120
crossref_primary_10_1111_cxo_12943
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_473486
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_547787
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_12932
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2012_07_001
crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2019_1627461
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0b013e318264f2a7
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_62_9_26
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_12673
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2011_11_014
crossref_primary_10_3109_02713683_2014_961614
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_07_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0b013e3182234630
crossref_primary_10_14479_jkoos_2014_19_1_93
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77289_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2024_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000000832
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_715640
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000000033
crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13257
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_65_6_42
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000001195
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_12412
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_36_000B52
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_450195
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exer_2024_109976
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_93840_6
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_vision_121219_081840
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1475_1313_2011_00832_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2015_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_024_01300_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2020_e04153
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_016_3439_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_visres_2017_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_09500340_2012_683827
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0b013e31825c3454
crossref_primary_10_1364_BOE_387254
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000000301
crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000002005
crossref_primary_10_1364_JOSAA_32_001764
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_13188
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
D8V
DOI 10.1167/iovs.10-5623
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
SwePub
SwePub Articles
SWEPUB Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1552-5783
ExternalDocumentID oai_DiVA_org_kth_29719
20811051
10_1167_iovs_10_5623
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
18M
2WC
34G
39C
5GY
5RE
AAYXX
ACGFO
ACNCT
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
N9A
OK1
P2P
RPM
SJN
TR2
TRV
W8F
WH7
WOQ
WOW
AFOSN
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
.55
.GJ
53G
ADTPV
AFFNX
AI.
AOWAS
D8V
VH1
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-1e00079575d99c441a917328b2e46cce67a2dba2aacd317f482a9ba87cd5a8e93
ISSN 1552-5783
0146-0404
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 06:33:22 EDT 2025
Thu Oct 02 05:38:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:16 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:08:54 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 03:33:45 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c393t-1e00079575d99c441a917328b2e46cce67a2dba2aacd317f482a9ba87cd5a8e93
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 20811051
PQID 822901774
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_kth_29719
proquest_miscellaneous_822901774
pubmed_primary_20811051
crossref_citationtrail_10_1167_iovs_10_5623
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_10_5623
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-Jan-05
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-01-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-Jan-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
PublicationTitleAlternate Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
PublicationYear 2011
SSID ssj0021120
Score 2.2292569
Snippet Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual field loss...
PURPOSE. Peripheral optical corrections are often thought to give few visual benefits beyond improved detection acuity. However, patients with central visual...
SourceID swepub
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 318
SubjectTerms aberrations
Adult
Contrast Sensitivity - physiology
eye growth
Fixation, Ocular
Humans
Medical engineering
Medicinsk teknik
myopia
Myopia - physiopathology
Other technology
Psychophysics
refractive error
repeatability
resolution acuity
TECHNOLOGY
TEKNIKVETENSKAP
thresholds
Vision, Ocular - physiology
Visual Acuity - physiology
Visual Fields
Visual Perception - physiology
visual-acuity
Övriga teknikvetenskaper
Title Influence of Optical Defocus on Peripheral Vision
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811051
https://www.proquest.com/docview/822901774
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-29719
Volume 52
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals - Free Access to All
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1552-5783
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021120
  issn: 1552-5783
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19620101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1552-5783
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021120
  issn: 1552-5783
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1552-5783
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021120
  issn: 1552-5783
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20070101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagSIhLxbvLSz7AqUpp7MSOj4W2akHlgLqot8ivZSt241WT9MCvZ2znsWWpBEhRlE0cR5pvdvJNxjOD0FtrudKCWWBu6SzJZCHgP0dZwgtg45pmQodcmLMv7GSafbrIL8Y2dyG7pFF7-ucf80r-B1U4B7j6LNl_QHaYFE7AMeALe0AY9n-F8WnfYcRTPreKn6WNnTndhiiAr2IcygYsdmMO-ToVXauwcQ0TrObNXC6WsSST1we4o-0zJkf4v7o6xtarcV32sKinrUzdhNj7B7bc8PinVa3czTXBZvx-CluMO9vORObgvvLYfqa3oTnZ0JVoEGm0rpuGmvlQ8aW7rvfgReBJ2PowEPNqGUAjQFmAAqbj62pYRNhfuovuETDpvm_H4ennwdsGIrnfZzow_n79Ub4CdHfzTTqy4WP8VkA2kI7zh2i78xbwQYT-Ebpjq8fo_lm3HuIJSgcNwG6GOw3AnQZgV-FRA3DUgKdoenx0_vEk6ZpgJJoK2iSp9TROAKs2QmggrxIcbEoKRWzGtLaMS2KUJFJqA1xwlhVECiULrk0uCyvoM7RVucruIAxMMNVG5RLsdKYpK1KbmX1DVEG41ZRM0G4vi1J3FeJ9o5JFGTxFxksvRP_DC3GC3g2jV7Eyyi3jcC_WEkyXj0fJyrq2LkOvgRT8jwl6HsU9TNTDAw-J8h-u-HLoh5ffDkp39b380cxLIngqXtw6w0v0YFTjV2iruWrta-CRjXoT9OUXpeZx3A
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence+of+optical+defocus+on+peripheral+vision&rft.jtitle=Investigative+ophthalmology+%26+visual+science&rft.au=Ros%C3%A9n%2C+Robert&rft.au=Lundstr%C3%B6m%2C+Linda&rft.au=Unsbo%2C+Peter&rft.date=2011-01-05&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167%2Fiovs.10-5623&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F20811051&rft.externalDocID=20811051
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1552-5783&client=summon