Continuum dynamics of the intention field under weakly cohesive social interaction

We investigate the long-time dynamics of an opinion formation model inspired by a work by Borghesi, Bouchaud and Jensen. First, we derive a Fokker–Planck-type equation under the assumption that interactions between individuals produce little consensus of opinion (grazing collision approximation). Se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMathematical models & methods in applied sciences Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 159 - 182
Main Authors Degond, Pierre, Liu, Jian-Guo, Merino-Aceituno, Sara, Tardiveau, Thomas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Company 01.01.2017
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
World Scientific Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0218-2025
1793-4060
1793-6314
1793-6314
DOI10.1142/S021820251740005X

Cover

More Information
Summary:We investigate the long-time dynamics of an opinion formation model inspired by a work by Borghesi, Bouchaud and Jensen. First, we derive a Fokker–Planck-type equation under the assumption that interactions between individuals produce little consensus of opinion (grazing collision approximation). Second, we study conditions under which the Fokker–Planck equation has non-trivial equilibria and derive the macroscopic limit (corresponding to the long-time dynamics and spatially localized interactions) for the evolution of the mean opinion. Finally, we compare two different types of interaction rates: the original one given in the work of Borghesi, Bouchaud and Jensen (symmetric binary interactions) and one inspired from works by Motsch and Tadmor (non-symmetric binary interactions). We show that the first case leads to a conservative model for the density of the mean opinion whereas the second case leads to a non-conservative equation. We also show that the speed at which consensus is reached asymptotically for these two rates has fairly different density dependence.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0218-2025
1793-4060
1793-6314
1793-6314
DOI:10.1142/S021820251740005X