Bridging Therapy or IV Thrombolysis in Minor Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion

Objective Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown. Methods Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention‐to‐treat, consecutive IVT‐treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of neurology Vol. 88; no. 1; pp. 160 - 169
Main Authors Seners, Pierre, Perrin, Claire, Lapergue, Bertrand, Henon, Hilde, Debiais, Séverine, Sablot, Denis, Girard Buttaz, Isabelle, Tamazyan, Ruben, Preterre, Cécile, Laksiri, Nadia, Mione, Gioia, Arquizan, Caroline, Lucas, Ludovic, Baron, Jean‐Claude, Turc, Guillaume
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2020
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0364-5134
1531-8249
1531-8249
DOI10.1002/ana.25756

Cover

Abstract Objective Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown. Methods Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention‐to‐treat, consecutive IVT‐treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity‐score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between‐groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow‐up. Results Overall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity‐score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75–1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77–5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (pinteraction < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67–6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01–2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38–0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20–8.83; p < 0.0001). Interpretation Although overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit–risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:160–169
AbstractList OBJECTIVE:Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown.METHODS:Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention-to-treat, consecutive IVT-treated minor strokes (NIHSS≤5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity-score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between-groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, i.e., modified Rankin score 0-1 at 3 months follow-up.RESULTS:Overall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity-score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (OR=0.96; 95%CI=0.75-1.24; P=0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR=3.01; 95%CI=1.77-5.11; P<0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (Pinteraction <0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR=3.26; 95%CI=1.67-6.35; P=0.0006) and distal M1 (OR=1.69; 95%CI=1.01-2.82; P=0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR=0.53; 95%CI=0.38-0.75; P=0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR=4.40; 95%CI=2.20-8.83; P<0.0001).INTERPRETATION:Although overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, while the benefit-risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
ObjectiveWhether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown.MethodsMulticentric retrospective observational study including, in intention‐to‐treat, consecutive IVT‐treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity‐score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between‐groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow‐up.ResultsOverall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity‐score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75–1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77–5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (pinteraction < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67–6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01–2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38–0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20–8.83; p < 0.0001).InterpretationAlthough overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit–risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:160–169
Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown.OBJECTIVEWhether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown.Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention-to-treat, consecutive IVT-treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity-score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between-groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow-up.METHODSMulticentric retrospective observational study including, in intention-to-treat, consecutive IVT-treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity-score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between-groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow-up.Overall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity-score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77-5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (pinteraction < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67-6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01-2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38-0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20-8.83; p < 0.0001).RESULTSOverall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity-score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77-5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (pinteraction < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67-6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01-2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38-0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20-8.83; p < 0.0001).Although overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit-risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:160-169.INTERPRETATIONAlthough overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit-risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:160-169.
Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown. Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention-to-treat, consecutive IVT-treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity-score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between-groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow-up. Overall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity-score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77-5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (p < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67-6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01-2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38-0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20-8.83; p < 0.0001). Although overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit-risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020.
Objective Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown. Methods Multicentric retrospective observational study including, in intention‐to‐treat, consecutive IVT‐treated minor strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤ 5) with LVO, with or without additional mechanical thrombectomy. Propensity‐score (inverse probability of treatment weighting) was used to reduce baseline between‐groups differences. The primary outcome was excellent outcome, that is, modified Rankin score 0 to 1 at 3 months follow‐up. Results Overall, 598 patients were included (214 and 384 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). Following propensity‐score weighting, the distribution of baseline clinical and radiological variables was similar across the two patient groups. Compared with IVT alone, bridging therapy was not associated with excellent outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75–1.24; p = 0.76), but was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.77–5.11; p < 0.0001). Occlusion site was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy on outcome (pinteraction < 0.0001), with bridging therapy associated with higher odds of excellent outcome in proximal M1 (OR = 3.26; 95% CI = 1.67–6.35; p = 0.0006) and distal M1 (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.01–2.82; p = 0.04) occlusions, but with lower odds of excellent outcome for M2 (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.38–0.75; p = 0.0003) occlusions. Bridging therapy was associated with higher rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in M2 occlusions only (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.20–8.83; p < 0.0001). Interpretation Although overall outcomes were similar in intended bridging therapy as compared to intended IVT alone in minor strokes with LVO, our results suggest that intended bridging therapy may be beneficial in M1 occlusions, whereas the benefit–risk profile may favor IVT alone in M2 occlusions. ANN NEUROL 2020 ANN NEUROL 2020;88:160–169
Author Turc, Guillaume
Sablot, Denis
Seners, Pierre
Laksiri, Nadia
Lapergue, Bertrand
Henon, Hilde
Tamazyan, Ruben
Lucas, Ludovic
Arquizan, Caroline
Debiais, Séverine
Girard Buttaz, Isabelle
Preterre, Cécile
Perrin, Claire
Baron, Jean‐Claude
Mione, Gioia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Pierre
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2134-0691
  surname: Seners
  fullname: Seners, Pierre
  email: pierre.seners@gmail.com
  organization: Sainte‐Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, FHU NeuroVasc, Institute of Psychiatrie and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM UMR 1266
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Claire
  surname: Perrin
  fullname: Perrin, Claire
  organization: Sainte‐Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, FHU NeuroVasc, Institute of Psychiatrie and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM UMR 1266
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bertrand
  surname: Lapergue
  fullname: Lapergue, Bertrand
  organization: Foch University Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Hilde
  surname: Henon
  fullname: Henon, Hilde
  organization: Université de Lille, INSERM UMR 1171, CHU Lille
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Séverine
  surname: Debiais
  fullname: Debiais, Séverine
  organization: Bretonneau Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Denis
  surname: Sablot
  fullname: Sablot, Denis
  organization: Perpignan Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Isabelle
  surname: Girard Buttaz
  fullname: Girard Buttaz, Isabelle
  organization: Valenciennes Hospital
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Ruben
  surname: Tamazyan
  fullname: Tamazyan, Ruben
  organization: Saint Joseph Hospital
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Cécile
  surname: Preterre
  fullname: Preterre, Cécile
  organization: Nantes University Hospital
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Nadia
  surname: Laksiri
  fullname: Laksiri, Nadia
  organization: La Timone University Hospital
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Gioia
  surname: Mione
  fullname: Mione, Gioia
  organization: Nancy University Hospital
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Caroline
  surname: Arquizan
  fullname: Arquizan, Caroline
  organization: CHRU Gui de Chauliac
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Ludovic
  surname: Lucas
  fullname: Lucas, Ludovic
  organization: Pellegrin University Hospital
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Jean‐Claude
  surname: Baron
  fullname: Baron, Jean‐Claude
  organization: Sainte‐Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, FHU NeuroVasc, Institute of Psychiatrie and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM UMR 1266
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Guillaume
  surname: Turc
  fullname: Turc, Guillaume
  organization: Sainte‐Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, FHU NeuroVasc, Institute of Psychiatrie and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM UMR 1266
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-02570598$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNp90UtPGzEQAGALgUqgPfAHkKVeWqkL4_Uj62NAbUFKm0MpV8vxehNTrx3s3aL8-7oNcECiJ9vyN6N5HKH9EINF6ITAGQGoz3XQZzWfcrGHJoRTUjU1k_toAlSwihPKDtFRzncAIAWBN-iQ1pSDrOUELS6Sa1curPDN2ia92eKY8PVteaXYL6PfZpexC_ibC-Xjx5DiL4sf3LDGc51WFt_anK3HC2P8mF0Mb9FBp3227x7PY_Tzy-eby6tqvvh6fTmbV4ZKEJWddkwzvVwa2jLeSFruGgzrCCNSd0AJgU4wxpmR06b0RNuuaQXlwrQMqKXH6NMu71p7tUmu12mronbqajZXLmSbegVlJsBl85sU_mHHNynejzYPqnfZWO91sHHMqqZSNEUDLfT9C3oXxxRKM6pmhDcAYsqKOn1U47K37XMJT5Mt4OMOmBRzTrZ7JgTU362psjX1b2vFnr-wxg16KOMcknb-fxEPztvt66nV7PtsF_EHZLelBw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00115_021_01138_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurol_2020_09_011
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2022_018662
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_24_00981_4
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1768150
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_021_05771_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_833020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_023_11653_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_NRL_0000000000000543
crossref_primary_10_1177_1756286421997368
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jns_2024_123270
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1019530
crossref_primary_10_1177_2396987321989865
crossref_primary_10_1002_ana_26491
crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2024_2304653
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_122_039182
crossref_primary_10_3389_fstro_2023_1242961
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2023_1079205
crossref_primary_10_1212_WNL_0000000000201498
crossref_primary_10_1177_2516608520976275
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_123_043937
crossref_primary_10_31083_j_jin2003068
crossref_primary_10_1111_ene_15301
crossref_primary_10_1161_SVIN_122_000819
crossref_primary_10_1136_neurintsurg_2021_018375
crossref_primary_10_1177_11795735251314881
crossref_primary_10_1136_jnis_2024_022124
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_72323
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jstrokecerebrovasdis_2024_107721
crossref_primary_10_1080_07853890_2024_2447407
crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_122_027326
crossref_primary_10_1136_jnis_2022_019557
crossref_primary_10_5853_jos_2022_03370
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jstrokecerebrovasdis_2020_105258
crossref_primary_10_1111_ene_16009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_021_05124_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_023_06948_w
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_122_039287
crossref_primary_10_1111_ene_15598
crossref_primary_10_1136_jnis_2022_019959
crossref_primary_10_1177_23969873231201715
crossref_primary_10_1111_ene_14541
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_120_030992
crossref_primary_10_1212_WNL_0000000000012063
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13195826
crossref_primary_10_1136_jnis_2023_020118
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_024_02994_z
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_123_044205
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_815814
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_122_041772
crossref_primary_10_1111_ene_15722
crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_120_033744
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thromres_2022_09_020
crossref_primary_10_2174_1574886316666211008140212
crossref_primary_10_17340_jkna_2021_1_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jocn_2020_10_021
crossref_primary_10_1177_23969873241251718
Cites_doi 10.1001/jama.2018.12498
10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24
10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012707
10.1001/jama.2018.8496
10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023455
10.1002/9780470316696
10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014568
10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014678
10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2773
10.3174/ajnr.A4048
10.1159/000369121
10.1177/2396987317746003
10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018113
10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127
10.1016/j.neurad.2019.01.089
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031097
10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021106
10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000208
10.1177/1747493019873510
10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
10.1212/WNL.0000000000008362
10.1136/jnnp-2014-308327
10.1212/WNL.0000000000000572
10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022335
10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014181
10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022114
10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9
10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012191
10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3112
10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005426
10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 American Neurological Association
2020 American Neurological Association.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 American Neurological Association
– notice: 2020 American Neurological Association.
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
CorporateAuthor MINOR‐STROKE Collaborators
MINOR-STROKE Collaborators
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: MINOR‐STROKE Collaborators
– name: MINOR-STROKE Collaborators
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7TK
7U7
C1K
K9.
7X8
1XC
VOOES
DOI 10.1002/ana.25756
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Neurosciences Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Toxicology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1531-8249
EndPage 169
ExternalDocumentID oai_HAL_inserm_02570598v1
32350929
10_1002_ana_25756
ANA25756
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1CY
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
23M
2QL
31~
33P
3O-
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5VS
66C
6J9
6P2
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAEJM
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AAQQT
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBMB
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACRZS
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFAZI
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AI.
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJJEV
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR1
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
F8P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FYBCS
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
GOZPB
GRPMH
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
J5H
JPC
KBYEO
KD1
KQQ
L7B
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LXL
LXN
LXY
LYRES
M6M
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N4W
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.-
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RWD
RWI
RX1
SAMSI
SJN
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V2E
V8K
V9Y
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
XJT
XPP
XSW
XV2
YOC
YQJ
ZGI
ZRF
ZRR
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
~X8
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
NPM
7TK
7U7
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
K9.
7X8
1XC
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3906-e7f4a4abbc3d458934aba0c4f1419af03110f64454c9781533df8d6356cd403e3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0364-5134
1531-8249
IngestDate Fri Sep 12 12:28:38 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 06:33:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 12:11:00 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:35 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:24:12 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:24 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:35:11 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License 2020 American Neurological Association.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3906-e7f4a4abbc3d458934aba0c4f1419af03110f64454c9781533df8d6356cd403e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-2134-0691
0000-0001-5059-4095
0000-0002-9878-2818
OpenAccessLink https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-02570598
PMID 32350929
PQID 2415800674
PQPubID 946345
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs hal_primary_oai_HAL_inserm_02570598v1
proquest_miscellaneous_2396857003
proquest_journals_2415800674
pubmed_primary_32350929
crossref_primary_10_1002_ana_25756
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ana_25756
wiley_primary_10_1002_ana_25756_ANA25756
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2020
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2020
  text: July 2020
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Hoboken, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Hoboken, USA
– name: United States
– name: Minneapolis
PublicationTitle Annals of neurology
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Neurol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2018; 320
2019; 93
2018; 3
2019; 50
2017; 48
2013; 44
2019; 11
2019; 46
2015; 86
2014; 38
1987
2020; 15
2014; 35
2016; 73
2020; 77
1998; 352
2014; 83
2017; 136
2018; 49
2016; 8
2016; 47
2014; 45
2017; 9
2007; 38
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
e_1_2_9_20_1
e_1_2_9_22_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
Smith EE (e_1_2_9_12_1) 2017; 136
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 49
  start-page: 2975
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2982
  article-title: Post‐thrombolysis recanalization in stroke referrals for thrombectomy: incidence, predictors, and prediction scores
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 49
  start-page: e46
  year: 2018
  end-page: e110
  article-title: 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 15
  start-page: 324
  year: 2020
  end-page: 331
  article-title: Endovascular versus medical therapy for large‐vessel anterior occlusive stroke presenting with mild symptoms
  publication-title: Int J Stroke
– volume: 47
  start-page: 2409
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2412
  article-title: Incidence and predictors of early recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 49
  start-page: 2391
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2397
  article-title: Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with milder strokes and large vessel occlusions
  publication-title: Stroke
– year: 1987
– volume: 11
  start-page: 535
  year: 2019
  end-page: 538
  article-title: European Stroke Organisation (ESO)‐ European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 320
  start-page: 1017
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1026
  article-title: Association of clinical, imaging, and thrombus characteristics with recanalization of visible intracranial occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 11
  start-page: 433
  year: 2019
  end-page: 438
  article-title: eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 38
  start-page: 967
  year: 2007
  end-page: 973
  article-title: The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 35
  start-page: 2265
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2272
  article-title: Early reperfusion rates with IV tPA are determined by CTA clot characteristics
  publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
– volume: 77
  start-page: 16
  year: 2020
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Medical management vs mechanical thrombectomy for mild strokes: an international multicenter study and systematic review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
– volume: 45
  start-page: 2004
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2009
  article-title: Unexplained early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis: incidence, predictors, and associated factors
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1277
  article-title: What constitutes the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery?
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 83
  start-page: 174
  year: 2014
  end-page: 181
  article-title: Factors associated with unfavorable outcome in minor ischemic stroke
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 44
  start-page: 2486
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2492
  article-title: Perfusion MR predicts outcome in high‐risk transient ischemic attack/minor stroke: a derivation‐validation study
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1291
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1296
  article-title: Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery M2 segment
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
– volume: 38
  start-page: 418
  year: 2014
  end-page: 424
  article-title: Medical and endovascular treatment of patients with large vessel occlusion presenting with mild symptoms: an observational multicenter study
  publication-title: Cerebrovasc Dis
– volume: 9
  start-page: 922
  year: 2017
  end-page: 928
  article-title: Vessel perforation during stent retriever thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: technical details and clinical outcomes
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1065
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1069
  article-title: Efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with M2 segment middle cerebral artery occlusions: meta‐analysis of data from the HERMES Collaboration
  publication-title: J Neurointerv Surg
– volume: 3
  start-page: 29
  year: 2018
  end-page: 38
  article-title: Minor stroke due to large artery occlusion. When is intravenous thrombolysis not enough? Results from the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Register
  publication-title: Eur Stroke J
– volume: 93
  start-page: e1618
  year: 2019
  end-page: e1626
  article-title: Outcome of endovascular therapy in stroke with large vessel occlusion and mild symptoms
  publication-title: Neurology
– volume: 136
  start-page: 2303
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2310
  article-title: Increase in endovascular therapy in get with the guidelines‐stroke after the publication of pivotal trials
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1466
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1472
  article-title: Clinical scales do not reliably identify acute ischemic stroke patients with large‐artery occlusion
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 320
  start-page: 156
  year: 2018
  end-page: 166
  article-title: Effect of alteplase vs aspirin on functional outcome for patients with acute ischemic stroke and minor nondisabling neurologic deficits: the PRISMS randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 49
  start-page: 2398
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2405
  article-title: Endovascular thrombectomy for mild strokes: how low should we go?
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 50
  start-page: 761
  year: 2019
  end-page: 764
  article-title: Thrombus length predicts lack of post‐thrombolysis early recanalization in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 86
  start-page: 87
  year: 2015
  end-page: 94
  article-title: Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
– volume: 48
  start-page: 3274
  year: 2017
  end-page: 3281
  article-title: Mechanical thrombectomy for minor and mild stroke patients harboring large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation: a multicenter cohort study
  publication-title: Stroke
– volume: 46
  start-page: 225
  year: 2019
  end-page: 230
  article-title: Thrombectomy or intravenous thrombolysis in patients with NIHSS of 5 or less?
  publication-title: J Neuroradiol
– volume: 352
  start-page: 1245
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1251
  article-title: Randomised double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European‐Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators
  publication-title: Lancet
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12498
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012707
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8496
– ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023455
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1002/9780470316696
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014568
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014678
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.2773
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4048
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1159/000369121
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
  doi: 10.1177/2396987317746003
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018113
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.01.089
– volume: 136
  start-page: 2303
  year: 2017
  ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  article-title: Increase in endovascular therapy in get with the guidelines‐stroke after the publication of pivotal trials
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031097
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021106
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000208
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1177/1747493019873510
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008362
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308327
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000572
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022335
– ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014181
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022114
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012191
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3112
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005426
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013144
SSID ssj0009610
Score 2.5524676
Snippet Objective Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large...
Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel...
ObjectiveWhether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large...
OBJECTIVE:Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by endovascular treatment) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large...
SourceID hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 160
SubjectTerms Bridging
Cardiovascular system
Confidence intervals
Hemorrhage
Intravenous administration
Life Sciences
Neurons and Cognition
Occlusion
Patients
Risk assessment
Statistical analysis
Stroke
Therapy
Thrombolysis
Thrombolytic drugs
Weighting
Title Bridging Therapy or IV Thrombolysis in Minor Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fana.25756
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350929
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2415800674
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2396857003
https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-02570598
Volume 88
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VHhAX3tBAQQaBxCXbJHYeFqflUS2oDwnaqgcky3Zsseo2QdtdDvx6ZpxHVR4S4pbI48T2eOzP9vgbgBepyzMcAlyc6ZLHokpcbKxPEcgJ7TJhZe2Dg-xBMTsWH0_z0w14PdyF6fghxg03sowwXpOBa3Oxc0kaqhs9wf6WE912ygvizX_36ZI6ShaBiYCO2eI85WJgFUqynTHnlbno2lfyhPwdZl5FrWHa2b0FX4YCd94mZ5P1ykzsj1-4HP-zRrfhZg9H2bTrP3dgwzV34fp-f-B-Dw7f0IUunN7YUUc_wNol-3CCb8v23LSBz4TNG7Y_bzDh82rZnjlGe7tsj1zM2QlRky_YobWLNe3L3Yfj3fdHb2dxH4MhtlwmRexKL7TQxlheixzBDT7rxAqfilRqj0NCmnjEVDmqtawIPNa-qon0ztYi4Y4_gM2mbdwWMFnbSjpvXFJ4zGB0VWr8rMMVky29riJ4NWhD2Z6gnOJkLFRHrZwpbCAVGiiC56Pot46V409CL1GlYzrxaM-me2reoG2fq4TC9-Wy-p5GsD0oXfUGfKEI2FQ0lYsIno3JaHp0nqIb165RhssixAfgETzsOsv4N55xhGKZxEoFlf-9mGp6MA0Pj_5d9DHcyGjdH9yGt2FztVy7JwiOVuZpsIKfSjIIJQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB61RQIuvB-BAgaBxCXbJHZeUi9bRLWF3a0E26qXynIcW6y6TdCyy6G_vjPOoyoPCXFz5HFiezz2l_H4M8Db0MQRTgHGj1TKfZEFxi-0DRHICWUiofPSugDZaTI6Ep9O4pMN2O3OwjT8EL3DjSzDzddk4OSQ3rliDVWVGuCAi5NNuOH25wgSfbkij8oTx0VAG21-HHLR8QoF0U5f9NpqtPmNYiF_B5rXcatbePbvwmlX5Sbe5GywXhUDffELm-P_tuke3GkRKRs2Q-g-bJjqAdyctHvuD-Fwj8504QrHZg0DAauX7OAYn5b1eVE7ShM2r9hkXmHG19WyPjOM3LtsTFHm7JjYyRfsUOvFmlxzj-Bo_-Psw8hvr2HwNc-DxDepFUqootC8FDHiG0yrQAsbijBXFmeFMLAIq2LUbJoRfixtVhLvnS5FwA1_DFtVXZmnwPJSZ7mxhQkSiwUKlaUKX2vwp0mnVmUevO_UIXXLUU5XZSxkw64cSewg6TrIgze96PeGmONPQu9Qp30-UWmPhmM5r9C8z2VAN_jFefYz9GC707psbfiHJGyT0WouPHjdZ6P10ZaKqky9RhmeJ-6KAO7Bk2a09F_jEUc0FuXYKKfzv1dTDqdDl3j276Kv4NZoNhnL8cH083O4HZEbwEURb8PWark2LxArrYqXziQuAc7VDEM
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB61Raq48H4EWjAIJC7ZJrHzUk9bYLWF7RZBW_WAZDmOLVbdJtWyy4Ff3xnnUZWHhLg58jixPR7PF3v8GeBVaOIIpwDjRyrlvsgC4xfahgjkhDKR0HlpXYDsNBkfiw-n8eka7HZnYRp-iH7BjSzDzddk4Bel3bkiDVWVGuB4i5N1uCESdJOEiD5fcUfliaMioH02Pw656GiFgminL3rNGa1_o1DI33Hmddjq_M7oNnztatyEm5wNVstioH_-Qub4n026A7daPMqGzQC6C2umugebB-2O-3043KMTXejf2FHDP8DqBds_wadFfV7UjtCEzSp2MKsw48tyUZ8ZRou7bEIx5uyEuMnn7FDr-YoW5h7A8ej90dux317C4GueB4lvUiuUUEWheSliRDeYVoEWNhRhrizOCWFgEVTFqNc0I_RY2qwk1jtdioAb_hA2qroyj4Hlpc5yYwsTJBYLFCpLFb7W4C-TTq3KPHjTaUPqlqGcLsqYy4ZbOZLYQdJ1kAcve9GLhpbjT0KvUaV9PhFpj4cTOavQuM9lQPf3xXn2I_Rgq1O6bC34uyRkk5EvFx686LPR9mhDRVWmXqEMzxN3QQD34FEzWPqv8YgjFotybJRT-d-rKYfToUs8-XfR57D56d1ITvanH5_CzYjWAFwI8RZsLBcrs41AaVk8cwZxCZ9cCvI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging+Therapy+or+IV+Thrombolysis+in+Minor+Stroke+with+Large+Vessel+Occlusion&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+neurology&rft.au=Seners%2C+Pierre&rft.au=Perrin%2C+Claire&rft.au=Lapergue%2C+Bertrand&rft.au=Henon%2C+Hilde&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0364-5134&rft.eissn=1531-8249&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=169&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fana.25756&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-5134&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-5134&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-5134&client=summon