Examining international practices in the management of pregnant women with von Willebrand disease

Background The management of pregnant women with von Willebrand disease (VWD) is complex as physiological pregnancy‐induced increases in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be blunted or absent. Women with VWD experience a heightened risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and special consideration m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 82 - 91
Main Authors Lavin, Michelle, Sánchez Luceros, Analia, Kouides, Peter, Abdul‐Kadir, Rezan, O’Donnell, James S., Baker, Ross I., Othman, Maha, Haberichter, Sandra L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Limited 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI10.1111/jth.15561

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background The management of pregnant women with von Willebrand disease (VWD) is complex as physiological pregnancy‐induced increases in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) may be blunted or absent. Women with VWD experience a heightened risk of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and special consideration must be given regarding neuraxial anesthesia (NA) and the need for prophylaxis at time of delivery. These challenges are compounded by a lack of robust evidence to guide clinical decision‐making. Objectives and Methods To determine the current international clinical practices in the management of pregnancy for women with VWD, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) conducted an international survey of health‐care providers (HCP). Results One hundred thirty‐two respondents from 39 countries were included in the final analysis. Variations in clinical practice were identified in antenatal (monitoring of plasma VWF and ferritin levels), peripartum (optimal plasma VWF target at delivery) and postpartum management (definitions used for PPH and postpartum monitoring). A key area of divergence was suitability for NA for women with type 2 and type 3 VWD, with many respondents advising against the use of NA even with VWF supplementation (29% type 2 VWD, 37% type 3 VWD) but others advising use once plasma VWF activity was >50 IU/dL (57% type 2 VWD; 50% type 3 VWD). Conclusions This survey highlighted areas of uncertainty surrounding common management issues for pregnant women with VWD. These data underscore the need for international collaborative research efforts focused on peripartum management to improve care for pregnant women with VWD.
Bibliography:Manuscript handled by: Jean Connors
This work was presented as an invited oral presentation at both the Women’s Health and VWF SSC at ISTH 2019.
Final decision: Jean Connors, 15 October 2021
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.15561