Course-level factors and undergraduate engineering students' ratings of instruction

Post-course instructor ratings are a common practice at universities in Europe, Australia, and North America. Rather than solely describing teaching practice, however, such ratings may be associated with a range of non-pedagogical factors. We explored engineering students' instructor ratings at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of engineering education Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 769 - 784
Main Authors Klopfer, Michelle D., Knight, David B., Grohs, Jacob R., Case, Scott W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor & Francis 03.07.2024
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0304-3797
1469-5898
DOI10.1080/03043797.2023.2224245

Cover

Abstract Post-course instructor ratings are a common practice at universities in Europe, Australia, and North America. Rather than solely describing teaching practice, however, such ratings may be associated with a range of non-pedagogical factors. We explored engineering students' instructor ratings at a large United States institution, investigating relationships between overall instructor rating and some of those non-pedagogical factors, including subject area, class size, and students' course grades. Instructor ratings were more favourable in humanities courses than in science or math courses, and students gave higher ratings to instructors who taught smaller class sizes. The strongest relationship existed between overall rating and students' course grades: students who received A's rated instructors an average 0.84 points higher on a 6-point scale than students who received F's. Students who withdrew from a course provided the lowest instructor ratings. When instructor ratings are used as metrics of teaching ability in discussions related to promotion, tenure, or salary adjustments, there is an inherent inequity in the system that must be acknowledged beyond already well-documented biases, as non-pedagogical factors often outside of the instructor's control may be significantly associated with those ratings.
AbstractList Post-course instructor ratings are a common practice at universities in Europe, Australia, and North America. Rather than solely describing teaching practice, however, such ratings may be associated with a range of non-pedagogical factors. We explored engineering students' instructor ratings at a large United States institution, investigating relationships between overall instructor rating and some of those non-pedagogical factors, including subject area, class size, and students' course grades. Instructor ratings were more favourable in humanities courses than in science or math courses, and students gave higher ratings to instructors who taught smaller class sizes. The strongest relationship existed between overall rating and students' course grades: students who received A's rated instructors an average 0.84 points higher on a 6-point scale than students who received F's. Students who withdrew from a course provided the lowest instructor ratings. When instructor ratings are used as metrics of teaching ability in discussions related to promotion, tenure, or salary adjustments, there is an inherent inequity in the system that must be acknowledged beyond already well-documented biases, as non-pedagogical factors often outside of the instructor's control may be significantly associated with those ratings.
Author Klopfer, Michelle D.
Knight, David B.
Case, Scott W.
Grohs, Jacob R.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michelle D.
  surname: Klopfer
  fullname: Klopfer, Michelle D.
  email: mklopfer@vt.edu
  organization: Virginia Tech
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David B.
  surname: Knight
  fullname: Knight, David B.
  organization: Virginia Tech
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jacob R.
  surname: Grohs
  fullname: Grohs, Jacob R.
  organization: Virginia Tech
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Scott W.
  surname: Case
  fullname: Case, Scott W.
  organization: Virginia Tech
BookMark eNqFkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BKHgwVPXNGnaLl6UxX-w4EE9h2k6XbJ0k3WSKvvtbVm9eNDTwPDemze_E3bovEPGzjM-y3jFr7jkuSzn5UxwIWdCiFzk6oBNsryYp6qaV4dsMmrSUXTMTkJYc54JpdSEvSx8TwHTDj-wS1ow0VNIwDVJ7xqkFUHTQ8QE3co6RLJulYTYN-hiuEwI4rAIiW8T60Kk3kTr3Sk7aqELePY9p-zt_u518Zgunx-eFrfL1MhKxbQsUZWmqsHIBoAbFDIvWpPzwmBTq0yZGmth6hKH3nWNhYFGAChRmUIJkckpu9jnbsm_9xiiXg_PuOGklgMXnlVS8EF1vVcZ8iEQttrYCGPPSGA7nXE9UtQ_FPVIUX9THNzql3tLdgO0-9d3s_dZ13rawKenrtERdp2nlsAZO5T8O-IL63mM_w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_rev3_3481
Cites_doi 10.1080/10528008.2019.1642114
10.1080/03075070120052071
10.1371/journal.pone.0209749
10.1057/eej.2014.31
10.1353/ff.2007.a224753
10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.627
10.1007/s11162-005-9007-y
10.1162/0011526054622015
10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.007
10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
10.5688/ajpe7177
10.1017/CBO9781139013451.014
10.1080/02602930500099193
10.1002/tl.23
10.1111/dsji.12023
10.1177/0273475308324086
10.1080/14703297.2015.1114957
10.1017/S1049096519001744
10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9
10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_7
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2023
2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2023
– notice: 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 0YH
AAYXX
CITATION
7TA
7TB
8FD
AHOVV
FR3
JG9
KR7
DOI 10.1080/03043797.2023.2224245
DatabaseName Taylor & Francis Open Access
CrossRef
Materials Business File
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Education Research Index
Engineering Research Database
Materials Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Materials Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Technology Research Database
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Materials Business File
DatabaseTitleList
Materials Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 0YH
  name: Taylor & Francis Open Access
  url: https://www.tandfonline.com
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Education
EISSN 1469-5898
EndPage 784
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_03043797_2023_2224245
2224245
Genre Research Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Science Foundation
– fundername: National
GroupedDBID .7F
.QJ
0BK
0R~
0YH
29G
2DF
30N
4.4
5GY
5VS
AAENE
AAJMT
AALDU
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABCCY
ABFIM
ABHAV
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPAQ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACTIO
ADCVX
ADGTB
ADLRE
ADXPE
AEISY
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AFKVX
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AHDZW
AIJEM
AJWEG
AKBVH
AKOOK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AQRUH
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BLEHA
CCCUG
CE4
CS3
DGEBU
DKSSO
DU5
EBS
E~A
E~B
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
H~P
IPNFZ
J.P
KYCEM
LJTGL
M0P
M4Z
NA5
NX~
O9-
P2P
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RTWRZ
S-T
SNACF
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEN
TFL
TFT
TFW
TN5
TNC
TTHFI
TUROJ
TWF
UT5
UU3
ZGOLN
~S~
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAYXX
ADYSH
AFRVT
AIYEW
ALSLI
AMPGV
CITATION
7TA
7TB
8FD
AAHSB
ADMLS
AHOVV
FR3
JG9
KR7
TASJS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-77e57c8bac3daa0ce2346fc406cedb515cbeb2cb7e379bbe6cad2aa528c652213
IEDL.DBID 0YH
ISSN 0304-3797
IngestDate Wed Aug 13 07:49:00 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:09:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:28 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:05:21 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License open-access: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c385t-77e57c8bac3daa0ce2346fc406cedb515cbeb2cb7e379bbe6cad2aa528c652213
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043797.2023.2224245
PQID 3080018320
PQPubID 12733
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_03043797_2023_2224245
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_03043797_2023_2224245
crossref_primary_10_1080_03043797_2023_2224245
proquest_journals_3080018320
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-07-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-07-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-07-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Abingdon
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle European journal of engineering education
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References e_1_3_4_4_1
e_1_3_4_3_1
Berk R. (e_1_3_4_7_1) 2018; 32
De Winter J. F. C. (e_1_3_4_11_1) 2010; 15
Young S. (e_1_3_4_37_1) 2014; 10
e_1_3_4_9_1
e_1_3_4_8_1
R Core Team (e_1_3_4_28_1) 2019
e_1_3_4_20_1
e_1_3_4_6_1
e_1_3_4_5_1
Hativa N. (e_1_3_4_15_1) 2013
e_1_3_4_24_1
e_1_3_4_21_1
e_1_3_4_22_1
e_1_3_4_27_1
e_1_3_4_25_1
e_1_3_4_26_1
Wright R. E. (e_1_3_4_36_1) 2006; 30
Millea M. (e_1_3_4_23_1) 2018; 138
Reeping D. (e_1_3_4_29_1) 2019; 35
Strumm B. (e_1_3_4_34_1) 2019
e_1_3_4_31_1
e_1_3_4_30_1
Addison W. E. (e_1_3_4_2_1) 2006; 40
e_1_3_4_12_1
e_1_3_4_35_1
e_1_3_4_13_1
e_1_3_4_10_1
e_1_3_4_33_1
e_1_3_4_16_1
e_1_3_4_17_1
e_1_3_4_14_1
e_1_3_4_18_1
e_1_3_4_19_1
Smith B. P. (e_1_3_4_32_1) 2009; 129
References_xml – ident: e_1_3_4_3_1
  doi: 10.1080/10528008.2019.1642114
– ident: e_1_3_4_26_1
  doi: 10.1080/03075070120052071
– ident: e_1_3_4_8_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_13_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209749
– volume: 40
  start-page: 409
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_3_4_2_1
  article-title: Students’ Perceptions of Course Difficulty and Their Ratings of the Instructor
  publication-title: College Student Journal
– volume: 35
  start-page: 142
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_3_4_29_1
  article-title: Visualization and Analysis of Student Enrollment Patterns in Foundational Engineering Courses
  publication-title: International Journal of Engineering Education
– ident: e_1_3_4_12_1
  doi: 10.1057/eej.2014.31
– volume-title: Student Ratings of Instruction: Recognizing Effective Teaching
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_3_4_15_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_18_1
  doi: 10.1353/ff.2007.a224753
– volume-title: Student Ratings of Instruction: A Summary of the Literature
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_3_4_34_1
– volume: 129
  start-page: 615
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_3_4_32_1
  article-title: Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness for Faculty Groups Based on Race and Gender
  publication-title: Education
– volume: 30
  start-page: 3
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_3_4_36_1
  article-title: A Comparative Analysis of Different Models Explaining the Relationship Between Instructor Ratings and Expected Student Grades
  publication-title: Educational Research Quarterly
– ident: e_1_3_4_20_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10755-014-9313-4
– ident: e_1_3_4_14_1
  doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.627
– ident: e_1_3_4_25_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11162-005-9007-y
– volume: 138
  start-page: 309
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_3_4_23_1
  article-title: What Matters in College Student Success? Determinants of College Retention and Graduation Rates
  publication-title: Education
– ident: e_1_3_4_31_1
  doi: 10.1162/0011526054622015
– volume: 10
  start-page: 70
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_3_4_37_1
  article-title: Online and Face-to-Face Teaching: How do Student Ratings Differ?
  publication-title: Journal of Online Learning and Teaching
– ident: e_1_3_4_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.08.007
– ident: e_1_3_4_16_1
  doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075
– ident: e_1_3_4_33_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-8292-4
– ident: e_1_3_4_22_1
  doi: 10.5688/ajpe7177
– volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  year: 2019
  ident: e_1_3_4_28_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_6_1
– ident: e_1_3_4_19_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.014
– volume: 32
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: e_1_3_4_7_1
  article-title: Start Spreading the News: Use Multiple Sources of Evidence to Evaluate Teaching
  publication-title: The Journal of Faculty Development
– ident: e_1_3_4_30_1
  doi: 10.1080/02602930500099193
– ident: e_1_3_4_27_1
  doi: 10.1002/tl.23
– ident: e_1_3_4_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/dsji.12023
– ident: e_1_3_4_10_1
  doi: 10.1177/0273475308324086
– ident: e_1_3_4_17_1
  doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1114957
– ident: e_1_3_4_9_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1049096519001744
– ident: e_1_3_4_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_9
– ident: e_1_3_4_35_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
– volume: 15
  start-page: 11
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_3_4_11_1
  article-title: Five-point Likert Items: T Test Versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon
  publication-title: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation
– ident: e_1_3_4_5_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8005-6_7
SSID ssj0012555
Score 2.3276753
Snippet Post-course instructor ratings are a common practice at universities in Europe, Australia, and North America. Rather than solely describing teaching practice,...
SourceID proquest
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 769
SubjectTerms Class Size
Colleges & universities
course grade
Educational Practices
Engineering education
faculty
Humanities Instruction
Pedagogy
Ratings
Ratings & rankings
Student evaluations
Students
Teacher Promotion
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Universities
Title Course-level factors and undergraduate engineering students' ratings of instruction
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03043797.2023.2224245
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3080018320
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1BS8MwFA46L3oQnYrTKTkInjK7Jmm6o4hjCO6iAz2VlzQZwuhknf_flzadGyI7eCnt4QX6XpL3te_l-wi5ETx3Tg1ilkinmQArGGgnWYpYP00M51AV2p_HyWgint5k001YhrZK_w3taqKIaq_2ixt02XTE3flqHlcD1fPS3z1McL56t0v2YoV3OKWj99GqkICIWdaFBMG8TXOI569hNtLTBnnpr826ykDDI3IYoCO9r2N9THZs0faqy6FDo00O1sgFT8iLl6MrLZv5tiAadHUovjT158YW0wXkXwg0qf0xomXNdFneUj8ximlJ545-_JDMnpLJ8PH1YcSChAIzPJVLxM5WKpNqMDwHiIyNuUicwSxubK4RyxiNn9ZGK4ue0NomBvIYQMapSRCZ9fkZaRXzwp4Tyjmme0gjEEaLSAiA3GEuk1ankYVYdYhoPJeZwC_uZS5mWb-hIQ0Oz7zDs-DwDumtzD5rgo1tBoP1sGTL6s-Gq2VIMr7FttvEMAtrFU08aPY7W3Txj6EvyT4-iqqTl3dJCwNjrxCvLPV1NSPxyqPxN2bb4BU
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELagDMDAo4AoFPCAxJSQxnaSjghRFWi70ErdItuxK0TVoj4Wfj13efQBQgydo0vi191n3-fvCLnlLLE2rPtOIKxyuDTckcoKJwKsHwWaMZkm2tudoNnjL33RX7kLg7RK3EPbTCgi9dW4uPEwuqDE3WM6j4X10MXa3y5EOEzfbZMdAXAcaX3M6ywyCQCZRZZJ4A7aFLd4_nrNWnxaUy_95a3TENQ4JLr4-Yx58uHOZ8rVXz90HTdr3RE5yBEqfcim1DHZMqMyFnfOiSBlsr-iYXhC3rDq3dQ4Q2Qf0bx8D4WvU7yeNhlMZDIHPEvN0ohOM0HN6R3F-TcaTOnY0vellu0p6TWeuo9NJ6_U4GgWiRlAdCNCHSmpWSKlp43PeGA1gAVtEgWQSSvYwWsVGmiYUibQMvGlFH6kAwCANXZGSqPxyJwTyhigChl5kmvFPc6lTCyETGFU5BnphxXCi_GJdS5jjtU0hnGtUDvN-y_G_ovz_qsQd2H2mel4_GdQXx38eJYeoNis2knM_rGtFjMlzl0CmCA2RwfqXWzw6huy2-y2W3HrufN6SfbgEU_Jw6xKSjBI5gog0kxdp2vgGxdRAr8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1NSwMxEA1aQfQgWhWrVXMQPKWum2Q3PYpa6lcRtKCnJckmRSjb0q3_38luth-I9OB5mUBmkszLzuQ9hC4YTa2N2yGJuFWEScOIVJYTAVhfRJpSWRTaX3pRt88eP3jVTZj7tkp3h7YlUURxVrvNPU5t1RF35ap5NG7HLSf93YIE56p362iDC4DnsKSDz-6skACImZeFBEacTfWI569hltLTEnnpr8O6yECdXbTjoSO-KWO9h9ZMVneqy75Do462F8gF99Gbk6PLDRm6tiDsdXUwTBq7d2OTwUSm3wA0sZkb4bxkuswvsVsY2SDHI4u_5iSzB6jfuX-_7RIvoUA0FXwK2NnwWAslNU2lDLQJKYushiyuTaoAy2gFV2utYgOeUMpEWqahlDwUOgJkdk0PUS0bZeYIYUoh3UsRSKYVCxiTMrWQy7hRIjAyjBuIVZ5LtOcXdzIXw-S6oiH1Dk-cwxPv8AZqzczGJcHGKoP2YliSafFnw5YyJAldYdusYpj4vQomDjS7ky04_sfQ52jz9a6TPD_0nk7QFnxhRVMvbaIaxMicAnSZqrNicf4ABVPh4Q
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Course-level+factors+and+undergraduate+engineering+students%E2%80%99+ratings+of+instruction&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+engineering+education&rft.au=Klopfer%2C+Michelle+D&rft.au=Knight%2C+David+B&rft.au=Grohs%2C+Jacob+R&rft.au=Case%2C+Scott+W&rft.date=2024-07-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0304-3797&rft.eissn=1469-5898&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=769&rft.epage=784&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F03043797.2023.2224245&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0304-3797&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0304-3797&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0304-3797&client=summon