Brand extension similarity can backfire when you look for something specific

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand extension is perceived to perform on specific attributes. This happens because similarity influences the perceived positioning of a brand ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of marketing Vol. 51; no. 5/6; pp. 850 - 868
Main Authors Dimitriu, Radu, Warlop, Luk, Samuelsen, Bendik Meling
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 01.01.2017
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0309-0566
1758-7123
1758-7123
DOI10.1108/EJM-09-2015-0662

Cover

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand extension is perceived to perform on specific attributes. This happens because similarity influences the perceived positioning of a brand extension: lower similarity extensions can be perceived as “specialized” products, whereas high similarity extensions are perceived as “all-in-one” products not performing exceptionally well on any specific attribute. Design/methodology/approach The authors test the hypothesized effect through three experimental studies. The authors manipulate similarity both within subjects (Study 1a) and between subjects (Study 1b and Study 2). Further, the authors test the effect for specific attributes that are physical/concrete in nature (Study 1a and Study 1b) as well as attributes that are abstract/imagery-related in nature (Study 2). Findings High compared to low similarity improves perceptions of overall performance (i.e. performance across all attributes). But as expected, the authors also find that a high similarity brand extension is perceived to perform worse on the attribute on which a low similarity brand extension specializes, even when the parent brands of the extensions possess that attribute to the same extent. This perception of attribute performance carries on to influence brand extension purchase likelihood. Practical implications The degree of brand extension similarity has consequences for how brand extensions are perceived to be positioned in the marketplace. Although high similarity extensions receive positive evaluations, they might not be suitable when a company is trying to instil a perception of exceptional performance on a specific attribute. Originality/value The authors demonstrate a consequential exception to the marketing wisdom that brands should extend to similar categories. Although the degree of brand extension similarity has been repeatedly shown to have a positive effect on brand extension evaluation, the authors document a case when its effect is actually detrimental. This study’s focus on the dependent variable of perceived performance on specific attributes is novel in the brand extension literature.
AbstractList Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand extension is perceived to perform on specific attributes. This happens because similarity influences the perceived positioning of a brand extension: lower similarity extensions can be perceived as “specialized” products, whereas high similarity extensions are perceived as “all-in-one” products not performing exceptionally well on any specific attribute. Design/methodology/approach The authors test the hypothesized effect through three experimental studies. The authors manipulate similarity both within subjects (Study 1a) and between subjects (Study 1b and Study 2). Further, the authors test the effect for specific attributes that are physical/concrete in nature (Study 1a and Study 1b) as well as attributes that are abstract/imagery-related in nature (Study 2). Findings High compared to low similarity improves perceptions of overall performance (i.e. performance across all attributes). But as expected, the authors also find that a high similarity brand extension is perceived to perform worse on the attribute on which a low similarity brand extension specializes, even when the parent brands of the extensions possess that attribute to the same extent. This perception of attribute performance carries on to influence brand extension purchase likelihood. Practical implications The degree of brand extension similarity has consequences for how brand extensions are perceived to be positioned in the marketplace. Although high similarity extensions receive positive evaluations, they might not be suitable when a company is trying to instil a perception of exceptional performance on a specific attribute. Originality/value The authors demonstrate a consequential exception to the marketing wisdom that brands should extend to similar categories. Although the degree of brand extension similarity has been repeatedly shown to have a positive effect on brand extension evaluation, the authors document a case when its effect is actually detrimental. This study’s focus on the dependent variable of perceived performance on specific attributes is novel in the brand extension literature.
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand extension is perceived to perform on specific attributes. This happens because similarity influences the perceived positioning of a brand extension: lower similarity extensions can be perceived as “specialized” products, whereas high similarity extensions are perceived as “all-in-one” products not performing exceptionally well on any specific attribute.Design/methodology/approachThe authors test the hypothesized effect through three experimental studies. The authors manipulate similarity both within subjects (Study 1a) and between subjects (Study 1b and Study 2). Further, the authors test the effect for specific attributes that are physical/concrete in nature (Study 1a and Study 1b) as well as attributes that are abstract/imagery-related in nature (Study 2).FindingsHigh compared to low similarity improves perceptions of overall performance (i.e. performance across all attributes). But as expected, the authors also find that a high similarity brand extension is perceived to perform worse on the attribute on which a low similarity brand extension specializes, even when the parent brands of the extensions possess that attribute to the same extent. This perception of attribute performance carries on to influence brand extension purchase likelihood.Practical implicationsThe degree of brand extension similarity has consequences for how brand extensions are perceived to be positioned in the marketplace. Although high similarity extensions receive positive evaluations, they might not be suitable when a company is trying to instil a perception of exceptional performance on a specific attribute.Originality/valueThe authors demonstrate a consequential exception to the marketing wisdom that brands should extend to similar categories. Although the degree of brand extension similarity has been repeatedly shown to have a positive effect on brand extension evaluation, the authors document a case when its effect is actually detrimental. This study’s focus on the dependent variable of perceived performance on specific attributes is novel in the brand extension literature.
Author Warlop, Luk
Samuelsen, Bendik Meling
Dimitriu, Radu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Radu
  surname: Dimitriu
  fullname: Dimitriu, Radu
  email: radu.dimitriu@cranfield.ac.uk
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Luk
  surname: Warlop
  fullname: Warlop, Luk
  email: luk.warlop@bi.no
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Bendik Meling
  surname: Samuelsen
  fullname: Samuelsen, Bendik Meling
  email: bendik.samuelsen@bi.no
BookMark eNp9kT1PwzAQhi1UJNrCzmiJOdSOHScZoSpfKmKB2XL8Qd0mdrBTlfx7UpWFgphuuHveOz03ASPnnQbgEqNrjFExWzw9J6hMUoSzBDGWnoAxzrMiyXFKRmCMyNBEGWNnYBLjGqEBIvkYLG-DcArqz067aL2D0Ta2FsF2PZTCwUrIjbFBw91KO9j7Lay930DjA4y-0d3KuncYWy2tsfIcnBpRR33xXafg7W7xOn9Ili_3j_ObZSJJQbtEijytsNRUVTnSOSmwoYbmiNJMICVTykyaqqJQpCpYlalMEypzmpHUCIWZIlOAD7lb14p-J-qat8E2IvQcI77XwfW64ajkex18r2Ngrg5MG_zHVseOr_02uOFMjktESEZKhocpdJiSwccYtPkVPHg-DmZHiLSd6AaXXRC2_g-cHUDd6CBq9deqHy8lXw17kEk
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1108_JPBM_04_2023_4445
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indmarman_2023_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijresmar_2021_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcs_13011
crossref_primary_10_1108_EJM_02_2021_0090
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijresmar_2021_09_013
Cites_doi 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90010-4
10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_9
10.1177/002224379102800303
10.1177/002224379202900301
10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
10.1177/002224379202900104
10.1086/209251
10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.010
10.1086/651566
10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.495
10.1177/002224299305700101
10.1177/002224379202900302
10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_16
10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.388
10.1177/03079459994380
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.003
10.1086/660044
10.1086/208542
10.1177/002224379703400304
10.1177/002224299005400102
10.1086/510217
10.1509/jmkg.70.2.018
10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_05
10.1086/667691
10.1509/jmr.10.0202
10.1080/00273171.2010.498290
10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383
10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
10.1509/jmkr.38.4.494.18901
10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_05
10.1086/422113
10.1177/002224379403100206
10.1509/jmr.07.0418
10.1177/002224379102800102
10.1086/510227
10.1509/jmkr.38.3.326.18864
10.1509/jmkr.47.2.335
10.1509/jmkg.64.2.80.17996
10.1086/651257
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<915::AID-EJSP797>3.0.CO;2-W
10.1086/209570
10.1086/338205
10.1086/653099
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Emerald Publishing Limited
Emerald Publishing Limited 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: Emerald Publishing Limited
– notice: Emerald Publishing Limited 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
0U~
1-H
7WY
7WZ
7XB
8AO
8FI
AFKRA
AXJJW
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
F~G
GNUQQ
K6~
L.-
L.0
M0C
M0Q
M2M
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PSYQQ
Q9U
ADTOC
UNPAY
DOI 10.1108/EJM-09-2015-0662
DatabaseName CrossRef
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
Trade PRO
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Asian & European Business Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ABI/INFORM Global
European Business Database
Psychology Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Business (OCUL)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content
Unpaywall
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest European Business
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
Asian & European Business Collection
ProQuest One Community College
Trade PRO
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: UNPAY
  name: Unpaywall
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Access Repository
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Business
EISSN 1758-7123
EndPage 868
ExternalDocumentID oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/12003
10_1108_EJM_09_2015_0662
10.1108/EJM-09-2015-0662
GroupedDBID 0R
1WG
29G
3FY
3V.
4.4
5GY
5VS
70U
7WY
8AO
8FI
8R4
8R5
9E0
9F-
AADTA
AADXL
AAGBP
AAMCF
AAPBV
AAUDR
ABIJV
ABIVO
ABPPZ
ABSDC
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACMTK
ACTAU
ADBBV
ADOMW
AEBZA
AEDOK
AEUCW
AFKRA
AHZQH
AJEBP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
APPLU
ASMFL
ATGMP
AUCOK
AVELQ
AXJJW
AZQEC
BBAFP
BCDNB
BENPR
BEZIV
BLEHN
BPHCQ
BUONS
BVXVI
CAG
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
F5P
FNNZZ
FYUFA
GEA
GEB
GEC
GEI
GMM
GMN
GMX
GNUQQ
GQ.
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
H13
HZ
IAO
ICO
IEA
IGG
IJT
IOF
IPNFZ
J1Y
JI-
JL0
K6
LXL
LXN
M0C
M2M
MS
N95
O9-
P2P
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
Q2X
RIG
RXW
TAE
TDF
TEM
TET
TFD
TGG
TMD
TMF
TMT
TN5
UCJ
UPT
V1G
WV
X
Z11
Z12
Z21
ZYZAG
-~X
.WV
0R~
AABYC
AAKOT
AAPSD
AAXBI
AAYXX
ABEAN
ABJNI
ABXQL
ABYQI
ACBMB
ACGFO
ACTSA
ADFRT
ADMHG
ADQHX
ADWNT
AEMMR
AETHF
AFNZV
AFRCI
AGTVX
AHMHQ
AIAFM
AILOG
AJFKA
AJPYP
AODMV
ASJQZ
BTXLY
CCPQU
CITATION
EOXHF
HZ~
K6~
M42
MS~
PHGZM
PHGZT
PSYQQ
PUEGO
SCAQC
SDURG
UKHRP
0U~
1-H
7XB
AFNTC
ALIPV
L.-
L.0
M0Q
PKEHL
Q9U
1OL
3R3
AARUZ
ABKIT
ABPXG
ACBFK
ACFHG
ACSXQ
ACWIT
ACYZK
ACZUD
ADFLA
ADIOT
ADQIE
ADQUB
ADTOC
ADYJY
AEACZ
AFFNX
AFJGD
AFQLH
AFVFF
AGCDK
AGHQT
AGQPQ
AGUEF
AGYKA
AHNLG
AI.
AJNYF
AJZCB
AKXVL
ALJBP
ALOWM
AZFZN
BAAKF
BFQZO
COF
IPY
ITC
LPU
MORNK
ROL
UGKUH
UNPAY
VH1
WS6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-ca72b1ce4db70e7381f4f470445a0dc246f22d88d3b86b5d5e34c74532fad16d3
IEDL.DBID ZYZAG
ISSN 0309-0566
1758-7123
IngestDate Tue Aug 19 09:07:19 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 12:18:49 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:43:12 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:13:14 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 26 17:04:21 EDT 2021
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5/6
Keywords Positioning
Perception
Specific attribute performance
Brand extension
Language English
License Licensed re-use rights only
https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies
cc-by-nc
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c384t-ca72b1ce4db70e7381f4f470445a0dc246f22d88d3b86b5d5e34c74532fad16d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/12003
PQID 1903353961
PQPubID 3659
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_1903353961
emerald_primary_10_1108_EJM-09-2015-0662
unpaywall_primary_10_1108_ejm_09_2015_0662
crossref_primary_10_1108_EJM_09_2015_0662
crossref_citationtrail_10_1108_EJM_09_2015_0662
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Bradford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bradford
PublicationTitle European journal of marketing
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Emerald Publishing Limited
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Emerald Publishing Limited
– name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
References (key2020120714014121900_ref032) 1981; 13
(key2020120714014121900_ref017) 2013; 39
(key2020120714014121900_ref030) 2010; 37
(key2020120714014121900_ref039) 1992; 29
(key2020120714014121900_ref044) 1977; 84
(key2020120714014121900_ref003) 2010; 37
(key2020120714014121900_ref041) 2002; 30
(key2020120714014121900_ref001) 1990; 54
(key2020120714014121900_ref031) 2007; 33
(key2020120714014121900_ref015) 2002; 36
(key2020120714014121900_ref029) 2004; 31
(key2020120714014121900_ref046) 2007; 24
(key2020120714014121900_ref025) 1990; 17
(key2020120714014121900_ref011) 2004; 14
(key2020120714014121900_ref012) 2007; 33
(key2020120714014121900_ref040) 2012; 49
(key2020120714014121900_ref026) 2002; 12
(key2020120714014121900_ref028) 2002; 28
(key2020120714014121900_ref002) 1997; 34
(key2020120714014121900_ref035) 1975; 7
(key2020120714014121900_ref019) 2011; 38
(key2020120714014121900_ref034) 1991; 28
(key2020120714014121900_ref045) 2006; 70
(key2020120714014121900_ref013) 2013; 50
(key2020120714014121900_ref021) 2008
(key2020120714014121900_ref006) 2001; 38
(key2020120714014121900_ref010) 2009; 43
(key2020120714014121900_ref038) 1992; 29
(key2020120714014121900_ref016) 2008; 18
(key2020120714014121900_ref008) 1994; 31
(key2020120714014121900_ref005) 2010; 47
(key2020120714014121900_ref018) 2010; 45
(key2020120714014121900_ref014) 1996; 5
(key2020120714014121900_ref004) 2000; 26
(key2020120714014121900_ref049) 2005; 42
(key2020120714014121900_ref050) 2010; 37
(key2020120714014121900_ref036) 2012; 46
(key2020120714014121900_ref022) 1992; 29
(key2020120714014121900_ref043) 1996; 26
(key2020120714014121900_ref023) 2001; 38
(key2020120714014121900_ref020) 1993; 57
(key2020120714014121900_ref024) 2000; 64
(key2020120714014121900_ref037) 2005; 42
(key2020120714014121900_ref047) 2015; 49
(key2020120714014121900_ref007) 1991; 28
(key2020120714014121900_ref048) 2006; 16
(key2020120714014121900_ref027) 2010; 44
(key2020120714014121900_ref033) 1991; 18
(key2020120714014121900_ref042) 1989; 57
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 248
  issue: 2
  year: 1981
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref032
  article-title: The dilution effect: nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information
  publication-title: Cognitive Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90010-4
– volume: 16
  start-page: 272
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref048
  article-title: Effects of parent-extension similarity and self regulatory focus on evaluations of brand extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_9
– volume: 28
  start-page: 281
  issue: 3
  year: 1991
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref034
  article-title: Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379102800303
– volume: 29
  start-page: 281
  issue: 3
  year: 1992
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref038
  article-title: Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379202900301
– volume: 7
  start-page: 573
  issue: 4
  year: 1975
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref035
  article-title: Family resemblances – Studies in internal structures of categories
  publication-title: Cognitive Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1182
  issue: 7-8
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref027
  article-title: Consumer responses to brand extensions: a comprehensive model
  publication-title: European Journal of Marketing
– volume: 29
  start-page: 35
  issue: 1
  year: 1992
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref022
  article-title: The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379202900104
– volume: 18
  start-page: 185
  issue: 2
  year: 1991
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref033
  article-title: Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/209251
– volume: 18
  start-page: 212
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref016
  article-title: Art and the brand: the role of visual art in enhancing brand extendibility
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.010
– volume: 37
  start-page: 224
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref003
  article-title: Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: firm stereotypes matter
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/651566
– volume: 42
  start-page: 495
  issue: 4
  year: 2005
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref049
  article-title: Does loving a brand mean loving its products? The role of brand-elicited affect in brand extension evaluations
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.495
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1993
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref020
  article-title: Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing
  doi: 10.1177/002224299305700101
– volume: 29
  start-page: 296
  issue: 3
  year: 1992
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref039
  article-title: The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379202900302
– volume: 14
  start-page: 141
  issue: 1-2
  year: 2004
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref011
  article-title: Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_16
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1300
  issue: 11-12
  year: 2009
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref010
  article-title: Brand extension strategies: perceived fit, brand type, and culture influences
  publication-title: European Journal of Marketing
– volume: 57
  start-page: 388
  issue: 3
  year: 1989
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref042
  article-title: Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect
  publication-title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.388
– volume: 30
  start-page: 131
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref041
  article-title: The effects of price on brand extension evaluations: the moderating role of extension similarity
  publication-title: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  doi: 10.1177/03079459994380
– volume: 49
  start-page: 262
  issue: 1-2
  year: 2015
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref047
  article-title: Exploring the effectiveness of consumer creativity in online marketing communications
  publication-title: European Journal of Marketing
– volume: 24
  start-page: 149
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref046
  article-title: Empirical generalizability of consumer evaluations of brand extensions
  publication-title: International Journal of Research in Marketing
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.11.003
– volume: 38
  start-page: 390
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref019
  article-title: The impact of product name on dieters’ and nondieters’ food evaluations and consumption
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/660044
– volume: 17
  start-page: 111
  issue: 2
  year: 1990
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref025
  article-title: Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/208542
– volume: 34
  start-page: 347
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref002
  article-title: Dimensions of brand personality
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379703400304
– volume: 54
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 1990
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref001
  article-title: Consumer evaluations of brand extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing
  doi: 10.1177/002224299005400102
– volume: 33
  start-page: 430
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref012
  article-title: Jack of all trades or master of one? Product differentiation and compensatory reasoning in consumer choice
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/510217
– volume: 70
  start-page: 18
  issue: 2
  year: 2006
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref045
  article-title: Drivers of brand extension success
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing
  doi: 10.1509/jmkg.70.2.018
– volume: 5
  start-page: 189
  issue: 2
  year: 1996
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref014
  article-title: Extensions of broad brands: the role of retrieval in evaluations of fit
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_05
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1154
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref017
  article-title: Money and thinking: reminders of money trigger abstract construal and shape consumer judgments
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/667691
– volume-title: Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity
  year: 2008
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref021
– volume: 50
  start-page: 365
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref013
  article-title: Putting brands in their place: how a lack of control keeps brands contained
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmr.10.0202
– volume: 45
  start-page: 627
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref018
  article-title: Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear
  publication-title: Multivariate Behavioral Research
  doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.498290
– volume: 42
  start-page: 383
  year: 2005
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref037
  article-title: Placebo effects of marketing actions: consumers may get what they pay for
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.383
– volume: 84
  start-page: 327
  issue: 4
  year: 1977
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref044
  article-title: Features of similarity
  publication-title: Psychological Review
  doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
– volume: 46
  start-page: 177
  issue: 1-2
  year: 2012
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref036
  article-title: The attitudinal response to alternative brand growth strategies
  publication-title: European Journal of Marketing
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1415
  issue: 11-12
  year: 2002
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref015
  article-title: Consumer evaluations of extensions and their effects on the core brand: key issues and research propositions
  publication-title: European Journal of Marketing
– volume: 38
  start-page: 494
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref006
  article-title: Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.494.18901
– volume: 12
  start-page: 119
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref026
  article-title: The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Psychology
  doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_05
– volume: 31
  start-page: 346
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref029
  article-title: When are broader brands stronger brands? An accessibility perspective on the success of brand extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/422113
– volume: 31
  start-page: 214
  issue: 2
  year: 1994
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref008
  article-title: The importance of the brand in brand extension
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379403100206
– volume: 49
  start-page: 373
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref040
  article-title: The effects of brand name structure on brand extension evaluations and parent brand dilution
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmr.07.0418
– volume: 28
  start-page: 16
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref007
  article-title: A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1177/002224379102800102
– volume: 33
  start-page: 529
  issue: 4
  year: 2007
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref031
  article-title: Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: the influence of analytic versus holistic thinking
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/510227
– volume: 38
  start-page: 326
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref023
  article-title: Threats to the external validity of brand extension research
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.3.326.18864
– volume: 47
  start-page: 335
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref005
  article-title: Brand extension strategy planning: empirical estimation of brand-category personality fit and atypicality
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing Research
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.2.335
– volume: 64
  start-page: 80
  issue: 2
  year: 2000
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref024
  article-title: The impact of ad repetition and ad content on consumer perceptions of incongruent extensions
  publication-title: Journal of Marketing
  doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.2.80.17996
– volume: 37
  start-page: 197
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref050
  article-title: Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/651257
– volume: 26
  start-page: 915
  issue: 6
  year: 1996
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref043
  article-title: The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both?
  publication-title: European Journal of Social Psychology
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<915::AID-EJSP797>3.0.CO;2-W
– volume: 26
  start-page: 386
  issue: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref004
  article-title: The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/209570
– volume: 28
  start-page: 618
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref028
  article-title: Consumers’ beliefs about product benefits: the effect of obviously irrelevant product information
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/338205
– volume: 37
  start-page: 543
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: key2020120714014121900_ref030
  article-title: Consumer reactions to brand extensions in a competitive context: does fit still matter?
  publication-title: Journal of Consumer Research
  doi: 10.1086/653099
SSID ssj0011037
Score 2.1864874
Snippet Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand...
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show that high similarity between a parent brand and an extension category can have a detrimental effect on how a brand...
SourceID unpaywall
proquest
crossref
emerald
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 850
SubjectTerms Between-subjects design
Brands
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Extensions
Hypothesis testing
Investigations
Margarine
Perceptions
Product choice
Purchase intention
Studies
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3NSxtBFH9ohNpLqa3StLHMwYMVlmzmY3dyKMWUBBETSjGQ2zKfGE020SSI_33fbHbTpoq3PczOLu_NzO837xPgpK0s8jZpIsm5j7g3rUg7yyKlPLWp9u2kSKTtD5KLIb8cidEODKpcmBBWWZ2JxUFtZybYyJsIXIwJ1k5aP-b3UegaFbyrVQsNVbZWsN-LEmO7sEdDV-Ua7HW6g1-_N36FkBVX-RUQ-jeOy1g2u5f9EAeAgChCWj7dAqr_snXXPHR_lc_V06OaTP6BpN57eFdySXK-Vv4B7Lj8A7ypQtk_wlUHgciSws4djGJkMZ6O8SaLxJugRIlW5s7jkUceb1xOnmYrMkHKTZDGksUstJZGWCMhFTOEEx3CsNe9_nkRld0TIsMkX0ZGpVS3jONWp7FLEZk99zyNORcqtobyxFOKirJMy0QLKxzjJuWCUa9sK7HsCGr5LHefgEjctPhLXkpt8UGo1CWG4VWEMcdSL-rQrESVmbK0eOhwMcmKK0YsMxRuFrezINwsCLcO3zZvzNdlNV4Ze1pK_6WhWzqrQ6NST1buxUX2d-XU4Wyjsmdzudvp1mc_vz7XF3hLA8IX1pgG1JYPK3eM_GSpv5aL7g9-zd_a
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Unpaywall
  dbid: UNPAY
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSyQxEC5kBNeLr1UcX-SwB13one5O0skcVRQRlT04oKcmT3yMPeLMIPrrrfRDHRXBWx_S6TRVlfoqVV8F4E9XWcRt0kSSMR8xb5JIO0sjpXxqhfbdrCTSnp5lRz12fMEv3njcFs3IlKwqDDtVUVZx1aSqqutAJ-DhTlJ1-JzOQlapBdO9s_-7l02-AF16ySlCJBwJ3Jib5GQsO-7mLuT60enxQL1PJ5zRB0ZuhTV_jYt79fSo-v13budwHs4b8k5VbXL7bzzCJT9_7uX4kz9agLkahpLdSm8WYcoVSzDTVMH_hpM9nMWS8og8nKeR4fXdNQbBiNkJCoNoZW497pbk8coV5GkwJn1E6wQRMBkOwq3U6BFJYHGGSqRl6B0enO8fRfXFC5Ghko0io0SqE-OY1SJ2Ap26Z56JmDGuYmtSlvk0RRlbqmWmueWOMiMYp6lXNsksXYFWMSjcKhCJ9o5L8lJqiw9cCZcZilEMpY4Kz9vQaSSQm7orebgco5-X0Uks84Pj0zzu5kFmeZBZG3Ze37ivOnJ8M3a7FupXQydUoQ0bjdTz2oyHOaIlSjntZkkb_r5qwqe5UK0mPrv2k8HrMJsGqFAe62xAa_QwdpsIdEZ6q1bsF2Ac9nc
  priority: 102
  providerName: Unpaywall
Title Brand extension similarity can backfire when you look for something specific
URI https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJM-09-2015-0662/full/html
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1903353961
http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/12003
UnpaywallVersion submittedVersion
Volume 51
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVMCB
  databaseName: Emerald Management eJournals Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1758-7123
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011037
  issn: 0309-0566
  databaseCode: ZYZAG
  dateStart: 19890101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.emerald.com/insight
  providerName: Emerald
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1758-7123
  dateEnd: 20241005
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0011037
  issn: 0309-0566
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20010501
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Na9swFH90CWy97Hs0XVt02GEbuHEsyXKO6UhXyhrKWKDtxeiTZnWc0jiU7q_fk79oujIY7GQfZFnSe9L7vU8BfBhKg7gt0UHCmAuY04NAWUMDKV1khHLDuEykPZnER1N2fMbPNmDS5MKUYZWVOaY8p2f50iupfR-4jadwW3DA314zPj7xnnsUYdwn0kd9b7HuXxbz7Al0UZSJsAPdi_OL0dfWr-Cz4hq_Aor-1nH5SG9rgupBtm6FQ5-t8mt5dyuz7J5IOnwBi2YyVSTK1f6qUPv614M6j_9vti_heY1eyahit1ewYfPX8LQJnn8D3w5Q9BlSWta9GY4sZ_MZ6s4I9QnSkCiprxwesuT20ubkbrEiGYJ8gsCZLBf-MmsUpMQnf_oAprcwPRz_-HIU1Pc1BJomrAi0FJEaaMuMEqEViAUcc0yEjHEZGh2x2EURsoahKokVN9xSpgXjNHLSDGJD30EnX-R2C0iCxwQOySWJMvjCpbCxpqj8UGqpcLwH_YY4qa6Lmfs7NbK0VGrCJMXlSsNh6pcr9cvVg0_tF9dVIY-_tP1YU-WxpmtU6MFOwxBpvfuXKYIsSjkdxoMefG6Z5I--7M_52m-3_2GI72Ez8gCjNAbtQKe4WdldhEeF2oPuwXhy-h2f08np6Hyv3gO_Act_CrM
linkProvider Emerald
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVKJcEE-RUmAPIAGSFWcf9uZQIQqp0jaJEGql3pZ9itLUCSRRlD_Hb2PWsQMB1FtvPqzX9sx45pudF8DLjnaI26RNJOch4cG2E-MdS7QO1OUmdLKykHYwzHpn_PhcnG_Bz7oWJqZV1jqxVNRubOMZeQsNF2OCdbL2u8n3JE6NitHVeoSGrkYruP2yxVhV2HHilwt04ab7Rx-R368oPeyefugl1ZSBxDLJZ4nVOTVt67kzeepztGCBB56nnAudOkt5FijFD3LMyMwIJzzjNueC0aBdO3MM970F2zy-XAO2D7rDT5_XcYxYhVfHMRBqrAOlqWx1jwcx7wANsIhtAOiGYfyrOniFe3fmxUQvF3o0-sMEHt6DuxV2Je9XwnYftnzxAG7XqfMPoX-Ahs-R8lw9HsKR6cXVBXrOCPQJcpAYbS8Dqliy-OoLshzPyQghPkHYTKbjOMoazSiJpZ8xfekRnN0IHR9DoxgX_gkQiUoCXylIaRxeCJ37zDJ0fRjzLA-iCa2aVMpWrczjRI2RKl2aVCokrko7KhJXReI24c36jsmqjcc1a19X1P_f0g2eNWGvZo-q_v2p-i2pTXi7Ztk_e_lvVxuP3b1-rxew0zsd9FX_aHjyFO7QiC7Kk6A9aMx-zP0zxEYz87wSQAJfblrmfwExUxzs
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9NAEB6VVCpcUHmpgRb2ABIgWXH24XUOFaJtoj6jClGpt2W9D1FInUASRfmL_CpmnXVKAPXWmw_22p4ZzXzzBnjd0RZxW26SnHOfcG_aSeEsS7T21MrCd7Kqkfasnx1e8ONLcbkGv-pemFBWWevESlHboQkx8hYaLsYE62Ttlo9lEecHvQ-jH0nYIBUyrfU6DR3XLNjdatxYbPI4cfMZunPj3aMD5P0bSnvdz_uHSdw4kBiW80litKRF2zhuC5k6idbMc89lyrnQqTWUZ55S_DnLijwrhBWOcSO5YNRr284sw3PvwboM_aINWN_r9s8_LXMaoSOvzmkg7FgmTdO81T0-CzUIaIxFGAlAV4zkX53CCwx8f1qO9HymB4M_zGFvEx5GHEs-LgTvEay58jFs1GX0T-B0D42gJVWMPQTkyPjq-gq9aAT9BLlJCm2-e1S3ZPbVlWQ-nJIBwn2CEJqMh2GtNZpUEtpAQynTU7i4Ezo-g0Y5LN0WkBwVBn6Sz_PC4oXQ0mWGoRvEmGPSiya0alIpE8eah-0aA1W5N2mukLgq7ahAXBWI24R3yydGi5Eet9z7NlL_f7eu8KwJ2zV7VNQDY3UjtU14v2TZP2e5b9crr31--1mvYANlX50e9U9ewAMagEYVFNqGxuTn1O0gTJoUL6P8Efhy1yL_G59pISY
linkToUnpaywall http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSyQxEC5kBNeLr1UcX-SwB13one5O0skcVRQRlT04oKcmT3yMPeLMIPrrrfRDHRXBWx_S6TRVlfoqVV8F4E9XWcRt0kSSMR8xb5JIO0sjpXxqhfbdrCTSnp5lRz12fMEv3njcFs3IlKwqDDtVUVZx1aSqqutAJ-DhTlJ1-JzOQlapBdO9s_-7l02-AF16ySlCJBwJ3Jib5GQsO-7mLuT60enxQL1PJ5zRB0ZuhTV_jYt79fSo-v13budwHs4b8k5VbXL7bzzCJT9_7uX4kz9agLkahpLdSm8WYcoVSzDTVMH_hpM9nMWS8og8nKeR4fXdNQbBiNkJCoNoZW497pbk8coV5GkwJn1E6wQRMBkOwq3U6BFJYHGGSqRl6B0enO8fRfXFC5Ghko0io0SqE-OY1SJ2Ap26Z56JmDGuYmtSlvk0RRlbqmWmueWOMiMYp6lXNsksXYFWMSjcKhCJ9o5L8lJqiw9cCZcZilEMpY4Kz9vQaSSQm7orebgco5-X0Uks84Pj0zzu5kFmeZBZG3Ze37ivOnJ8M3a7FupXQydUoQ0bjdTz2oyHOaIlSjntZkkb_r5qwqe5UK0mPrv2k8HrMJsGqFAe62xAa_QwdpsIdEZ6q1bsF2Ac9nc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brand+extension+similarity+can+backfire+when+you+look+for+something+specific&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+marketing&rft.au=Dimitriu%2C+Radu&rft.au=Warlop%2C+Luk&rft.au=Samuelsen%2C+Bendik+Meling&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.issn=0309-0566&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5%2F6&rft.spage=850&rft.epage=868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FEJM-09-2015-0662&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1108_EJM_09_2015_0662
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0309-0566&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0309-0566&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0309-0566&client=summon