Insights into the stress corrosion cracking of solution annealed alloy 690 in simulated pressurized water reactor primary water under dynamic straining

The intergranular attack near both stagnant and active stress corrosion crack (SCC) tips of solution annealed alloy 690 were characterized after constant extension rate tensile tests in simulated pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water containing 18 cc H2/kg H2O. In both cracks, an intergranul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa materialia Vol. 151; no. C; pp. 321 - 333
Main Authors Kuang, Wenjun, Song, Miao, Was, Gary S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2018
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1359-6454
1873-2453
DOI10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.002

Cover

More Information
Summary:The intergranular attack near both stagnant and active stress corrosion crack (SCC) tips of solution annealed alloy 690 were characterized after constant extension rate tensile tests in simulated pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water containing 18 cc H2/kg H2O. In both cracks, an intergranular oxide, composed of NiO and Cr2O3, was observed beyond the crack tip with an adjacent Cr depleted grain boundary migration zone. The stagnant crack has a compact Cr2O3 covering the crack tip and the adjacent grain boundary migration zone is deep and free of oxidation, while the active crack has porous penetrative oxide extending into the migration zone. The ability to form a compact Cr2O3 film at the crack tip is important to the IGSCC resistance and may be dictated by the efficiency of Cr diffusion up the migrated grain boundary. When a compact Cr2O3 film does not form at the crack tip, the Cr depleted grain boundary migration zone is subject to penetrative oxidation via the inward diffusion of oxygen, making the zone susceptible to crack propagation. Thus, even a high Cr content cannot guarantee the immunity of a Ni base alloy to SCC during dynamic straining. [Display omitted]
Bibliography:2011-01-K; AC07-051D14517
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
ISSN:1359-6454
1873-2453
DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.002