Variations and morphometric features of the vermiform appendix: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 114,080 subjects with clinical implications

• Published in: Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 85 - 98
• Main Authors: Kacprzyk, Artur, DroŚ, Jakub, Stefura, Tomasz, Krzysztofik, Marta, JasiŃska, Katarzyna, PĘdziwiatr, Michał, Major, Piotr, Hołda, Mateusz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2020; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Anatomic Variation; Anatomy; Appendicitis; Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging; Appendicitis - pathology; Appendix; Appendix - anatomy & histology; Appendix - diagnostic imaging; appendix vermiform; Humans; Meta-analysis; Morphology; Quality assessment; Systematic review; anatomy; appendicitis; appendix vermiform
• ISSN: 0897-3806; 1098-2353; 1098-2353
• DOI: 10.1002/ca.23474

Determining the true and indisputable data regarding the vermiform appendix (VA) morphology is of a great clinical interest. The aim of this study was to provide the best evidence‐based anatomical overview of the variations in location and size of VA using a systematic and meta‐analytical approach. A systematic review with meta‐analysis was performed of studies reporting variants of the location and morphometric data regarding the VA. The MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, BIOSIS, SciELO, and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched throughout June 2018. The reported locations of the body of the VA were re‐classified into a new, standardized classification system divided into nine categories. The AQUA tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. The research was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROPSERO database. Our meta‐analysis included 242 studies (n = 114,080). Overall, the VA was most commonly found in the retrocecal location (32.1%, 95%CI: 29.2–35.1), followed by the pelvic (28.5%, 95%CI: 26.7–30.4) and ileal (14.5%, 95%CI: 11.8–17.7) locations. Subjects without known appendiceal pathologies had significantly smaller VA outer diameters (5.84 mm, 95%CI: 5.68–5.99) than patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis (10.64 mm, 95%CI: 10.14–11.15). The overall pooled mean length of the VA was 80.29 mm (95%CI: 76.68–83.89). Significant differences were found in size of the VA between imaging modalities. The results obtained from this evidence‐based anatomy study will improve the clinical understanding of the VA anatomy, which in turn will have major implications for clinical practice. Clin. Anat. 32:85–98, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.