Machine Learning in Orthodontics: Introducing a 3d Auto-segmentation and Auto-landmark Finder of Cbct Images To Assess Maxillary Constriction in Unilateral Impacted Canine patients

• Published in: The Angle orthodontist Vol. 90; no. 1; pp. 77 - 84
• Main Authors: Chen, Si, Wang, Li, Li, Gang, Wu, Tai-Hsien, Diachina, Shannon, Tejera, Beatriz, Kwon, Jane Jungeun, Lin, Feng-Chang, Lee, Yan-Ting, Xu, Tianmin, Shen, Dinggang, Ko, Ching-Chang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists 01.01.2020
• Subjects: Adolescent; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Constriction; Cuspid; Humans; Incisor; Machine Learning; Maxilla; Original; Orthodontics; Palatal Expansion Technique; Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Tooth, Impacted; Canine impaction; Image segmentation; Orthodontics; Machine learning; CBCT
• ISSN: 0003-3219; 1945-7103; 1945-7103
• DOI: 10.2319/012919-59.1

To (1) introduce a novel machine learning method and (2) assess maxillary structure variation in unilateral canine impaction for advancing clinically viable information. A machine learning algorithm utilizing Learning-based multi-source IntegratioN frameworK for Segmentation (LINKS) was used with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to quantify volumetric skeletal maxilla discrepancies of 30 study group (SG) patients with unilaterally impacted maxillary canines and 30 healthy control group (CG) subjects. Fully automatic segmentation was implemented for maxilla isolation, and maxillary volumetric and linear measurements were performed. Analysis of variance was used for statistical evaluation. Maxillary structure was successfully auto-segmented, with an average dice ratio of 0.80 for three-dimensional image segmentations and a minimal mean difference of two voxels on the midsagittal plane for digitized landmarks between the manually identified and the machine learning-based (LINKS) methods. No significant difference in bone volume was found between impaction ([2.37 ± 0.34] [Formula: see text] 10 mm ) and nonimpaction ([2.36 ± 0.35] [Formula: see text] 10 mm ) sides of SG. The SG maxillae had significantly smaller volumes, widths, heights, and depths ( .05) than CG. The data suggest that palatal expansion could be beneficial for those with unilateral canine impaction, as underdevelopment of the maxilla often accompanies that condition in the early teen years. Fast and efficient CBCT image segmentation will allow large clinical data sets to be analyzed effectively.