Generation and validation of algorithms to identify subjects with dementia using administrative data

Objectives To generate and validate algorithms for the identification of individuals with dementia in the community setting, by the interrogation of administrative records, an inexpensive and already available source of data. Methods We collected and anonymized information on demented individuals 65...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurological sciences Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 2155 - 2161
Main Authors DiFrancesco, Jacopo C., Pina, Alessandra, Giussani, Giorgia, Cortesi, Laura, Bianchi, Elisa, Cavalieri d’Oro, Luca, Amodio, Emanuele, Nobili, Alessandro, Tremolizzo, Lucio, Isella, Valeria, Appollonio, Ildebrando, Ferrarese, Carlo, Beghi, Ettore
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.10.2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1590-1874
1590-3478
1590-3478
DOI10.1007/s10072-019-03968-3

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives To generate and validate algorithms for the identification of individuals with dementia in the community setting, by the interrogation of administrative records, an inexpensive and already available source of data. Methods We collected and anonymized information on demented individuals 65 years of age or older from ten general practitioners (GPs) in the district of Brianza (Northern Italy) and compared this with the administrative data of the local health protection agency ( Agenzia per la Tutela della Salute ). Indicators of the disease in the administrative database (diagnosis of dementia in the hospital discharge records; use of cholinesterase inhibitors/memantine; neuropsychological tests; brain CT/MRI; outpatient neurological visits) were used separately and in different combinations to generate algorithms for the detection of patients with dementia. Results When used individually, indicators of dementia showed good specificity, but low sensitivity. By their combination, we generated different algorithms: I-therapy with ChEI/memantine or diagnosis of dementia at discharge or neuropsychological tests (specificity 97.9%, sensitivity 52.5%); II-therapy with ChEI/memantine or diagnosis of dementia at discharge or neuropsychological tests or brain CT/MRI or neurological visit (sensitivity 90.8%, specificity 70.6%); III-therapy with ChEI/memantine or diagnosis of dementia at discharge or neuropsychological tests or brain CT/MRIMRI and neurological visit (specificity 89.3%, sensitivity 73.3%). Conclusions These results show that algorithms obtained from administrative data are not sufficiently accurate in classifying patients with dementia, whichever combination of variables is used for the identification of the disease. Studies in large patient cohorts are needed to develop further strategies for identifying patients with dementia in the community setting.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1590-1874
1590-3478
1590-3478
DOI:10.1007/s10072-019-03968-3