Generation and validation of algorithms to identify subjects with dementia using administrative data
Objectives To generate and validate algorithms for the identification of individuals with dementia in the community setting, by the interrogation of administrative records, an inexpensive and already available source of data. Methods We collected and anonymized information on demented individuals 65...
Saved in:
| Published in | Neurological sciences Vol. 40; no. 10; pp. 2155 - 2161 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.10.2019
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1590-1874 1590-3478 1590-3478 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10072-019-03968-3 |
Cover
| Summary: | Objectives
To generate and validate algorithms for the identification of individuals with dementia in the community setting, by the interrogation of administrative records, an inexpensive and already available source of data.
Methods
We collected and anonymized information on demented individuals 65 years of age or older from ten general practitioners (GPs) in the district of Brianza (Northern Italy) and compared this with the administrative data of the local health protection agency (
Agenzia per la Tutela della Salute
). Indicators of the disease in the administrative database (diagnosis of dementia in the hospital discharge records; use of cholinesterase inhibitors/memantine; neuropsychological tests; brain CT/MRI; outpatient neurological visits) were used separately and in different combinations to generate algorithms for the detection of patients with dementia.
Results
When used individually, indicators of dementia showed good specificity, but low sensitivity. By their combination, we generated different algorithms: I-therapy with ChEI/memantine
or
diagnosis of dementia at discharge
or
neuropsychological tests (specificity 97.9%, sensitivity 52.5%); II-therapy with ChEI/memantine
or
diagnosis of dementia at discharge
or
neuropsychological tests
or
brain CT/MRI
or
neurological visit (sensitivity 90.8%, specificity 70.6%); III-therapy with ChEI/memantine
or
diagnosis of dementia at discharge
or
neuropsychological tests
or
brain CT/MRIMRI
and
neurological visit (specificity 89.3%, sensitivity 73.3%).
Conclusions
These results show that algorithms obtained from administrative data are not sufficiently accurate in classifying patients with dementia, whichever combination of variables is used for the identification of the disease. Studies in large patient cohorts are needed to develop further strategies for identifying patients with dementia in the community setting. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ISSN: | 1590-1874 1590-3478 1590-3478 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10072-019-03968-3 |