The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. Subjects and methods A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of urology Vol. 39; no. 11; pp. 4261 - 4265
Main Authors Zhang, Lv Wen, Fei, Xiang, Song, Yan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.11.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0724-4983
1433-8726
1433-8726
DOI10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5

Cover

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. Subjects and methods A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. Results All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P  < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P  < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively ( P  < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. ( P  > 0.05). Conclusion The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.
AbstractList To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.SUBJECTS AND METHODSA total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).RESULTSAll operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.CONCLUSIONThe novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.
To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05). The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. Subjects and methods A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. Results All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P  < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P  < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively ( P  < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. ( P  > 0.05). Conclusion The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.Subjects and methodsA total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.ResultsAll operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.
Author Fei, Xiang
Song, Yan
Zhang, Lv Wen
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lv Wen
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Lv Wen
  organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xiang
  surname: Fei
  fullname: Fei, Xiang
  organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yan
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Yan
  email: Alexander-song@163.com
  organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kT1vFDEQhi2UiFwCf4ACWaJJs8Trz3WJIkKQItGEeuXzzhJHXnvxR6T79_i4I0gpUk3zPO-M5j1HJyEGQOhDTz73hKirTAjjoiO07whTlHbiDdr0nLFuUFSeoA1RlHdcD-wMnef8SEivJBFv0RljWmsqyQal-wfA1rvgrPEY5rlNu8NxxiE-gcdPxta64FxtcTHgmqBAitnG1VnsXXmIJbk177ALuLSoksCUBULZR9R1hXR0WnrbYKt379DpbHyG98d5gX7efL2_vu3ufnz7fv3lrrNMidIJKYkknGwlWNBKaUNhHiTnwCZrYZ6YHCYuYGJc9hqUnKWxQvOt2hpNoGcX6PKQu6b4u0Iu4-KyBe9NgFjzSAUdOOs13aOfXqCPsabQrmuUZoorOuhGfTxSdbvANK7JLSbtxn_fbAA9ALa9KCeYn5GejPvKxkNlY6ts_FvZKJo0vJCsK2b_7ZKM86-r7KDmtif8gvT_7FesP_enq8g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000002202
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_022_01401_7
crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_408
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5741437
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_1340192
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11144155
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2023_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04556_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2023_02_008
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0669
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_024_04280_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_06_179
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_022_01049_w
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x
10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w
10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092
10.1111/bju.13828
10.1089/end.2018.0222
10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x
10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025
10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
10.1159/000507266
10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006
10.1111/bju.14101
10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7
10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005
10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021
– notice: 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
– notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7T5
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Immunology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1433-8726
EndPage 4265
ExternalDocumentID 33999260
10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.GJ
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29R
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3O-
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WH7
WJK
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
ZGI
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
~KM
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PUEGO
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7T5
7XB
8FK
H94
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-56606040b6ece9779a2ef8644e3dccefd368d45ed34619e76f6ac594b7ba90e13
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0724-4983
1433-8726
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 15:02:25 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 16 15:31:37 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:26:32 EST 2025
Wed Oct 01 02:25:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:30 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:48:00 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Vacuum suction ureteroscopy
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy
Clinical efficacy
Upper ureteral calculi
Language English
License 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-56606040b6ece9779a2ef8644e3dccefd368d45ed34619e76f6ac594b7ba90e13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMID 33999260
PQID 2593747289
PQPubID 36817
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2528431921
proquest_journals_2593747289
pubmed_primary_33999260
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5
springer_journals_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20211100
2021-11-00
2021-Nov
20211101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2021
  text: 20211100
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Berlin
PublicationTitle World journal of urology
PublicationTitleAbbrev World J Urol
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Urol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Kallidonis, Ntasiotis, Knoll, Sarica, Papatsoris, Somani, Greco, Aboumarzouk, Álvarez-Maestro, Sanguedolce (CR8) 2017; 3
Deng, Liu, Duan, Cai, Zhao, Zhu, Fan, Wu, Zeng (CR10) 2018; 122
Elsheemy, Maher, Mursi, Shouman, Shoukry, Morsi, Meshref (CR11) 2014; 32
Rodríguez, Sacco (CR13) 2015; 22
Wu, LiuT, Wang, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang (CR5) 2020
Deng, Chen, Liu, Laguna, de la Rosette, Duan, Wenqi, Zeng (CR6) 2019; 37
Lu, Chen, Wang, Song, Zhang, Liu, Zeng, Wang, Zhang, Gu (CR4) 2020; 38
Wollin, Preminger (CR7) 2018; 46
Preminger, Tiselius, Assimos, Alken, Buck, Gallucci, Knoll, Lingeman, Nakada, Pearle, Sarica, Türk, Wolf (CR2) 2007; 52
Chen, Liao, Feng, Ye, Zeng, Wang, Shi (CR12) 2018; 32
Jung, Nørby, Frimodt-Møller, Osther (CR16) 2008; 54
Zeng, Mai, Xia, Wang, Keqin, Wang, Long, Ma, Li, Wan, Wu, Liu, Cui, Zhao, Qin, Zeng, Liu, Duan, Mai, Yang, Kong, Zhang, Cai, Shao, Yue, Li, Ding, Tang, Ye (CR1) 2017; 120
Hyams, Monga, Pearle, Antonelli, Semins, Assimos, Lingeman, Pais, Preminger, Lipkin, Eisner, Shah, Sur, Mufarrij, Matlaga (CR3) 2015; 193
Lai, Jiao, Diao, Seery, Hu, Wang, Hou, Wang, Zhang, Liu (CR9) 2020
Liang, Liang, Yu, Huang, Chen, Wang, Zhu, Liang (CR14) 2020; 20
Jakobsen, Jung, Gramsbergen, Osther, Walter (CR15) 2010; 105
MS Elsheemy (3722_CR11) 2014; 32
P Lu (3722_CR4) 2020; 38
D Rodríguez (3722_CR13) 2015; 22
JS Jakobsen (3722_CR15) 2010; 105
T Deng (3722_CR6) 2019; 37
T Deng (3722_CR10) 2018; 122
ES Hyams (3722_CR3) 2015; 193
H Liang (3722_CR14) 2020; 20
G Zeng (3722_CR1) 2017; 120
Y Chen (3722_CR12) 2018; 32
Z Wu (3722_CR5) 2020
H Jung (3722_CR16) 2008; 54
GM Preminger (3722_CR2) 2007; 52
DA Wollin (3722_CR7) 2018; 46
P Kallidonis (3722_CR8) 2017; 3
S Lai (3722_CR9) 2020
References_xml – volume: 46
  start-page: 87
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 97
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them
  publication-title: Urolithiasis
  doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 481
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  end-page: 487
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy using 365 μm holmium laser for nephrolithiasis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w
– volume: 32
  start-page: 985
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 990
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in children: predictive factors for complications and success
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1404
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1413
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Endoluminal isoproterenol irrigation decreases renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureterorenoscopy: a clinical randomized, controlled study
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092
– volume: 120
  start-page: 109
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 116
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.13828
– volume: 32
  start-page: 923
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  end-page: 927
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Comparison of safety and efficacy in preventing postoperative infectious complications of a 14/16F ureteral access sheath with a 12/14F ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy
  publication-title: J Endourol
  doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0222
– volume: 193
  start-page: 165
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 169
  ident: CR3
  article-title: A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002
– volume: 105
  start-page: 121
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 124
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Endoluminal isoproterenol reduces renal pelvic pressure during semirigid ureterorenoscopy: a porcine model
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x
– year: 2020
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1610
  issue: 6
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1631
  ident: CR2
  article-title: 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
– year: 2020
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Negative-pressure ureteroscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones
  publication-title: Urol Int
  doi: 10.1159/000507266
– volume: 3
  start-page: 554
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 566
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Minimally invasive surgical ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteric stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006
– volume: 122
  start-page: 29
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 39
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14101
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1687
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1701
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7
– volume: 22
  start-page: 266
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  end-page: 272
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease
  publication-title: Adv Chronic Kidney Dis
  doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Thermal effect of holmium laser during ureteroscopic lithotripsy
  publication-title: BMC Urol
  doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w
– volume: 3
  start-page: 554
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 3722_CR8
  publication-title: Eur Urol Focus
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006
– year: 2020
  ident: 3722_CR5
  publication-title: Urol Int
  doi: 10.1159/000507266
– volume: 22
  start-page: 266
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 3722_CR13
  publication-title: Adv Chronic Kidney Dis
  doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005
– year: 2020
  ident: 3722_CR9
  publication-title: Int J Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025
– volume: 122
  start-page: 29
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3722_CR10
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14101
– volume: 120
  start-page: 109
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3722_CR1
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/bju.13828
– volume: 32
  start-page: 985
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 3722_CR11
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1687
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 3722_CR6
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7
– volume: 193
  start-page: 165
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 3722_CR3
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002
– volume: 20
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 3722_CR14
  publication-title: BMC Urol
  doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w
– volume: 32
  start-page: 923
  issue: 10
  year: 2018
  ident: 3722_CR12
  publication-title: J Endourol
  doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0222
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1404
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  ident: 3722_CR16
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092
– volume: 52
  start-page: 1610
  issue: 6
  year: 2007
  ident: 3722_CR2
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039
– volume: 46
  start-page: 87
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3722_CR7
  publication-title: Urolithiasis
  doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x
– volume: 105
  start-page: 121
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 3722_CR15
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 481
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 3722_CR4
  publication-title: World J Urol
  doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w
SSID ssj0017605
Score 2.4069605
Snippet Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it...
To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with...
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 4261
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Calcification (ectopic)
Complications
Female
Humans
Lithotripsy
Lithotripsy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Oncology
Original Article
Patients
Postoperative
Suction - methods
Suctioning
Treatment Outcome
Ureteral Calculi - pathology
Ureteral Calculi - surgery
Ureteroscopes
Ureteroscopy
Urology
Vacuum
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  dbid: AGYKE
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwEB7BIiEuPFsIL7kSNxpE1k6cHBHiIRA9dSU4RYkzUVfdJqvdBAl-PTOJk4pHK3GOPXbssecbzcxngCOd-kiWTbtkekKX7HHqJiYiXY6UlsbLc90893b3I7geqZt7_94Whc27bPcuJNnc1H2xG1OpcDUxpwBpdqEWYclnB2UAS2dXD7cXffRA23pIPVSuikJpi2U-lvLaIL1Dme8ipI3huVyDUTflNt_k90ldpSfm-Q2b42f_aR1WLRIVZ63qbMACFpuwfGdj7VswIw0SXeGkQKaaSMyTKHNRlI84EY-Jqes_Yt7Sz4p6xok1JVe5jI0gcP-rrOhCmj-JcSEIZYo-pZ1F1NMpzmwfkk4jmHoy_gKjy4uf59eufaHBNVL7lUtYkMl3TtMADRKSjJIh5iFBLJSZMZhnMggz5WMmFTlqqIM8SIwfqVSnSXSKnvwKg6IscAeE8jRpBtPRcepgFCbG05nKCI0GmOZB6IDXbVNsLH05v6IxiXvi5WYxY1rMuFnM2HfguO8zbck7_tt6v9v92B7keUzeoSSPi9xSB771n-kIclwlKbCsuQ3ZeMnEcg5st1rTDycJAEbkMzrwvdOAv8L_PZfdzzXfg5UhK1FTI7kPg2pW4wGBpSo9tGfjBc7vCIs
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999260
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2593747289
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2528431921
Volume 39
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1433-8726
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017605
  issn: 0724-4983
  databaseCode: AFBBN
  dateStart: 19970201
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1433-8726
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017605
  issn: 0724-4983
  databaseCode: AGYKE
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1433-8726
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017605
  issn: 0724-4983
  databaseCode: U2A
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fS-NAEB5OBfFF9PyVO5UVfDuDprvJJk_SSntyh0UOC_UpJJsJFmrSaxvB__5m0k1E5HzKQ5JNyDfZ-WZ35huAc536SJ5Nu-R6Qpf8ceomJiJbjpSWxstzXbd7uxsGtyP1a-yP7YLbwqZVNnNiPVFnpeE18kui6ZKoL8UH17O_LneN4t1V20JjDTY8oips1XrcBlyetnWRuqNcFYXSFs3UpXMszMK1yZxQpDkge--YPrDNDzultQMa7MC2ZY6iu4J6F75g8RU27-ze-B7MCXHRFDoKZGmIxLyKMhdF-YJT8ZKYqnoWi5VcrKjmnAhTclXKxAgi40_lkiaQxauYFIJYoWhT0HmIajbDub2HRqcnmGo62YfRoP9wc-vajgqukdpfusTdWCznKg3QIDG_KOlgHhIlQpkZg3kmgzBTPmZSUWCFOsiDxPiRSnWaRFfoyQNYL8oCj0AoTxOSLB_HqX5RmBhPZyoj9hhgmgehA17zOWNj5ca568U0boWSawhigiCuIYh9B36098xWYhufXn3coBTbH28Rv5mJA2ftafpleB8kKbCs-BryyZKF4Bw4XKHbPk4SYYsoxnPgooH7bfD_v8u3z9_lO2x12NTqGsZjWF_OKzwhMrNMT2uLPYWN7qDXG_Lx5-PvPh17_eH9Hzo76nT_AfrG9Gs
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEB4BlUovFS20uEC7SPTUWsTetdc-IIRoUXiEE0i5GXs9ViMFO01iUP4Uv5EZv1CFyo2z96Wd2Z1vvDPfAOzpxEOybNom0xPYZI8TOzYh6XKotDROlumq3Nvg0u9fq7OhN1yChzYXhsMq2zuxuqjTwvA_8n2C6ZKgL_kHh5O_NleN4tfVtoRGrRbnuLgnl212cPqL5PvddU9-Xx337aaqgG2k9uY24RcmjOklPhok9BPGLmYBwQKUqTGYpdIPUuVhKhU5F6j9zI-NF6pEJ3HYQ0fSuMvwRsmeYq5-PewcPEc3eZjaVbYKA9kk6VSpekwEw7nQHMCk2QH81xA-Q7fPXmYrg3eyBu8bpCqOatX6AEuYf4S3g-Ytfh2mpGGiTawUyFQUsVmIIhN5cYdjcRebsrwVs5qeVpRTDrwpOAtmZASB_z_FnC6s2UKMckEoVHQh7zxEOZngtOlDo9MMphyPNuD6Vfb6E6zkRY6bIJSjSXOYro5DC8MgNo5OVUpo1cck8wMLnHY7I9PQm3OVjXHUETNXIohIBFElgsiz4EfXZ1KTe7zYeruVUtQc9Fn0pJYW7Haf6Yjyu0ucY1FyG8IAkonnLPhcS7ebThJADMmntOBnK-6nwf-_li8vr-UbrPavBhfRxenl-Ra8c1ntqvzJbViZT0vcISA1T75W2ivg5rWPyyOpyCwp
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB5RKqFeKugDApS6EpxoBImdODlUFYKuoBTUA0h7C4kzESttk2V3Q7V_rb-uM4kTVKFy4xy_5Bl7volnvgHY1VmAZNm0S6YncskeZ25qYtLlWGlpvKLQTbm3i8vw9Fp9HwbDJfjT5cJwWGV3JzYXdV4Z_kd-QDBdEvQl_-CgsGERP08GXyd3LleQ4pfWrpxGqyLnuPhN7tvsy9kJyXrP9wffro5PXVthwDVSB3OXsAyTxxxmIRokJBSnPhYRQQSUuTFY5DKMchVgLhU5GqjDIkxNEKtMZ2l8iJ6kcV_ASy2V5HAyPeydPU_bnEztK1fFkbQJO03aHpPCcF40BzNpdgb_NYqPkO6jV9rG-A1W4bVFreKoVbM1WMLyDaxc2Hf5tzAlbRNdkqVApqVIzUJUhSirexyL-9TU9S8xa6lqRT3lIJyKM2JGRpAjcFvN6fKaLcSoFIRIRR_-zkPUkwlObR8anWYw9Xj0Dq6fZa_fw3JZlbgBQnmatIip6zjMMI5S4-lc5YRcQ8yKMHLA67YzMZbqnCtujJOepLkRQUIiSBoRJIED-32fSUv08WTr7U5KiT30s-RBRR341H-m48pvMGmJVc1tCA9IJqFzYL2Vbj-dJLAYk3_pwOdO3A-D_38tm0-v5SOs0EFJfpxdnm_BK5-1rkml3Ibl-bTGD4Sp5tlOo7wCbp77tPwFweEwZA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+clinical+efficacy+of+novel+vacuum+suction+ureteroscopic+lithotripsy+in+the+treatment+of+upper+ureteral+calculi&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+urology&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Lv+Wen&rft.au=Xiang%2C+Fei&rft.au=Song%2C+Yan&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4261&rft.epage=4265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00345-021-03722-5&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon