The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. Subjects and methods A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of urology Vol. 39; no. 11; pp. 4261 - 4265 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.11.2021
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0724-4983 1433-8726 1433-8726 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective
To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.
Subjects and methods
A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.
Results
All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%,
P
< 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%,
P
< 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (
P
< 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusion
The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.SUBJECTS AND METHODSA total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).RESULTSAll operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased.CONCLUSIONThe novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased. To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3-5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05). The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased. Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches. Subjects and methods A total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm. Results All operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively ( P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. ( P > 0.05). Conclusion The novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased. ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with traditional rigid and flexible ureteroscopic approaches.Subjects and methodsA total of 160 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were included in this study. 50 patients underwent rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, 54 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and 56 patients underwent vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operative time, length of hospitalization, stone-free rate, the incidence of postoperative complications, and total treatment cost were compared among the three groups. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the stone diameter over and below 1.5 cm.ResultsAll operations were performed successfully, and there were no cases converted to open surgery. Compared with the other 2 groups, the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group had a higher stone-free rate at 3–5 days (90.0% vs. 61.9% vs. 55.6%, P < 0.05) and 1 month (96.4% vs. 77.7% vs. 74.0%, P < 0.05) postoperatively. In subgroup analysis, the stone-free rate of the vacuum suction ureteroscopy group was significantly higher when the stone diameter was > 1.5 cm at 1 month postoperatively (P < 0.05) compared with that in the other 2 groups; however, there were no differences in postoperative complications. (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy has significantly improved the stone-free rate especially in complicated cases, compared with that in rigid and flexible approaches; however, the complication and cost were not increased. |
Author | Fei, Xiang Song, Yan Zhang, Lv Wen |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lv Wen surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Lv Wen organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiang surname: Fei fullname: Fei, Xiang organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University – sequence: 3 givenname: Yan surname: Song fullname: Song, Yan email: Alexander-song@163.com organization: Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital, China Medical University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kT1vFDEQhi2UiFwCf4ACWaJJs8Trz3WJIkKQItGEeuXzzhJHXnvxR6T79_i4I0gpUk3zPO-M5j1HJyEGQOhDTz73hKirTAjjoiO07whTlHbiDdr0nLFuUFSeoA1RlHdcD-wMnef8SEivJBFv0RljWmsqyQal-wfA1rvgrPEY5rlNu8NxxiE-gcdPxta64FxtcTHgmqBAitnG1VnsXXmIJbk177ALuLSoksCUBULZR9R1hXR0WnrbYKt379DpbHyG98d5gX7efL2_vu3ufnz7fv3lrrNMidIJKYkknGwlWNBKaUNhHiTnwCZrYZ6YHCYuYGJc9hqUnKWxQvOt2hpNoGcX6PKQu6b4u0Iu4-KyBe9NgFjzSAUdOOs13aOfXqCPsabQrmuUZoorOuhGfTxSdbvANK7JLSbtxn_fbAA9ALa9KCeYn5GejPvKxkNlY6ts_FvZKJo0vJCsK2b_7ZKM86-r7KDmtif8gvT_7FesP_enq8g |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000002202 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_022_01401_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_bco2_408 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_5741437 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_1340192 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11144155 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuroe_2023_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_023_04556_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acuro_2023_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0669 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_024_04280_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2022_06_179 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_022_01049_w |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x 10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w 10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092 10.1111/bju.13828 10.1089/end.2018.0222 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039 10.1159/000507266 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006 10.1111/bju.14101 10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 – notice: 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Immunology Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1433-8726 |
EndPage | 4265 |
ExternalDocumentID | 33999260 10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29R 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WJK WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z8W Z91 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX ~KM AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PUEGO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7T5 7XB 8FK H94 K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-56606040b6ece9779a2ef8644e3dccefd368d45ed34619e76f6ac594b7ba90e13 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 15:02:25 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 16 15:31:37 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:26:32 EST 2025 Wed Oct 01 02:25:28 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:30 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:48:00 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 11 |
Keywords | Vacuum suction ureteroscopy Ureteroscopic lithotripsy Clinical efficacy Upper ureteral calculi |
Language | English |
License | 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-56606040b6ece9779a2ef8644e3dccefd368d45ed34619e76f6ac594b7ba90e13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 33999260 |
PQID | 2593747289 |
PQPubID | 36817 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2528431921 proquest_journals_2593747289 pubmed_primary_33999260 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5 springer_journals_10_1007_s00345_021_03722_5 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20211100 2021-11-00 2021-Nov 20211101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2021 text: 20211100 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Berlin |
PublicationTitle | World journal of urology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | World J Urol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World J Urol |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Kallidonis, Ntasiotis, Knoll, Sarica, Papatsoris, Somani, Greco, Aboumarzouk, Álvarez-Maestro, Sanguedolce (CR8) 2017; 3 Deng, Liu, Duan, Cai, Zhao, Zhu, Fan, Wu, Zeng (CR10) 2018; 122 Elsheemy, Maher, Mursi, Shouman, Shoukry, Morsi, Meshref (CR11) 2014; 32 Rodríguez, Sacco (CR13) 2015; 22 Wu, LiuT, Wang, Zheng, Zhang, Zhang (CR5) 2020 Deng, Chen, Liu, Laguna, de la Rosette, Duan, Wenqi, Zeng (CR6) 2019; 37 Lu, Chen, Wang, Song, Zhang, Liu, Zeng, Wang, Zhang, Gu (CR4) 2020; 38 Wollin, Preminger (CR7) 2018; 46 Preminger, Tiselius, Assimos, Alken, Buck, Gallucci, Knoll, Lingeman, Nakada, Pearle, Sarica, Türk, Wolf (CR2) 2007; 52 Chen, Liao, Feng, Ye, Zeng, Wang, Shi (CR12) 2018; 32 Jung, Nørby, Frimodt-Møller, Osther (CR16) 2008; 54 Zeng, Mai, Xia, Wang, Keqin, Wang, Long, Ma, Li, Wan, Wu, Liu, Cui, Zhao, Qin, Zeng, Liu, Duan, Mai, Yang, Kong, Zhang, Cai, Shao, Yue, Li, Ding, Tang, Ye (CR1) 2017; 120 Hyams, Monga, Pearle, Antonelli, Semins, Assimos, Lingeman, Pais, Preminger, Lipkin, Eisner, Shah, Sur, Mufarrij, Matlaga (CR3) 2015; 193 Lai, Jiao, Diao, Seery, Hu, Wang, Hou, Wang, Zhang, Liu (CR9) 2020 Liang, Liang, Yu, Huang, Chen, Wang, Zhu, Liang (CR14) 2020; 20 Jakobsen, Jung, Gramsbergen, Osther, Walter (CR15) 2010; 105 MS Elsheemy (3722_CR11) 2014; 32 P Lu (3722_CR4) 2020; 38 D Rodríguez (3722_CR13) 2015; 22 JS Jakobsen (3722_CR15) 2010; 105 T Deng (3722_CR6) 2019; 37 T Deng (3722_CR10) 2018; 122 ES Hyams (3722_CR3) 2015; 193 H Liang (3722_CR14) 2020; 20 G Zeng (3722_CR1) 2017; 120 Y Chen (3722_CR12) 2018; 32 Z Wu (3722_CR5) 2020 H Jung (3722_CR16) 2008; 54 GM Preminger (3722_CR2) 2007; 52 DA Wollin (3722_CR7) 2018; 46 P Kallidonis (3722_CR8) 2017; 3 S Lai (3722_CR9) 2020 |
References_xml | – volume: 46 start-page: 87 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 97 ident: CR7 article-title: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them publication-title: Urolithiasis doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x – volume: 38 start-page: 481 issue: 2 year: 2020 end-page: 487 ident: CR4 article-title: Clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy using 365 μm holmium laser for nephrolithiasis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w – volume: 32 start-page: 985 issue: 4 year: 2014 end-page: 990 ident: CR11 article-title: Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in children: predictive factors for complications and success publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x – volume: 54 start-page: 1404 issue: 6 year: 2008 end-page: 1413 ident: CR16 article-title: Endoluminal isoproterenol irrigation decreases renal pelvic pressure during flexible ureterorenoscopy: a clinical randomized, controlled study publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092 – volume: 120 start-page: 109 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 116 ident: CR1 article-title: Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.13828 – volume: 32 start-page: 923 issue: 10 year: 2018 end-page: 927 ident: CR12 article-title: Comparison of safety and efficacy in preventing postoperative infectious complications of a 14/16F ureteral access sheath with a 12/14F ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0222 – volume: 193 start-page: 165 issue: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 169 ident: CR3 article-title: A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002 – volume: 105 start-page: 121 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 124 ident: CR15 article-title: Endoluminal isoproterenol reduces renal pelvic pressure during semirigid ureterorenoscopy: a porcine model publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x – year: 2020 ident: CR9 article-title: Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025 – volume: 52 start-page: 1610 issue: 6 year: 2007 end-page: 1631 ident: CR2 article-title: 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039 – year: 2020 ident: CR5 article-title: Negative-pressure ureteroscopic holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones publication-title: Urol Int doi: 10.1159/000507266 – volume: 3 start-page: 554 issue: 6 year: 2017 end-page: 566 ident: CR8 article-title: Minimally invasive surgical ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteric stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature publication-title: Eur Urol Focus doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006 – volume: 122 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 39 ident: CR10 article-title: Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.14101 – volume: 37 start-page: 1687 issue: 8 year: 2019 end-page: 1701 ident: CR6 article-title: Systematic review and cumulative analysis of the managements for proximal impacted ureteral stones publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7 – volume: 22 start-page: 266 issue: 4 year: 2015 end-page: 272 ident: CR13 article-title: Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease publication-title: Adv Chronic Kidney Dis doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005 – volume: 20 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: CR14 article-title: Thermal effect of holmium laser during ureteroscopic lithotripsy publication-title: BMC Urol doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w – volume: 3 start-page: 554 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 3722_CR8 publication-title: Eur Urol Focus doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.006 – year: 2020 ident: 3722_CR5 publication-title: Urol Int doi: 10.1159/000507266 – volume: 22 start-page: 266 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 3722_CR13 publication-title: Adv Chronic Kidney Dis doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005 – year: 2020 ident: 3722_CR9 publication-title: Int J Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025 – volume: 122 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 3722_CR10 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.14101 – volume: 120 start-page: 109 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3722_CR1 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.13828 – volume: 32 start-page: 985 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 3722_CR11 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1152-x – volume: 37 start-page: 1687 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 3722_CR6 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2561-7 – volume: 193 start-page: 165 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 3722_CR3 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.002 – volume: 20 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3722_CR14 publication-title: BMC Urol doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00639-w – volume: 32 start-page: 923 issue: 10 year: 2018 ident: 3722_CR12 publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0222 – volume: 54 start-page: 1404 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 3722_CR16 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.092 – volume: 52 start-page: 1610 issue: 6 year: 2007 ident: 3722_CR2 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039 – volume: 46 start-page: 87 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 3722_CR7 publication-title: Urolithiasis doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x – volume: 105 start-page: 121 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 3722_CR15 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08678.x – volume: 38 start-page: 481 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 3722_CR4 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02776-w |
SSID | ssj0017605 |
Score | 2.4069605 |
Snippet | Objective
To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it... To investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it with... ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of a novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic approach in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi and to compare it... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 4261 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Calcification (ectopic) Complications Female Humans Lithotripsy Lithotripsy - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nephrology Oncology Original Article Patients Postoperative Suction - methods Suctioning Treatment Outcome Ureteral Calculi - pathology Ureteral Calculi - surgery Ureteroscopes Ureteroscopy Urology Vacuum |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium dbid: AGYKE link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LT9wwEB7BIiEuPFsIL7kSNxpE1k6cHBHiIRA9dSU4RYkzUVfdJqvdBAl-PTOJk4pHK3GOPXbssecbzcxngCOd-kiWTbtkekKX7HHqJiYiXY6UlsbLc90893b3I7geqZt7_94Whc27bPcuJNnc1H2xG1OpcDUxpwBpdqEWYclnB2UAS2dXD7cXffRA23pIPVSuikJpi2U-lvLaIL1Dme8ipI3huVyDUTflNt_k90ldpSfm-Q2b42f_aR1WLRIVZ63qbMACFpuwfGdj7VswIw0SXeGkQKaaSMyTKHNRlI84EY-Jqes_Yt7Sz4p6xok1JVe5jI0gcP-rrOhCmj-JcSEIZYo-pZ1F1NMpzmwfkk4jmHoy_gKjy4uf59eufaHBNVL7lUtYkMl3TtMADRKSjJIh5iFBLJSZMZhnMggz5WMmFTlqqIM8SIwfqVSnSXSKnvwKg6IscAeE8jRpBtPRcepgFCbG05nKCI0GmOZB6IDXbVNsLH05v6IxiXvi5WYxY1rMuFnM2HfguO8zbck7_tt6v9v92B7keUzeoSSPi9xSB771n-kIclwlKbCsuQ3ZeMnEcg5st1rTDycJAEbkMzrwvdOAv8L_PZfdzzXfg5UhK1FTI7kPg2pW4wGBpSo9tGfjBc7vCIs priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | The clinical efficacy of novel vacuum suction ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00345-021-03722-5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33999260 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2593747289 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2528431921 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1433-8726 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017605 issn: 0724-4983 databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium customDbUrl: eissn: 1433-8726 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017605 issn: 0724-4983 databaseCode: AGYKE dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1433-8726 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0017605 issn: 0724-4983 databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fS-NAEB5OBfFF9PyVO5UVfDuDprvJJk_SSntyh0UOC_UpJJsJFmrSaxvB__5m0k1E5HzKQ5JNyDfZ-WZ35huAc536SJ5Nu-R6Qpf8ceomJiJbjpSWxstzXbd7uxsGtyP1a-yP7YLbwqZVNnNiPVFnpeE18kui6ZKoL8UH17O_LneN4t1V20JjDTY8oips1XrcBlyetnWRuqNcFYXSFs3UpXMszMK1yZxQpDkge--YPrDNDzultQMa7MC2ZY6iu4J6F75g8RU27-ze-B7MCXHRFDoKZGmIxLyKMhdF-YJT8ZKYqnoWi5VcrKjmnAhTclXKxAgi40_lkiaQxauYFIJYoWhT0HmIajbDub2HRqcnmGo62YfRoP9wc-vajgqukdpfusTdWCznKg3QIDG_KOlgHhIlQpkZg3kmgzBTPmZSUWCFOsiDxPiRSnWaRFfoyQNYL8oCj0AoTxOSLB_HqX5RmBhPZyoj9hhgmgehA17zOWNj5ca568U0boWSawhigiCuIYh9B36098xWYhufXn3coBTbH28Rv5mJA2ftafpleB8kKbCs-BryyZKF4Bw4XKHbPk4SYYsoxnPgooH7bfD_v8u3z9_lO2x12NTqGsZjWF_OKzwhMrNMT2uLPYWN7qDXG_Lx5-PvPh17_eH9Hzo76nT_AfrG9Gs |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9tAEB4BlUovFS20uEC7SPTUWsTetdc-IIRoUXiEE0i5GXs9ViMFO01iUP4Uv5EZv1CFyo2z96Wd2Z1vvDPfAOzpxEOybNom0xPYZI8TOzYh6XKotDROlumq3Nvg0u9fq7OhN1yChzYXhsMq2zuxuqjTwvA_8n2C6ZKgL_kHh5O_NleN4tfVtoRGrRbnuLgnl212cPqL5PvddU9-Xx337aaqgG2k9uY24RcmjOklPhok9BPGLmYBwQKUqTGYpdIPUuVhKhU5F6j9zI-NF6pEJ3HYQ0fSuMvwRsmeYq5-PewcPEc3eZjaVbYKA9kk6VSpekwEw7nQHMCk2QH81xA-Q7fPXmYrg3eyBu8bpCqOatX6AEuYf4S3g-Ytfh2mpGGiTawUyFQUsVmIIhN5cYdjcRebsrwVs5qeVpRTDrwpOAtmZASB_z_FnC6s2UKMckEoVHQh7zxEOZngtOlDo9MMphyPNuD6Vfb6E6zkRY6bIJSjSXOYro5DC8MgNo5OVUpo1cck8wMLnHY7I9PQm3OVjXHUETNXIohIBFElgsiz4EfXZ1KTe7zYeruVUtQc9Fn0pJYW7Haf6Yjyu0ucY1FyG8IAkonnLPhcS7ebThJADMmntOBnK-6nwf-_li8vr-UbrPavBhfRxenl-Ra8c1ntqvzJbViZT0vcISA1T75W2ivg5rWPyyOpyCwp |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB5RKqFeKugDApS6EpxoBImdODlUFYKuoBTUA0h7C4kzESttk2V3Q7V_rb-uM4kTVKFy4xy_5Bl7volnvgHY1VmAZNm0S6YncskeZ25qYtLlWGlpvKLQTbm3i8vw9Fp9HwbDJfjT5cJwWGV3JzYXdV4Z_kd-QDBdEvQl_-CgsGERP08GXyd3LleQ4pfWrpxGqyLnuPhN7tvsy9kJyXrP9wffro5PXVthwDVSB3OXsAyTxxxmIRokJBSnPhYRQQSUuTFY5DKMchVgLhU5GqjDIkxNEKtMZ2l8iJ6kcV_ASy2V5HAyPeydPU_bnEztK1fFkbQJO03aHpPCcF40BzNpdgb_NYqPkO6jV9rG-A1W4bVFreKoVbM1WMLyDaxc2Hf5tzAlbRNdkqVApqVIzUJUhSirexyL-9TU9S8xa6lqRT3lIJyKM2JGRpAjcFvN6fKaLcSoFIRIRR_-zkPUkwlObR8anWYw9Xj0Dq6fZa_fw3JZlbgBQnmatIip6zjMMI5S4-lc5YRcQ8yKMHLA67YzMZbqnCtujJOepLkRQUIiSBoRJIED-32fSUv08WTr7U5KiT30s-RBRR341H-m48pvMGmJVc1tCA9IJqFzYL2Vbj-dJLAYk3_pwOdO3A-D_38tm0-v5SOs0EFJfpxdnm_BK5-1rkml3Ibl-bTGD4Sp5tlOo7wCbp77tPwFweEwZA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+clinical+efficacy+of+novel+vacuum+suction+ureteroscopic+lithotripsy+in+the+treatment+of+upper+ureteral+calculi&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+urology&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Lv+Wen&rft.au=Xiang%2C+Fei&rft.au=Song%2C+Yan&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4261&rft.epage=4265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00345-021-03722-5&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0724-4983&client=summon |