Ex-PRESS implantation with phacoemulsification in POAG versus CPACG
AIM: To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG).METHODS: Retrospective, co...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of ophthalmology Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 51 - 55 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
China
International Journal of Ophthalmology Press
18.01.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2222-3959 2227-4898 |
DOI | 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.08 |
Cover
Abstract | AIM: To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG).METHODS: Retrospective, comparative study. A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) receiving the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implantation combined with phacoemulsification were reviewed. Thirty eyes (30 patients) had the combined procedures for POAG, and the other 30 eyes (30 patients) for CPACG. RESULTS: The follow-up was 39.37±7.09mo (range 3 to 49mo) in patients with POAG and 37.10±9.26mo (range 9 to 49mo) in patients with CPACG (P=0.29). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity was 0.41 logMAR for POAG and 0.38 logMAR for CPACG at the last follow-up (P=0.22). The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of the POAG group was significantly lower than the CPACG group at 1, 3, 12, and 18mo after surgery (P=0.02, 0.00, 0.04, 0.01) with similar glaucoma medications after surgery (P〉0.16). At 3y after surgery, the cumulative complete and qualified success rates were 63.3% (POAG) and 53.3% (CPACG), 83.3% (POAG) and 73.3% (CPACG) (P=0.41, 0.49), respectively. The POAG group had more hypotony than the CPACG group (P=0.04).CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes show the Ex-PRESS implantation combined with phacoemulcification can effectively lower the IOP in both the POAG and CPACG groups. The POAG group seems to have lower postoperative IOP and a higher risk of hypotony. |
---|---|
AbstractList | AIMTo compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG).METHODSRetrospective, comparative study. A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) receiving the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implantation combined with phacoemulsification were reviewed. Thirty eyes (30 patients) had the combined procedures for POAG, and the other 30 eyes (30 patients) for CPACG.RESULTSThe follow-up was 39.37±7.09mo (range 3 to 49mo) in patients with POAG and 37.10±9.26mo (range 9 to 49mo) in patients with CPACG (P=0.29). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity was 0.41 logMAR for POAG and 0.38 logMAR for CPACG at the last follow-up (P=0.22). The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of the POAG group was significantly lower than the CPACG group at 1, 3, 12, and 18mo after surgery (P=0.02, 0.00, 0.04, 0.01) with similar glaucoma medications after surgery (P>0.16). At 3y after surgery, the cumulative complete and qualified success rates were 63.3% (POAG) and 53.3% (CPACG), 83.3% (POAG) and 73.3% (CPACG) (P=0.41, 0.49), respectively. The POAG group had more hypotony than the CPACG group (P=0.04).CONCLUSIONThe long-term outcomes show the Ex-PRESS implantation combined with phacoemulcification can effectively lower the IOP in both the POAG and CPACG groups. The POAG group seems to have lower postoperative IOP and a higher risk of hypotony. To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG). Retrospective, comparative study. A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) receiving the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implantation combined with phacoemulsification were reviewed. Thirty eyes (30 patients) had the combined procedures for POAG, and the other 30 eyes (30 patients) for CPACG. The follow-up was 39.37±7.09mo (range 3 to 49mo) in patients with POAG and 37.10±9.26mo (range 9 to 49mo) in patients with CPACG ( =0.29). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity was 0.41 logMAR for POAG and 0.38 logMAR for CPACG at the last follow-up ( =0.22). The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of the POAG group was significantly lower than the CPACG group at 1, 3, 12, and 18mo after surgery ( =0.02, 0.00, 0.04, 0.01) with similar glaucoma medications after surgery ( >0.16). At 3y after surgery, the cumulative complete and qualified success rates were 63.3% (POAG) and 53.3% (CPACG), 83.3% (POAG) and 73.3% (CPACG) ( =0.41, 0.49), respectively. The POAG group had more hypotony than the CPACG group ( =0.04). The long-term outcomes show the Ex-PRESS implantation combined with phacoemulcification can effectively lower the IOP in both the POAG and CPACG groups. The POAG group seems to have lower postoperative IOP and a higher risk of hypotony. AIM: To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG).METHODS: Retrospective, comparative study. A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) receiving the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implantation combined with phacoemulsification were reviewed. Thirty eyes (30 patients) had the combined procedures for POAG, and the other 30 eyes (30 patients) for CPACG. RESULTS: The follow-up was 39.37±7.09mo (range 3 to 49mo) in patients with POAG and 37.10±9.26mo (range 9 to 49mo) in patients with CPACG (P=0.29). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity was 0.41 logMAR for POAG and 0.38 logMAR for CPACG at the last follow-up (P=0.22). The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of the POAG group was significantly lower than the CPACG group at 1, 3, 12, and 18mo after surgery (P=0.02, 0.00, 0.04, 0.01) with similar glaucoma medications after surgery (P〉0.16). At 3y after surgery, the cumulative complete and qualified success rates were 63.3% (POAG) and 53.3% (CPACG), 83.3% (POAG) and 73.3% (CPACG) (P=0.41, 0.49), respectively. The POAG group had more hypotony than the CPACG group (P=0.04).CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes show the Ex-PRESS implantation combined with phacoemulcification can effectively lower the IOP in both the POAG and CPACG groups. The POAG group seems to have lower postoperative IOP and a higher risk of hypotony. |
Author | Jie Lan Da-Peng Sun Jie Wu Ya-Ni Wang Li-Xin Xie |
AuthorAffiliation | Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, ShandongProvince, China Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, ShandongAcademy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, ShandongProvince, China |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China – name: 2 Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jie surname: Lan fullname: Lan, Jie organization: Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China; Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Da-Peng surname: Sun fullname: Sun, Da-Peng organization: Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Jie surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Jie organization: Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Ya-Ni surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Ya-Ni organization: Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Li-Xin surname: Xie fullname: Xie, Li-Xin organization: Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpVUU1Lw0AQXUSxWj17k-DJS-p-7_YilFCrIFisnpdNsmlXkt02m1T996YfFp3LDLw37zHzzsGx884AcIXgAElM4Z398AMMkRhANIDyCJxhjEVM5VAeb2cckyEb9sBlCB-wK84ggvQU9LBEdCgEPwPJ-Cuevo5ns8hWy1K7RjfWu-jTNotoudCZN1VbBlvYbAdYF01fRpNoberQhiiZjpLJBTgpdBnM5b73wfvD-C15jJ9fJk_J6DnOiKBNTLEWSEIj8hxyU0jGiwzRQkuU5gQKLDNJKJcE6pRoxLimqSgMToXORZoyTvrgfqe7bNPK5JlxTa1Ltaxtpetv5bVV_xFnF2ru14phzAiVncDtXqD2q9aERlU2ZKbs7ja-DQpJzhgRBNGOev3X62Dy-7mOcLcjZLUPoTbFgYKg2sajunjUJh4FkYIb95v9xsK7-cq6-WGFi86SCc7JD79yjW0 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | International Journal of Ophthalmology Press 2017 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: International Journal of Ophthalmology Press 2017 |
DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.08 |
DatabaseName | 维普_期刊 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 维普中文期刊数据库 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Ex-PRESS implantation with phacoemulsification in POAG versus CPACG |
EISSN | 2227-4898 |
EndPage | 55 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5225348 28149776 10_18240_ijo_2017_01_08 671435766 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | -SE -S~ 2RA 53G 5VR 5VS 92L ABKZE AENEX AFUIB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CAJEE CAJUS CCEZO CHBEP CIEJG CQIGP DIK FA0 GROUPED_DOAJ HYE IPNFZ Q-- Q-4 RIG RNS RPM U1G U5O W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-42a7180e7dd06ef856fc14fa81bd30728c8346830ab3a156a4b7fe2b7ad7bb563 |
ISSN | 2222-3959 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:09:17 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 22:41:35 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:29:58 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:14:56 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:05:17 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device cataract surgery glaucoma phacoemulsification |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c374t-42a7180e7dd06ef856fc14fa81bd30728c8346830ab3a156a4b7fe2b7ad7bb563 |
Notes | glaucoma; Ex-PRESS miniature glaucomadevice; cataract surgery; phacoemulsification AIM: To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG).METHODS: Retrospective, comparative study. A total of 60 eyes (60 patients) receiving the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implantation combined with phacoemulsification were reviewed. Thirty eyes (30 patients) had the combined procedures for POAG, and the other 30 eyes (30 patients) for CPACG. RESULTS: The follow-up was 39.37±7.09mo (range 3 to 49mo) in patients with POAG and 37.10±9.26mo (range 9 to 49mo) in patients with CPACG (P=0.29). The mean change in best corrected visual acuity was 0.41 logMAR for POAG and 0.38 logMAR for CPACG at the last follow-up (P=0.22). The postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of the POAG group was significantly lower than the CPACG group at 1, 3, 12, and 18mo after surgery (P=0.02, 0.00, 0.04, 0.01) with similar glaucoma medications after surgery (P〉0.16). At 3y after surgery, the cumulative complete and qualified success rates were 63.3% (POAG) and 53.3% (CPACG), 83.3% (POAG) and 73.3% (CPACG) (P=0.41, 0.49), respectively. The POAG group had more hypotony than the CPACG group (P=0.04).CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes show the Ex-PRESS implantation combined with phacoemulcification can effectively lower the IOP in both the POAG and CPACG groups. The POAG group seems to have lower postoperative IOP and a higher risk of hypotony. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://www.ijo.cn/create_pdf.aspx?file_no=20170108&flag=1&journal_id=gjyken |
PMID | 28149776 |
PQID | 1865537314 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5225348 proquest_miscellaneous_1865537314 pubmed_primary_28149776 crossref_primary_10_18240_ijo_2017_01_08 chongqing_primary_671435766 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-01-18 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-01-18 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2017 text: 2017-01-18 day: 18 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | China |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: China |
PublicationTitle | International journal of ophthalmology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | International Journal of Ophthalmology |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | International Journal of Ophthalmology Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: International Journal of Ophthalmology Press |
References | 17061230 - Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):753-5 24232313 - Eye (Lond). 2014 Jan;28(1):1-8 24465860 - PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86045 15741808 - J Glaucoma. 2005 Apr;14(2):98-102 16488940 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7 24767229 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;49(2):200-4 23617934 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;91(6):e500-1 19668548 - Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:81-7 22196977 - Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):694-702 19223790 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Aug;18(6):488-91 23741296 - PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e63591 16462873 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;41(1):51-9 23990272 - Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;57(6):520-8 22274666 - J Glaucoma. 2013 Mar;22(3):209-14 20051881 - J Glaucoma. 2011 Jan;20(1):57-62 16086969 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):340-1 23912181 - Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;57(6):514-9 17964403 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;33(11):1946-52 22895522 - J Glaucoma. 2014 Feb;23(2):88-94 24810572 - Eye (Lond). 2014 Aug;28(8):1034 16647135 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):930-6 17224744 - J Glaucoma. 2007 Jan;16(1):14-9 20623471 - Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):12-9 |
References_xml | – reference: 19668548 - Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:81-7 – reference: 24810572 - Eye (Lond). 2014 Aug;28(8):1034 – reference: 20623471 - Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):12-9 – reference: 20051881 - J Glaucoma. 2011 Jan;20(1):57-62 – reference: 15741808 - J Glaucoma. 2005 Apr;14(2):98-102 – reference: 24767229 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;49(2):200-4 – reference: 23617934 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;91(6):e500-1 – reference: 22895522 - J Glaucoma. 2014 Feb;23(2):88-94 – reference: 23990272 - Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;57(6):520-8 – reference: 19223790 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Aug;18(6):488-91 – reference: 17964403 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;33(11):1946-52 – reference: 17061230 - Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep-Oct;16(5):753-5 – reference: 23912181 - Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;57(6):514-9 – reference: 24465860 - PLoS One. 2014 Jan 23;9(1):e86045 – reference: 17224744 - J Glaucoma. 2007 Jan;16(1):14-9 – reference: 23741296 - PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e63591 – reference: 22196977 - Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):694-702 – reference: 16086969 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):340-1 – reference: 16462873 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;41(1):51-9 – reference: 16647135 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):930-6 – reference: 16488940 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7 – reference: 22274666 - J Glaucoma. 2013 Mar;22(3):209-14 – reference: 24232313 - Eye (Lond). 2014 Jan;28(1):1-8 |
SSID | ssj0000650104 |
Score | 2.0628545 |
Snippet | AIM: To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with... To compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with... AIMTo compare the long-term outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap in combination of phacoemulsification with... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref chongqing |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 51 |
SubjectTerms | Clinical Research |
Title | Ex-PRESS implantation with phacoemulsification in POAG versus CPACG |
URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/60944X/201701/671435766.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28149776 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1865537314 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5225348 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBAviDvdAAWJB6TJkIsdu49VNTZNdKvEJsZTZCcOLWrTjjYS4q_wZzkndkLS7gH2ElWOm7j-Pp9bj48JeQs62EShzKgEulAm05RKHhsacKFAGw1UwHGD8_gsPrlkp1f8qtf73cpaKjf6ffrrxn0lt0EV2gBX3CX7H8g2D4UG-Az4whUQhus_YXz0k1YziHsd56pwiYNVaHU1BVFnFuV8jblAqk5pnJwPjw8xE6NcH44mw9Fx2zjtRgdbNSWWq-lmquaLTgj-kw2dns4aanwurQhTdGKcQkRxX251--JC1F8VPZu1ow4BpqdSJygrT3QnXOkGdN4eUCeNBCQa2CIhjQauBLip2wRwxB5F3Yhkf4d6Vr664rRWU9v6vjs6QIKRAsjNvuPezkBUVVlluyeAuFpUlAglOIhCbNXirrT7ZDwC05RHTN4hd0MBhlnLX7dqnqMvi4cX1j_LlY7CAXzovh5rTrt3YRGP6bL4dg2mSdcY2vFwthN1W5bPxUPywE27N7T8e0R6pnhM7o1dUsYTMqpp6LVp6CENvRto6M0KD2noWRp6FQ2fksuPRxejE-rO5qBpJNiGslCBVeMbkWV-bHJY33kasFyBF5SB2ghlKiMWy8hXOoL1HiumRW5CLVQmtOZx9IzsFcvCvCBexkMm_VBnnBk20FynvlKZTkMF_XTO--SgmbBkZWuwJLFAQx9g6ZN39RQ2N9GxRRASACFBEBI_SHzZJ2_qKU5AiOI_Y6owy3INvWPOIxEFrE-e2ylvHlbj1ieiA0bTAQu0d-8Us2lVqN0RaP_W3zwg9_8uvpdkb_OjNK_ACN7o1xUZ_wBIvrIW |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ex-PRESS+implantation+with+phacoemulsification+in+POAG+versus+CPACG&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Lan%2C+Jie&rft.au=Sun%2C+Da-Peng&rft.au=Wu%2C+Jie&rft.au=Wang%2C+Ya-Ni&rft.date=2017-01-18&rft.pub=International+Journal+of+Ophthalmology+Press&rft.issn=2222-3959&rft.eissn=2227-4898&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=55&rft_id=info:doi/10.18240%2Fijo.2017.01.08&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28149776&rft.externalDocID=PMC5225348 |
thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F60944X%2F60944X.jpg |