Test–Retest Reproducibility for the Tau PET Imaging Agent Flortaucipir F 18

Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including C-PiB and F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Nuclear Medicine Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 937 - 943
Main Authors Devous, Michael D., Joshi, Abhinay D., Navitsky, Michael, Southekal, Sudeepti, Pontecorvo, Michael J., Shen, Haiqing, Lu, Ming, Shankle, William R., Seibyl, John P., Marek, Ken, Mintun, Mark A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society of Nuclear Medicine 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
1535-5667
DOI10.2967/jnumed.117.200691

Cover

Abstract Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including C-PiB and F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and monitoring of neurofibrillary pathology over time. Flortaucipir F 18 is one such tracer. Initial clinical studies indicated greater tau binding in AD and mild cognitive impairment patients than in controls in a pattern consistent with tau pathology observed at autopsy. However, little is known about the reproducibility of such findings. To our knowledge, this study reports the first data regarding test-retest reproducibility of flortaucipir F 18 PET. Twenty-one subjects who completed the study (5 healthy controls, 6 mild cognitive impairment, and 10 AD) received 370 MBq of flortaucipir F 18 and were imaged for 20 min beginning 80 min after injection and again at 110 min after injection. Follow-up (retest) imaging occurred between 48 h and 4 wk after initial imaging. Images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute template space. SUVRs were calculated using AAL (Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas) volumes of interest (VOIs) for parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI composed of average values from parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used. All VOIs were referenced to a subsection of cerebellar gray matter (cere-crus) as well as a parametrically derived white matter-based reference region (parametric estimate of reference signal intensity [PERSI]). test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore test-retest performance. Test-retest analyses demonstrated low variability in flortaucipir F 18 SUVR. The SD of mean percentage change between test and retest using the PERSI reference region was 2.22% for a large posterior neocortical VOI, 1.84% for MUBADA, 1.46% for frontal, 1.98% for temporal, 2.28% for parietal, and 3.27% for occipital VOIs. Further, significant correlations ( > 0.85; < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test-retest consistency) were greater than 0.92 for all regions. Significant test-retest reproducibility for flortaucipir F 18 was found across neocortical and mesial temporal lobe structures. These preliminary data suggest that flortaucipir F 18 tau imaging could be used to examine changes in tau burden over time.
AbstractList Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and monitoring of neurofibrillary pathology over time. Flortaucipir F 18 is one such tracer. Initial clinical studies indicated greater tau binding in AD and mild cognitive impairment patients than in controls in a pattern consistent with tau pathology observed at autopsy. However, little is known about the reproducibility of such findings. To our knowledge, this study reports the first data regarding test-retest reproducibility of flortaucipir F 18 PET. Methods: Twenty-one subjects who completed the study (5 healthy controls, 6 mild cognitive impairment, and 10 AD) received 370 MBq of flortaucipir F 18 and were imaged for 20 min beginning 80 min after injection and again at 110 min after injection. Follow-up (retest) imaging occurred between 48 h and 4 wk after initial imaging. Images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute template space. SUVRs were calculated using AAL (Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas) volumes of interest (VOIs) for parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI composed of average values from parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used. All VOIs were referenced to a subsection of cerebellar gray matter (cere-crus) as well as a parametrically derived white matter-based reference region (parametric estimate of reference signal intensity [PERSI]). t test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore test-retest performance. Results: Test-retest analyses demonstrated low variability in flortaucipir F 18 SUVR. The SD of mean percentage change between test and retest using the PERSI reference region was 2.22% for a large posterior neocortical VOI, 1.84% for MUBADA, 1.46% for frontal, 1.98% for temporal, 2.28% for parietal, and 3.27% for occipital VOIs. Further, significant correlations (R2 > 0.85; P < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test-retest consistency) were greater than 0.92 for all regions. Conclusion: Significant test-retest reproducibility for flortaucipir F 18 was found across neocortical and mesial temporal lobe structures. These preliminary data suggest that flortaucipir F 18 tau imaging could be used to examine changes in tau burden over time.Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and monitoring of neurofibrillary pathology over time. Flortaucipir F 18 is one such tracer. Initial clinical studies indicated greater tau binding in AD and mild cognitive impairment patients than in controls in a pattern consistent with tau pathology observed at autopsy. However, little is known about the reproducibility of such findings. To our knowledge, this study reports the first data regarding test-retest reproducibility of flortaucipir F 18 PET. Methods: Twenty-one subjects who completed the study (5 healthy controls, 6 mild cognitive impairment, and 10 AD) received 370 MBq of flortaucipir F 18 and were imaged for 20 min beginning 80 min after injection and again at 110 min after injection. Follow-up (retest) imaging occurred between 48 h and 4 wk after initial imaging. Images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute template space. SUVRs were calculated using AAL (Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas) volumes of interest (VOIs) for parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI composed of average values from parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used. All VOIs were referenced to a subsection of cerebellar gray matter (cere-crus) as well as a parametrically derived white matter-based reference region (parametric estimate of reference signal intensity [PERSI]). t test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore test-retest performance. Results: Test-retest analyses demonstrated low variability in flortaucipir F 18 SUVR. The SD of mean percentage change between test and retest using the PERSI reference region was 2.22% for a large posterior neocortical VOI, 1.84% for MUBADA, 1.46% for frontal, 1.98% for temporal, 2.28% for parietal, and 3.27% for occipital VOIs. Further, significant correlations (R2 > 0.85; P < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test-retest consistency) were greater than 0.92 for all regions. Conclusion: Significant test-retest reproducibility for flortaucipir F 18 was found across neocortical and mesial temporal lobe structures. These preliminary data suggest that flortaucipir F 18 tau imaging could be used to examine changes in tau burden over time.
Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including C-PiB and F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and monitoring of neurofibrillary pathology over time. Flortaucipir F 18 is one such tracer. Initial clinical studies indicated greater tau binding in AD and mild cognitive impairment patients than in controls in a pattern consistent with tau pathology observed at autopsy. However, little is known about the reproducibility of such findings. To our knowledge, this study reports the first data regarding test-retest reproducibility of flortaucipir F 18 PET. Twenty-one subjects who completed the study (5 healthy controls, 6 mild cognitive impairment, and 10 AD) received 370 MBq of flortaucipir F 18 and were imaged for 20 min beginning 80 min after injection and again at 110 min after injection. Follow-up (retest) imaging occurred between 48 h and 4 wk after initial imaging. Images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute template space. SUVRs were calculated using AAL (Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas) volumes of interest (VOIs) for parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI composed of average values from parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used. All VOIs were referenced to a subsection of cerebellar gray matter (cere-crus) as well as a parametrically derived white matter-based reference region (parametric estimate of reference signal intensity [PERSI]). test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore test-retest performance. Test-retest analyses demonstrated low variability in flortaucipir F 18 SUVR. The SD of mean percentage change between test and retest using the PERSI reference region was 2.22% for a large posterior neocortical VOI, 1.84% for MUBADA, 1.46% for frontal, 1.98% for temporal, 2.28% for parietal, and 3.27% for occipital VOIs. Further, significant correlations ( > 0.85; < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test-retest consistency) were greater than 0.92 for all regions. Significant test-retest reproducibility for flortaucipir F 18 was found across neocortical and mesial temporal lobe structures. These preliminary data suggest that flortaucipir F 18 tau imaging could be used to examine changes in tau burden over time.
Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetapir. Recently, PET tracers for tau neurofibrillary tangles have become available and have shown utility in detection and monitoring of neurofibrillary pathology over time. Flortaucipir F 18 is one such tracer. Initial clinical studies indicated greater tau binding in AD and mild cognitive impairment patients than in controls in a pattern consistent with tau pathology observed at autopsy. However, little is known about the reproducibility of such findings. To our knowledge, this study reports the first data regarding test–retest reproducibility of flortaucipir F 18 PET. Methods: Twenty-one subjects who completed the study (5 healthy controls, 6 mild cognitive impairment, and 10 AD) received 370 MBq of flortaucipir F 18 and were imaged for 20 min beginning 80 min after injection and again at 110 min after injection. Follow-up (retest) imaging occurred between 48 h and 4 wk after initial imaging. Images were spatially normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute template space. SUVRs were calculated using AAL (Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas) volumes of interest (VOIs) for parietal, temporal, occipital, anterior, and posterior hippocampal, parahippocampal, and fusiform regions, as well as a posterior neocortical VOI composed of average values from parietal, temporal, and occipital areas. Further, a VOI derived by discriminant analysis that maximally separated diagnostic groups (multiblock barycentric discriminant analysis [MUBADA]) was used. All VOIs were referenced to a subsection of cerebellar gray matter (cere-crus) as well as a parametrically derived white matter–based reference region (parametric estimate of reference signal intensity [PERSI]). t test, correlation analyses, and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to explore test–retest performance. Results: Test–retest analyses demonstrated low variability in flortaucipir F 18 SUVR. The SD of mean percentage change between test and retest using the PERSI reference region was 2.22% for a large posterior neocortical VOI, 1.84% for MUBADA, 1.46% for frontal, 1.98% for temporal, 2.28% for parietal, and 3.27% for occipital VOIs. Further, significant correlations (R2 > 0.85; P < 0.001) were observed for all regions, and intraclass correlation coefficient values (test–retest consistency) were greater than 0.92 for all regions. Conclusion: Significant test–retest reproducibility for flortaucipir F 18 was found across neocortical and mesial temporal lobe structures. These preliminary data suggest that flortaucipir F 18 tau imaging could be used to examine changes in tau burden over time.
Author Shankle, William R.
Southekal, Sudeepti
Navitsky, Michael
Seibyl, John P.
Pontecorvo, Michael J.
Shen, Haiqing
Devous, Michael D.
Joshi, Abhinay D.
Lu, Ming
Mintun, Mark A.
Marek, Ken
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michael D.
  surname: Devous
  fullname: Devous, Michael D.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Abhinay D.
  surname: Joshi
  fullname: Joshi, Abhinay D.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Navitsky
  fullname: Navitsky, Michael
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Sudeepti
  surname: Southekal
  fullname: Southekal, Sudeepti
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Michael J.
  surname: Pontecorvo
  fullname: Pontecorvo, Michael J.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Haiqing
  surname: Shen
  fullname: Shen, Haiqing
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ming
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Ming
– sequence: 8
  givenname: William R.
  surname: Shankle
  fullname: Shankle, William R.
– sequence: 9
  givenname: John P.
  surname: Seibyl
  fullname: Seibyl, John P.
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Ken
  surname: Marek
  fullname: Marek, Ken
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Mark A.
  surname: Mintun
  fullname: Mintun, Mark A.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kb1OwzAUhS0Eoj_wACzIEgtLSq4d28lYoRaQikAoSGyW4zjFVZoUxxm68Q68IU-Cq8JSiene4TtX554zQsdN2xiELiCekIyLm1XTr005ARATEsc8gyM0JMCyiHPydoyGMXCIGIvZAI26bhUHJk3TUzQgGUkTLtgQPeam89-fXy_GhwW_mI1ry17bwtbWb3HVOuzfDc5Vj59nOX5Yq6Vtlni6NI3H87p1XgV6Yx2eY0jP0Eml6s6c_84xep3P8tv7aPF093A7XUSaCuIjMIwrU_BSGUaIAqi0UgI0paCyVJcxkBJ4xkQiyozqAqiuClYxXVSaElHQMbre3w1uP_pgXK5tp01dq8a0fSchS8ODhNEkoFcH6KrtXRPcSQKQUsETsqMuf6m-CJHKjbNr5bbyL6gAiD2gXdt1zlRSW6-8bRvvlK0lxHJXidxXIkMlcl9JUMKB8u_4_5ofLVeP4g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2020_106100
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcn_2018_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41583_019_0240_3
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_117_200006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40336_018_0290_y
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaneurol_2022_2793
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_240206
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMoa2100708
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_120_254961
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaneurol_2020_0528
crossref_primary_10_1002_jlcr_3813
crossref_primary_10_1162_imag_a_00402
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41591_020_0762_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12404
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_022_00986_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23095023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2020_12_014
crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awz090
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_020_05118_w
crossref_primary_10_14283_jpad_2021_37
crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_13158
crossref_primary_10_3233_ADR_230012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_023_06280_7
crossref_primary_10_1093_braincomms_fcad305
crossref_primary_10_1093_aje_kwad197
crossref_primary_10_3390_biom13020290
crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2023_13239
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12434
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nucmedbio_2021_03_011
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_118_221697
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_598234
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43657_022_00068_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13020367
crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_25774
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11011_021_00733_4
crossref_primary_10_1177_0271678X19879226
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_118259
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_215072
crossref_primary_10_3233_JPD_191774
crossref_primary_10_3233_JAD_200808
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_023_06196_2
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnmt_123_267113
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2020_04_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_019_04488_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_022_01097_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_022_05999_z
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_020_15436_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13195_023_01160_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_70005
crossref_primary_10_1212_WNL_0000000000208061
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40120_024_00604_x
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_124_268700
crossref_primary_10_1002_trc2_12415
Cites_doi 10.1002/ana.24711
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.002
10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
10.1007/s00259-011-1745-9
10.2967/jnumed.117.200006
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2361-07.2007
10.1007/BF00308809
10.2967/jnumed.115.170027
10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.013
10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028
10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00065-1
10.1007/s00259-016-3363-z
10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5
10.2174/156720511796717221
10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/R119
10.1073/pnas.82.12.4245
10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-V
10.1093/brain/awu064
10.3233/JAD-2012-112111
10.2967/jnumed.111.089730
10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.037
10.1212/WNL.0b013e318245d295
10.1002/ana.24546
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.020
10.1186/alzrt231
10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2362
10.1007/s00259-009-1129-6
10.3233/JAD-2007-12105
10.1002/ana.22248
10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00141-9
10.1212/WNL.42.3.631
10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z
10.1002/ana.22068
10.2967/jnumed.111.094029
10.3233/JAD-122059
10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008
10.1093/brain/aww023
10.1038/197192b0
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034
10.2967/jnumed.112.117341
10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.014
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1, 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
– notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1, 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
NAPCQ
P64
7X8
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.117.200691
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Docstoc
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Technology Research Database
Docstoc
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2159-662X
1535-5667
EndPage 943
ExternalDocumentID 29284675
10_2967_jnumed_117_200691
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 123
18M
41~
5VS
96U
AAYXX
ACGFO
AEGXH
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CITATION
GX1
N9A
RHI
TSM
U5U
W8F
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
29L
2WC
3O-
53G
5RE
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
ABEFU
ABSQV
ABUWG
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADDZX
ADMOG
AENEX
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFOSN
AFRAH
AHMBA
AI.
ALIPV
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EX3
F5P
F9R
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
HMCUK
I-F
IL9
INIJC
J5H
KQ8
L7B
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
N4W
NAPCQ
NPM
OK1
P2P
P62
PHGZT
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
R0Z
RNS
RWL
S0X
SJN
SV3
TAE
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X7M
YHG
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
4T-
8FD
FR3
K9.
M7Z
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-1e56aeb6dae522a11fcaa71c331a98cd012d1695747d93cb13cfb5f5cbfc327b3
ISSN 0161-5505
1535-5667
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 14:11:43 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 10:41:44 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:00:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:19 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords AV-1451
flortaucipir
Alzheimer’s disease
reliability
tau imaging
Language English
License 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c372t-1e56aeb6dae522a11fcaa71c331a98cd012d1695747d93cb13cfb5f5cbfc327b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/6/937.full.pdf
PMID 29284675
PQID 2118376424
PQPubID 40808
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1982842534
proquest_journals_2118376424
pubmed_primary_29284675
crossref_citationtrail_10_2967_jnumed_117_200691
crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_117_200691
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-06-00
20180601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-06-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Journal of Nuclear Medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate J Nucl Med
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine
References Giacobini (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.11) 2007; 12
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.24
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.1
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.25
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.2
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.22
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.44
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.3
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.23
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.20
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.42
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.21
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.43
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.40
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.41
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.28
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.29
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.26
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.27
Kidd (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.4) 1963; 197
Brier (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.19) 2016; 8
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.8
Pontecorvo (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.30) 2017; 140
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.9
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.5
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.6
Chiotis (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.39) 2016; 43
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.7
Fuentes (2021051712120600000_59.6.937.13) 2011; 8
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.35
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.14
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.36
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.33
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.12
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.34
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.31
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.10
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.32
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.17
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.18
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.15
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.37
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.16
2021051712120600000_59.6.937.38
References_xml – ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.35
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.20
  doi: 10.1002/ana.24711
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.10
  doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.002
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.29
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1745-9
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.27
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200006
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.12
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2361-07.2007
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.24
  doi: 10.1007/BF00308809
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.34
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170027
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.36
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.013
– volume: 140
  start-page: 748
  year: 2017
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.30
  article-title: Relationships between flortaucipir PET tau binding and amyloid burden, clinical diagnosis, age and cognition
  publication-title: Brain.
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.22
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.7
  doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00065-1
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1686
  year: 2016
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.39
  article-title: Imaging in-vivo tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease with THK5317 PET in a multimodal paradigm
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3363-z
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.26
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70884-5
– volume: 8
  start-page: 686
  year: 2011
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.13
  article-title: A clinical perspective: anti tau’s treatment in Alzheimer’s disease
  publication-title: Curr Alzheimer Res.
  doi: 10.2174/156720511796717221
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.28
  doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/R119
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.3
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4245
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.42
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.090340
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.2
  doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-V
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.15
  doi: 10.1093/brain/awu064
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.31
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-112111
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.43
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.089730
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.16
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.037
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.8
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318245d295
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.21
  doi: 10.1002/ana.24546
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.33
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.020
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.37
  doi: 10.1186/alzrt231
– volume: 8
  start-page: 338ra66
  year: 2016
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.19
  article-title: Tau and Abeta imaging, CSF measures, and cognition in Alzheimer's disease
  publication-title: Sci Trans Med.
  doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2362
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.40
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1129-6
– volume: 12
  start-page: 37
  year: 2007
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.11
  article-title: One hundred years after the discovery of Alzheimer’s disease: a turning point for therapy?
  publication-title: J Alzheimers Dis.
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-2007-12105
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.5
  doi: 10.1002/ana.22248
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.9
  doi: 10.1016/S0531-5565(02)00141-9
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.6
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.42.3.631
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.25
  doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.41
  doi: 10.1002/ana.22068
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.44
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.094029
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.18
  doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.17
  doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.23
  doi: 10.1093/brain/aww023
– volume: 197
  start-page: 192
  year: 1963
  ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.4
  article-title: Paired helical filaments in electron microscopy of Alzheimer’s disease
  publication-title: Nature.
  doi: 10.1038/197192b0
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.32
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.14
  doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.117341
– ident: 2021051712120600000_59.6.937.38
  doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.014
SSID ssj0006888
ssj0062072
Score 2.4897642
Snippet Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. There are several PET imaging biomarkers for Aβ including...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 937
SubjectTerms Alzheimer's disease
Autopsies
Autopsy
Biomarkers
Cerebellum
Cognitive ability
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficients
Diagnostic systems
Discriminant analysis
Hippocampus
Impairment
Injection
Medical imaging
Neocortex
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neurofibrillary tangles
Parahippocampal gyrus
Pathology
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Reproducibility
Senile plaques
Substantia alba
Substantia grisea
Tau protein
Temporal lobe
Tomography
Tracers
β-Amyloid
Title Test–Retest Reproducibility for the Tau PET Imaging Agent Flortaucipir F 18
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29284675
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2118376424
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1982842534
Volume 59
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2159-662X
  dateEnd: 20250401
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006888
  issn: 0161-5505
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 19640101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2159-662X
  dateEnd: 20241001
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0006888
  issn: 0161-5505
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19640101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2159-662X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0062072
  issn: 0161-5505
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 0
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKkBAviG86BjIS4oEoUMeJkzxWrNU-C0Kp1LfIsR2pY6RdPyaNv5672EuzD9DgJaocu458P5_PvvP9CHmvVRiGXHG_5JH2QxX3YM5p40sBtrXhXOo6Zf7xSOyNw4NJNOl02lFL61XxSf269V7J_0gVykCueEv2HyTb_CkUwG-QLzxBwvC8m4xBpfvf8egUY4vndfJWG-160YQPZnLtfRtk3v5Py0fUx7tU3vAUzW6oPZ8uvKHnlNPJBjotQ7XClMdy0bjh69xOsC1sHSLsmvPZetkKw98EEh_MljVvsNcvkKr7YvNmJM-nK3d2247ex_MeJPYzP2oyAtBt2mDsTfuAgiWbQKpGp0Y-WI12XTW3lDlF7FKDT29o1dTmhbmu7YNUoL_5pILGGr3PtSfJkn9dzaw9-poPx0dHeTaYZB_mZz6SjqFz3jGw3CP3g1gIJMDY3T9sFnKR1LSlzbdapzj2-vlGn1fNmj_sVWqbJXtMHjkZ0r5FzhPSMdVT8uDYyfEZOWwBiF4DEAUAURACBQBRABB1AKI1gGgbQHRIWfKcjIeD7Mue79g1fMXjYOUzEwlpCqGlARtcMlYqKWOmOGcyTZQGy0UzkUaw39QpVwXjqiyiMlJFqXgQF_wF2apmlXlFaI9LTDok4gJ384kopOYqjZkWWpSg8rukdzk4uXKp55EB5TSHLSiOZ27HEzPP53Y8u-Rj02Ru8678rfLO5Yjnbnou8wC2zrB6hkHYJe-a16A80SMmKwPTImdpEqAfmkOdl1ZSTW9BGqBtHm3fofVr8nCD_B2ytVqszRswVlfF2xpSvwGgVZQB
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test-Retest+Reproducibility+for+the+Tau+PET+Imaging+Agent+Flortaucipir+F+18&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Devous%2C+Michael+D&rft.au=Joshi%2C+Abhinay+D&rft.au=Navitsky%2C+Michael&rft.au=Southekal%2C+Sudeepti&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.issn=1535-5667&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=937&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967%2Fjnumed.117.200691&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon