A hierarchy of hop-indexed models for the Capacitated Minimum Spanning Tree Problem

The Capacitated Minimum Spanning Tree Problem (CMSTP) is to find a minimum spanning tree subject to an additional constraint stating that the number of nodes in each subtree pending from a given root node is not greater than a given number Q. Gouveia and Martins (1996) proposed a hop‐indexed flow mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNetworks Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 1 - 16
Main Authors Gouveia, Luis, Martins, Pedro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2000
John Wiley & Sons
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0028-3045
1097-0037
DOI10.1002/(SICI)1097-0037(200001)35:1<1::AID-NET1>3.0.CO;2-L

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Capacitated Minimum Spanning Tree Problem (CMSTP) is to find a minimum spanning tree subject to an additional constraint stating that the number of nodes in each subtree pending from a given root node is not greater than a given number Q. Gouveia and Martins (1996) proposed a hop‐indexed flow model for the CMSTP. This formulation is a generalization of a well‐known single‐commodity flow model proposed by Gavish (1983). The linear programming (LP) bound of the new formulation has produced the best bounds for a set of tests (tests with the root in the corner of the grid of nodes) which have been characterized as hard by most of the available lower‐bounding schemes. The deficiency of the new formulation is the range of variation of the extra hop index which leads to storage problems when instances with 80 nodes are tried. We propose several levels of aggregation of the original formulation, yielding a hierarchy of hop‐indexed LP models with fewer variables than the original model and which are weaker than the LP relaxation of the original formulation but still stronger than the LP relaxation of the single‐commodity flow model. This hierarchy suggests an iterative method for computing lower bounds for the CMSTP. It iteratively transforms a given model into a more disaggregated model with a tighter relaxation. Reduction tests performed in a given iteration can be used to eliminate variables from the models arising in later iterations. Computational results assessing the efficiency of the iterative method are reported. The results are taken from a set of benchmark instances with 41 and 81 nodes and two new instances with 121 nodes. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:50A764D749FFFE0F42F4BD7C0A106AC8E34E1A1C
ArticleID:NET1
ark:/67375/WNG-J5XPFC20-F
ISSN:0028-3045
1097-0037
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0037(200001)35:1<1::AID-NET1>3.0.CO;2-L