Biophysical compartment models for single-shell diffusion MRI in the human brain: a model fitting comparison
Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000 s mm−2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models ha...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 55009 - 55023 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        England
          IOP Publishing
    
        07.03.2022
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0031-9155 1361-6560 1361-6560  | 
| DOI | 10.1088/1361-6560/ac46de | 
Cover
| Abstract | Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000 s mm−2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model ( BSME2 ) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model ( BZ2 ) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model ( BSGD2 ) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improved BSGD2 fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, while BZ2 and BSME2 retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, the BZ2 and BSME2 models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies. | 
    
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero
-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of
= 1000 s mm
. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model (BSME2) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model (BZ2) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model (BSGD2) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improvedBSGD2fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, whileBZ2andBSME2retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, theBZ2andBSME2models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies. Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b -value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000 s mm −2 . To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model ( BS ME 2 ) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model ( BZ 2 ) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model ( BS GD 2 ) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improved BS GD 2 fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, while BZ 2 and BS ME 2 retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, the BZ 2 and BS ME 2 models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies. Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zerob-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting ofb= 1000 s mm-2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model (BSME2) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model (BZ2) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model (BSGD2) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improvedBSGD2fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, whileBZ2andBSME2retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, theBZ2andBSME2models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies.Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zerob-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting ofb= 1000 s mm-2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model (BSME2) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model (BZ2) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model (BSGD2) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improvedBSGD2fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, whileBZ2andBSME2retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, theBZ2andBSME2models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies. Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000 s mm−2. To produce microstructural parameter maps, the tensor model is usually used, despite known limitations. Although compartment models have demonstrated improved fits in multi-shell dMRI data, they are rarely used for single-shell parameter maps, where their effectiveness is unclear from the literature. Here, various compartment models combining isotropic balls and symmetric tensors were fitted to single-shell dMRI data to investigate model fitting optimization and extract the most information possible. Full testing was performed in 5 subjects, and 3 subjects with multi-shell data were included for comparison. The results were tested and confirmed in a further 50 subjects. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model fitting technique outperformed non-linear least squares. Using MCMC, the 2-fibre-orientation mono-exponential ball and stick model ( BSME2 ) provided artifact-free, stable results, in little processing time. The analogous ball and zeppelin model ( BZ2 ) also produced stable, low-noise parameter maps, though it required much greater computing resources (50 000 burn-in steps). In single-shell data, the gamma-distributed diffusivity ball and stick model ( BSGD2 ) underperformed relative to other models, despite being an often-used software default. It produced artifacts in the diffusivity maps even with extremely long processing times. Neither increased diffusion weighting nor a greater number of gradient orientations improved BSGD2 fits. In white matter (WM), the tensor produced the best fit as measured by Bayesian information criterion. This result contrasts with studies using multi-shell data. However, in crossing fibre regions the tensor confounded geometric effects with fractional anisotropy (FA): the planar/linear WM FA ratio was 49%, while BZ2 and BSME2 retained 76% and 83% of restricted fraction, respectively. As a result, the BZ2 and BSME2 models are strong candidates to optimize information extraction from single-shell dMRI studies.  | 
    
| Author | Hassel, Stefanie Lam, Raymond W Zamyadi, Mojdeh Kennedy, Sidney H Hall, Geoffrey B Strother, Stephen C Frey, Benicio N Davis, Andrew D Arnott, Stephen R Downar, Jonathan Harris, Jacqueline K  | 
    
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrew D orcidid: 0000-0002-6078-0163 surname: Davis fullname: Davis, Andrew D organization: McMaster University Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Hamilton, Canada – sequence: 2 givenname: Stefanie surname: Hassel fullname: Hassel, Stefanie organization: University of Calgary Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Calgary, Canada – sequence: 3 givenname: Stephen R surname: Arnott fullname: Arnott, Stephen R organization: Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada – sequence: 4 givenname: Geoffrey B surname: Hall fullname: Hall, Geoffrey B organization: St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada – sequence: 5 givenname: Jacqueline K surname: Harris fullname: Harris, Jacqueline K organization: Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, Canada – sequence: 6 givenname: Mojdeh surname: Zamyadi fullname: Zamyadi, Mojdeh organization: University of Toronto , Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Canada – sequence: 7 givenname: Jonathan surname: Downar fullname: Downar, Jonathan organization: University Health Network Centre for Mental Health, Toronto, Canada – sequence: 8 givenname: Benicio N surname: Frey fullname: Frey, Benicio N organization: McMaster University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Hamilton, Canada – sequence: 9 givenname: Raymond W orcidid: 0000-0001-7142-4669 surname: Lam fullname: Lam, Raymond W organization: University of British Columbia Department of Psychiatry, Vancouver, Canada – sequence: 10 givenname: Sidney H surname: Kennedy fullname: Kennedy, Sidney H organization: Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada – sequence: 11 givenname: Stephen C orcidid: 0000-0002-3198-217X surname: Strother fullname: Strother, Stephen C organization: University of Toronto , Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Canada  | 
    
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed | 
    
| BookMark | eNp9kUFvFCEUgImpsdvq3ZPhpoeOhWVhwFttrDapMTF6Jgw8XJoZGIE59N_LZtYejOmJhHzfy8v3ztBJTBEQek3Je0qkvKRM0E5wQS6N3QkHz9Dm8esEbQhhtFOU81N0Vso9IZTK7e4FOmU7JTin_QaNH0Oa9w8lWDNim6bZ5DpBrHhKDsaCfcq4hPhrhK7sYRyxC94vJaSIv36_xSHiuge8XyYT8ZBNiB-wWV3sQ63NPE4NJcWX6Lk3Y4FXx_cc_bz59OP6S3f37fPt9dVdZ5mQtXMDk5Q6L2CQngyKq7avha03RjkhrXIKPKdWWcksWCeV6q0DYFT45g7sHL1b5845_V6gVD2FYtv2JkJait4Kyne9oH3f0DdHdBkmcHrOYTL5Qf8t1ACyAjanUjL4R4QSfTiCPhTXh-J6PUJTxD-KDdXU1qy2QuNT4sUqtpvo-7Tk2Co9hb_9Dz5Pgxa95ppwTojSs_PsD_ZUqWM | 
    
| CODEN | PHMBA7 | 
    
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ad0216 | 
    
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.075 10.3389/fnins.2019.00492 10.1002/mrm.20723 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.012 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.067 10.3389/fnins.2017.00720 10.3389/fninf.2011.00004 10.1016/j.scib.2018.12.010 10.1177/096228029900800204 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 10.3389/fninf.2018.00097 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.008 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.060 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_38 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.001 10.1002/mrm.25080 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.019 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.014 10.1002/hbm.22099 10.1002/mrm.22055 10.1002/mrm.10609 10.1503/jpn.160129 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 10.1007/s12311-019-01035-3 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.031 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101673 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4277 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 10.1002/mrm.20667 10.1002/mrm.20741 10.1002/mrm.24204 10.1503/jpn.180036 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.016 10.1002/jmri.21380 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041 10.1186/s12888-016-0785-x 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081 10.1002/nbm.3841 10.3389/fphy.2017.00061 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.007 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.048 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.021  | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved. 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.  | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved. – notice: 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.  | 
    
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8  | 
    
| DOI | 10.1088/1361-6560/ac46de | 
    
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database  | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Medicine Biology Physics  | 
    
| EISSN | 1361-6560 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | 34965517 10_1088_1361_6560_ac46de pmbac46de  | 
    
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural  | 
    
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Canadian Institutes of Health Research grantid: MOP137097 funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000024 – fundername: CIHR grantid: MOP137097 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: S10 RR023043 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: S10 RR019307 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: S10 RR023401  | 
    
| GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X 123 1JI 4.4 5B3 5RE 5VS 5ZH 7.M 7.Q AAGCD AAJIO AAJKP AATNI ABCXL ABHWH ABJNI ABLJU ABQJV ABUFD ABVAM ACAFW ACGFS ACHIP ADEQX AEFHF AEINN AENEX AFYNE AKPSB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOAED ASPBG ATQHT AVWKF AZFZN CBCFC CEBXE CJUJL CRLBU CS3 DU5 EBS EDWGO EJD EMSAF EPQRW EQZZN F5P IHE IJHAN IOP IZVLO KOT LAP M45 N5L N9A P2P PJBAE R4D RIN RNS RO9 ROL RPA SY9 TN5 W28 XPP AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-db3811df6eb8f0b959349ce2faa9d68c9d9ef51c9c83cecd8997cdee316fdb3b3 | 
    
| IEDL.DBID | IOP | 
    
| ISSN | 0031-9155 1361-6560  | 
    
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 16:21:54 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 16 06:20:44 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:28 EDT 2025 Sat Oct 25 05:36:09 EDT 2025 Wed Jun 07 11:19:00 EDT 2023 Sat Oct 25 01:59:02 EDT 2025  | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | true | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 5 | 
    
| Keywords | magnetic resonance imaging compartment model diffusion-weighted imaging DTI biophysical modelling diffusion tensor imaging neuroimaging  | 
    
| Language | English | 
    
| License | This article is available under the terms of the IOP-Standard License. 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.  | 
    
| LinkModel | DirectLink | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c368t-db3811df6eb8f0b959349ce2faa9d68c9d9ef51c9c83cecd8997cdee316fdb3b3 | 
    
| Notes | PMB-112502.R1 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23  | 
    
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6078-0163 0000-0001-7142-4669 0000-0002-3198-217X  | 
    
| PMID | 34965517 | 
    
| PQID | 2615476177 | 
    
| PQPubID | 23479 | 
    
| PageCount | 15 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | iop_journals_10_1088_1361_6560_ac46de pubmed_primary_34965517 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac46de crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1361_6560_ac46de proquest_miscellaneous_2615476177  | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | 2022-03-07 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-03-07 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2022 text: 2022-03-07 day: 07  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2020 | 
    
| PublicationPlace | England | 
    
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England | 
    
| PublicationTitle | Physics in medicine & biology | 
    
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | PMB | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Phys. Med. Biol | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2022 | 
    
| Publisher | IOP Publishing | 
    
| Publisher_xml | – name: IOP Publishing | 
    
| References | Behrens (pmbac46debib9) 2003; 50 Giacosa (pmbac46debib19) 2016; 135 Panagiotaki (pmbac46debib34) 2012; 59 Fan (pmbac46debib16) 2016; 124 Yang (pmbac46debib43) 2019; 13 Yip (pmbac46debib44) 2017; 2 Behrens (pmbac46debib8) 2007; 34 Jelescu (pmbac46debib23) 2017; 5 Basser (pmbac46debib6) 1994; 66 Khan (pmbac46debib28) 2019; 21 Anderson (pmbac46debib4) 2005; 54 Smith (pmbac46debib37) 2004; 23 Cook (pmbac46debib12) 2006 MacQueen (pmbac46debib32) 2019; 44 Ji (pmbac46debib25) 2019; 18 Baum (pmbac46debib7) 2018; 173 Sotiropoulos (pmbac46debib39) 2016; 134 Pasternak (pmbac46debib36) 2009; 62 Karapanagiotidis (pmbac46debib26) 2017; 147 Xing (pmbac46debib42) 2018; 63 Karns (pmbac46debib27) 2017; 343 Wilkins (pmbac46debib41) 2015; 109 Akram (pmbac46debib1) 2017; 158 Marcus (pmbac46debib33) 2011; 5 Zhang (pmbac46debib45) 2012; 61 Edwards (pmbac46debib14) 2017; 11 Sotiropoulos (pmbac46debib38) 2008; 28 Andersson (pmbac46debib5) 2015; 122 Alexander (pmbac46debib2) 2019; 32 Bland (pmbac46debib11) 1999; 8 Davis (pmbac46debib13) 2019; 4 Ennis (pmbac46debib15) 2006; 55 Pasternak (pmbac46debib35) 2012; 15 Alnæs (pmbac46debib3) 2018; 75 Ferizi (pmbac46debib17) 2014; 72 Jbabdi (pmbac46debib22) 2012; 68 Kruschke (pmbac46debib30) 2015 Lam (pmbac46debib31) 2016; 16 Bishop (pmbac46debib10) 2018; 182 Geeraert (pmbac46debib18) 2018; 182 Harms (pmbac46debib20) 2018; 12 Koch (pmbac46debib29) 2017; 42 Watson (pmbac46debib40) 2019; 21 Hosey (pmbac46debib21) 2005; 54 Jeurissen (pmbac46debib24) 2013; 34  | 
    
| References_xml | – volume: 124 start-page: 1108 year: 2016 ident: pmbac46debib16 article-title: MGH–USC human connectome project datasets with ultra-high b-value diffusion MRI publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.075 – volume: 13 start-page: 492 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib43 article-title: A Simplified crossing fiber model in diffusion weighted imaging publication-title: Frontiers Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00492 – volume: 54 start-page: 1480 year: 2005 ident: pmbac46debib21 article-title: Inference of multiple fiber orientations in high angular resolution diffusion imaging publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20723 – volume: 158 start-page: 332 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib1 article-title: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation sweet spots and hyperdirect cortical connectivity in Parkinson’s disease publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.012 – volume: 122 start-page: 166 year: 2015 ident: pmbac46debib5 article-title: Non-parametric representation and prediction of single- and multi-shell diffusion-weighted MRI data using Gaussian processes publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.067 – volume: 11 start-page: 720 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib14 article-title: NODDI-DTI: estimating neurite orientation and dispersion parameters from a diffusion tensor in healthy white matter publication-title: Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00720 – volume: 5 start-page: 4 year: 2011 ident: pmbac46debib33 article-title: Informatics and data mining tools and strategies for the human connectome project publication-title: Front. Neuroinform. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00004 – volume: 63 start-page: 1606 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib42 article-title: The anatomy of reliability: a must read for future human brain mapping publication-title: Sci. Bull. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.12.010 – volume: 8 start-page: 135 year: 1999 ident: pmbac46debib11 article-title: Measuring agreement in method comparison studies publication-title: Stat. Methods Med. Res. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204 – volume: 61 start-page: 1000 year: 2012 ident: pmbac46debib45 article-title: NODDI: Practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 – volume: 66 start-page: 259 year: 1994 ident: pmbac46debib6 article-title: MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging publication-title: Biophys. J. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 – volume: 12 start-page: 97 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib20 article-title: Robust and fast markov chain monte carlo sampling of diffusion mri microstructure models publication-title: Front. Neuroinform. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00097 – volume: 343 start-page: 72 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib27 article-title: Atypical white-matter microstructure in congenitally deaf adults: a region of interest and tractography study using diffusion-tensor imaging publication-title: Hear. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.008 – volume: 109 start-page: 341 year: 2015 ident: pmbac46debib41 article-title: Fiber estimation and tractography in diffusion MRI: Development of simulated brain images and comparison of multi-fiber analysis methods at clinical b-values publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.060 – year: 2015 ident: pmbac46debib30 – volume: 15 start-page: 305 year: 2012 ident: pmbac46debib35 article-title: Estimation of extracellular volume from regularized multi-shell diffusion MRI publication-title: Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Interv. MICCAI Int. Conf. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_38 – volume: 2 start-page: 188 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib44 article-title: Shared microstructural features of behavioral and substance addictions revealed in areas of crossing fibers publication-title: Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.001 – volume: 72 start-page: 1785 year: 2014 ident: pmbac46debib17 article-title: A ranking of diffusion MRI compartment models with in vivo human brain data: diffusion MRI compartment models publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25080 – volume: 182 start-page: 343 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib18 article-title: A comparison of inhomogeneous magnetization transfer, myelin volume fraction, and diffusion tensor imaging measures in healthy children publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.019 – volume: 134 start-page: 396 year: 2016 ident: pmbac46debib39 article-title: Fusion in diffusion MRI for improved fibre orientation estimation: an application to the 3T and 7T data of the human connectome project publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.014 – volume: 34 start-page: 2747 year: 2013 ident: pmbac46debib24 article-title: Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Hum. Brain Mapp. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22099 – volume: 62 start-page: 717 year: 2009 ident: pmbac46debib36 article-title: Free water elimination and mapping from diffusion MRI publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22055 – volume: 50 start-page: 1077 year: 2003 ident: pmbac46debib9 article-title: Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10609 – volume: 42 start-page: 331 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib29 article-title: Decreased uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in male publication-title: J. Psychiatry Neurosci. doi: 10.1503/jpn.160129 – volume: 23 start-page: S208 year: 2004 ident: pmbac46debib37 article-title: Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 – volume: 18 start-page: 761 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib25 article-title: Measurement of projections between dentate nucleus and contralateral frontal cortex in human brain via diffusion tensor tractography publication-title: Cerebellum doi: 10.1007/s12311-019-01035-3 – volume: 147 start-page: 272 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib26 article-title: Tracking thoughts: exploring the neural architecture of mental time travel during mind-wandering publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.031 – volume: 21 start-page: 101673 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib40 article-title: Graph theory analysis of DTI tractography in children with traumatic injury publication-title: NeuroImage Clin. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101673 – volume: 75 start-page: 287 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib3 article-title: Association of heritable cognitive ability and psychopathology with white matter properties in children and adolescents publication-title: JAMA Psychiatry doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4277 – volume: 34 start-page: 144 year: 2007 ident: pmbac46debib8 article-title: Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.018 – volume: 54 start-page: 1194 year: 2005 ident: pmbac46debib4 article-title: Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20667 – volume: 55 start-page: 136 year: 2006 ident: pmbac46debib15 article-title: Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20741 – volume: 68 start-page: 1846 year: 2012 ident: pmbac46debib22 article-title: Model-based analysis of multishell diffusion MR data for tractography: How to get over fitting problems publication-title: Magn. Reson. Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24204 – volume: 44 start-page: 223 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib32 article-title: The canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND): magnetic resonance imaging protocols publication-title: J. Psychiatry Neurosci. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180036 – volume: 4 start-page: 913 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib13 article-title: White matter indices of medication response in major depression: a diffusion tensor imaging study publication-title: Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.016 – volume: 28 start-page: 199 year: 2008 ident: pmbac46debib38 article-title: A regularized two-tensor model fit to low angular resolution diffusion images using basis directions publication-title: J. Magn. Reson. Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.21380 – volume: 173 start-page: 275 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib7 article-title: The impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity derived from diffusion MRI publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.041 – volume: 16 start-page: 105 year: 2016 ident: pmbac46debib31 article-title: Discovering biomarkers for antidepressant response: protocol from the Canadian biomarker integration network in depression (CAN-BIND) and clinical characteristics of the first patient cohort publication-title: BMC Psychiatry doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0785-x – volume: 59 start-page: 2241 year: 2012 ident: pmbac46debib34 article-title: Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: a taxonomy and comparison publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081 – volume: 32 start-page: e3841 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib2 article-title: Imaging brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: practicality and applications publication-title: NMR Biomed. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3841 – volume: 5 start-page: 61 year: 2017 ident: pmbac46debib23 article-title: Design and validation of diffusion mri models of white matter publication-title: Front. Phys. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2017.00061 – volume: 21 start-page: 101597 year: 2019 ident: pmbac46debib28 article-title: Biomarkers of parkinson’s disease: Striatal sub-regional structural morphometry and diffusion MRI publication-title: NeuroImage Clin. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.007 – start-page: 2759 year: 2006 ident: pmbac46debib12 article-title: Camino: open-source diffusion-MRI reconstruction and processing – volume: 135 start-page: 273 year: 2016 ident: pmbac46debib19 article-title: Dance and music training have different effects on white matter diffusivity in sensorimotor pathways publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.048 – volume: 182 start-page: 441 year: 2018 ident: pmbac46debib10 article-title: Structural network differences in chronic muskuloskeletal pain: Beyond fractional anisotropy publication-title: NeuroImage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.021  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0011824 | 
    
| Score | 2.382925 | 
    
| Snippet | Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000 s... Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero b -value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of b = 1000... Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zero -value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting of = 1000 s mm... Clinically oriented studies commonly acquire diffusion MRI (dMRI) data with a single non-zerob-value (i.e. single-shell) and diffusion weighting ofb= 1000 s...  | 
    
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref iop  | 
    
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher  | 
    
| StartPage | 55009 | 
    
| SubjectTerms | Anisotropy Bayes Theorem biophysical modelling Brain - diagnostic imaging compartment model Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods diffusion tensor imaging diffusion-weighted imaging DTI Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods magnetic resonance imaging neuroimaging White Matter - diagnostic imaging  | 
    
| Title | Biophysical compartment models for single-shell diffusion MRI in the human brain: a model fitting comparison | 
    
| URI | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ac46de https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965517 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2615476177  | 
    
| Volume | 67 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVIOP databaseName: IOP Electronic Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1361-6560 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0011824 issn: 0031-9155 databaseCode: IOP dateStart: 19560101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://iopscience.iop.org/ providerName: IOP Publishing  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB6SlIRe2ubVbl-okBxy0O7almS5PZXSkAa2LaWBHALCehiWbL2m3j20v76jxy6kNCH0ZuwZWx5L1ifNNzMAR7nlZSNyRnPjDGU811Ryp2mp9Rhn48qyEF8x-SzOLtj5Jb_cgHfrWJh5l379QzyMiYKjCRMhTo6yQmTU54wZ1YYJ6zbhQSERGPvovS9f1y4EBM4s-SX_pXVjHtrEZ90OMcNUc_oYrlaNjAyT6-FyoYfm91_5G__zLZ7AowRByfsougsbrt2D7ViU8tce7EySux1PBn6o6fdhhpe79ElJ5K0HejoJlXR6gtCX-F2HmaO9p5YSX3hl6XfiyOTbJzJtCQJNEgoCEu2rUrwlddQlzTRQr9NdPbnpAC5OP37_cEZToQZqCiEX1Gqc9zPbCKdlM9Y-1zGrjMubuq6skKaylWt4ZiojC-wSFtd4pbHOFZloUFcXh7DVzlv3DAjCI8O494cbBGpSS8EtF9KhibSrhRjAaPXZlElZzH0xjZkK3nQplTes8oZV0bADOFlrdDGDxx2yx2hNlYZxf4ccuSHX_dBKlIqrMS74xpXqbDOAN6vupHDEejdM3br5sle4ZuWsRORYDuBp7GfrhoX0_Twrn9-zIS_gYe7jMTwprnwJW4ufS_cKUdJCvw6j4Q8lOQxc | 
    
| linkProvider | IOP Publishing | 
    
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7RIioupZTXFgpGggMH724S23G4IeiqBbZUiEq9mfgRqWLJRmT30P56xo9dqQgqpN6iZCZxxnb8OfPNDMCr3PKyETmjuXGGMp5rKrnTtNR6jKtxZVmIr5gei8NT9vGMn6U6pyEWZt6lT_8QD2Oi4GjCRIiTo6wQGfU5Y0a1YcK6UWebDbgd8pT4CL4vJ2s3AoJnlnyTf9O8shZt4PP-DTPDcjO5B99XDY0skx_D5UIPzeUfORxv8CY7sJ2gKHkXxe_DLdfuwp1YnPJiF7amye2OJwNP1PQPYIaXu9S1JPLXA02dhIo6PUEITPzfh5mjvaeYEl-AZen_yJHp1yNy3hIEnCQUBiTaV6d4S-qoS5rzQMFOd_Ukp4dwOjn49v6QpoIN1BRCLqjVuP5nthFOy2asfc5jVhmXN3VdWSFNZSvX8MxURhY4NCzu9UpjnSsy0aCuLh7BZjtv3RMgCJMM494vbhCwSS0Ft1xIh2bSrhZiAKNV1ymTspn7ohozFbzqUipvXOWNq6JxB_BmrdHFTB7XyL5Ga6o0nftr5MgVue6nVqJUXI1x4zeuFPbnAF6uhpTCmevdMXXr5ste4d6VsxIRZDmAx3GsrRsW0vjzrNz7z4a8gK2TDxP1-ej401O4m_sQDc-TK5_B5uLX0u0jcFro52Fy_AZv_hG9 | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biophysical+compartment+models+for+single-shell+diffusion+MRI+in+the+human+brain%3A+a+model+fitting+comparison&rft.jtitle=Physics+in+medicine+%26+biology&rft.au=Davis%2C+Andrew+D&rft.au=Hassel%2C+Stefanie&rft.au=Arnott%2C+Stephen+R&rft.au=Hall%2C+Geoffrey+B&rft.date=2022-03-07&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1361-6560%2Fac46de&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F34965517&rft.externalDocID=34965517 | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0031-9155&client=summon |