Breakdown of elasticity theory for jammed hard-particle packings: conical nonlinear constitutive theory

Hard-particle packings have provided a rich source of outstanding theoretical problems and served as useful starting points to model the structure of granular media, liquids, living cells, glasses, and random media. The nature of “jammed” hard-particle packings is a current subject of keen interest....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of solids and structures Vol. 40; no. 25; pp. 7143 - 7153
Main Authors Torquato, S., Donev, A., Stillinger, F.H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2003
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0020-7683
1879-2146
DOI10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00359-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:Hard-particle packings have provided a rich source of outstanding theoretical problems and served as useful starting points to model the structure of granular media, liquids, living cells, glasses, and random media. The nature of “jammed” hard-particle packings is a current subject of keen interest. We demonstrate that the response of jammed hard-particle packings to global deformations cannot be described by linear elasticity (even for small particle displacements) but involves a “conical” nonlinear constitutive theory. It is the singular nature of the hard-particle potential that leads to the breakdown of linear elasticity. Interestingly, a nonlinear theory arises because the feasible particle displacements (leading to unjamming) depend critically on the local spatial arrangement of the particles, implying a directionality in the feasible strains that is absent in particle systems with soft potentials. Mathematically, the set of feasible strains has a conical structure, i.e., components of the imposed strain tensor generally obey linear inequalities. The nature of the nonlinear behavior is illustrated by analyzing several specific packings. Finally, we examine the conditions under which a packing can be considered to “incompressible” in the traditional sense.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-7683
1879-2146
DOI:10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00359-7