Magnetic resonance angiography for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A review from the international workshop for pulmonary functional imaging

• Published in: World journal of radiology Vol. 10; no. 6; pp. 52 - 64
• Main Authors: Tsuchiya, Nanae, Beek, Edwin JR van, Ohno, Yoshiharu, Hatabu, Hiroto, Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Swift, Andrew, Vogel-Claussen, Jens, Biederer, Jürgen, Wild, James, Wielpütz, Mark O, Schiebler, Mark L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 28.06.2018
• Subjects: Review; Pulmonary embolism; Radiation induced; Artifacts; Hypersensitivity; Lung; Magnetic resonance angiography; Computerized tomography angiography; Female; Neoplasms; Outcome assessment (health care)
• ISSN: 1949-8470; 1949-8470
• DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i6.52

Pulmonary contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is useful for the primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Many sites have chosen not to use CE-MRA as a first line of diagnostic tool for PE because of the speed and higher efficacy of computerized tomographic angiography (CTA). In this review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of CE-MRA and the appropriate imaging scenarios for the primary diagnosis of PE derived from our unique multi-institutional experience in this area. The optimal patient for this test has a low to intermediate suspicion for PE based on clinical decision rules. Patients in extremis are not candidates for this test. Younger women (< 35 years of age) and patients with iodinated contrast allergies are best served by using this modality We discuss the history of the use of this test, recent technical innovations, artifacts, direct and indirect findings for PE, ancillary findings, and the effectiveness (patient outcomes) of CE-MRA for the exclusion of PE. Current outcomes data shows that CE-MRA and NM V/Q scans are effective alternative tests to CTA for the primary diagnosis of PE.