A methodology to benchmark flexible payload architectures in a megaconstellation use case
Summary This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of satellite communications and networking Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 29 - 46 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.01.2021
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1542-0973 1542-0981 |
DOI | 10.1002/sat.1344 |
Cover
Abstract | Summary
This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted
μ. The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same
μ parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of
μ over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent‐pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam‐steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis.
This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between flexibility and complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfil the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Summary
This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted
μ. The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same
μ parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of
μ over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent‐pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam‐steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis.
This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between flexibility and complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfil the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted . The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent‐pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam‐steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis. This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non‐uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted μ. The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same μ parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of μ over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent‐pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam‐steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis. This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade-offs between high flexibility and low complexity. High flexibility would enable the satellite to adapt to various distributions of user terminals on the ground and fulfill the data rate demand of these users. Besides, low complexity is required to keep satellite networks competitive in the context of emerging 5G networks. To estimate the flexibility of a payload, an indicator to characterize the non-uniformity of user distributions is proposed. Each benchmarked payload may be characterized by a graph relating the throughput to this parameter further denoted mu. The payload provides the same throughput trends for different scenarios of user distributions with the same mu parameter. As a consequence, the average capacity of the system may be estimated by (a) calculating the probability distribution of mu over the orbit and (b) integrating the throughput based on this payload response. It thus results in a straightforward way for benchmarking payloads directly on an estimation of the averaged capacity, accounting for the user distribution over the earth. A simulation platform has been developed to characterize the payload throughput including the implementation of a resource allocation algorithm that accounts for constraints of various payloads. Using this definition and the developed tool, we benchmark a bent-pipe architecture, a beam hopping architecture and a hybrid beam-steering architecture for a LEO megaconstellation use case. The methodology showcases the interest for investigating different payload architectures depending on realistic traffic scenario analysis. |
Author | Goussetis, George Tubau, Ségolène Gayrard, Jean‐Didier Garcia Vigueras, Maria Vidal, Florian Legay, Hervé |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Florian orcidid: 0000-0001-6834-1475 surname: Vidal fullname: Vidal, Florian email: florian.vidal@thalesaleniaspace.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Hervé surname: Legay fullname: Legay, Hervé – sequence: 3 givenname: George surname: Goussetis fullname: Goussetis, George organization: Heriot‐Watt University – sequence: 4 givenname: Maria surname: Garcia Vigueras fullname: Garcia Vigueras, Maria organization: INSA Rennes – sequence: 5 givenname: Ségolène surname: Tubau fullname: Tubau, Ségolène – sequence: 6 givenname: Jean‐Didier surname: Gayrard fullname: Gayrard, Jean‐Didier |
BackLink | https://univ-rennes.hal.science/hal-02530973$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWD_APyHgRQ9bk81-ZI9F1AoFD9aDpzDNzrap6aYmqdr_3l0rHkRPMwy_93jzjsh-61ok5IyzIWcsvQoQh1xk2R4Z8DxLE1ZJvv-zl-KQHIWw7MiC5XxAnkd0hXHhamfdfEujozNs9WIF_oU2Fj_MzCJdw9Y6qCl4vTARddx4DNS0FDrxHLRrQ0RrIRrX0k1AqiHgCTlowAY8_Z7H5On2Zno9TiYPd_fXo0miRcGzRNSQZw2mKPM047rAVIiikYAlr6QsORNMYFFUPKtKTGc15wJFLeUMGoCScXFMLne-C7Bq7U0XfascGDUeTVR_Y2ku-s_fevZ8x669e91giGrpNr7t4qk0K6RkVS5lR13sKO1dCB6bH1vOVF-y6kpWfckdOvyFahO_eogejP1LkOwE78bi9l9j9TiafvGfia2OIA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_s23031425 crossref_primary_10_1002_sat_1412 crossref_primary_10_1109_TAES_2023_3278253 crossref_primary_10_1109_COMST_2022_3197695 crossref_primary_10_1002_sat_1504 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNET_2023_3260166 |
Cites_doi | 10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2014.6934570 10.1109/TED.2009.2016128 10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2010.5586860 10.1109/TAP.2018.2846768 10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2520912 10.23919/EuCAP.2017.7928493 10.1109/MWC.2005.1522108 10.1109/COMST.2016.2532458 10.1109/TBC.2017.2755263 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2511661 10.1109/JSTSP.2007.914876 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Attribution |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. – notice: 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. – notice: Attribution |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7SP 8FD FR3 H8D JQ2 KR7 L7M 1XC VOOES |
DOI | 10.1002/sat.1344 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Electronics & Communications Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aerospace Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database Electronics & Communications Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Engineering Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Aerospace Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 1542-0981 |
EndPage | 46 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_HAL_hal_02530973v1 10_1002_sat_1344 SAT1344 |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions funderid: MSCA-ITN-2016-722840 |
GroupedDBID | .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OC 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5VS 66C 6OB 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 FEDTE G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.T H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HVGLF HZ~ IN- IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ UB1 V2E W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WLBEL WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XSW XV2 ~IA ~WT AAYXX ADMLS AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION 1OB 7SP 8FD AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY FR3 H8D JQ2 KR7 L7M 1XC VOOES |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3614-3da54fe2e85241c6e2336f8ae71988710303e6691497e2bd113e3d88bafaa7013 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1542-0973 |
IngestDate | Fri Sep 12 12:50:20 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 11:24:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:33:17 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:24 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:59:21 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | megaconstellation hybrid beamforming resource allocation payload multibeam LEO |
Language | English |
License | Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3614-3da54fe2e85241c6e2336f8ae71988710303e6691497e2bd113e3d88bafaa7013 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6834-1475 0000-0002-8042-2347 |
OpenAccessLink | https://univ-rennes.hal.science/hal-02530973 |
PQID | 2468809588 |
PQPubID | 1026343 |
PageCount | 18 |
ParticipantIDs | hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02530973v1 proquest_journals_2468809588 crossref_primary_10_1002_sat_1344 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_sat_1344 wiley_primary_10_1002_sat_1344_SAT1344 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | January/February 2021 2021-01-00 20210101 2021-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2021 text: January/February 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Chichester |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester |
PublicationTitle | International journal of satellite communications and networking |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc – name: Wiley |
References | 2009; 56 2010 2016; 10 2019 2018 2017 2005 2016 2016; 104 2014 2016; 18 2018; 66 2008; 2 1979; 22 2018; 64 2005; 12 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 Legay H (e_1_2_8_10_1) 2016 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 Brélaz D (e_1_2_8_14_1) 1979; 22 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 Maral G (e_1_2_8_3_1) 2005 e_1_2_8_9_1 (e_1_2_8_17_1) 2018 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 Portillo I (e_1_2_8_6_1) 2018 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 66 start-page: 4426 issue: 9 year: 2018 end-page: 4436 article-title: Analytical model and study of continuous parallel plate waveguide lens‐like multiple‐beam antennas publication-title: IEEE Trans Antenna Propagation – volume: 64 start-page: 266 issue: 12 year: 2018 end-page: 280 article-title: Radio resource management optimization of flexible satellite payloads for dvb‐s2 systems publication-title: IEEE Trans Broadcast – start-page: 2409 year: 2017 end-page: 2412 – volume: 56 start-page: 951 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 958 article-title: Accurate characterization of TWTA distortion in multicarrier operation by means of a correlation‐based method publication-title: IEEE Trans Electron Devices – volume: 2 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2008 end-page: 73 article-title: Dynamic spectrum management: complexity and duality publication-title: IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process – year: 2005 – start-page: 118 year: 2016 end-page: 119 article-title: Multiple beam antenna based on a parallel platewaveguide continuous delay lens beamformer publication-title: Proc Int Symp Antennas Propag – volume: 22 issue: 14 year: 1979 article-title: New methods to color the vertices of a graph publication-title: Commun ACM – year: 2018 article-title: A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband publication-title: 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC) – start-page: 12 year: 2018 article-title: European electronic communications code publication-title: Off J Eur Union – start-page: 2413 year: 2017 end-page: 2417 – volume: 12 start-page: 72 issue: 5 year: 2005 end-page: 80 article-title: Integration of satellite and terrestrial systems in future multimedia communications publication-title: IEEE Wirel Commun – volume: 104 start-page: 623 issue: 13 year: 2016 end-page: 632 article-title: A new era in elemental digital beamforming for spaceborne communications phased arrays publication-title: Proc IEEE – volume: 10 start-page: 501 issue: 13 year: 2016 end-page: 513 article-title: Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large‐scale antenna arrays publication-title: IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process – year: 2019 – start-page: 374 year: 2014 end-page: 381 – volume: 18 start-page: 1617 issue: 18 year: 2016 end-page: 1655 article-title: Next generation 5G wireless networks: a comprehensive survey publication-title: IEEE Commun Surv Tutor – year: 2010 – start-page: 12 year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 article-title: European electronic communications code publication-title: Off J Eur Union – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2014.6934570 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1109/TED.2009.2016128 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2010.5586860 – volume: 22 issue: 14 year: 1979 ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 article-title: New methods to color the vertices of a graph publication-title: Commun ACM – volume-title: Satellite communications systems year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2846768 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2520912 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.23919/EuCAP.2017.7928493 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1109/MWC.2005.1522108 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1109/COMST.2016.2532458 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1109/TBC.2017.2755263 – start-page: 118 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 article-title: Multiple beam antenna based on a parallel platewaveguide continuous delay lens beamformer publication-title: Proc Int Symp Antennas Propag – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2511661 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2007.914876 – year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 article-title: A technical comparison of three low earth orbit satellite constellation systems to provide global broadband publication-title: 69th International Astronautical Congress (IAC) – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 |
SSID | ssj0026051 |
Score | 2.3100367 |
Snippet | Summary
This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low... This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade‐offs between high flexibility and low complexity.... This paper proposes a methodology to benchmark satellite payload architectures and find the optimal trade-offs between high flexibility and low complexity.... |
SourceID | hal proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 29 |
SubjectTerms | Algorithms Beam steering Benchmarks Complexity Flexibility hybrid beamforming LEO Life Sciences megaconstellation Methodology multibeam Parameters payload Payloads Resource allocation Satellite networks Wireless networks |
Title | A methodology to benchmark flexible payload architectures in a megaconstellation use case |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fsat.1344 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2468809588 https://univ-rennes.hal.science/hal-02530973 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3Nb9MwFH9i4wIHBgNEoVTehNgp3WI7TnKMKFWF2h1oK3XiEDmOzVBLNy0ph_31vJePrkMgoZ0iJbaS-H39_PLyewAffDyPONV5vhHOk9JIsrnAQ3_pnMUttK7ykJNzNZrLL4tg0VRV0r8wNT_ENuFGllH5azJwnRWnd6ShhS77vpBEBeoLRbT5g69b5ihC6TVVquQeMdK0vLNn_LSdeC8S7V1SHeQOyNyFqlWsGR7At_Yp6xKTZX9TZn1z-weB48Ne4zk8ayAoS2qdeQGP7PoQnu4QE76Ei4TVraWrpDsrr1iG2nz5U98smSMKzWxl2TVt9nXOdr9FFOzHmmmc_B09LSJPqq0i0bNNYZnBiPkK5sPPs08jr2nC4BmBodsTuQ6ks9xGAQZ7oywXQrlI29CP0UFRlzJhlYpxpxVanuU-pVXzKMq00zpEgPka9tdXa_sGGMZClecqNFYGUmQmjkIduyAPVWwRdfIOnLQCSU3DUE6NMlZpza3MU1yslBarA0fbkdc1K8dfxhyjTLeXiUZ7lIxTOoc4T5BS_PI70G1FnjbGW6RcKvRqcRBFHfhYye6fN0mnyYyOb_934Dt4wqkqpkridGG_vNnY9whryqwHj5PBZDztVYr8GwhD9HE |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT9swFH-i5bBxYF8gCt3mTdM4pSy24yTaqZpA3VY4bEXqJCTLceyBKC0iKYf99XsvaboygTTtFMmxlcTv6-fnl58B3oXYjjjVB6EVPpDSSrK5KEB_6b3DJbSp8pDHJ2pwKr-Mo_EafGz-han5IZYJN7KMyl-TgVNC-uAPa2hhyl4opGzBerU9R4jo25I7inB6TZYqeUCcNA3z7Ad-0Iy8E4ta51QJuQIzV8FqFW2OnsBZ8551kcllb15mPfvrLwrH__yQp7C5QKGsX6vNM1hz0-ewscJN-AJ-9Fl9unSVd2fljGWo0OdX5uaSeWLRzCaOXdN63-RsdTuiYBdTZnDwT3S2CD6pvIqkz-aFYxaD5hacHh2OPg2CxTkMgRUYvQORm0h6x10SYby3ynEhlE-Mi8MUfRQdVCacUikutmLHszykzGqeJJnxxsSIMbehPZ1N3Q4wDIcqz1VsnYykyGyaxCb1UR6r1CHw5B3YbySi7YKknM7KmOiaXplrnCxNk9WBN8ue1zUxxz193qJQl7eJSXvQH2pqQ6gnSCtuww50G5nrhf0WmkuFji2NkqQD7yvhPfgQ_b0_ouvuv3Z8DY8Go-OhHn4--boHjzkVyVQ5nS60y5u5e4kop8xeVdr8G5xs9vs |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9wwEB7xkFA5lEdBbAvUoKo9ZSG24yTHFbDa8lLVgkTVg-U4NiDosmKzHPj1zOSx3aIioZ4iJbaSeF6fJ5NvAD6FeB5xqg9CK3wgpZVkc1GA_tJ7h1toU-YhT05V71weXkQXdVUl_QtT8UOME25kGaW_JgMf5H7nD2no0BTtUEg5DbNSYZQkQPR9TB1FML3iSpU8IEqahnh2l-80M_8KRdNXVAg5gTInsWoZbLoL8Kt5zKrG5KY9KrK2fXzG4Ph_77EIb2sMyjqV0izBlOsvw_wEM-E7-NlhVW_pMuvOijuWoTpf_Tb3N8wTh2Z269iAdvsmZ5MfI4bsus8MTr5EV4vQk4qrSPZsNHTMYshcgfPuwdleL6i7MARWYOwORG4i6R13SYTR3irHhVA-MS4OU_RQ1KZMOKVS3GrFjmd5SHnVPEky442JEWGuwkz_ru_WgGEwVHmuYutkJEVm0yQ2qY_yWKUOYSdvwZdGINrWFOXUKeNWV-TKXONiaVqsFmyNRw4qWo5_jNlGmY4vE492r3Os6RwCPUFK8RC2YL0Rua6td6i5VOjW0ihJWvC5lN2LN9E_Omd0fP_agR9h7tt-Vx9_PT36AG84VciUCZ11mCnuR24DIU6RbZa6_ATD1fWq |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+methodology+to+benchmark+flexible+payload+architectures+in+a+megaconstellation+use+case&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+satellite+communications+and+networking&rft.au=Vidal%2C+Florian&rft.au=Legay%2C+Herv%C3%A9&rft.au=Goussetis%2C+George&rft.au=Garcia+Vigueras%2C+Maria&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.issn=1542-0973&rft.eissn=1542-0981&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=46&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fsat.1344&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fsat.1344&rft.externalDocID=SAT1344 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1542-0973&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1542-0973&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1542-0973&client=summon |