The moral limits of what, exactly?
While moral arguments for limiting market expansionism proliferate, a fundamental question has been left unanswered: the moral limits of what, exactly? Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) theorists tend to employ different terms – markets, putting a price tag, buying and selling – interchangeably and inco...
Saved in:
Published in | Economics and philosophy Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 229 - 251 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01.07.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0266-2671 1474-0028 |
DOI | 10.1017/S0266267124000191 |
Cover
Summary: | While moral arguments for limiting market expansionism proliferate, a fundamental question has been left unanswered: the moral limits of what, exactly? Moral Limits of Markets (MLM) theorists tend to employ different terms – markets, putting a price tag, buying and selling – interchangeably and inconsistently to describe the phenomenon they are troubled by. I clarify this ambiguity by offering a novel taxonomy of different dimensions of exchange I identify as the sources of the normative concerns of most MLM arguments: Alienation, Commodification, Marketization, Privatization. This taxonomy allows us to better understand why and what about ‘markets’ should be limited. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0266-2671 1474-0028 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0266267124000191 |