School equity, marketisation and access to the Australian senior secondary curriculum

This study examines how access to the academic curriculum creates patterns of inequality in Australian schools. Examining students' access to the academic curriculum gives an indication of how schooling is structured to support students in pursuing higher education opportunities. To date, littl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEducational review (Birmingham) Vol. 75; no. 2; pp. 243 - 263
Main Authors Dean, Jenny, Roberts, Philip, Perry, Laura B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Birmingham Routledge 23.02.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0013-1911
1465-3397
DOI10.1080/00131911.2021.1909537

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study examines how access to the academic curriculum creates patterns of inequality in Australian schools. Examining students' access to the academic curriculum gives an indication of how schooling is structured to support students in pursuing higher education opportunities. To date, little research attention has been given to the opportunities schools offer students to access the academic curriculum in order to enter university. Using administrative data on students and schools, we find that there are fewer average curriculum subjects, and less complexity in the subjects offered, in schools with low levels of socio-educational advantage. We argue that curriculum differentiation across schools is a systemic constraint that students in schools with higher levels of socio-educational disadvantage face in progressing to university because these schools are less able to provide students with access to core academic curriculum subjects in the final year of secondary school. Previous research has highlighted the social differences reflected in both educational access and outcomes due to the marketisation of schools and policies of school choice. Our findings indeed demonstrate that there are relationships between access to the academic curriculum, school socio-educational advantage and the social composition of schools, and these factors have important educational policy implications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0013-1911
1465-3397
DOI:10.1080/00131911.2021.1909537