Mendelian randomization in the multivariate general linear model framework

• Published in: Genetic epidemiology Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 17 - 31
• Main Authors: Allman, Phillip H., Aban, Inmaculada, Long, Dustin M., Patki, Amit, MacKenzie, Todd, Irvin, Marguerite R., Lange, Leslie A., Lange, Ethan, Cutter, Gary, Tiwari, Hemant K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.02.2022
• Subjects: Bias; Causality; general linear model; Genetic diversity; genetics; Humans; Hypothesis testing; instrumental variable; Linear Models; Mendelian randomization; Mendelian Randomization Analysis - methods; Models, Genetic; Simulation; Smoking; Smoking - genetics; genetics; instrumental variable; Mendelian randomization; general linear model
• ISSN: 0741-0395; 1098-2272; 1098-2272
• DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22435

Mendelian randomization (MR) is an application of instrumental variable (IV) methods to observational data in which the IV is a genetic variant. MR methods applicable to the general exponential family of distributions are currently not well characterized. We adapt a general linear model framework to the IV setting and propose a general MR method applicable to any full‐rank distribution from the exponential family. Empirical bias and coverage are estimated via simulations. The proposed method is compared to several existing MR methods. Real data analyses are performed using data from the REGARDS study to estimate the potential causal effect of smoking frequency on stroke risk in African Americans. In simulations with binary variates and very weak instruments the proposed method had the lowest median [Q1, Q3] bias (0.10 [−3.68 to 3.62]); compared with 2SPS (0.27 [−3.74 to 4.26]) and the Wald method (−0.69 [−1.72 to 0.35]). Low bias was observed throughout other simulation scenarios; as well as more than 90% coverage for the proposed method. In simulations with count variates, the proposed method performed comparably to 2SPS; the Wald method maintained the most consistent low bias; and 2SRI was biased towards the null. Real data analyses find no evidence for a causal effect of smoking frequency on stroke risk. The proposed MR method has low bias and acceptable coverage across a wide range of distributional scenarios and instrument strengths; and provides a more parsimonious framework for asymptotic hypothesis testing compared to existing two‐stage procedures.