Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography

The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. A total of 170 adnexal masses in 161 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of or not s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 164; no. 2; pp. 381 - 386
Main Authors Stein, SM, Laifer-Narin, S, Johnson, MB, Roman, LD, Muderspach, LI, Tyszka, JM, Ralls, PW
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.02.1995
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839975

Cover

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. A total of 170 adnexal masses in 161 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of or not suggestive of malignant tumor on the basis of gray-scale morphology, internal flow versus peripheral or no flow, and spectral Doppler pulsatility, as measured by a pulsatility index (PI) threshold of 1.0 and a resistive index (RI) threshold of 0.4. Surgical pathology revealed 123 benign masses and 46 malignant masses. One malignant mass was confirmed by cytologic evaluation of ascitic fluid. On gray-scale analysis, 46 of the 47 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of tumor, and 76 of the 123 benign masses were classified as not suggestive of tumor (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 62%; negative predictive value [NPV], 99%; and positive predictive value [PPV], 50%). The use of internal color flow as a predictor of malignant tumor yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 69%, an NPV of 89%, and a PPV of 49%. The PI and RI values were significantly lower (p < .0001) in malignant masses than in benign masses, although the values overlapped considerably. For a PI of less than 1.0, sensitivity was 67%, specificity was 66%, NPV was 83%, and PPV was 46%. For an RI of less than 0.4, sensitivity was 24%, specificity was 90%, NPV was 73%, and PPV was 50%. In our series, a gray-scale prediction of benignity was reliable (NPV = 99%), and a prediction of malignancy was unreliable (PPV = 50%). Internal color flow was not useful as a predictor of malignancy (PPV = 49%). Although the absence of internal or peripheral color flow suggested benignity (NPV = 94%), only 17 (16 benign) of the masses (about 10%) had no flow. Spectral Doppler analysis with RI and PI was not useful, as no reliable discriminatory value with both high sensitivity and high specificity could be found for either parameter because of the overlap in values obtained for benign and malignant masses.
AbstractList The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses.A total of 170 adnexal masses in 161 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of or not suggestive of malignant tumor on the basis of gray-scale morphology, internal flow versus peripheral or no flow, and spectral Doppler pulsatility, as measured by a pulsatility index (PI) threshold of 1.0 and a resistive index (RI) threshold of 0.4.SUBJECTS AND METHODSA total of 170 adnexal masses in 161 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of or not suggestive of malignant tumor on the basis of gray-scale morphology, internal flow versus peripheral or no flow, and spectral Doppler pulsatility, as measured by a pulsatility index (PI) threshold of 1.0 and a resistive index (RI) threshold of 0.4.Surgical pathology revealed 123 benign masses and 46 malignant masses. One malignant mass was confirmed by cytologic evaluation of ascitic fluid. On gray-scale analysis, 46 of the 47 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of tumor, and 76 of the 123 benign masses were classified as not suggestive of tumor (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 62%; negative predictive value [NPV], 99%; and positive predictive value [PPV], 50%). The use of internal color flow as a predictor of malignant tumor yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 69%, an NPV of 89%, and a PPV of 49%. The PI and RI values were significantly lower (p < .0001) in malignant masses than in benign masses, although the values overlapped considerably. For a PI of less than 1.0, sensitivity was 67%, specificity was 66%, NPV was 83%, and PPV was 46%. For an RI of less than 0.4, sensitivity was 24%, specificity was 90%, NPV was 73%, and PPV was 50%.RESULTSSurgical pathology revealed 123 benign masses and 46 malignant masses. One malignant mass was confirmed by cytologic evaluation of ascitic fluid. On gray-scale analysis, 46 of the 47 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of tumor, and 76 of the 123 benign masses were classified as not suggestive of tumor (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 62%; negative predictive value [NPV], 99%; and positive predictive value [PPV], 50%). The use of internal color flow as a predictor of malignant tumor yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 69%, an NPV of 89%, and a PPV of 49%. The PI and RI values were significantly lower (p < .0001) in malignant masses than in benign masses, although the values overlapped considerably. For a PI of less than 1.0, sensitivity was 67%, specificity was 66%, NPV was 83%, and PPV was 46%. For an RI of less than 0.4, sensitivity was 24%, specificity was 90%, NPV was 73%, and PPV was 50%.In our series, a gray-scale prediction of benignity was reliable (NPV = 99%), and a prediction of malignancy was unreliable (PPV = 50%). Internal color flow was not useful as a predictor of malignancy (PPV = 49%). Although the absence of internal or peripheral color flow suggested benignity (NPV = 94%), only 17 (16 benign) of the masses (about 10%) had no flow. Spectral Doppler analysis with RI and PI was not useful, as no reliable discriminatory value with both high sensitivity and high specificity could be found for either parameter because of the overlap in values obtained for benign and malignant masses.CONCLUSIONIn our series, a gray-scale prediction of benignity was reliable (NPV = 99%), and a prediction of malignancy was unreliable (PPV = 50%). Internal color flow was not useful as a predictor of malignancy (PPV = 49%). Although the absence of internal or peripheral color flow suggested benignity (NPV = 94%), only 17 (16 benign) of the masses (about 10%) had no flow. Spectral Doppler analysis with RI and PI was not useful, as no reliable discriminatory value with both high sensitivity and high specificity could be found for either parameter because of the overlap in values obtained for benign and malignant masses.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses. A total of 170 adnexal masses in 161 patients were classified prospectively as suggestive of or not suggestive of malignant tumor on the basis of gray-scale morphology, internal flow versus peripheral or no flow, and spectral Doppler pulsatility, as measured by a pulsatility index (PI) threshold of 1.0 and a resistive index (RI) threshold of 0.4. Surgical pathology revealed 123 benign masses and 46 malignant masses. One malignant mass was confirmed by cytologic evaluation of ascitic fluid. On gray-scale analysis, 46 of the 47 malignant masses were classified as suggestive of tumor, and 76 of the 123 benign masses were classified as not suggestive of tumor (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 62%; negative predictive value [NPV], 99%; and positive predictive value [PPV], 50%). The use of internal color flow as a predictor of malignant tumor yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 69%, an NPV of 89%, and a PPV of 49%. The PI and RI values were significantly lower (p < .0001) in malignant masses than in benign masses, although the values overlapped considerably. For a PI of less than 1.0, sensitivity was 67%, specificity was 66%, NPV was 83%, and PPV was 46%. For an RI of less than 0.4, sensitivity was 24%, specificity was 90%, NPV was 73%, and PPV was 50%. In our series, a gray-scale prediction of benignity was reliable (NPV = 99%), and a prediction of malignancy was unreliable (PPV = 50%). Internal color flow was not useful as a predictor of malignancy (PPV = 49%). Although the absence of internal or peripheral color flow suggested benignity (NPV = 94%), only 17 (16 benign) of the masses (about 10%) had no flow. Spectral Doppler analysis with RI and PI was not useful, as no reliable discriminatory value with both high sensitivity and high specificity could be found for either parameter because of the overlap in values obtained for benign and malignant masses.
Author Roman, LD
Muderspach, LI
Stein, SM
Laifer-Narin, S
Johnson, MB
Tyszka, JM
Ralls, PW
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Stein, SM
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Laifer-Narin, S
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Johnson, MB
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Roman, LD
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Muderspach, LI
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Tyszka, JM
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Ralls, PW
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3425227$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7839975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kc1uEzEUhS1UVNLAA7BA8gKx6gT_zXiGHWqBIlViAxI7y-O5Tlw59mBPGrLnwXGaUVWxYGXL9ztHPvdcoLMQAyD0mpIVY1S813dpRRuxYivZ8q6T9TO0oLVoKk4FPUMLwhtatYT_fIEucr4jhMi2k-fofMYX6M-1sxYShMnpycWAo8U9BLcOWIcBb7UvVx0mrIcAv7UvLzlD_oAT-CK4B3yv_Q6OsnXShyob7eESm-hjwtdxHD2kywerPIKZUnGYX3GOIRbNuDm8RM-t9hlezecS_fj86fvVTXX77cvXq4-3leF1M1XacCY5t5oxQpq2H7Q0tSR905ta9LbjWtRWmqHmJaglskC9IIXoBDSMA1-idyffMcVfO8iT2rpswHsdIO6ykpJyRrgo4JsZ3PVbGNSY3Fang5rXVuZv57k-BrZJB-PyI8YFq1n56hLRE2ZSzDmBfSQoUccCVSlQlQIVe2It_9EYNz1UU5bn_H-Vc7qNW2_2LoHKpT5fIlC13-9PMG8p_wt3M67r
CODEN AAJRDX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_012_2229_2
crossref_primary_10_17116_onkolog20154352_58
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2005_10_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2024_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_09090552
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2019181814
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00129_006_1839_9
crossref_primary_10_17116_onkolog20176510_14
crossref_primary_10_2217_17520363_2_3_291
crossref_primary_10_1089_jwh_2007_0476
crossref_primary_10_1097_00003081_199912000_00018
crossref_primary_10_4236_ojog_2013_37A1005
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiology_216_1_r00jl15242
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0301_5629_96_00216_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8389_05_70295_5
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1525_1438_1999_99032_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rigp_2003_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1447_0756_2011_01642_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1740_8261_1998_tb01616_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2006_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13224_012_0307_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_RCT_0b013e3181568890
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpobgyn_2009_01_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0020_7292_98_00018_6
crossref_primary_10_3109_10739689709148315
crossref_primary_10_14260_jemds_2015_2398
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_24119
crossref_primary_10_18410_jebmh_2017_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_5150
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_6444
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0929_8266_97_10023_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_017_1272_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_0301_5629_96_00087_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8389_01_00009_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_00003081_200109000_00006
crossref_primary_10_37549_AR1366
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_171_6_9843295
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_32970_X
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2233001850
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiology_212_1_r99jl3619
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_006_0163_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2004_10_630
crossref_primary_10_1111_IGC_0b013e3181a1d73e
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2005_10_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2007_02_040
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cult_2010_03_003
crossref_primary_10_1177_875647939701300105
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiology_217_3_r00dc20803
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2007_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_GCO_0b013e328011ec99
crossref_primary_10_18410_jebmh_2015_591
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_05_2226
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2003_12_006
crossref_primary_10_18410_jebmh_2021_98
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2008_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2018172271
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpet_2017_11_003
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10032_1007
crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_326125512
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0b013e318242b4e0
crossref_primary_10_1097_00130747_200403000_00001
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0976_0016_12_60095_7
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiology_214_1_r00ja3939
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cult_2011_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0033_8389_22_00441_9
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiographics_20_5_g00se101445
crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2005_20_3_468
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0887_2171_99_90069_0
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_1893
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1074_3804_99_80051_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1471_0528_2000_tb11646_x
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcp0901926
crossref_primary_10_3109_14722240108500425
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 1995 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 1995 INIST-CNRS
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839975
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1546-3141
EndPage 386
ExternalDocumentID 7839975
3425227
10_2214_ajr_164_2_7839975
www164_2_381
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations United States
North America
America
GroupedDBID -
08R
1KJ
23M
2WC
3O-
53G
55
5GY
5RE
AAEJM
AAWTL
ABFLS
ABOCM
ACRZS
ADACO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFFNX
AJJEV
AJYGW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
C1A
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
GJ
GX1
H13
L7B
LSO
O0-
P2P
SJN
TRR
UDS
VH1
W2D
WH7
WOQ
X7M
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
---
-DD
.55
.GJ
1CY
34G
39C
AAYXX
AI.
CITATION
J5H
MJL
TR2
TWZ
W8F
YJK
YQI
YQJ
ZVN
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-ac32733fa220068bda7c570b6bc54bf93a45f7cd53000f07006b4057094e623e3
ISSN 0361-803X
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 05:18:55 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:21:45 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:31 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:45:21 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 10 19:18:33 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Sonography
Doppler ultrasound study
Human
Intravaginal administration
Color
Adnexa uteri
Malignant tumor
Experimental study
Spectral analysis
Female genital diseases
Genital diseases
Gray scale
Echography
Female
Diagnosis
Benign neoplasm
Adnexal diseases
Public health
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c356t-ac32733fa220068bda7c570b6bc54bf93a45f7cd53000f07006b4057094e623e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 7839975
PQID 77132034
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_77132034
pubmed_primary_7839975
pascalfrancis_primary_3425227
crossref_primary_10_2214_ajr_164_2_7839975
crossref_citationtrail_10_2214_ajr_164_2_7839975
highwire_smallpub1_www164_2_381
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1995-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1995-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 1995
  text: 1995-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace Leesburg, VA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Leesburg, VA
– name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of roentgenology (1976)
PublicationTitleAlternate AJR Am J Roentgenol
PublicationYear 1995
Publisher Am Roentgen Ray Soc
American Roentgen Ray Society
Publisher_xml – name: Am Roentgen Ray Soc
– name: American Roentgen Ray Society
SSID ssj0007897
Score 1.8158028
Snippet The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the relative usefulness of color Doppler, spectral Doppler, and gray-scale sonography in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 381
SubjectTerms Adnexal Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Diagnosis, Differential
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Genital system. Mammary gland
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Ovarian Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
Title Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography
URI http://www.ajronline.org/cgi/content/abstract/164/2/381
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7839975
https://www.proquest.com/docview/77132034
Volume 164
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1546-3141
  dateEnd: 20240930
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007897
  issn: 0361-803X
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19650101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVFQY
  databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1546-3141
  dateEnd: 20240930
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007897
  issn: 0361-803X
  databaseCode: GX1
  dateStart: 19650101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php
  providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELbKIiEuiNeKAgs-cKKb0NhO0nKroEsXbVup7Uq9RXZir0BLi_qgLHd-Hv-J8Stpy5tLVbmJY-X76hnbM98g9EwWCeGc8oAIVgRMxSQQqVQBi4umYlwp1dTJyf1B0jtnb6fxtFb7thW1tF6JMP_y07yS_0EV2gBXnSX7D8iWnUIDfAd84RMQhs-_wvi1q26yelc6fkLOdKVNvR3-AVzsCx3n0uDFTH7WaSJcH_GaXQCbw_JJNrTat9k3uFjwq2CZu_hiLWa9APcanNQqxNOkZeqMftfeAGd9W_Laq9n6U6AtWYrFHIapBWGN5JNWhwIPZWsbYjzpnpqIg3FYbdCedU5PuqNg0Bm538p4n2FvMB6atn5YFY4eDfsd03gWukjmwiX4xT4E2jPQD3HkxtUY8Ssfwro1OdIkAutqaglXM7kVRHeUJVvzMrV1YZyJp1Z9e996EBIxbRrfL0LoKSRhCt5j2xZ22VXq3rOgZVwjhRmQkPQauk7SJNEFNd5Mq4ijtGVq_ZRDt4fs-qkvfnjmrpvkpat15C7XTFC26sqvl0XGPZrcRrfcugZ3LEnvoJqc3UU3-i5y4x76usdVPFfYchUDs3DJVey4ii1X8UvsmYoNU_V9FVOPseEpdnw8Nn15lvpWXLH0Pjo_6U5e9QJXAiTIaZysAp5T8K-p4kRvfbVEwdM8TpsiEXnMhGpTzmKV5kVM4f0qMF_NROglSLPNJDj2kh6ig9l8Jh8gXDCapIIKkheSiYi3ZYsLxSKRKy54EdVR07_xLHf6-LpMy2UG62QNUgYgZQBSRjIHUh09L2_5aMVhfnfxUw9jtoS3eglwRdlms7FXAUPr6GgH3bJPRyvowaOdgRHQJ3t8JufrZZamWgmBsjo6tCQob3UPf_iHrh-hm9V_8TE6WC3W8gi87ZV4Yjj8HS0Z1ks
linkProvider Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation+of+benign+and+malignant+adnexal+masses+%3A+relative+value+of+gray-scale%2C+color+Doppler%2C+and+spectral+Doppler+sonography&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+roentgenology+%281976%29&rft.au=STEIN%2C+S.+M&rft.au=LAIFER-NARIN%2C+S&rft.au=JOHNSON%2C+M.+B&rft.au=ROMAN%2C+L.+D&rft.date=1995-02-01&rft.pub=American+Roentgen+Ray+Society&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214%2Fajr.164.2.7839975&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=3425227
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0361-803X&client=summon