Benchmarking airborne laser scanning tree segmentation algorithms in broadleaf forests shows high accuracy only for canopy trees

Individual tree segmentation from airborne laser scanning data is a longstanding and important challenge in forest remote sensing. Tree segmentation algorithms are widely available, but robust intercomparison studies are rare due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable reference data. Here we provid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation Vol. 123; p. 103490
Main Authors Cao, Yujie, Ball, James G.C., Coomes, David A., Steinmeier, Leon, Knapp, Nikolai, Wilkes, Phil, Disney, Mathias, Calders, Kim, Burt, Andrew, Lin, Yi, Jackson, Toby D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1569-8432
1872-826X
1872-826X
DOI10.1016/j.jag.2023.103490

Cover

More Information
Summary:Individual tree segmentation from airborne laser scanning data is a longstanding and important challenge in forest remote sensing. Tree segmentation algorithms are widely available, but robust intercomparison studies are rare due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable reference data. Here we provide a benchmark data set for temperate and tropical broadleaf forests generated from labelled terrestrial laser scanning data. We compared the performance of four widely used tree segmentation algorithms against this benchmark data set. All algorithms performed reasonably well on the canopy trees. The point cloud-based algorithm AMS3D (Adaptive Mean Shift 3D) had the highest overall accuracy, closely followed by the 2D raster based region growing algorithm Dalponte2016 +. However, all algorithms failed to accurately segment the understory trees. This result was consistent across both forest types. This study emphasises the need to assess tree segmentation algorithms directly using benchmark data, rather than comparing with forest indices such as biomass or the number and size distribution of trees. We provide the first openly available benchmark data set for tropical forests and we hope future studies will extend this work to other regions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1569-8432
1872-826X
1872-826X
DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2023.103490