Active earth pressure for subgrade retaining walls in cohesive backfills with tensile strength cut-off subjected to seepage effects

The commonly used Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) failure condition has a limitation that it overestimates the tensile strength of cohesive soils. To overcome this limitation, the tensile strength cut-off was applied where the predicted tensile strength is reduced or eliminated. This work then presented a kinema...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Central South University Vol. 27; no. 7; pp. 2148 - 2159
Main Authors Fu, He-lin, Wang, Cheng-yang, Li, Huan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Changsha Central South University 01.07.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2095-2899
2227-5223
DOI10.1007/s11771-020-4437-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:The commonly used Mohr-Coulomb (M-C) failure condition has a limitation that it overestimates the tensile strength of cohesive soils. To overcome this limitation, the tensile strength cut-off was applied where the predicted tensile strength is reduced or eliminated. This work then presented a kinematical approach to evaluate the active earth pressure on subgrade retaining walls in cohesive backfills with saturated seepage effects. An effective rotational failure mechanism was constructed assuming an associative flow rule. The impact of seepage forces, whose distribution is described by a closed-form solution, was incorporated into the analysis. The thrust of active earth pressure was derived from the energy conservation equation, and an optimization program was then coded to obtain the most critical solution. Several sets of charts were produced to perform a parameter analysis. The results show that taking soil cohesion into account has a distinct beneficial influence on the stability of retaining walls, while seepage forces have an adverse effect. The active earth pressure increases when tensile strength cut-off is considered, and this increment is more noticeable under larger cohesion.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2095-2899
2227-5223
DOI:10.1007/s11771-020-4437-4