Differences of EST-SSR and genomic-SSR markers in assessing genetic diversity in poplar

We analyzed the genetic differences of 16 poplar clones between genomic-SSR and EST-SSR markers. The statistical results show that the average number of alleles detected by genomic-SSR was 4.1, Shannon's index 1.0646, observed heterozygos- ity 0.4427 and expected heterozygosity 0.5523, while for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForestry Studies in China Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors Song, Yue-peng, Jiang, Xi-bing, Zhang, Man, Wang, Ze-liang, Bo, Wen-hao, An, Xin-min, Zhang, De-qiang, Zhang, Zhi-yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Beijing Forestry University 01.03.2012
Springer Nature B.V
National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Tree and Ornamental Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Laboratory of State Forestry Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, P.R.China%College of Horticulture, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1008-1321
2095-4034
1993-0372
2197-5620
DOI10.1007/s11632-012-0106-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:We analyzed the genetic differences of 16 poplar clones between genomic-SSR and EST-SSR markers. The statistical results show that the average number of alleles detected by genomic-SSR was 4.1, Shannon's index 1.0646, observed heterozygos- ity 0.4427 and expected heterozygosity 0.5523, while for the EST-SSR, the average number of alleles was 2.8, Shannon's index 0.6985, observed heterozygosity 0.2330 and expected heterozygosity 0.4684. Cluster analysis indicated that the EST-SSR capacity of genotypic identification was more precise than that of genomic-SSR. These resuks reveal that EST-SSR and genomic-SSR have statistically significant genetic differences in polymorphism detection and genotypic identification. These differences could provide a theoretical basis for the rational use of SSR markers in species diversity and other related research.
Bibliography:poplar, genomic-SSR, EST-SSR, genetic differences
11-3919/S
We analyzed the genetic differences of 16 poplar clones between genomic-SSR and EST-SSR markers. The statistical results show that the average number of alleles detected by genomic-SSR was 4.1, Shannon's index 1.0646, observed heterozygos- ity 0.4427 and expected heterozygosity 0.5523, while for the EST-SSR, the average number of alleles was 2.8, Shannon's index 0.6985, observed heterozygosity 0.2330 and expected heterozygosity 0.4684. Cluster analysis indicated that the EST-SSR capacity of genotypic identification was more precise than that of genomic-SSR. These resuks reveal that EST-SSR and genomic-SSR have statistically significant genetic differences in polymorphism detection and genotypic identification. These differences could provide a theoretical basis for the rational use of SSR markers in species diversity and other related research.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1008-1321
2095-4034
1993-0372
2197-5620
DOI:10.1007/s11632-012-0106-5