The Diagnostic Value of Contrast‐Enhanced Vessel Wall MRI for Diagnosing Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
ABSTRACT Background Imaging biomarkers for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) are highly needed, and intracranial contrast‐enhanced vessel wall imaging (CE‐VWI) can potentially detect cerebral vessel wall abnormalities in lupus. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of CE‐VWI i...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 62; no. 4; pp. 1021 - 1034 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2025
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI | 10.1002/jmri.29810 |
Cover
Summary: | ABSTRACT
Background
Imaging biomarkers for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) are highly needed, and intracranial contrast‐enhanced vessel wall imaging (CE‐VWI) can potentially detect cerebral vessel wall abnormalities in lupus.
Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic value of CE‐VWI in differentiating NPSLE from non‐NPSLE.
Study Type
Cross‐sectional, retrospective.
Subjects
Forty‐seven patients with NPSLE (mean age, 44.3 years ± 13.2 standard deviation [SD], 40 females, 85%) and 52 patients without NPSLE (mean age, 43.0 years ± 16.5 SD, 49 females, 89%). The non‐NPSLE group consisted of SLE patients who had no NP symptoms or were diagnosed with comorbidities from other diseases.
Field Strength/Sequence
3‐T, three‐dimensional (3D) contrast‐enhanced vessel wall imaging (3D‐T1‐CUBE).
Assessment
Vessel wall lesions (VWLs) were visually assessed across 15 segments, from the internal carotid artery and basilar artery to A1–A2 for ACA, M1–M2 for MCA, and P1–P2 for PCA, for wall thickening and enhancement. Conventional MRI and MR angiography were also used to assess infarction, hemorrhage, atrophy, and arterial stenosis.
Statistical Tests
Paired comparisons using the chi‐square and unpaired t‐tests were followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating factors with significant group differences to identify associations with NPSLE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) assessed the diagnostic performance of CE‐VWI. A p‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The NPSLE group showed a significantly higher number of contrast‐enhancing VWLs (CE‐VWLs; median [interquartile range]: 2 [0.5–4] vs. 0 [0–1]). Cerebral infarctions and arterial stenotic lesions were more common in NPSLE, occurring in 12 (26%) vs. 2 (3%) and 19 (40%) vs. 5 (9%) of patients, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified CE‐VWLs as the sole significant factor associated with NPSLE (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.23–3.16). The ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.78 for CE‐VWLs, with a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 87%.
Data Conclusion
CE‐VWI may demonstrate high specificity and good diagnostic performance in differentiating NPSLE from non‐NPSLE.
Evidence Level
3.
Technical Efficacy
Stage 2. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 21K15836. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.29810 |