Agreement between supine and standing bioimpedance spectroscopy devices and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for body composition determination

Summary Background Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare a stand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical physiology and functional imaging Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 355 - 361
Main Authors Esco, Michael R., Fedewa, Michael V., Freeborn, Todd J., Moon, Jordan R., Wingo, Jonathan E., Cicone, Zack, Holmes, Clifton J., Hornikel, Bjoern, Welborn, Bailey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1475-0961
1475-097X
1475-097X
DOI10.1111/cpf.12585

Cover

Abstract Summary Background Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BISSTA) and a supine BIS device (BISSUP) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat‐free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels. Methods Ninety‐five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BISSTA, BISSUP and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8‐ to 12‐h fast in a euhydration state. Results Supine BIS device and BISSTA produced r‐values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were ‘trivial’ for FFM comparing both BISSUP and BISSTA to DXA (<0·1) and ‘small’ for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BISSTA resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < −1·82 kg) versus BISSUP (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < −3·10 kg) for FFM. Conclusion Fat‐free mass values for BISSTA resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.
AbstractList Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position.BACKGROUNDResearch comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position.The purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BISSTA ) and a supine BIS device (BISSUP ) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels.PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BISSTA ) and a supine BIS device (BISSUP ) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels.Ninety-five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BISSTA , BISSUP and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8- to 12-h fast in a euhydration state.METHODSNinety-five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BISSTA , BISSUP and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8- to 12-h fast in a euhydration state.Supine BIS device and BISSTA produced r-values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were 'trivial' for FFM comparing both BISSUP and BISSTA to DXA (<0·1) and 'small' for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BISSTA resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < -1·82 kg) versus BISSUP (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < -3·10 kg) for FFM.RESULTSSupine BIS device and BISSTA produced r-values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were 'trivial' for FFM comparing both BISSUP and BISSTA to DXA (<0·1) and 'small' for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BISSTA resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < -1·82 kg) versus BISSUP (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < -3·10 kg) for FFM.Fat-free mass values for BISSTA resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.CONCLUSIONFat-free mass values for BISSTA resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.
Summary Background Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BISSTA) and a supine BIS device (BISSUP) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat‐free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels. Methods Ninety‐five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BISSTA, BISSUP and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8‐ to 12‐h fast in a euhydration state. Results Supine BIS device and BISSTA produced r‐values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were ‘trivial’ for FFM comparing both BISSUP and BISSTA to DXA (<0·1) and ‘small’ for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BISSTA resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < −1·82 kg) versus BISSUP (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < −3·10 kg) for FFM. Conclusion Fat‐free mass values for BISSTA resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.
BackgroundResearch comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BISSTA) and a supine BIS device (BISSUP) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat‐free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels.MethodsNinety‐five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BISSTA, BISSUP and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8‐ to 12‐h fast in a euhydration state.ResultsSupine BIS device and BISSTA produced r‐values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were ‘trivial’ for FFM comparing both BISSUP and BISSTA to DXA (<0·1) and ‘small’ for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BISSTA resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < −1·82 kg) versus BISSUP (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < −3·10 kg) for FFM.ConclusionFat‐free mass values for BISSTA resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.
Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures in a standing position instead of the traditional supine position. The purpose of this study was to compare a standing BIS device (BIS ) and a supine BIS device (BIS ) to DXA for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in a cohort of male and female subjects displaying a wide range of ages and BMI levels. Ninety-five subjects (30 ± 15 years, 170 ± 8·0 cm, 72·6 ± 14·8 kg) participated in the study. Body composition measures were taken from BIS , BIS and DXA during a single visit to the laboratory following an 8- to 12-h fast in a euhydration state. Supine BIS device and BIS produced r-values >0·91 and low SEE values for all measurements compared to DXA. Effect sizes were 'trivial' for FFM comparing both BIS and BIS to DXA (<0·1) and 'small' for FM and BF% (<0·39). Compared to DXA, BIS resulted in lower total (TE) and constant errors/mean differences (CE) (TE < 3·6 kg, CE < -1·82 kg) versus BIS (TE < 4·35 kg, CE < -3·10 kg) for FFM. Fat-free mass values for BIS resulted in the most comparable measurements to DXA with no mean differences and the lowest total error and effect size. However, the findings indicated both BIS devices may be acceptable alternatives to DXA for BF%, FM and FFM in clinical practice.
Author Hornikel, Bjoern
Esco, Michael R.
Wingo, Jonathan E.
Fedewa, Michael V.
Welborn, Bailey
Moon, Jordan R.
Freeborn, Todd J.
Cicone, Zack
Holmes, Clifton J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Michael R.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9470-9680
  surname: Esco
  fullname: Esco, Michael R.
  email: mresco@ua.edu
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael V.
  surname: Fedewa
  fullname: Fedewa, Michael V.
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Todd J.
  surname: Freeborn
  fullname: Freeborn, Todd J.
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jordan R.
  surname: Moon
  fullname: Moon, Jordan R.
  organization: ImpediMed, Inc. Clinical Department
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jonathan E.
  surname: Wingo
  fullname: Wingo, Jonathan E.
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Zack
  surname: Cicone
  fullname: Cicone, Zack
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Clifton J.
  surname: Holmes
  fullname: Holmes, Clifton J.
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Bjoern
  surname: Hornikel
  fullname: Hornikel, Bjoern
  organization: University of Alabama
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Bailey
  surname: Welborn
  fullname: Welborn, Bailey
  organization: University of Alabama
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31287228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1u1DAUhS3Uiv7AghdAltjAYto4jp1kWY0oIFWii1bqzvLPzchVYhvbocqOR0DiDXkS3Jkpiwq8sK_l7xz53nOCDpx3gNAbUp2Rss51GM5IzTr2Ah2TpmWrqm_vDv7WnByhk5Tuq4q0tGlfoiNK6q6t6-4Y_brYRIAJXMYK8gOAw2kO1gGWzuCUy27dBivr7RTASKcBpwA6R5-0Dws28N1qSFvczHL8_eMnOIibBd-VMsoFS5V8DNn6CXJc8OAjVt4sWPsp-GTLgysuGeJknXy8vUKHgxwTvN6fp-j28uPN-vPq6uunL-uLq5WmjLKVUjWVnBsKXT1UqvRDG2ZaoFRx2TAgnGpKgQ7amEpxCoPRQ9crXQE0VT_QU_R-5xui_zZDymKyScM4Sgd-TqKuWcNIR-u2oO-eofd-jq78rlC863vOGS3U2z01qwmMCNFOMi7iadwFON8BuowvRRiEtnnbc47SjoJU4jFQUQIV20CL4sMzxZPpv9i9-4MdYfk_KNbXlzvFH9bktT8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfca_2023_105779
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells12020263
crossref_primary_10_12965_jer_2346404_202
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2023_1212775
crossref_primary_10_1089_lrb_2019_0067
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajhb_24141
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41430_019_0496_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2025_1508805
crossref_primary_10_3390_sports8010007
crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000003321
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_89568_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2024_10_158
crossref_primary_10_1111_cob_12658
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16050614
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jare_2020_05_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nutres_2023_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1093_jn_nxac116
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clnesp_2024_07_009
crossref_primary_10_3390_fractalfract5010013
crossref_primary_10_3389_fspor_2024_1352192
Cites_doi 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.5.1542
10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc224a
10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
10.1038/ejcn.2013.148
10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003
10.1519/JSC.0000000000002831
10.1249/00005768-199504000-00018
10.1038/s41430-018-0335-3
10.1371/journal.pone.0200465
10.1007/s00421-008-0881-9
10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.010
10.1038/ejcn.2012.159
10.1249/01.MSS.0000121943.02489.2B
10.1586/17434440.5.2.239
10.1519/JSC.0000000000000732
10.1038/ejcn.2016.50
10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0228
10.1186/1743-7075-5-7
10.1152/ajpendo.00361.2003
10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90358-5
10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278
10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.025
10.1038/oby.2011.38
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2019 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2019 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QP
7TS
7U5
8FD
K9.
L7M
7X8
DOI 10.1111/cpf.12585
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Physical Education Index
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1475-097X
EndPage 361
ExternalDocumentID 31287228
10_1111_cpf_12585
CPF12585
Genre shortCommunication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Impedimed, Limited
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
29B
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6J9
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AAYXX
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
1OB
7QP
7TS
7U5
8FD
K9.
L7M
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-bb23a66d3e82f0b722345d7e33b6a45e163c33e3fcdd0b63efdcf89bc0ee409f3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1475-0961
1475-097X
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 10:36:03 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 04:37:18 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:18 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 02:26:36 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:41:06 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
fat-free mass
adiposity
bioimpedance spectroscopy
body fat
Language English
License 2019 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3535-bb23a66d3e82f0b722345d7e33b6a45e163c33e3fcdd0b63efdcf89bc0ee409f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9470-9680
PMID 31287228
PQID 2268996653
PQPubID 1006519
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2254518327
proquest_journals_2268996653
pubmed_primary_31287228
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_cpf_12585
crossref_primary_10_1111_cpf_12585
wiley_primary_10_1111_cpf_12585_CPF12585
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2019
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2019
  text: September 2019
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Clinical physiology and functional imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate Clin Physiol Funct Imaging
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2004; 287
1986; 1
2009b; 28
2015; 25
2018; 8
2009; 41
1997; 82
2019; 73
2015; 29
1995; 27
2009a; 105
2013; 67
2004; 36
2002; 102
2018
2008; 5
2016; 70
1992
2011; 25
1945; 158
2011; 19
2017; 104
2007; 26
2018; 13
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
Pace N (e_1_2_7_19_1) 1945; 158
e_1_2_7_9_1
Lohman TG (e_1_2_7_12_1) 1992
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
References_xml – volume: 158
  start-page: 685
  year: 1945
  end-page: 691
  article-title: Studies on body composition. 3. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content
  publication-title: J Biol Chem
– volume: 73
  start-page: 194
  year: 2019
  end-page: 199
  article-title: Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Total body water estimations in healthy men and women using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison
  publication-title: Nutr Metab (Lond)
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3
  year: 2009
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1542
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1558
  article-title: Predicting body cell mass with bioimpedance by using theoretical methods: a technological review
  publication-title: J Appl Physiol
– volume: 70
  start-page: 1181
  year: 2016
  article-title: Body composition in overweight and obese women postpartum: bioimpedance methods validated by dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry and doubly labeled water
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr
– volume: 105
  start-page: 119
  year: 2009a
  end-page: 130
  article-title: Estimating body fat in NCAA division I female athletes: a five‐compartment model validation of laboratory methods
  publication-title: Eur J Appl Physiol
– volume: 27
  start-page: 587
  year: 1995
  end-page: 591
  article-title: Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry and two different software packages
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
– year: 2018
  article-title: Body composition assessment in male and female bodybuilders: a 4‐compartment model comparison of dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry and impedance‐based devices
  publication-title: J Strength Cond Res
– volume: 1
  start-page: 307
  year: 1986
  end-page: 310
  article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 36
  start-page: 731
  year: 2004
  end-page: 735
  article-title: Comparison of Bod Pod and DXA in female collegiate athletes
  publication-title: Med Sci Sports Exerc
– year: 1992
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1040
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1045
  article-title: The accuracy of hand‐to‐hand bioelectrical impedance analysis in predicting body composition in college‐age female athletes
  publication-title: J Strength Cond Res
– volume: 13
  start-page: e0200465
  year: 2018
  article-title: Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index: a retrospective study on 3655 measures
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 102
  start-page: 1677
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1679
  article-title: Concurrent validity of the BOD POD and dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry techniques for assessing body composition in young women
  publication-title: J Am Diet Assoc
– volume: 25
  start-page: 198
  year: 2015
  end-page: 215
  article-title: Methodology review: using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of body composition in athletes and active people
  publication-title: Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab
– volume: 26
  start-page: 771
  year: 2007
  end-page: 777
  article-title: Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1012
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1021
  article-title: Assessing body composition in taller or broader individuals using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry: a systematic review
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr
– volume: 287
  start-page: E842
  year: 2004
  end-page: E847
  article-title: Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry lean soft tissue hydration: independent contributions of intra‐ and extracellular water
  publication-title: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
– volume: 8
  start-page: 10980
  year: 2018
  article-title: Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole‐body fat percentage ─a cross‐sectional study in American adult individuals
  publication-title: Sci Rep
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1083
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1089
  article-title: A better index of body adiposity
  publication-title: Obesity (Silver Spring)
– volume: 29
  start-page: 918
  year: 2015
  end-page: 925
  article-title: Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes
  publication-title: J Strength Cond Res
– volume: 5
  start-page: 239
  year: 2008
  end-page: 261
  article-title: Bioimpedance measurements of human body composition: critical analysis and outlook
  publication-title: Expert Rev Med Devices
– volume: 104
  start-page: 101
  year: 2017
  end-page: 105
  article-title: Body composition by DXA
  publication-title: Bone
– volume: 28
  start-page: 516
  year: 2009b
  end-page: 525
  article-title: Total body water changes after an exercise intervention tracked using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a deuterium oxide comparison
  publication-title: Clin Nutr
– volume: 67
  start-page: S10
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: S13
  article-title: Bioelectrical impedance validation studies: alternative approaches to their interpretation
  publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.5.1542
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc224a
– volume-title: Advances in Body Composition Assessment
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
– volume: 158
  start-page: 685
  year: 1945
  ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  article-title: Studies on body composition. 3. The body water and chemically combined nitrogen content in relation to fat content
  publication-title: J Biol Chem
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.148
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.003
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002831
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1249/00005768-199504000-00018
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41430-018-0335-3
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200465
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0881-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.06.010
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.159
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000121943.02489.2B
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.2.239
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000732
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.50
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0228
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-5-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00361.2003
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90358-5
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.025
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.38
SSID ssj0017347
Score 2.3503828
Snippet Summary Background Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices...
Research comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take measures...
BackgroundResearch comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) to dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited, especially with newer BIS devices that take...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 355
SubjectTerms Absorptiometry, Photon
Adiposity
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Background radiation
bioimpedance spectroscopy
Body Composition
Body fat
Body Mass Index
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Electric Impedance
fat‐free mass
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Positioning - methods
Position measurement
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Spectroscopy
Spectrum Analysis
Standing Position
Supine Position
X-rays
Young Adult
Title Agreement between supine and standing bioimpedance spectroscopy devices and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for body composition determination
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcpf.12585
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31287228
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2268996653
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2254518327
Volume 39
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 1475-0961
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1475-097X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017347
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LixQxEC6WPYgX34_RVaJ48NLDTOfRaTwti8MirIi4MAehyRMWtXuYx2E8-RME_6G_xKp0unF9gHhLk-pOOqlKvkrqAfCsrqWOcm4KpbQphNGysGUUhXBeo2yVovLk4Hz2Wp2ei1dLuTyAF4MvTB8fYjxwI8lI6zUJuLGbn4TcreIUd2dNDuZzLtMV7dsxdNS84im52FxUsqC0JjmqEFnxjG9e3ot-A5iX8WracBbX4f3Q1d7O5MN0t7VT9_mXKI7_-S834FoGouy455ybcBDaW3DlLF-134Zvx6iJp7NDlm252Ga3wipmWs8GdxhmL7oLRN6emIclt00Kj9mt9syHtAglcnL4-v7la0iOhmyJxbXZM-xdt6Yl61PYrvcM4TOznd8zMnPPtmT4lWyuQ0934Hzx8t3JaZEzOBSOS47TbktulPI86DLObIVYREhfBc6tMkIGBIOO88Cj835mFQ_Ru6hr62YhoOIZ-V04bLs23AdGihsvpSlrzYUKutbBl650yla-FlFM4Pkwl43L4c0py8bHZlBzcJCbNMgTeDqSrvqYHn8iOhoYoslivWkQq2pSECWfwJOxGgWSbllMG7od0SAopYWymsC9npHGVjiiARwEjZ1N7PD35puTN4tUePDvpA_hKsK5bAF3BIfb9S48Qsi0tY-TbPwAbggWzw
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEX3oWFAgZx4JLVbmwnjsSlKqwW6FYItdJeUORXpApIVvs4LCd-AhL_kF_CjONElIeEuDnyJHbsGfsbex4AT4tCqkqOdZJlSidCK5mYtBKJsE6hbKUid-TgPDvOpqfi9VzOd-B55wvTxofoD9xIMsJ6TQJOB9I_SbldVEPcnpW8ABfpfo7E8sW7PnjUOOchvdhY5DKhxCYxrhDZ8fSvnt-NfoOY5xFr2HIm1-B919nW0uTDcLM2Q_v5lziO__s31-FqxKLsoGWeG7Dj65twaRZv22_BtwNUxsPxIYvmXGy1WWAV07VjnUcMM2fNGYJvR_zDgucmRchsFlvmfFiHAjn5fH3_8tUHX0M2x-JSb5k2q2ZJq9Ynv15uGSJoZhq3ZWTpHs3J8CvRYoeebsPp5OXJ4TSJSRwSyyXHmTcp11nmuFdpNTI5whEhXe45N5kW0iMetJx7XlnnRibjvnK2UoWxI-9R96z4HuzWTe3vAiPdjadSp4XiIvOqUN6lNrWZyV0hKjGAZ91kljZGOKdEGx_LTtPBQS7DIA_gSU-6aMN6_Ilov-OIMkr2qkS4qkhHlHwAj_tqlEm6aNG1bzZEg7iU1sp8AHdaTupb4QgIcBAUdjbww9-bLw_fTkLh3r-TPoLL05PZUXn06vjNfbiC6C4axO3D7nq58Q8QQa3NwyAoPwC2Ixrr
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFH4qRaq4lJ0OFDCIA5eMZuIljjhVhVFZWlWISnNAirxKFZBEsxyGEz8BiX_IL-HZcSLKIiFujvwSO_Z79vfstwA8KUsuPZ-qTAipMqYkz3TuWcaMlShbOStscHA-PhFHZ-zVnM-34FnvC9PFhxgO3IJkxPU6CHhr_U9Cblo_xt1Z8ktwmQnUrgIiejvEjpoWNGYXm7KCZyGvSQorFMx4hlcvbka_IcyLgDXuOLOr8L7va2do8mG8Xumx-fxLGMf__JlrsJuQKDnoWOc6bLn6Buwcp7v2m_DtAFXxeHhIkjEXWa5brCKqtqT3hyH6vDlH6G0D95DotxniYzbthlgXV6FIHjy-vn_56qKnIZljcaE2ROllswhr1ie3WmwI4meiG7shwc49GZPhV5K9Tni6BWezF-8Oj7KUwiEzlFOcd51TJYSlTuZ-ogsEI4zbwlGqhWLcIRo0lDrqjbUTLajz1nhZajNxDjVPT2_Ddt3Ubg9I0NxozlVeSsqEk6V0Nje5EbqwJfNsBE_7uaxMim8e0mx8rHo9Bwe5ioM8gscDadsF9fgT0X7PEFWS62WFYFUGDZHTETwaqlEiwzWLql2zDjSISsNKWYzgTsdIQysU4QAOgsTORnb4e_PV4eksFu7-O-lD2Dl9PqvevDx5fQ-uILRL1nD7sL1arN19hE8r_SCKyQ9ioxma
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agreement+between+supine+and+standing+bioimpedance+spectroscopy+devices+and+dual%E2%80%90energy+X%E2%80%90ray+absorptiometry+for+body+composition+determination&rft.jtitle=Clinical+physiology+and+functional+imaging&rft.au=Esco%2C+Michael+R.&rft.au=Fedewa%2C+Michael+V.&rft.au=Freeborn%2C+Todd+J.&rft.au=Moon%2C+Jordan+R.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.issn=1475-0961&rft.eissn=1475-097X&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fcpf.12585&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_cpf_12585
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-0961&client=summon