Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment

Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inObesity surgery Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 4861 - 4867
Main Authors Manos, Thierry, Nedelcu, Marius, Nedelcu, Anamaria, Gagner, Michel, Weiss, Abdul Kader, Bastid, Christophe, Carandina, Sergio, Noel, Patrick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.11.2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0960-8923
1708-0428
1708-0428
DOI10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8

Cover

Abstract Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation. Methods All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak. Results A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes. Conclusions Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service. Graphical abstract
AbstractList IntroductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.MethodsAll consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.ResultsA total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.INTRODUCTIONLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.METHODSAll consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.RESULTSA total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.CONCLUSIONSAlthough there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.
Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation. Methods All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak. Results A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes. Conclusions Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service. Graphical abstract
Author Weiss, Abdul Kader
Nedelcu, Anamaria
Noel, Patrick
Bastid, Christophe
Nedelcu, Marius
Gagner, Michel
Carandina, Sergio
Manos, Thierry
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Thierry
  surname: Manos
  fullname: Manos, Thierry
  organization: ELSAN
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Marius
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2414-3511
  surname: Nedelcu
  fullname: Nedelcu, Marius
  email: nedelcu.marius@gmail.com
  organization: ELSAN, ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anamaria
  surname: Nedelcu
  fullname: Nedelcu, Anamaria
  organization: ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Michel
  surname: Gagner
  fullname: Gagner, Michel
  organization: Sacre Coeur Hospital
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Abdul Kader
  surname: Weiss
  fullname: Weiss, Abdul Kader
  organization: Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Christophe
  surname: Bastid
  fullname: Bastid, Christophe
  organization: ELSAN
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Sergio
  surname: Carandina
  fullname: Carandina, Sergio
  organization: ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Patrick
  surname: Noel
  fullname: Noel, Patrick
  organization: ELSAN, Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City, Mediclinic Airport Road
BookMark eNp9kE9LwzAYh4NMcJt-AU8FL16iSdr8qeBhDJ3CwIPbOaTp29nZNjPJhH176yYIO-z0Xp7n5cczQoPOdYDQNSV3lBB5HygVOceEUUy44AKrMzSkkihMMqYGaEhyQbDKWXqBRiGsSU8KxobocQ7mM5lUEXzy3gB8QzIzIXqw0bW7h2S5KU2EMpk0K-fr-NEmrkoWHkxsoYuX6LwyTYCrvztGy-enxfQFz99mr9PJHNuUs4jTwkBGU6aysuIVAVVWlphSWFvkheBScqCZLIhkJi-kMpZS4EXGwCiZW2nSMbo9_N1497WFEHVbBwtNYzpw26AZF4JxTrO0R2-O0LXb-q5f11NS5ZSzPaUOlPUuBA-VtnU0sXZd9KZuNCX6t6s-dNV9Lb3vqlWvsiN14-vW-N1pKT1IoYe7Ffj_VSesHz8Mi5w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10386_2
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5691_24_10042_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14823
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77869_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgstr_2023_1186945
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09623_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_024_07199_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_023_00357_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2023_09_003
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2023_0284
crossref_primary_10_2147_CEG_S461534
crossref_primary_10_20517_2574_1225_2024_30
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_022_05935_y
Cites_doi 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3
10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2
10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016
10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019
10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019
10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001
10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x
10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y
10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017
10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z
10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0
10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011
10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337
10.1089/lap.2020.0731
10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8
10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019
10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0
10.1155/2018/2494069
10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.028
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.
2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
– notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.
– notice: 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Public Health Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
PROQUEST
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Public Health
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: PROQUEST
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1708-0428
EndPage 4867
ExternalDocumentID 10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
1N0
1SB
203
28-
29N
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2VQ
2~H
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
40D
40E
53G
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AAQQT
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GRRUI
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KPH
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
NDZJH
NF0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RNI
ROL
RPX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJN
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W48
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7W
Z7X
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8Q
Z8V
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
ZXE
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
PUEGO
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3bae413284df5f0e8dfc0ad6ccb9b65775e147b072a9b78ac11e5b42ea879c7a3
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0960-8923
1708-0428
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 18:21:16 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 06:01:19 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 02:14:17 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:55 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:47:01 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords Double pigtail
Endoscopy
Septotomy
Leak size
Sleeve gastrectomy
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c352t-3bae413284df5f0e8dfc0ad6ccb9b65775e147b072a9b78ac11e5b42ea879c7a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-2414-3511
PQID 2578915243
PQPubID 55143
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2566255143
proquest_journals_2578915243
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8
springer_journals_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20211100
2021-11-00
20211101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2021
  text: 20211100
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
PublicationSubtitle The Journal of Metabolic Surgery and Allied Care
PublicationTitle Obesity surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev OBES SURG
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Giuliani, Romano, Marchese (CR7) 2019; 15
Mizrahi, Grinbaum, Elazary (CR14) 2021; 31
Nedelcu, Manos, Noel (CR21) 2020
De Moura, De Moura, Neto (CR6) 2019; 15
Donatelli, Dumont, Cereatti (CR9) 2015; 25
Pequignot, Fuks, Verhaeghe (CR8) 2012; 22
CR16
Garofalo, Noreau-Nguyen, Denis (CR5) 2017; 13
Buchwald, Oien (CR2) 2013; 23
Jung, Jackson, Gordon (CR3) 2021
Almadi, Bamihriz, Aljebreen (CR20) 2013; 5
Szymanski, Ontiveros, Burdick (CR11) 2018; 2018
Surace, Mercky, Demarquay (CR13) 2011; 74
Lazzati, Guy-Lachuer, Delaunay (CR1) 2014; 10
Campos, Ferreira, Teixeira (CR15) 2016; 26
Baretta, Campos, Correia (CR19) 2015; 29
Nedelcu, Manos, Cotirlet (CR10) 2015; 25
Rosenthal, Diaz (CR17) 2012; 8
Balagué, Ruiz de Adana, Ibarzabal (CR18) 2021; 17
Leeds, Burdick (CR12) 2016; 12
Eubanks, Edwards, Fearing (CR4) 2008; 206
H Buchwald (5656_CR2) 2013; 23
M Nedelcu (5656_CR10) 2015; 25
D De Moura (5656_CR6) 2019; 15
M Surace (5656_CR13) 2011; 74
I Mizrahi (5656_CR14) 2021; 31
JM Campos (5656_CR15) 2016; 26
5656_CR16
S Eubanks (5656_CR4) 2008; 206
MA Almadi (5656_CR20) 2013; 5
A Lazzati (5656_CR1) 2014; 10
A Giuliani (5656_CR7) 2019; 15
K Szymanski (5656_CR11) 2018; 2018
M Nedelcu (5656_CR21) 2020
F Garofalo (5656_CR5) 2017; 13
G Donatelli (5656_CR9) 2015; 25
A Pequignot (5656_CR8) 2012; 22
C Balagué (5656_CR18) 2021; 17
SG Leeds (5656_CR12) 2016; 12
JJ Jung (5656_CR3) 2021
RJ Rosenthal (5656_CR17) 2012; 8
G Baretta (5656_CR19) 2015; 29
References_xml – volume: 26
  start-page: 1992
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1993
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Septotomy and balloon dilation to treat chronic leak after sleeve gastrectomy: technical principles
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3
– year: 2021
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Intraoperative leak test is associated with lower postoperative bleed rate in primary sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity matched analysis of primary and revision bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2
– volume: 10
  start-page: 328
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  end-page: 334
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005–2011
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015
– volume: 206
  start-page: 935
  year: 2008
  end-page: 938
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016
– volume: 13
  start-page: 925
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  end-page: 932
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Pescarus R Evolution of endoscopic treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: from partially covered to long, fully covered stents
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1014
  year: 2019
  end-page: 9
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: management with endoscopic double pigtail drainage. A systemativ review
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019
– ident: CR16
– volume: 17
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  end-page: 43
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Insights into the treatment of postsleeve gastrectomy leak: analysis of the results of 105 cases on a national register
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1293
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1301
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Treatment of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy by endoscopic internal drainage (EID)
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x
– volume: 25
  start-page: 559
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 563
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Outcome of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy based on a new algorithm addressing leak size and gastric stenosis
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1278
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1285
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1714
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1720
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Bariatric postoperative fistula: a life-saving endoscopic procedure
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z
– volume: 22
  start-page: 712
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 720
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Is there a place for pigtail drains in the management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1416
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1419
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Endoscopic management of GI fistulae with over-the-scope clip system
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011
– volume: 5
  start-page: 337
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  end-page: 40
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Fatal aortoesophageal fistula bleeding after stenting for a leak post sleeve gastrectomy
  publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337
– year: 2020
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Aortic injuries following stent deployments in bariatric surgery-review of literature
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0731
– volume: 31
  start-page: 813
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  end-page: 819
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: low efficacy of the over-the-scope clip
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8
– volume: 8
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  end-page: 19
  ident: CR17
  article-title: International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019
– volume: 23
  start-page: 427
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  end-page: 436
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0
– volume: 15
  start-page: 124151
  year: 2019
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Outcomes of a novel bariatric stent in the management of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: a multicenter study
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 2494069
  year: 2018
  ident: CR11
  article-title: endolumenal vacuum therapy and fistulojejunostomy in the management of sleeve gastrectomy staple line leaks
  publication-title: Case Rep Surg
  doi: 10.1155/2018/2494069
– volume: 10
  start-page: 328
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 5656_CR1
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015
– year: 2021
  ident: 5656_CR3
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2
– year: 2020
  ident: 5656_CR21
  publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
  doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0731
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1293
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  ident: 5656_CR9
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x
– volume: 5
  start-page: 337
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: 5656_CR20
  publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337
– volume: 25
  start-page: 559
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 5656_CR10
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1992
  year: 2016
  ident: 5656_CR15
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3
– ident: 5656_CR16
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.028
– volume: 23
  start-page: 427
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 5656_CR2
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0
– volume: 206
  start-page: 935
  year: 2008
  ident: 5656_CR4
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016
– volume: 31
  start-page: 813
  issue: 2
  year: 2021
  ident: 5656_CR14
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1014
  year: 2019
  ident: 5656_CR7
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019
– volume: 22
  start-page: 712
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 5656_CR8
  publication-title: Obes Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0
– volume: 2018
  start-page: 2494069
  year: 2018
  ident: 5656_CR11
  publication-title: Case Rep Surg
  doi: 10.1155/2018/2494069
– volume: 8
  start-page: 8
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 5656_CR17
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019
– volume: 74
  start-page: 1416
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  ident: 5656_CR13
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1278
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  ident: 5656_CR12
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017
– volume: 17
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 5656_CR18
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1714
  issue: 7
  year: 2015
  ident: 5656_CR19
  publication-title: Surg Endosc
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z
– volume: 15
  start-page: 124151
  year: 2019
  ident: 5656_CR6
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
– volume: 13
  start-page: 925
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 5656_CR5
  publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019
SSID ssj0021622
Score 2.4326274
Snippet Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main...
IntroductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main...
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After...
SourceID proquest
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 4861
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal surgery
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Contributions
Ostomy
Patients
Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8NADD90gvgifmJ1ygm-aaHt9dO3Is4hzBdX2Fu5u6YKzna4TvC_N-naFUUFn5veQS6X_ELulzB2QVxGLazctITITBcyy1S-wpwn0wJdMjhKEMF59OAPE_d-4k0aUti8fe3eliRrT92R3Wy_ZhNj-ksoxAzX2YZH7bzQihMnXqVZtr-sHSA2N0PELw1V5uc1voajDmN-K4vW0Waww7YbmMjj5bnusjUo9tjmqCmE7zMajfnCYxrwzR-nAO_A7yTxPnRVvn5c82RGmXzG4-lTien_8ysvcz5uH5UfsGRwO74Zms0kBFMjQKpMoSRgtMFQkuVebkGY5dqSma-1ipTvBYEHthsoK3BkpIJQatsGT7kOyDCIdCDFIesVZQFHjBOoAivPEemAm3sylCDRIRIbgC40GMxuFZLqpk04TauYpl2DY1JiikpMayWmocEuV__Mlk0y_pTut3pOmwszT8lzRIglXGGw89VnNHWqX8gCygXJ-JitEcIz2FV7Pt0Sv-94_D_xE7blkInUjMM-61VvCzhF6FGps9rSPgE5-80t
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2578915243
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566255143
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1708-0428
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021622
  issn: 0960-8923
  databaseCode: AFBBN
  dateStart: 19970201
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1708-0428
  dateEnd: 20241102
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021622
  issn: 0960-8923
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 19970201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: PROQUEST
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1708-0428
  dateEnd: 20241102
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021622
  issn: 0960-8923
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 19970201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1708-0428
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021622
  issn: 0960-8923
  databaseCode: AGYKE
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com
  providerName: Springer Nature
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1708-0428
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0021622
  issn: 0960-8923
  databaseCode: U2A
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9tAEB4c-5JLSWlC3aZmC72lS_ReuRCKHOyYlpqSxOCcxD5GLdSxnEQJ9N93RpZsWmgu0mFXWjQ7u_ONZr8ZgA_MZbShV0gvDJ2M0HnSJIZ8HmdD2pIxMCETnL_Nkuk8-rKIFx2YtVwYPlbZ7on1Ru1Ky__IT1m1hmRsovDz-k5y1SiOrrYlNHRTWsGd1SnG9qAXcGasLvRG49n3y60L5iebuALhdpkStmloNBsynZ_UbGVyrxnlyPRvU7XDn_-ETGtLNDmAFw2EFNlmzl9CB1evgGtl_hIZV_wWV0vEJxQXmokgtipvf38S8zW79k5kyx_0VdXPW1EW4ro9ZX4I88n4-nwqm9II0hJiqmRoNJL5IdviirjwMHWF9bRLrDVDk8RKxehHyngq0EOjUm19H2MTBahTNbRKh0fQXZUrfA2CURZ6RUHQB6Mi1qlGTTsk0wN4hWMf_FYKuW3yhnP5imW-y3jMkstJcnktuTztw8n2mfUma8azvY9b4ebNCnrId_Pdh_fbZtJ9DmjoFZaP3Cch940hXx8-tpOye8X_R3zz_IhvYT9gPagph8fQre4f8R1hj8oMYE8tFF3Tc38AvWwyGs34fnHzdTxolI1a50H2Bx_h2TE
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LTxRBEK4gHPBiNEBYRWwTOUGHmel5mhCzKri8NgR3E25jP2o0cdlZZcDw5_xtVs3O7AYSuXGenu6kurrqq67-qgDeMZfRKq-QnlJOhug8aWJDMY-zikwyBkYxwfm0H_eG4dFFdLEAf1suDD-rbG1ibahdafmOfJdVKyNnE6oPk1-Su0ZxdrVtoaGb1gpury4x1hA7jvH2D4VwV3uHn2m_t4LgYH_wqSebLgPSEviopDIayZKTmXZFVHiYusJ62sXWmszEUZJE6IeJ8ZJAZyZJtfV9jEwYoE6TzCZa0bxPYClUYUbB39LH_f7Z-Szk8-NpHoPiBJkSlmpoO1Pynh_X7GgK5xlVyfSua5zj3Xsp2trzHTyHZw1kFd2pjr2ABRyvAPfm_Cm63GFcfB0h3qD4opl4Yqvy8va9GE74KsGJ7ug7SbH6cSnKQgzaV-2rMHwUIa3B4rgc4zoIRnXoFQVBLQyLSKcaNVlkpiOwRcEO-K0UctvUKed2GaN8XmGZJZeT5PJacnnage3ZP5NplY4HR2-0ws2bE3uVz_WrA29nn-mscQJFj7G85jExhYsMMTuw027KfIr_r_jy4RXfwHJvcHqSnxz2j1_B04B1oqY7bsBi9fsaXxPuqcxmo1wCvj22Pv8Da48Ryw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2VIiEuCEQRWwoYiZ5aq0mcxAkSQivK0tIPIdGV9hZsZ9xKbDcLTUH9a_w6ZvLRCCR66zmOLY2fx2_seR6A16xldCrwMlCqlDGWgbSppZindIpcMkZWscD56Djdm8afZslsBX73WhhOq-x9YuOoy8rxGfkOQyunzSZWO75Li_i8O3m3_C65ghTftPblNFqIHODVLwrfLt7u79Jcb0bR5MPJ-z3ZVRiQjohHLZU1SF6cXHTpEx9gVnoXmDJ1zuY2TbROMIy1DXRkcqsz48IQExtHaDKdO20U9XsH7mqlck4n1LMh2AvT9gaDIgSZEYvqBDutbC9MG100BfLMp2T296Y4MN1_LmebPW_yEB50ZFWMW3Q9ghVcPAauyvlNjLm2uPgyR_yJ4qNhyYmrq_OrN2K65EOEUoznp2Sz-uxcVF6c9PnsazC9FRM9gdVFtcCnIJjPYeA9kSyMfWIyg4Z8MQsR2JfgCMLeCoXrXijnQhnzYnhbmS1XkOWKxnJFNoKt63-W7fscN7be6I1bdGv1ohiQNYJX159plfHViVlgdcltUgoUmVyOYLuflKGL_4-4fvOIL-Eeobg43D8-eAb3I4ZEo3PcgNX6xyU-J8JT2xcNsgR8vW0o_wHc4g9l
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leak+After+Sleeve+Gastrectomy%3A+Updated+Algorithm+of+Treatment&rft.jtitle=Obesity+surgery&rft.au=Manos+Thierry&rft.au=Nedelcu+Marius&rft.au=Nedelcu+Anamaria&rft.au=Gagner+Michel&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4861&rft.epage=4867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11695-021-05656-8&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon