Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment
Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon...
Saved in:
| Published in | Obesity surgery Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 4861 - 4867 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York
Springer US
01.11.2021
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0960-8923 1708-0428 1708-0428 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8 |
Cover
| Abstract | Introduction
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.
Methods
All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.
Results
A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.
Conclusions
Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.
Graphical abstract |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | IntroductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.MethodsAll consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.ResultsA total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.ConclusionsAlthough there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.INTRODUCTIONLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation.All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.METHODSAll consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak.A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.RESULTSA total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1-7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2-6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes.Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service.CONCLUSIONSAlthough there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service. Introduction Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After an initial enthusiasm for stents, the endoscopic treatment evolved including in the current management the septotomy with balloon dilatation and pigtails insertions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the updated algorithm of endoscopic treatment of leak following LSG including septotomy and balloon dilatation. Methods All consecutive patients treated by endoscopy between January 2018 and March 2020 for leak following LSG were included in the current study. After recording the demographic and the leak history, we have analyzed the number of endoscopic sessions, the duration of treatment, and the healing rate of endoscopic treatment for 3 groups: A, small orifice (< 10 mm); B, large orifice (> 10 mm) and acute leak; and group C with large orifice and late leak. Results A total of 53 patients received endoscopic treatment for leak following LSG. The leaks achieved complete healing after average duration of 3.2 months (range 1–7 months), 2.3 months for group A, 4.2 months for group B, and 3.7 months for group C. The average number of endoscopic procedures was 2.8 (range 2–6) and was required for general population: for group A, 2.3 sessions; in group B, 3.4 sessions; and in group C, 2.7 sessions. Two out of 53 patients (3.8%) required additional treatment outside of the current algorithm, one in group A and another in group B. One patient was transferred for pulmonary abscess, and for another patient, the leak was considered chronic after a total of 14 months, and a laparoscopic fistula-jejunostomy was performed with favorable outcomes. Conclusions Although there is still no consensus for endoscopic management of leaks after LSG, the benefits of pigtails and the septotomy are undeniable, and it should be included in the armamentarium of any bariatric endoscopic service. Graphical abstract |
| Author | Weiss, Abdul Kader Nedelcu, Anamaria Noel, Patrick Bastid, Christophe Nedelcu, Marius Gagner, Michel Carandina, Sergio Manos, Thierry |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Thierry surname: Manos fullname: Manos, Thierry organization: ELSAN – sequence: 2 givenname: Marius orcidid: 0000-0002-2414-3511 surname: Nedelcu fullname: Nedelcu, Marius email: nedelcu.marius@gmail.com organization: ELSAN, ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité – sequence: 3 givenname: Anamaria surname: Nedelcu fullname: Nedelcu, Anamaria organization: ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité – sequence: 4 givenname: Michel surname: Gagner fullname: Gagner, Michel organization: Sacre Coeur Hospital – sequence: 5 givenname: Abdul Kader surname: Weiss fullname: Weiss, Abdul Kader organization: Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City – sequence: 6 givenname: Christophe surname: Bastid fullname: Bastid, Christophe organization: ELSAN – sequence: 7 givenname: Sergio surname: Carandina fullname: Carandina, Sergio organization: ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre Chirurgical de L’Obésité – sequence: 8 givenname: Patrick surname: Noel fullname: Noel, Patrick organization: ELSAN, Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai Healthcare City, Mediclinic Airport Road |
| BookMark | eNp9kE9LwzAYh4NMcJt-AU8FL16iSdr8qeBhDJ3CwIPbOaTp29nZNjPJhH176yYIO-z0Xp7n5cczQoPOdYDQNSV3lBB5HygVOceEUUy44AKrMzSkkihMMqYGaEhyQbDKWXqBRiGsSU8KxobocQ7mM5lUEXzy3gB8QzIzIXqw0bW7h2S5KU2EMpk0K-fr-NEmrkoWHkxsoYuX6LwyTYCrvztGy-enxfQFz99mr9PJHNuUs4jTwkBGU6aysuIVAVVWlphSWFvkheBScqCZLIhkJi-kMpZS4EXGwCiZW2nSMbo9_N1497WFEHVbBwtNYzpw26AZF4JxTrO0R2-O0LXb-q5f11NS5ZSzPaUOlPUuBA-VtnU0sXZd9KZuNCX6t6s-dNV9Lb3vqlWvsiN14-vW-N1pKT1IoYe7Ffj_VSesHz8Mi5w |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_023_10386_2 crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_5691_24_10042_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14823 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_77869_7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgstr_2023_1186945 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_022_09623_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_024_07199_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_023_00357_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gtc_2023_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2023_0284 crossref_primary_10_2147_CEG_S461534 crossref_primary_10_20517_2574_1225_2024_30 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_022_05935_y |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001 10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017 10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337 10.1089/lap.2020.0731 10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0 10.1155/2018/2494069 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.028 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021. 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021. – notice: 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Public Health Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland PROQUEST ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Public Health MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: PROQUEST url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1708-0428 |
| EndPage | 4867 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 1N0 1SB 203 28- 29N 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 53G 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AAQQT AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGVAE AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GRRUI H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ KDC KOV KPH LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q NDZJH NF0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RNI ROL RPX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJN SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7W Z7X Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8Q Z8V Z91 Z92 ZMTXR ZOVNA ZXE ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PUEGO 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-3bae413284df5f0e8dfc0ad6ccb9b65775e147b072a9b78ac11e5b42ea879c7a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
| ISSN | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
| IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 18:21:16 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 06:01:19 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 02:14:17 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:55 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:47:01 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 11 |
| Keywords | Double pigtail Endoscopy Septotomy Leak size Sleeve gastrectomy |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c352t-3bae413284df5f0e8dfc0ad6ccb9b65775e147b072a9b78ac11e5b42ea879c7a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2414-3511 |
| PQID | 2578915243 |
| PQPubID | 55143 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2566255143 proquest_journals_2578915243 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8 springer_journals_10_1007_s11695_021_05656_8 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20211100 2021-11-00 20211101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2021 text: 20211100 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | New York |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York |
| PublicationSubtitle | The Journal of Metabolic Surgery and Allied Care |
| PublicationTitle | Obesity surgery |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | OBES SURG |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | Giuliani, Romano, Marchese (CR7) 2019; 15 Mizrahi, Grinbaum, Elazary (CR14) 2021; 31 Nedelcu, Manos, Noel (CR21) 2020 De Moura, De Moura, Neto (CR6) 2019; 15 Donatelli, Dumont, Cereatti (CR9) 2015; 25 Pequignot, Fuks, Verhaeghe (CR8) 2012; 22 CR16 Garofalo, Noreau-Nguyen, Denis (CR5) 2017; 13 Buchwald, Oien (CR2) 2013; 23 Jung, Jackson, Gordon (CR3) 2021 Almadi, Bamihriz, Aljebreen (CR20) 2013; 5 Szymanski, Ontiveros, Burdick (CR11) 2018; 2018 Surace, Mercky, Demarquay (CR13) 2011; 74 Lazzati, Guy-Lachuer, Delaunay (CR1) 2014; 10 Campos, Ferreira, Teixeira (CR15) 2016; 26 Baretta, Campos, Correia (CR19) 2015; 29 Nedelcu, Manos, Cotirlet (CR10) 2015; 25 Rosenthal, Diaz (CR17) 2012; 8 Balagué, Ruiz de Adana, Ibarzabal (CR18) 2021; 17 Leeds, Burdick (CR12) 2016; 12 Eubanks, Edwards, Fearing (CR4) 2008; 206 H Buchwald (5656_CR2) 2013; 23 M Nedelcu (5656_CR10) 2015; 25 D De Moura (5656_CR6) 2019; 15 M Surace (5656_CR13) 2011; 74 I Mizrahi (5656_CR14) 2021; 31 JM Campos (5656_CR15) 2016; 26 5656_CR16 S Eubanks (5656_CR4) 2008; 206 MA Almadi (5656_CR20) 2013; 5 A Lazzati (5656_CR1) 2014; 10 A Giuliani (5656_CR7) 2019; 15 K Szymanski (5656_CR11) 2018; 2018 M Nedelcu (5656_CR21) 2020 F Garofalo (5656_CR5) 2017; 13 G Donatelli (5656_CR9) 2015; 25 A Pequignot (5656_CR8) 2012; 22 C Balagué (5656_CR18) 2021; 17 SG Leeds (5656_CR12) 2016; 12 JJ Jung (5656_CR3) 2021 RJ Rosenthal (5656_CR17) 2012; 8 G Baretta (5656_CR19) 2015; 29 |
| References_xml | – volume: 26 start-page: 1992 year: 2016 end-page: 1993 ident: CR15 article-title: Septotomy and balloon dilation to treat chronic leak after sleeve gastrectomy: technical principles publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3 – year: 2021 ident: CR3 article-title: Intraoperative leak test is associated with lower postoperative bleed rate in primary sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity matched analysis of primary and revision bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2 – volume: 10 start-page: 328 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 334 ident: CR1 article-title: Bariatric surgery trends in France: 2005–2011 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015 – volume: 206 start-page: 935 year: 2008 end-page: 938 ident: CR4 article-title: Use of endoscopic stents to treat anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016 – volume: 13 start-page: 925 issue: 6 year: 2017 end-page: 932 ident: CR5 article-title: Pescarus R Evolution of endoscopic treatment of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: from partially covered to long, fully covered stents publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019 – volume: 15 start-page: 1014 year: 2019 end-page: 9 ident: CR7 article-title: Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: management with endoscopic double pigtail drainage. A systemativ review publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019 – ident: CR16 – volume: 17 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 43 ident: CR18 article-title: Insights into the treatment of postsleeve gastrectomy leak: analysis of the results of 105 cases on a national register publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001 – volume: 25 start-page: 1293 issue: 7 year: 2015 end-page: 1301 ident: CR9 article-title: Treatment of leaks following sleeve gastrectomy by endoscopic internal drainage (EID) publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x – volume: 25 start-page: 559 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 563 ident: CR10 article-title: Outcome of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy based on a new algorithm addressing leak size and gastric stenosis publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y – volume: 12 start-page: 1278 issue: 7 year: 2016 end-page: 1285 ident: CR12 article-title: Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017 – volume: 29 start-page: 1714 issue: 7 year: 2015 end-page: 1720 ident: CR19 article-title: Bariatric postoperative fistula: a life-saving endoscopic procedure publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z – volume: 22 start-page: 712 issue: 5 year: 2012 end-page: 720 ident: CR8 article-title: Is there a place for pigtail drains in the management of gastric leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0 – volume: 74 start-page: 1416 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 1419 ident: CR13 article-title: Endoscopic management of GI fistulae with over-the-scope clip system publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011 – volume: 5 start-page: 337 issue: 12 year: 2013 end-page: 40 ident: CR20 article-title: Fatal aortoesophageal fistula bleeding after stenting for a leak post sleeve gastrectomy publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337 – year: 2020 ident: CR21 article-title: Aortic injuries following stent deployments in bariatric surgery-review of literature publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0731 – volume: 31 start-page: 813 issue: 2 year: 2021 end-page: 819 ident: CR14 article-title: Staple line leaks following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: low efficacy of the over-the-scope clip publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8 – volume: 8 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: 19 ident: CR17 article-title: International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019 – volume: 23 start-page: 427 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 436 ident: CR2 article-title: Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0 – volume: 15 start-page: 124151 year: 2019 ident: CR6 article-title: Outcomes of a novel bariatric stent in the management of sleeve gastrectomy leaks: a multicenter study publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis – volume: 2018 start-page: 2494069 year: 2018 ident: CR11 article-title: endolumenal vacuum therapy and fistulojejunostomy in the management of sleeve gastrectomy staple line leaks publication-title: Case Rep Surg doi: 10.1155/2018/2494069 – volume: 10 start-page: 328 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 5656_CR1 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.015 – year: 2021 ident: 5656_CR3 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2 – year: 2020 ident: 5656_CR21 publication-title: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0731 – volume: 25 start-page: 1293 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 5656_CR9 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1675-x – volume: 5 start-page: 337 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 5656_CR20 publication-title: World J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v5.i12.337 – volume: 25 start-page: 559 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 5656_CR10 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1561-y – volume: 26 start-page: 1992 year: 2016 ident: 5656_CR15 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2256-3 – ident: 5656_CR16 doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.028 – volume: 23 start-page: 427 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 5656_CR2 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0 – volume: 206 start-page: 935 year: 2008 ident: 5656_CR4 publication-title: J Am Coll Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.016 – volume: 31 start-page: 813 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 5656_CR14 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05036-8 – volume: 15 start-page: 1014 year: 2019 ident: 5656_CR7 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.03.019 – volume: 22 start-page: 712 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 5656_CR8 publication-title: Obes Surg doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0597-0 – volume: 2018 start-page: 2494069 year: 2018 ident: 5656_CR11 publication-title: Case Rep Surg doi: 10.1155/2018/2494069 – volume: 8 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 5656_CR17 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019 – volume: 74 start-page: 1416 issue: 6 year: 2011 ident: 5656_CR13 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.011 – volume: 12 start-page: 1278 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: 5656_CR12 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.017 – volume: 17 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 5656_CR18 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.001 – volume: 29 start-page: 1714 issue: 7 year: 2015 ident: 5656_CR19 publication-title: Surg Endosc doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3869-z – volume: 15 start-page: 124151 year: 2019 ident: 5656_CR6 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis – volume: 13 start-page: 925 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 5656_CR5 publication-title: Surg Obes Relat Dis doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.019 |
| SSID | ssj0021622 |
| Score | 2.4326274 |
| Snippet | Introduction
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main... IntroductionLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main... Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common procedure performed worldwide, and still the leak is considered the main limitation. After... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 4861 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Endoscopy Gastrointestinal surgery Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Contributions Ostomy Patients Surgery |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8NADD90gvgifmJ1ygm-aaHt9dO3Is4hzBdX2Fu5u6YKzna4TvC_N-naFUUFn5veQS6X_ELulzB2QVxGLazctITITBcyy1S-wpwn0wJdMjhKEMF59OAPE_d-4k0aUti8fe3eliRrT92R3Wy_ZhNj-ksoxAzX2YZH7bzQihMnXqVZtr-sHSA2N0PELw1V5uc1voajDmN-K4vW0Waww7YbmMjj5bnusjUo9tjmqCmE7zMajfnCYxrwzR-nAO_A7yTxPnRVvn5c82RGmXzG4-lTien_8ysvcz5uH5UfsGRwO74Zms0kBFMjQKpMoSRgtMFQkuVebkGY5dqSma-1ipTvBYEHthsoK3BkpIJQatsGT7kOyDCIdCDFIesVZQFHjBOoAivPEemAm3sylCDRIRIbgC40GMxuFZLqpk04TauYpl2DY1JiikpMayWmocEuV__Mlk0y_pTut3pOmwszT8lzRIglXGGw89VnNHWqX8gCygXJ-JitEcIz2FV7Pt0Sv-94_D_xE7blkInUjMM-61VvCzhF6FGps9rSPgE5-80t priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Leak After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Updated Algorithm of Treatment |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11695-021-05656-8 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2578915243 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2566255143 |
| Volume | 31 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: SpringerLink Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: AFBBN dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 20241102 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: PROQUEST customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 20241102 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19970201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium customDbUrl: eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: AGYKE dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://link.springer.com providerName: Springer Nature – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) customDbUrl: eissn: 1708-0428 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0021622 issn: 0960-8923 databaseCode: U2A dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.springerlink.com/journals/ providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1La9tAEB4c-5JLSWlC3aZmC72lS_ReuRCKHOyYlpqSxOCcxD5GLdSxnEQJ9N93RpZsWmgu0mFXWjQ7u_ONZr8ZgA_MZbShV0gvDJ2M0HnSJIZ8HmdD2pIxMCETnL_Nkuk8-rKIFx2YtVwYPlbZ7on1Ru1Ky__IT1m1hmRsovDz-k5y1SiOrrYlNHRTWsGd1SnG9qAXcGasLvRG49n3y60L5iebuALhdpkStmloNBsynZ_UbGVyrxnlyPRvU7XDn_-ETGtLNDmAFw2EFNlmzl9CB1evgGtl_hIZV_wWV0vEJxQXmokgtipvf38S8zW79k5kyx_0VdXPW1EW4ro9ZX4I88n4-nwqm9II0hJiqmRoNJL5IdviirjwMHWF9bRLrDVDk8RKxehHyngq0EOjUm19H2MTBahTNbRKh0fQXZUrfA2CURZ6RUHQB6Mi1qlGTTsk0wN4hWMf_FYKuW3yhnP5imW-y3jMkstJcnktuTztw8n2mfUma8azvY9b4ebNCnrId_Pdh_fbZtJ9DmjoFZaP3Cch940hXx8-tpOye8X_R3zz_IhvYT9gPagph8fQre4f8R1hj8oMYE8tFF3Tc38AvWwyGs34fnHzdTxolI1a50H2Bx_h2TE |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LTxRBEK4gHPBiNEBYRWwTOUGHmel5mhCzKri8NgR3E25jP2o0cdlZZcDw5_xtVs3O7AYSuXGenu6kurrqq67-qgDeMZfRKq-QnlJOhug8aWJDMY-zikwyBkYxwfm0H_eG4dFFdLEAf1suDD-rbG1ibahdafmOfJdVKyNnE6oPk1-Su0ZxdrVtoaGb1gpury4x1hA7jvH2D4VwV3uHn2m_t4LgYH_wqSebLgPSEviopDIayZKTmXZFVHiYusJ62sXWmszEUZJE6IeJ8ZJAZyZJtfV9jEwYoE6TzCZa0bxPYClUYUbB39LH_f7Z-Szk8-NpHoPiBJkSlmpoO1Pynh_X7GgK5xlVyfSua5zj3Xsp2trzHTyHZw1kFd2pjr2ABRyvAPfm_Cm63GFcfB0h3qD4opl4Yqvy8va9GE74KsGJ7ug7SbH6cSnKQgzaV-2rMHwUIa3B4rgc4zoIRnXoFQVBLQyLSKcaNVlkpiOwRcEO-K0UctvUKed2GaN8XmGZJZeT5PJacnnage3ZP5NplY4HR2-0ws2bE3uVz_WrA29nn-mscQJFj7G85jExhYsMMTuw027KfIr_r_jy4RXfwHJvcHqSnxz2j1_B04B1oqY7bsBi9fsaXxPuqcxmo1wCvj22Pv8Da48Ryw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9QwEB2VIiEuCEQRWwoYiZ5aq0mcxAkSQivK0tIPIdGV9hZsZ9xKbDcLTUH9a_w6ZvLRCCR66zmOLY2fx2_seR6A16xldCrwMlCqlDGWgbSppZindIpcMkZWscD56Djdm8afZslsBX73WhhOq-x9YuOoy8rxGfkOQyunzSZWO75Li_i8O3m3_C65ghTftPblNFqIHODVLwrfLt7u79Jcb0bR5MPJ-z3ZVRiQjohHLZU1SF6cXHTpEx9gVnoXmDJ1zuY2TbROMIy1DXRkcqsz48IQExtHaDKdO20U9XsH7mqlck4n1LMh2AvT9gaDIgSZEYvqBDutbC9MG100BfLMp2T296Y4MN1_LmebPW_yEB50ZFWMW3Q9ghVcPAauyvlNjLm2uPgyR_yJ4qNhyYmrq_OrN2K65EOEUoznp2Sz-uxcVF6c9PnsazC9FRM9gdVFtcCnIJjPYeA9kSyMfWIyg4Z8MQsR2JfgCMLeCoXrXijnQhnzYnhbmS1XkOWKxnJFNoKt63-W7fscN7be6I1bdGv1ohiQNYJX159plfHViVlgdcltUgoUmVyOYLuflKGL_4-4fvOIL-Eeobg43D8-eAb3I4ZEo3PcgNX6xyU-J8JT2xcNsgR8vW0o_wHc4g9l |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leak+After+Sleeve+Gastrectomy%3A+Updated+Algorithm+of+Treatment&rft.jtitle=Obesity+surgery&rft.au=Manos+Thierry&rft.au=Nedelcu+Marius&rft.au=Nedelcu+Anamaria&rft.au=Gagner+Michel&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4861&rft.epage=4867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs11695-021-05656-8&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-8923&client=summon |