Direct Comparison of EMLA versus Lidocaine for Pain Control in Nd: YAG 1,064 nm Laser Hair Removal

Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. OBJECTIVESTo comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDermatologic surgery Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 396 - 398
Main Authors GUARDIANO, ROBERT A., NORWOOD, Christopher W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc 01.04.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1076-0512
DOI10.1097/00042728-200504000-00004

Cover

Abstract Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. OBJECTIVESTo compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal. METHODSSixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale. RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects. CONCLUSIONSNd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic.
AbstractList Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. OBJECTIVESTo compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal. METHODSSixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale. RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects. CONCLUSIONSNd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic.
Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. To compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal. Sixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale. There was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects. Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic.
Author NORWOOD, Christopher W.
GUARDIANO, ROBERT A.
AuthorAffiliation Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: ROBERT
  surname: GUARDIANO
  middlename: A.
  fullname: GUARDIANO, ROBERT A.
  organization: Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: NORWOOD
  middlename: W.
  fullname: NORWOOD, Christopher W.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkctOwzAQRb0oog_4BeQPIDBO4thhgVSV0iKFhxAsWFlO4qiGJK7stBV_j0tpF0iI1cxYd651zwxRrzWtQggTuCCQsksAiEMW8iAEoBD7MYDtWw8NCLAkAErCPho69w5AwjSCY9QnlDMSkWiA8httVdHhiWmW0mpnWmwqPL3PxnitrFs5nOnSFFK3ClfG4iffeXHbWVNj3z6UV_htPMPkHJIYtw3OpFMWz6W2-Fk1Zi3rE3RUydqp0586Qq-305fJPMgeZ3eTcRYUEQ3jgFOacloyWuZMqZQSWiUsVAlLclKRuCr9qMKExxGrZMSL3Kct0pJCmXLOQUYjdLbzXa7yRpViaXUj7afYh_WC652gsMY5qypR6E52eptG6loQEFuiYk9UHIiKb6LegP8yOPzx_2q8W92YuvNgP-rVRlmxULLuFuKvG0ZfQTOG-A
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2008_2462
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_4725_2007_34125_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_02683555241273133
crossref_primary_10_2530_jslsm_jslsm_36_0001
crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200805000_00011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_det_2012_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clindermatol_2015_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_4725_2011_02271_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_008_0599_2
crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200901000_00014
crossref_primary_10_1080_14764172_2017_1358458
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2011_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0b013e318170a7a4
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2253_11_25
crossref_primary_10_1111_dsu_12069
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2022_11_022
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2005 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2005 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1097/00042728-200504000-00004
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EndPage 398
ExternalDocumentID 15871313
10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004
00042728-200504000-00004
Genre Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1B1
1OC
29F
31~
36B
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8L-
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAAAV
AAHHS
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAONW
AARTV
AASCR
AAUEB
AAZKR
ABASU
ABBUW
ABCQN
ABDIG
ABEML
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPXF
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABXYN
ABZAD
ABZZY
ACCFJ
ACDDN
ACDOF
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACSCC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ACXQS
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
ADZOD
AEBDS
AEETU
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AFBFQ
AFBPY
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFMBP
AFNMH
AFSOK
AFZJQ
AHQNM
AHQVU
AHVBC
AINUH
AIWBW
AJAOE
AJBDE
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKCTQ
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOQMC
AZBYB
BAFTC
BQLVK
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DIWNM
DR2
DU5
DUNZO
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
EX3
F00
F01
F04
FCALG
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GNXGY
GODZA
GQDEL
H.X
HF~
HLJTE
HOLLA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IKREB
IX1
J0M
K48
L-C
LC2
LC3
LH4
LP6
LP7
LW6
M41
MK4
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NQ-
O9-
ODMTH
OHYEH
OIG
OPUJH
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVOZU
OXXIT
P0-
P2P
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
RX1
SUPJJ
TEORI
TSPGW
UB1
UDS
W8V
W99
WOW
WQJ
WXI
WYUIH
XG1
YFH
ZGI
ZXP
ZZMQN
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
OLW
WRC
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-855985d75db7ee9515f672e676b1f14fdf67e268437fa38cb050c9d50d98880a3
ISSN 1076-0512
IngestDate Wed Feb 19 02:34:25 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:01:30 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:47 EDT 2025
Fri May 16 03:49:58 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3524-855985d75db7ee9515f672e676b1f14fdf67e268437fa38cb050c9d50d98880a3
PMID 15871313
PageCount 3
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_15871313
crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004
crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004
wolterskluwer_health_00042728-200504000-00004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-April
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-April
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Dermatologic surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Dermatol Surg
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc
References Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1747
References_xml – reference: - Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1747
SSID ssj0012930
Score 1.8903041
Snippet Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon,...
SourceID pubmed
crossref
wolterskluwer
SourceType Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 396
SubjectTerms Anesthetics, Combined
Anesthetics, Local
Double-Blind Method
Female
Hair Removal - adverse effects
Humans
Laser Therapy
Lidocaine
Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
Male
Pain - prevention & control
Pain Measurement
Prilocaine
Sex Factors
Title Direct Comparison of EMLA versus Lidocaine for Pain Control in Nd: YAG 1,064 nm Laser Hair Removal
URI https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00042728-200504000-00004
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871313
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 1076-0512
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 20141231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0012930
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBASQlzHxkV-4C2kaurYTngLa6GgtUGl08ZTlDiJNEHTqReQ-BP8Zc6xvTTZRdp4idwojqxzvpzz2T0XQt4WKlRSlKGbsYLj0Y1yU1H4bt6TfZ8HpSz1P7rjiRgd-V9O-Emn87cRtbRZZ13158q8kv_RKtwDvWKW7C00W78UbsAY9AtX0DBcb6RjY6_MN33eS9AZjg8jB4MtNivYcefgq5BIYjTh19Sk-OnYdBhOdH_n79EnB8zZAbAGp5o7h-DWls4oPV2C6OeLX3YNlr8O0JCvjcF0Vo2UagzhAXI8-BxNYq22-MNwOnOibn3aHE-P43hwoaCBc9xtnTvwRrgKIgXJ8Tb3pWoFmbbW8s2s5VJoJ-w7hQsmoWWLrUc4bR40aMPKQtHw0cx0rr5k_k1Z4Z5uINLXWOFopHTuvOlyfKG49nWP3iF3-1IIbIkxmNb1yJAbmfIWduk2NMxWAb3yTS2-U5OcB78XGAyx-qFzIRqMZvaIPLRbERoZXD0mnaJ6Qu6NbbDFU5IZeNEtvOiipAgvauBFa3hR0AdFeFELLwrDSf6eArio9w6gRas51dCiCC1qofWMHH0czg5Grm3J4Spg6r4bYD1_nkuOVbkLYOe8FLJfCCkyr_T8MoefBRYQYrJMWaAykIUKc97LwwA8Rcqek51qURUvCM2xtqUCig8-1w-DXsYYHlYIwVM_TX22R-S54BJl69Vj25SfSSNuQos8qUWeaJHvEa-eeWZqttxgzq7RzXYGD6THPFiH21JWYhKUk-sUvn_L51-S-9vP6xXZWS83xWsguuvsjQbfP3HXkwE
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct+Comparison+of+EMLA+versus+Lidocaine+for+Pain+Control+in+Nd%3A+YAG+1%2C064+nm+Laser+Hair+Removal&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic+surgery&rft.au=GUARDIANO%2C+ROBERT+A.&rft.au=NORWOOD%2C+Christopher+W.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.pub=by+the+American+Society+for+Dermatologic+Surgery%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2F00042728-200504000-00004&rft.externalDocID=00042728-200504000-00004
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon