Direct Comparison of EMLA versus Lidocaine for Pain Control in Nd: YAG 1,064 nm Laser Hair Removal
Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. OBJECTIVESTo comp...
Saved in:
Published in | Dermatologic surgery Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 396 - 398 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc
01.04.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1076-0512 |
DOI | 10.1097/00042728-200504000-00004 |
Cover
Abstract | Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy.
OBJECTIVESTo compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal.
METHODSSixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale.
RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects.
CONCLUSIONSNd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy.
OBJECTIVESTo compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal.
METHODSSixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale.
RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects.
CONCLUSIONSNd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic. Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon, pain is described by most patients undergoing long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064 nm laser therapy. To compare the efficacy of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) versus topical lidocaine (LMX) in pain control for Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal. Sixty-four patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized study over a 6-month period. Each patient had half of the treatment area covered with EMLA and the other half with LMX 30 minutes prior to treatment. Neither was applied under occlusion. Immediately following their treatment session, patients completed a visual analog pain scale. There was no statistically significant difference in pain control between EMLA and LMX. However, female test subjects demonstrated lower pain scores than male test subjects. Nd:YAG 1,064 nm laser hair removal is a painful procedure. Topical anesthetics have been proven to reduce pain for laser hair removal. There is no statistically significant difference between the two most commonly used topical anesthetics for pain control in laser hair removal. Therefore, cost and minimizing potential side effects should guide the physician in selecting the appropriate anesthetic. |
Author | NORWOOD, Christopher W. GUARDIANO, ROBERT A. |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: ROBERT surname: GUARDIANO middlename: A. fullname: GUARDIANO, ROBERT A. organization: Department of Dermatology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland – sequence: 2 givenname: Christopher surname: NORWOOD middlename: W. fullname: NORWOOD, Christopher W. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkctOwzAQRb0oog_4BeQPIDBO4thhgVSV0iKFhxAsWFlO4qiGJK7stBV_j0tpF0iI1cxYd651zwxRrzWtQggTuCCQsksAiEMW8iAEoBD7MYDtWw8NCLAkAErCPho69w5AwjSCY9QnlDMSkWiA8httVdHhiWmW0mpnWmwqPL3PxnitrFs5nOnSFFK3ClfG4iffeXHbWVNj3z6UV_htPMPkHJIYtw3OpFMWz6W2-Fk1Zi3rE3RUydqp0586Qq-305fJPMgeZ3eTcRYUEQ3jgFOacloyWuZMqZQSWiUsVAlLclKRuCr9qMKExxGrZMSL3Kct0pJCmXLOQUYjdLbzXa7yRpViaXUj7afYh_WC652gsMY5qypR6E52eptG6loQEFuiYk9UHIiKb6LegP8yOPzx_2q8W92YuvNgP-rVRlmxULLuFuKvG0ZfQTOG-A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1089_pho_2008_2462 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_4725_2007_34125_x crossref_primary_10_1177_02683555241273133 crossref_primary_10_2530_jslsm_jslsm_36_0001 crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200805000_00011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_det_2012_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clindermatol_2015_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1524_4725_2011_02271_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10103_008_0599_2 crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200901000_00014 crossref_primary_10_1080_14764172_2017_1358458 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2011_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1097_PRS_0b013e318170a7a4 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2253_11_25 crossref_primary_10_1111_dsu_12069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2022_11_022 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2005 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2005 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1097/00042728-200504000-00004 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EndPage | 398 |
ExternalDocumentID | 15871313 10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004 00042728-200504000-00004 |
Genre | Comparative Study Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1B1 1OC 29F 31~ 36B 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8L- 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAAAV AAHHS AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAONW AARTV AASCR AAUEB AAZKR ABASU ABBUW ABCQN ABDIG ABEML ABJNI ABOCM ABPXF ABVCZ ABXVJ ABXYN ABZAD ABZZY ACCFJ ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACGFS ACILI ACSCC ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ACXQS ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB ADZOD AEBDS AEETU AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AFBFQ AFBPY AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFMBP AFNMH AFSOK AFZJQ AHQNM AHQVU AHVBC AINUH AIWBW AJAOE AJBDE AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKCTQ ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AOQMC AZBYB BAFTC BQLVK BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIWNM DR2 DU5 DUNZO EBS EEVPB EJD EX3 F00 F01 F04 FCALG FEDTE G-S G.N GNXGY GODZA GQDEL H.X HF~ HLJTE HOLLA HVGLF HZ~ IHE IKREB IX1 J0M K48 L-C LC2 LC3 LH4 LP6 LP7 LW6 M41 MK4 N04 N05 N9A NF~ NQ- O9- ODMTH OHYEH OIG OPUJH OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVOZU OXXIT P0- P2P P2X P2Z P4B P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIG RLZ ROL RPZ RX1 SUPJJ TEORI TSPGW UB1 UDS W8V W99 WOW WQJ WXI WYUIH XG1 YFH ZGI ZXP ZZMQN ~IA ~WT AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM OLW WRC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-855985d75db7ee9515f672e676b1f14fdf67e268437fa38cb050c9d50d98880a3 |
ISSN | 1076-0512 |
IngestDate | Wed Feb 19 02:34:25 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:01:30 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:47 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 03:49:58 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3524-855985d75db7ee9515f672e676b1f14fdf67e268437fa38cb050c9d50d98880a3 |
PMID | 15871313 |
PageCount | 3 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_15871313 crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004 crossref_primary_10_1097_00042728_200504000_00004 wolterskluwer_health_00042728-200504000-00004 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-April |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2005 text: 2005-April |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Dermatologic surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Dermatol Surg |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc |
References | Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1747 |
References_xml | – reference: - Dermatol Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):1747 |
SSID | ssj0012930 |
Score | 1.8903041 |
Snippet | Laser hair removal is an effective therapy for the treatment of hirsutism, hypertrichosis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae. Although side effects are uncommon,... |
SourceID | pubmed crossref wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 396 |
SubjectTerms | Anesthetics, Combined Anesthetics, Local Double-Blind Method Female Hair Removal - adverse effects Humans Laser Therapy Lidocaine Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination Male Pain - prevention & control Pain Measurement Prilocaine Sex Factors |
Title | Direct Comparison of EMLA versus Lidocaine for Pain Control in Nd: YAG 1,064 nm Laser Hair Removal |
URI | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00042728-200504000-00004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871313 |
Volume | 31 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1076-0512 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19970101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true dateEnd: 20141231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0012930 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBASQlzHxkV-4C2kaurYTngLa6GgtUGl08ZTlDiJNEHTqReQ-BP8Zc6xvTTZRdp4idwojqxzvpzz2T0XQt4WKlRSlKGbsYLj0Y1yU1H4bt6TfZ8HpSz1P7rjiRgd-V9O-Emn87cRtbRZZ13158q8kv_RKtwDvWKW7C00W78UbsAY9AtX0DBcb6RjY6_MN33eS9AZjg8jB4MtNivYcefgq5BIYjTh19Sk-OnYdBhOdH_n79EnB8zZAbAGp5o7h-DWls4oPV2C6OeLX3YNlr8O0JCvjcF0Vo2UagzhAXI8-BxNYq22-MNwOnOibn3aHE-P43hwoaCBc9xtnTvwRrgKIgXJ8Tb3pWoFmbbW8s2s5VJoJ-w7hQsmoWWLrUc4bR40aMPKQtHw0cx0rr5k_k1Z4Z5uINLXWOFopHTuvOlyfKG49nWP3iF3-1IIbIkxmNb1yJAbmfIWduk2NMxWAb3yTS2-U5OcB78XGAyx-qFzIRqMZvaIPLRbERoZXD0mnaJ6Qu6NbbDFU5IZeNEtvOiipAgvauBFa3hR0AdFeFELLwrDSf6eArio9w6gRas51dCiCC1qofWMHH0czg5Grm3J4Spg6r4bYD1_nkuOVbkLYOe8FLJfCCkyr_T8MoefBRYQYrJMWaAykIUKc97LwwA8Rcqek51qURUvCM2xtqUCig8-1w-DXsYYHlYIwVM_TX22R-S54BJl69Vj25SfSSNuQos8qUWeaJHvEa-eeWZqttxgzq7RzXYGD6THPFiH21JWYhKUk-sUvn_L51-S-9vP6xXZWS83xWsguuvsjQbfP3HXkwE |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct+Comparison+of+EMLA+versus+Lidocaine+for+Pain+Control+in+Nd%3A+YAG+1%2C064+nm+Laser+Hair+Removal&rft.jtitle=Dermatologic+surgery&rft.au=GUARDIANO%2C+ROBERT+A.&rft.au=NORWOOD%2C+Christopher+W.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.pub=by+the+American+Society+for+Dermatologic+Surgery%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1076-0512&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2F00042728-200504000-00004&rft.externalDocID=00042728-200504000-00004 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-0512&client=summon |