Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests

Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEconomics of education review Vol. 84; p. 102162
Main Authors Saygin, Perihan O., Atwater, Ann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0272-7757
1873-7382
DOI10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162

Cover

Abstract Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender differences in tendency to leave questions blank across subjects, difficulty levels, and stakes. Exploiting the tracking system and using the resulting variation in the effective guessing penalty across different test sections, we find that female test-takers skip significantly more questions than male test-takers in the quantitative track while we do not find a significant difference in other tracks. Among quantitative track students, the gender gap is larger in Math and when questions are more difficult while it reverses in Literature. We also find that self-assessment is related to skipping behavior and explains part of the gender gap. Male test-takers are more likely than female test-takers to report that they are good at Math, Science, and Social Science after conditioning on their number of correct answers in the corresponding test sections. This gender gap, consistently with the one in skipping behavior, reverses when it comes to Literature. Differently from previous literature, our findings suggest that the magnitude and the sign of the gender gap in answering questions under uncertainty is context dependent.
AbstractList Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender differences in tendency to leave questions blank across subjects, difficulty levels, and stakes. Exploiting the tracking system and using the resulting variation in the effective guessing penalty across different test sections, we find that female test-takers skip significantly more questions than male test-takers in the quantitative track while we do not find a significant difference in other tracks. Among quantitative track students, the gender gap is larger in Math and when questions are more difficult while it reverses in Literature. We also find that self-assessment is related to skipping behavior and explains part of the gender gap. Male test-takers are more likely than female test-takers to report that they are good at Math, Science, and Social Science after conditioning on their number of correct answers in the corresponding test sections. This gender gap, consistently with the one in skipping behavior, reverses when it comes to Literature. Differently from previous literature, our findings suggest that the magnitude and the sign of the gender gap in answering questions under uncertainty is context dependent.
ArticleNumber 102162
Author Saygin, Perihan O.
Atwater, Ann
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Perihan O.
  surname: Saygin
  fullname: Saygin, Perihan O.
  email: psaygin@ufl.edu
  organization: Department of Economics, Robert F. Lanzillotti Public Policy Research Center and affiliate faculty, Education Policy Research Center, University of Florida, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ann
  surname: Atwater
  fullname: Atwater, Ann
  organization: Department of Economics, University of Florida, USA
BookMark eNqNkM1KAzEUhYNUsK2-Q15gan5mMulG0KJVKHSj65BJbtq0Y0aTaUGf3gwVBDe6OnC453DuN0Gj0AVACFMyo4SK690MTHbsIcJxxgij2WZUsDM0prLmRc0lG6ExYTUr6rqqL9AkpR0hpJKEj9F6CcFCxNY7BxGCgYR9wC3oow8b_H6A1PsuJNy0OuxxF_DWb7ZF6vU-X2YJVkfrP8HiPp-mS3TudJvg6lun6OXh_nnxWKzWy6fF7aowvKJ9QeWczXkjmJQl1aKGinBbSlo2WRwlJS8ZaQR1TmvhBDCZ51LOteBmXmvDp-jm1Gtil1IEp4zv9TC1j9q3ihI14FE79YNHDXjUCU8ukL8K3qJ_1fHjP9G7UxTyg0cPUSXjB3TWRzC9sp3_u-QLMGmIlQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4153942
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4403119
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2022_102270
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4564289
crossref_primary_10_1080_09645292_2022_2113858
crossref_primary_10_1177_23780231231177157
crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjac003
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4022082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2020_103603
crossref_primary_10_1086_729099
crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjae030
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4164361
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10058_023_00339_5
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4354209
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3757012
Cites_doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386
10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00341.x
10.1287/mnsc.2013.1776
10.1080/00220489709595917
10.1023/A:1018810430105
10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
10.1007/s00181-019-01662-z
10.1080/00220485.1995.10844852
10.1257/jel.47.2.448
10.1177/0956797617741719
10.1257/aer.20170007
10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
10.1162/003355301556400
10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.001
10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.007
10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.012
10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1873-7382
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162
S0272775721000819
GroupedDBID --K
--M
-~X
.~1
0R~
1B1
1RT
1~.
1~5
29G
4.4
457
4G.
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JO
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFFL
AAFJI
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAPFB
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABEHJ
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMMH
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACRLP
ACROA
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADFHU
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEKER
AEYQN
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFKWA
AFODL
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGTHC
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIIAU
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AJWLA
AKYCK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
AOMHK
ASPBG
AVARZ
AVWKF
AXJTR
AXLSJ
AZFZN
BEHZQ
BEZPJ
BGSCR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNTGB
BPUDD
BULVW
BZJEE
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HMB
HMY
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IXIXF
J1W
KOM
LPU
LY5
M3Y
M41
MO0
MS~
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PRBVW
Q38
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEB
SEE
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSB
SSF
SSO
SSS
SSZ
T5K
TN5
UHS
ULY
UNMZH
UPT
WUQ
XPP
YK3
ZMT
~G-
AATTM
AAXKI
AAYWO
AAYXX
ABWVN
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMHG
ADNMO
AEIPS
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AGRNS
AIGII
AIIUN
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ANKPU
APXCP
BNPGV
CITATION
SSH
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-189293b628841a67e503d4814b3d4f1043420b61ffaa6f6e28580133a63c97ac3
IEDL.DBID AIKHN
ISSN 0272-7757
IngestDate Tue Jul 01 03:59:57 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:13:28 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:45:13 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Gender gap
Guessing
I23
Multiple-choice test
D80
J16
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c351t-189293b628841a67e503d4814b3d4f1043420b61ffaa6f6e28580133a63c97ac3
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2021
2021-10-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2021
  text: October 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Economics of education review
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References Iriberri, Rey-Biel (bib0020) 2019
Coffman, Klinowski (bib0007) 2020; 09
Barber, Odean (bib0003) 2001; 116
Duckworth, Seligman (bib0009) 2005; 16
Funk, Perrone (bib0016) 2016; 12
Filippin, Crosetto (bib0015) 2016; 62
Baldiga (bib0002) 2014; 60
Riener, Wagner (bib0026) 2018; 164
WEF (bib0031) 2021
Saygin (bib0028) 2020; 59
Akyol, Key, Krishna (bib0001) 2016
Bordalo, Coffman, Gennaioli, Shleifer (bib0005) 2019; 109
Croson, Gneezy (bib0008) 2009; 47
Pekkarinen (bib0024) 2015; 115
Gershon, Yakov (bib0017) 1991; 28
Murphy, Alexander (bib0022) 2000; 25
Breda, Ly (bib0006) 2015; 7
Goodman, Gurantz, Smith (bib0018) 2020; 12
Montolio, Taberner (bib0021) 2018
Saltiel (bib0027) 2019
Exley, Kessler (bib0014) 2019
Walstad, Robson (bib0030) 1997; 28
Perez-Felkner, Nix, Thomas (bib0025) 2017; 8
Espinosa, Gardeazabal (bib0012) 2010; 54
Espinosa, Gardeazabal (bib0013) 2013; 9
Hirschfeld, Moore, Brown (bib0019) 1995; 26
OECD (bib0023) 2020
Beyer (bib0004) 1999; 41
Eckel, Grossman (bib0011) 2008; vol. 1
Ebenstein, Lavy, Roth (bib0010) 2016; 8
Stoet, Geary (bib0029) 2018; 29
Montolio (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0021) 2018
Croson (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0008) 2009; 47
Hirschfeld (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0019) 1995; 26
Espinosa (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0012) 2010; 54
Coffman (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0007) 2020; 09
Stoet (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0029) 2018; 29
Funk (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0016) 2016; 12
Iriberri (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0020) 2019
Akyol (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0001) 2016
Exley (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0014) 2019
Perez-Felkner (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0025) 2017; 8
Murphy (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0022) 2000; 25
Pekkarinen (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0024) 2015; 115
Ebenstein (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0010) 2016; 8
Goodman (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0018) 2020; 12
Filippin (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0015) 2016; 62
OECD (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0023) 2020
Riener (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0026) 2018; 164
Baldiga (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0002) 2014; 60
Gershon (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0017) 1991; 28
Bordalo (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0005) 2019; 109
WEF (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0031) 2021
Breda (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0006) 2015; 7
Beyer (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0004) 1999; 41
Walstad (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0030) 1997; 28
Duckworth (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0009) 2005; 16
Saltiel (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0027) 2019
Barber (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0003) 2001; 116
Eckel (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0011) 2008; vol. 1
Saygin (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0028) 2020; 59
Espinosa (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0013) 2013; 9
References_xml – volume: 12
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0018
  article-title: Take two! sat retaking and college enrollment gaps
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
– volume: 16
  start-page: 939
  year: 2005
  end-page: 944
  ident: bib0009
  article-title: Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents
  publication-title: Psychological Science (0956–7976)
– volume: 116
  start-page: 261
  year: 2001
  end-page: 292
  ident: bib0003
  article-title: Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment*
  publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Economics
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3
  year: 2000
  end-page: 53
  ident: bib0022
  article-title: A motivated exploration of motivation terminology
  publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology
– volume: 115
  start-page: 94
  year: 2015
  end-page: 110
  ident: bib0024
  article-title: Gender differences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
– volume: 29
  start-page: 581
  year: 2018
  end-page: 593
  ident: bib0029
  article-title: The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education
  publication-title: Psychological Science
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0023
  article-title: Students self-efficacy and fear of failure
– volume: 8
  start-page: 36
  year: 2016
  end-page: 65
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: The long-run economic consequences of high-stakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
– year: 2018
  ident: bib0021
  article-title: Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design
  publication-title: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona Working Paper
– volume: 9
  start-page: 107
  year: 2013
  end-page: 135
  ident: bib0013
  article-title: Do students behave rationally in multiple choice tests? evidence from a field experiment
  publication-title: Journal of Economics and Management
– year: 2019
  ident: bib0027
  article-title: What’S math got to do with it? multidimensional ability and the gender gap in STEM
  publication-title: 2019 meeting papers 1201, society for economic dynamics
– volume: 28
  start-page: 155
  year: 1997
  end-page: 171
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics
  publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education
– volume: 09
  year: 2020
  ident: bib0007
  article-title: The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores
  publication-title: Harvard Business School Working Papers
– year: 2019
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment
  publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Discussion Paper
– volume: vol. 1
  start-page: 1061
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1073
  ident: bib0011
  article-title: Chapter 113 men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence
  publication-title: Handbook of experimental economics results
– volume: 47
  year: 2009
  ident: bib0008
  article-title: Gender differences in preferences
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Literature
– volume: 8
  start-page: 386
  year: 2017
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1037
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1065
  ident: bib0028
  article-title: Gender bias in standardized tests: Evidence from a centralized college admissions system
  publication-title: Empirical Economics
– year: 2021
  ident: bib0031
  article-title: Global gender gap report
  publication-title: World Economic Forum Insight Report
– year: 2016
  ident: bib0001
  article-title: Hit or miss? test taking behavior in multiple choice exams
  publication-title: Working paper, national bureau of economic research
– volume: 12
  year: 2016
  ident: bib0016
  article-title: Gender differences in academic performance: The role of negative marking in multiple-choice exams
  publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Working Paper
– volume: 164
  start-page: 86
  year: 2018
  end-page: 89
  ident: bib0026
  article-title: Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions? the role of age
  publication-title: Economics letters
– volume: 7
  start-page: 53
  year: 2015
  end-page: 75
  ident: bib0006
  article-title: Professors in core science fields are not always biased against women: Evidence from france
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
– year: 2019
  ident: bib0014
  article-title: The gender gap in self-promotion
  publication-title: Working paper 26345, national bureau of economic research
– volume: 28
  start-page: 23
  year: 1991
  end-page: 35
  ident: bib0017
  article-title: Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Measurement
– volume: 54
  start-page: 415
  year: 2010
  end-page: 425
  ident: bib0012
  article-title: Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests
  publication-title: Journal of Mathematical Psychology
– volume: 41
  year: 1999
  ident: bib0004
  article-title: Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations
  publication-title: Sex roles
– volume: 60
  start-page: 434
  year: 2014
  end-page: 448
  ident: bib0002
  article-title: Gender differences in willingness to guess
  publication-title: Management Science
– volume: 62
  start-page: 3138
  year: 2016
  end-page: 3160
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes
  publication-title: Management Science
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3
  year: 1995
  end-page: 15
  ident: bib0019
  article-title: Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics
  publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education
– volume: 109
  year: 2019
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Beliefs about gender
  publication-title: American Economic Review
– volume: 8
  start-page: 386
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0025
  article-title: Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386
– volume: 28
  start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0017
  article-title: Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Measurement
  doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00341.x
– volume: 60
  start-page: 434
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0002
  article-title: Gender differences in willingness to guess
  publication-title: Management Science
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1776
– volume: 28
  start-page: 155
  issue: 2
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0030
  article-title: Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics
  publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education
  doi: 10.1080/00220489709595917
– volume: 41
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0004
  article-title: Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations
  publication-title: Sex roles
  doi: 10.1023/A:1018810430105
– volume: 7
  start-page: 53
  issue: 4
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0006
  article-title: Professors in core science fields are not always biased against women: Evidence from france
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
– volume: vol. 1
  start-page: 1061
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0011
  article-title: Chapter 113 men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence
  doi: 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1037
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0028
  article-title: Gender bias in standardized tests: Evidence from a centralized college admissions system
  publication-title: Empirical Economics
  doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01662-z
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0023
– volume: 26
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0019
  article-title: Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics
  publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education
  doi: 10.1080/00220485.1995.10844852
– year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0031
  article-title: Global gender gap report
  publication-title: World Economic Forum Insight Report
– volume: 8
  start-page: 36
  issue: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0010
  article-title: The long-run economic consequences of high-stakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0027
  article-title: What’S math got to do with it? multidimensional ability and the gender gap in STEM
– volume: 12
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0018
  article-title: Take two! sat retaking and college enrollment gaps
  publication-title: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
– volume: 09
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0007
  article-title: The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores
  publication-title: Harvard Business School Working Papers
– volume: 47
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0008
  article-title: Gender differences in preferences
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Literature
  doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
– year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0021
  article-title: Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design
  publication-title: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona Working Paper
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0014
  article-title: The gender gap in self-promotion
– volume: 29
  start-page: 581
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0029
  article-title: The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education
  publication-title: Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1177/0956797617741719
– volume: 109
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0005
  article-title: Beliefs about gender
  publication-title: American Economic Review
  doi: 10.1257/aer.20170007
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0022
  article-title: A motivated exploration of motivation terminology
  publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology
  doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
– volume: 116
  start-page: 261
  issue: 1
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0003
  article-title: Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment*
  publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Economics
  doi: 10.1162/003355301556400
– volume: 9
  start-page: 107
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0013
  article-title: Do students behave rationally in multiple choice tests? evidence from a field experiment
  publication-title: Journal of Economics and Management
– year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0001
  article-title: Hit or miss? test taking behavior in multiple choice exams
– volume: 12
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0016
  article-title: Gender differences in academic performance: The role of negative marking in multiple-choice exams
  publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Working Paper
– volume: 54
  start-page: 415
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0012
  article-title: Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests
  publication-title: Journal of Mathematical Psychology
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.001
– volume: 115
  start-page: 94
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0024
  article-title: Gender differences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations
  publication-title: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
  doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.007
– volume: 164
  start-page: 86
  issue: C
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0026
  article-title: Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions? the role of age
  publication-title: Economics letters
  doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.012
– volume: 62
  start-page: 3138
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0015
  article-title: A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes
  publication-title: Management Science
  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0020
  article-title: Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment
  publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Discussion Paper
– volume: 16
  start-page: 939
  issue: 12
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0009
  article-title: Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents
  publication-title: Psychological Science (0956–7976)
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
SSID ssj0005803
Score 2.345199
Snippet Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 102162
SubjectTerms Gender gap
Guessing
Multiple-choice test
Title Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162
Volume 84
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB66XLyIK9alzMHr2ExmyRRPpVjqVkUt9BYmyQRiSywaLx787b5JJlZBUPAUEuZB-PLyluGb9yF03IcayDMRJ0wYRrhhhuiAJUQbjxuqYsVLMub1RI6n_GImZg00rM_CWFqli_1VTC-jtXvSc2j2llnWu4eGyg8CAS1MldiaqO2zvhQt1B6cX44nK6aHKgWS7XpiDRyhp6J52bYTgroVfPEh39lRBlT6P2epL5lntIHWXcmIB9VbbaKGybes2rJjZmyjm0oPDtdiJ_Dr4yzHC6PtbgEuI7_1LhwtdD7HTzm2Q4oJ1IVzWFlvJmRvJsFQeBYvO2g6OnsYjokTSiAxE7QgVEGRwyKrHMyploERHku4ojyCSwoNF-O-F0maplrLVBpfASTQnGrJ4n6gY7aLWjnAsIewFkFARaIT6Lg5T5WSiYhS-M489bWSXgcFNTBh7KaIWzGLRVjTxR7DFaShhTSsIO0g-mm5rCZp_MHmtMY-_OYVIQT8X633_2V9gNbsXUXcO0St4vnVHEEBUkRd1Dx5p11ws-Hd1W3XudsHgV7dNA
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB5qPehFXLGuc_A6NpNZiycplqptPdiCt2GSTKC2xKLx4sHf7pssWkFQ8BRI3oPwZfKW4Zv3IXTWgRoocBEnTDhGuGOOWMUSYl3AHdWx5gUZcziS_Qm_eRAPDdStz8J4WmUV-8uYXkTr6k67QrO9mE7b99BQhUoJaGHKxLaCVrlgyg_QP39f4nnoQh7ZWxNvXtF5SpKXbzohpHu5lxCynR9kQGX4c45ayju9TbRRFYz4snynLdRw2bbXWq54GTvorlSDw7XUCfz4eJrhubN-rwAXcd-vLRzNbTbDTxn2I4oJVIUzsKy3EqZvLsFQduYvu2jSuxp3-6SSSSAxEzQnVEOJwyKvG8yplcqJgCVcUx7BJYV2i_EwiCRNU2tlKl2oARJoTa1kcUfZmO2hZgYw7CNshVJUJDaBfpvzVGuZiCiFr8zT0GoZtJCqgTFxNUPcS1nMTU0WezRfkBoPqSkhbSH66bko52j8weeixt58WxMGwv2v3gf_8j5Fa_3xcGAG16PbQ7Tun5QUviPUzJ9f3TGUInl0Uiy1D3be3Gk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender+differences+in+leaving+questions+blank+on+high-stakes+standardized+tests&rft.jtitle=Economics+of+education+review&rft.au=Saygin%2C+Perihan+O.&rft.au=Atwater%2C+Ann&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0272-7757&rft.eissn=1873-7382&rft.volume=84&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.econedurev.2021.102162&rft.externalDocID=S0272775721000819
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon