Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests
Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender dif...
Saved in:
Published in | Economics of education review Vol. 84; p. 102162 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0272-7757 1873-7382 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162 |
Cover
Abstract | Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender differences in tendency to leave questions blank across subjects, difficulty levels, and stakes. Exploiting the tracking system and using the resulting variation in the effective guessing penalty across different test sections, we find that female test-takers skip significantly more questions than male test-takers in the quantitative track while we do not find a significant difference in other tracks. Among quantitative track students, the gender gap is larger in Math and when questions are more difficult while it reverses in Literature. We also find that self-assessment is related to skipping behavior and explains part of the gender gap. Male test-takers are more likely than female test-takers to report that they are good at Math, Science, and Social Science after conditioning on their number of correct answers in the corresponding test sections. This gender gap, consistently with the one in skipping behavior, reverses when it comes to Literature. Differently from previous literature, our findings suggest that the magnitude and the sign of the gender gap in answering questions under uncertainty is context dependent. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a penalty for wrong answers. In this paper, we use administrative data from Turkish college admissions test to study the heterogeneity in gender differences in tendency to leave questions blank across subjects, difficulty levels, and stakes. Exploiting the tracking system and using the resulting variation in the effective guessing penalty across different test sections, we find that female test-takers skip significantly more questions than male test-takers in the quantitative track while we do not find a significant difference in other tracks. Among quantitative track students, the gender gap is larger in Math and when questions are more difficult while it reverses in Literature. We also find that self-assessment is related to skipping behavior and explains part of the gender gap. Male test-takers are more likely than female test-takers to report that they are good at Math, Science, and Social Science after conditioning on their number of correct answers in the corresponding test sections. This gender gap, consistently with the one in skipping behavior, reverses when it comes to Literature. Differently from previous literature, our findings suggest that the magnitude and the sign of the gender gap in answering questions under uncertainty is context dependent. |
ArticleNumber | 102162 |
Author | Saygin, Perihan O. Atwater, Ann |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Perihan O. surname: Saygin fullname: Saygin, Perihan O. email: psaygin@ufl.edu organization: Department of Economics, Robert F. Lanzillotti Public Policy Research Center and affiliate faculty, Education Policy Research Center, University of Florida, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Ann surname: Atwater fullname: Atwater, Ann organization: Department of Economics, University of Florida, USA |
BookMark | eNqNkM1KAzEUhYNUsK2-Q15gan5mMulG0KJVKHSj65BJbtq0Y0aTaUGf3gwVBDe6OnC453DuN0Gj0AVACFMyo4SK690MTHbsIcJxxgij2WZUsDM0prLmRc0lG6ExYTUr6rqqL9AkpR0hpJKEj9F6CcFCxNY7BxGCgYR9wC3oow8b_H6A1PsuJNy0OuxxF_DWb7ZF6vU-X2YJVkfrP8HiPp-mS3TudJvg6lun6OXh_nnxWKzWy6fF7aowvKJ9QeWczXkjmJQl1aKGinBbSlo2WRwlJS8ZaQR1TmvhBDCZ51LOteBmXmvDp-jm1Gtil1IEp4zv9TC1j9q3ihI14FE79YNHDXjUCU8ukL8K3qJ_1fHjP9G7UxTyg0cPUSXjB3TWRzC9sp3_u-QLMGmIlQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4153942 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4403119 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2022_102270 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4564289 crossref_primary_10_1080_09645292_2022_2113858 crossref_primary_10_1177_23780231231177157 crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjac003 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4022082 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2020_103603 crossref_primary_10_1086_729099 crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjae030 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4164361 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10058_023_00339_5 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4354209 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3757012 |
Cites_doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00341.x 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1776 10.1080/00220489709595917 10.1023/A:1018810430105 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8 10.1007/s00181-019-01662-z 10.1080/00220485.1995.10844852 10.1257/jel.47.2.448 10.1177/0956797617741719 10.1257/aer.20170007 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019 10.1162/003355301556400 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.001 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.007 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.012 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Education |
EISSN | 1873-7382 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162 S0272775721000819 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M -~X .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29G 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JO AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFFL AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAPFB AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO ABEHJ ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACNCT ACRLP ACROA ADBBV ADEZE ADFHU ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AEYQN AFFDN AFFNX AFKWA AFODL AFTJW AGHFR AGTHC AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIIAU AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJWLA AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AXLSJ AZFZN BEHZQ BEZPJ BGSCR BKOJK BLXMC BNTGB BPUDD BULVW BZJEE CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HMB HMY HVGLF HZ~ IHE IXIXF J1W KOM LPU LY5 M3Y M41 MO0 MS~ N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SEB SEE SES SEW SPCBC SSB SSF SSO SSS SSZ T5K TN5 UHS ULY UNMZH UPT WUQ XPP YK3 ZMT ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADMHG ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFXIZ AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP BNPGV CITATION SSH |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-189293b628841a67e503d4814b3d4f1043420b61ffaa6f6e28580133a63c97ac3 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0272-7757 |
IngestDate | Tue Jul 01 03:59:57 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:13:28 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:45:13 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Gender gap Guessing I23 Multiple-choice test D80 J16 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c351t-189293b628841a67e503d4814b3d4f1043420b61ffaa6f6e28580133a63c97ac3 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_econedurev_2021_102162 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | October 2021 2021-10-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2021 text: October 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Economics of education review |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Iriberri, Rey-Biel (bib0020) 2019 Coffman, Klinowski (bib0007) 2020; 09 Barber, Odean (bib0003) 2001; 116 Duckworth, Seligman (bib0009) 2005; 16 Funk, Perrone (bib0016) 2016; 12 Filippin, Crosetto (bib0015) 2016; 62 Baldiga (bib0002) 2014; 60 Riener, Wagner (bib0026) 2018; 164 WEF (bib0031) 2021 Saygin (bib0028) 2020; 59 Akyol, Key, Krishna (bib0001) 2016 Bordalo, Coffman, Gennaioli, Shleifer (bib0005) 2019; 109 Croson, Gneezy (bib0008) 2009; 47 Pekkarinen (bib0024) 2015; 115 Gershon, Yakov (bib0017) 1991; 28 Murphy, Alexander (bib0022) 2000; 25 Breda, Ly (bib0006) 2015; 7 Goodman, Gurantz, Smith (bib0018) 2020; 12 Montolio, Taberner (bib0021) 2018 Saltiel (bib0027) 2019 Exley, Kessler (bib0014) 2019 Walstad, Robson (bib0030) 1997; 28 Perez-Felkner, Nix, Thomas (bib0025) 2017; 8 Espinosa, Gardeazabal (bib0012) 2010; 54 Espinosa, Gardeazabal (bib0013) 2013; 9 Hirschfeld, Moore, Brown (bib0019) 1995; 26 OECD (bib0023) 2020 Beyer (bib0004) 1999; 41 Eckel, Grossman (bib0011) 2008; vol. 1 Ebenstein, Lavy, Roth (bib0010) 2016; 8 Stoet, Geary (bib0029) 2018; 29 Montolio (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0021) 2018 Croson (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0008) 2009; 47 Hirschfeld (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0019) 1995; 26 Espinosa (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0012) 2010; 54 Coffman (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0007) 2020; 09 Stoet (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0029) 2018; 29 Funk (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0016) 2016; 12 Iriberri (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0020) 2019 Akyol (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0001) 2016 Exley (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0014) 2019 Perez-Felkner (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0025) 2017; 8 Murphy (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0022) 2000; 25 Pekkarinen (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0024) 2015; 115 Ebenstein (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0010) 2016; 8 Goodman (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0018) 2020; 12 Filippin (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0015) 2016; 62 OECD (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0023) 2020 Riener (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0026) 2018; 164 Baldiga (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0002) 2014; 60 Gershon (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0017) 1991; 28 Bordalo (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0005) 2019; 109 WEF (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0031) 2021 Breda (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0006) 2015; 7 Beyer (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0004) 1999; 41 Walstad (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0030) 1997; 28 Duckworth (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0009) 2005; 16 Saltiel (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0027) 2019 Barber (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0003) 2001; 116 Eckel (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0011) 2008; vol. 1 Saygin (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0028) 2020; 59 Espinosa (10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0013) 2013; 9 |
References_xml | – volume: 12 year: 2020 ident: bib0018 article-title: Take two! sat retaking and college enrollment gaps publication-title: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy – volume: 16 start-page: 939 year: 2005 end-page: 944 ident: bib0009 article-title: Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents publication-title: Psychological Science (0956–7976) – volume: 116 start-page: 261 year: 2001 end-page: 292 ident: bib0003 article-title: Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment* publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Economics – volume: 25 start-page: 3 year: 2000 end-page: 53 ident: bib0022 article-title: A motivated exploration of motivation terminology publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology – volume: 115 start-page: 94 year: 2015 end-page: 110 ident: bib0024 article-title: Gender differences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations publication-title: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization – volume: 29 start-page: 581 year: 2018 end-page: 593 ident: bib0029 article-title: The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education publication-title: Psychological Science – year: 2020 ident: bib0023 article-title: Students self-efficacy and fear of failure – volume: 8 start-page: 36 year: 2016 end-page: 65 ident: bib0010 article-title: The long-run economic consequences of high-stakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics – year: 2018 ident: bib0021 article-title: Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design publication-title: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona Working Paper – volume: 9 start-page: 107 year: 2013 end-page: 135 ident: bib0013 article-title: Do students behave rationally in multiple choice tests? evidence from a field experiment publication-title: Journal of Economics and Management – year: 2019 ident: bib0027 article-title: What’S math got to do with it? multidimensional ability and the gender gap in STEM publication-title: 2019 meeting papers 1201, society for economic dynamics – volume: 28 start-page: 155 year: 1997 end-page: 171 ident: bib0030 article-title: Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education – volume: 09 year: 2020 ident: bib0007 article-title: The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores publication-title: Harvard Business School Working Papers – year: 2019 ident: bib0020 article-title: Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Discussion Paper – volume: vol. 1 start-page: 1061 year: 2008 end-page: 1073 ident: bib0011 article-title: Chapter 113 men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence publication-title: Handbook of experimental economics results – volume: 47 year: 2009 ident: bib0008 article-title: Gender differences in preferences publication-title: Journal of Economic Literature – volume: 8 start-page: 386 year: 2017 ident: bib0025 article-title: Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology – volume: 59 start-page: 1037 year: 2020 end-page: 1065 ident: bib0028 article-title: Gender bias in standardized tests: Evidence from a centralized college admissions system publication-title: Empirical Economics – year: 2021 ident: bib0031 article-title: Global gender gap report publication-title: World Economic Forum Insight Report – year: 2016 ident: bib0001 article-title: Hit or miss? test taking behavior in multiple choice exams publication-title: Working paper, national bureau of economic research – volume: 12 year: 2016 ident: bib0016 article-title: Gender differences in academic performance: The role of negative marking in multiple-choice exams publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Working Paper – volume: 164 start-page: 86 year: 2018 end-page: 89 ident: bib0026 article-title: Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions? the role of age publication-title: Economics letters – volume: 7 start-page: 53 year: 2015 end-page: 75 ident: bib0006 article-title: Professors in core science fields are not always biased against women: Evidence from france publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics – year: 2019 ident: bib0014 article-title: The gender gap in self-promotion publication-title: Working paper 26345, national bureau of economic research – volume: 28 start-page: 23 year: 1991 end-page: 35 ident: bib0017 article-title: Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies publication-title: Journal of Educational Measurement – volume: 54 start-page: 415 year: 2010 end-page: 425 ident: bib0012 article-title: Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests publication-title: Journal of Mathematical Psychology – volume: 41 year: 1999 ident: bib0004 article-title: Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations publication-title: Sex roles – volume: 60 start-page: 434 year: 2014 end-page: 448 ident: bib0002 article-title: Gender differences in willingness to guess publication-title: Management Science – volume: 62 start-page: 3138 year: 2016 end-page: 3160 ident: bib0015 article-title: A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes publication-title: Management Science – volume: 26 start-page: 3 year: 1995 end-page: 15 ident: bib0019 article-title: Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education – volume: 109 year: 2019 ident: bib0005 article-title: Beliefs about gender publication-title: American Economic Review – volume: 8 start-page: 386 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0025 article-title: Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00386 – volume: 28 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0017 article-title: Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies publication-title: Journal of Educational Measurement doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00341.x – volume: 60 start-page: 434 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0002 article-title: Gender differences in willingness to guess publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1776 – volume: 28 start-page: 155 issue: 2 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0030 article-title: Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education doi: 10.1080/00220489709595917 – volume: 41 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0004 article-title: Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations publication-title: Sex roles doi: 10.1023/A:1018810430105 – volume: 7 start-page: 53 issue: 4 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0006 article-title: Professors in core science fields are not always biased against women: Evidence from france publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics – volume: vol. 1 start-page: 1061 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0011 article-title: Chapter 113 men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence doi: 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8 – volume: 59 start-page: 1037 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0028 article-title: Gender bias in standardized tests: Evidence from a centralized college admissions system publication-title: Empirical Economics doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01662-z – year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0023 – volume: 26 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0019 article-title: Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics publication-title: The Journal of Economic Education doi: 10.1080/00220485.1995.10844852 – year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0031 article-title: Global gender gap report publication-title: World Economic Forum Insight Report – volume: 8 start-page: 36 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0010 article-title: The long-run economic consequences of high-stakes examinations: Evidence from transitory variation in pollution publication-title: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0027 article-title: What’S math got to do with it? multidimensional ability and the gender gap in STEM – volume: 12 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0018 article-title: Take two! sat retaking and college enrollment gaps publication-title: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy – volume: 09 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0007 article-title: The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores publication-title: Harvard Business School Working Papers – volume: 47 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0008 article-title: Gender differences in preferences publication-title: Journal of Economic Literature doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0021 article-title: Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design publication-title: Institut d’Economia de Barcelona Working Paper – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0014 article-title: The gender gap in self-promotion – volume: 29 start-page: 581 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0029 article-title: The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education publication-title: Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/0956797617741719 – volume: 109 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0005 article-title: Beliefs about gender publication-title: American Economic Review doi: 10.1257/aer.20170007 – volume: 25 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0022 article-title: A motivated exploration of motivation terminology publication-title: Contemporary Educational Psychology doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019 – volume: 116 start-page: 261 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0003 article-title: Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment* publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Economics doi: 10.1162/003355301556400 – volume: 9 start-page: 107 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0013 article-title: Do students behave rationally in multiple choice tests? evidence from a field experiment publication-title: Journal of Economics and Management – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0001 article-title: Hit or miss? test taking behavior in multiple choice exams – volume: 12 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0016 article-title: Gender differences in academic performance: The role of negative marking in multiple-choice exams publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Working Paper – volume: 54 start-page: 415 issue: 5 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0012 article-title: Optimal correction for guessing in multiple-choice tests publication-title: Journal of Mathematical Psychology doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.001 – volume: 115 start-page: 94 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0024 article-title: Gender differences in behaviour under competitive pressure: Evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations publication-title: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.08.007 – volume: 164 start-page: 86 issue: C year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0026 article-title: Gender differences in willingness to compete and answering multiple-choice questions? the role of age publication-title: Economics letters doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.012 – volume: 62 start-page: 3138 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_bib0015 article-title: A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes publication-title: Management Science doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294 – year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0020 article-title: Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment publication-title: Center for Economic and Policy Research Discussion Paper – volume: 16 start-page: 939 issue: 12 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162_sbref0009 article-title: Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents publication-title: Psychological Science (0956–7976) doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x |
SSID | ssj0005803 |
Score | 2.345199 |
Snippet | Around the world, multiple-choice tests are widely used as part of high-stakes examinations. To counteract lucky guessing, many of them have instituted a... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 102162 |
SubjectTerms | Gender gap Guessing Multiple-choice test |
Title | Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102162 |
Volume | 84 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB66XLyIK9alzMHr2ExmyRRPpVjqVkUt9BYmyQRiSywaLx787b5JJlZBUPAUEuZB-PLyluGb9yF03IcayDMRJ0wYRrhhhuiAJUQbjxuqYsVLMub1RI6n_GImZg00rM_CWFqli_1VTC-jtXvSc2j2llnWu4eGyg8CAS1MldiaqO2zvhQt1B6cX44nK6aHKgWS7XpiDRyhp6J52bYTgroVfPEh39lRBlT6P2epL5lntIHWXcmIB9VbbaKGybes2rJjZmyjm0oPDtdiJ_Dr4yzHC6PtbgEuI7_1LhwtdD7HTzm2Q4oJ1IVzWFlvJmRvJsFQeBYvO2g6OnsYjokTSiAxE7QgVEGRwyKrHMyploERHku4ojyCSwoNF-O-F0maplrLVBpfASTQnGrJ4n6gY7aLWjnAsIewFkFARaIT6Lg5T5WSiYhS-M489bWSXgcFNTBh7KaIWzGLRVjTxR7DFaShhTSsIO0g-mm5rCZp_MHmtMY-_OYVIQT8X633_2V9gNbsXUXcO0St4vnVHEEBUkRd1Dx5p11ws-Hd1W3XudsHgV7dNA |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFB5qPehFXLGuc_A6NpNZiycplqptPdiCt2GSTKC2xKLx4sHf7pssWkFQ8BRI3oPwZfKW4Zv3IXTWgRoocBEnTDhGuGOOWMUSYl3AHdWx5gUZcziS_Qm_eRAPDdStz8J4WmUV-8uYXkTr6k67QrO9mE7b99BQhUoJaGHKxLaCVrlgyg_QP39f4nnoQh7ZWxNvXtF5SpKXbzohpHu5lxCynR9kQGX4c45ayju9TbRRFYz4snynLdRw2bbXWq54GTvorlSDw7XUCfz4eJrhubN-rwAXcd-vLRzNbTbDTxn2I4oJVIUzsKy3EqZvLsFQduYvu2jSuxp3-6SSSSAxEzQnVEOJwyKvG8yplcqJgCVcUx7BJYV2i_EwiCRNU2tlKl2oARJoTa1kcUfZmO2hZgYw7CNshVJUJDaBfpvzVGuZiCiFr8zT0GoZtJCqgTFxNUPcS1nMTU0WezRfkBoPqSkhbSH66bko52j8weeixt58WxMGwv2v3gf_8j5Fa_3xcGAG16PbQ7Tun5QUviPUzJ9f3TGUInl0Uiy1D3be3Gk |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender+differences+in+leaving+questions+blank+on+high-stakes+standardized+tests&rft.jtitle=Economics+of+education+review&rft.au=Saygin%2C+Perihan+O.&rft.au=Atwater%2C+Ann&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0272-7757&rft.eissn=1873-7382&rft.volume=84&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.econedurev.2021.102162&rft.externalDocID=S0272775721000819 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0272-7757&client=summon |