Phase field modeling and computer implementation: A review

• Published in: Engineering fracture mechanics Vol. 262; p. 108234
• Main Authors: Zhuang, X., Zhou, S., Huynh, G.D., Areias, P., Rabczuk, T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2022; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Brittle fracture; Coalescing; Computer implementation; Crack initiation; Crack propagation; Differential equations; Finite element method; Fracture mechanics; Hydraulic fracture; Phase field; Scalars; Finite element method; Hydraulic fracture; Computer implementation; Brittle fracture; Phase field
• ISSN: 0013-7944; 1873-7315
• DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108234

This paper presents an overview of the theories and computer implementation aspects of phase field models (PFM) of fracture. The advantage of PFM over discontinuous approaches to fracture is that PFM can elegantly simulate complicated fracture processes including fracture initiation, propagation, coalescence, and branching by using only a scalar field, the phase field. In addition, fracture is a natural outcome of the simulation and obtained through the solution of an additional differential equation related to the phase field. No extra fracture criteria are needed and an explicit representation of a crack surface as well as complex track crack procedures are avoided in PFM for fracture, which in turn dramatically facilitates the implementation. The PFM is thermodynamically consistent and can be easily extended to multi-physics problem by ‘changing’ the energy functional accordingly. Besides an overview of different PFMs, we also present comparative numerical benchmark examples to show the capability of PFMs. •Development in phase field models and the computer implementation is reviewed.•The theories on phase field modeling are systematically summarized.•Representative numerical examples are presented for different fracture problems.