Flow cytometric evaluation of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Where do we stand?

Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a relevant parameter of response to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several methods have been developed, flow cytometry has emerged as the most useful and standardized approach to measure and quantify MRD. The improved sensitiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHematological oncology Vol. 40; no. 5; pp. 835 - 842
Main Authors D’Arena, Giovanni, Sgambato, Alessandro, Volpe, Silvestro, Coppola, Giuseppe, Amodeo, Rachele, Tirino, Virginia, D’Auria, Fiorella, Statuto, Teodora, Valvano, Luciana, Pietrantuono, Giuseppe, Deaglio, Silvia, Efremov, Dimitar, Laurenti, Luca, Aiello, Antonella
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-0232
1099-1069
1099-1069
DOI10.1002/hon.3037

Cover

More Information
Summary:Measurable residual disease (MRD) has emerged as a relevant parameter of response to therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several methods have been developed, flow cytometry has emerged as the most useful and standardized approach to measure and quantify MRD. The improved sensitivity of MRD measurements has been paralleled by the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for CLL, increasing the applicability of MRD detection in this setting. Chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy have firstly demonstrated their ability to obtain a deep MRD. Combined targeted therapies are also demonstrating a high molecular response rate and prospective trials are exploring the role of MRD to guide the duration of treatment in this setting. In this review we briefly summarize what we have learned about MRD with emphasis on its flow cytometric detection.
Bibliography:Luca Laurenti and Antonella Aiello authors contributed equally to the work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-0232
1099-1069
1099-1069
DOI:10.1002/hon.3037