Mega‐analysis of the brain‐age gap in substance use disorder: An ENIGMA Addiction working group study
Background and Aims The brain age gap (BAG), calculated as the difference between a machine learning model‐based predicted brain age and chronological age, has been increasingly investigated in psychiatric disorders. Tobacco and alcohol use are associated with increased BAG; however, no studies have...
Saved in:
Published in | Addiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 119; no. 11; pp. 1937 - 1946 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.11.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0965-2140 1360-0443 1360-0443 |
DOI | 10.1111/add.16621 |
Cover
Summary: | Background and Aims
The brain age gap (BAG), calculated as the difference between a machine learning model‐based predicted brain age and chronological age, has been increasingly investigated in psychiatric disorders. Tobacco and alcohol use are associated with increased BAG; however, no studies have compared global and regional BAG across substances other than alcohol and tobacco. This study aimed to compare global and regional estimates of brain age in individuals with substance use disorders and healthy controls.
Design
This was a cross‐sectional study.
Setting
This is an Enhancing Neuro Imaging through Meta‐Analysis Consortium (ENIGMA) Addiction Working Group study including data from 38 global sites.
Participants
This study included 2606 participants, of whom 1725 were cases with a substance use disorder and 881 healthy controls.
Measurements
This study used the Kaufmann brain age prediction algorithms to generate global and regional brain age estimates using T1 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We used linear mixed effects models to compare global and regional (FreeSurfer lobestrict output) BAG (i.e. predicted minus chronological age) between individuals with one of five primary substance use disorders as well as healthy controls.
Findings
Alcohol use disorder (β = −5.49, t = −5.51, p < 0.001) was associated with higher global BAG, whereas amphetamine‐type stimulant use disorder (β = 3.44, t = 2.42, p = 0.02) was associated with lower global BAG in the separate substance‐specific models.
Conclusions
People with alcohol use disorder appear to have a higher brain‐age gap than people without alcohol use disorder, which is consistent with other evidence of the negative impact of alcohol on the brain. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institute on Drug Abuse, Grant/Award Number: R01DA014100 (to J.J.F.); CONACYT‐FOSISS project, Grant/Award Number: 0201493; CONACYT‐Catedras project, Grant/Award Number: 2358948; Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant/Award Number: DA051922 (to C.R.L.); AI and Val Rosenstrauss Senior Research Fellowship (2022‐2026; to V.L.); National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) Investigator Grant (2023‐2027) Grant/Award Number: ID:2016833 (to V.L.); Australian Catholic University competitive scheme (to V.L.); National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Grant/Award Number: ZIAAA000125; Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research; NHMRC Investigator Leadership, Grant/Award Number: 2017962 (to L.S.); University of Melbourne Dame Kate Campbell fellowship (to L.S.); NIH, Grant/Award Number: RO1 MH129832 (to L.S.); NHMRC Investigator Leadership Grant, Grant/Award Number: 2009464 (to A.V.G.) ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0965-2140 1360-0443 1360-0443 |
DOI: | 10.1111/add.16621 |