NATO-Türkiye Relations From Irreplaceable Partner to Questionable Ally

With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers arguing that a revival of Russian power would lead to Türkiye’s return to the alliance as a good-standing member, while others questioned the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStudia Europejskie (Warszawa) Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 93 - 116
Main Author Bölme, Selin M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Centre for Europe - University of Warsaw 01.01.2022
Centrum Europejskie Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Center for Europe, Warsaw University
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1428-149X
2719-3780
DOI10.33067/SE.3.2022.5

Cover

Abstract With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers arguing that a revival of Russian power would lead to Türkiye’s return to the alliance as a good-standing member, while others questioned the likelihood of such a scenario due to the country’s political transformation. This is not the fi rst time Türkiye’s role within the alliance has become a subject of debate. Türkiye is often described as a valuable and dedicated partner of NATO. Yet, since the beginning of its membership, the country’s role in the alliance has been questioned more than that of any other member state. This article seeks to analyse NATO’s relations with Türkiye and the country’s role within the alliance from a historical perspective. It aims to understand the debates on Türkiye’s role within NATO by focusing on the moments of transformation in relations. The main assumption of this article is that, from the beginning of Türkiye’s membership process, Turkish American relations have been the main determinant of Türkiye-NATO relations. Türkiye’s role, defence, and identity have always been questioned by European members. But these debates on Türkiye had, until as recently as the 2010s, been directed and/or suppressed by the US in accordance withits own interests. The US had been the main supporter of Türkiye in the alliance against the opposition and criticism of Europeans in exchange for Türkiye’s commitment to US policies. While differences on interests and values between the US and Türkiye became more visible after 2010, Türkiye failed to secure the support of the alliance’s European members to fill the gap left by the waning US support. Indeed, the differences between them grew from security-based issues, to wider, more major identity issues.
AbstractList With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers arguing that a revival of Russian power would lead to Türkiye’s return to the alliance as a good-standing member, while others questioned the likelihood of such a scenario due to the country’s political transformation. This is not the first time Türkiye’s role within the alliance has become a subject of debate. Türkiye is often described as a valuable and dedicated partner of NATO. Yet, since the beginning of its membership, the country’s role in the alliance has been questioned more than that of any other member state. This article seeks to analyse NATO’s relations with Türkiye and the country’s role within the alliance from a historical perspective. It aims to understand the debates on Türkiye’s role within NATO by focusing on the moments of transformation in relations. The main assumption of this article is that, from the beginning of Türkiye’s membership process, TurkishAmerican relations have been the main determinant of Türkiye-NATO relations. Türkiye’s role, defence, and identity have always been questioned by European members. But these debates on Türkiye had, until as recently as the 2010s, been directed and/or suppressed by the US in accordance with its own interests. The US had been the main supporter of Türkiye in the alliance against the opposition and criticism of Europeans in exchange for Türkiye’s commitment to US policies. While differences on interests and values between the US and Türkiye became more visible after 2010, Türkiye failed to secure the support of the alliance’s European members to fill the gap left by the waning US support. Indeed, the differences between them grew from security-based issues, to wider, more major identity issues.
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers arguing that a revival of Russian power would lead to Türkiye’s return to the alliance as a good-standing member, while others questioned the likelihood of such a scenario due to the country’s political transformation. This is not the fi rst time Türkiye’s role within the alliance has become a subject of debate. Türkiye is often described as a valuable and dedicated partner of NATO. Yet, since the beginning of its membership, the country’s role in the alliance has been questioned more than that of any other member state. This article seeks to analyse NATO’s relations with Türkiye and the country’s role within the alliance from a historical perspective. It aims to understand the debates on Türkiye’s role within NATO by focusing on the moments of transformation in relations. The main assumption of this article is that, from the beginning of Türkiye’s membership process, TurkishAmerican relations have been the main determinant of Türkiye-NATO relations. Türkiye’s role, defence, and identity have always been questioned by European members. But these debates on Türkiye had, until as recently as the 2010s, been directed and/or suppressed by the US in accordance with its own interests. The US had been the main supporter of Türkiye in the alliance against the opposition and criticism of Europeans in exchange for Türkiye’s commitment to US policies. While differences on interests and values between the US and Türkiye became more visible after 2010, Türkiye failed to secure the support of the alliance’s European members to fill the gap left by the waning US support. Indeed, the differences between them grew from security-based issues, to wider, more major identity issues.
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers arguing that a revival of Russian power would lead to Türkiye’s return to the alliance as a good-standing member, while others questioned the likelihood of such a scenario due to the country’s political transformation. This is not the fi rst time Türkiye’s role within the alliance has become a subject of debate. Türkiye is often described as a valuable and dedicated partner of NATO. Yet, since the beginning of its membership, the country’s role in the alliance has been questioned more than that of any other member state. This article seeks to analyse NATO’s relations with Türkiye and the country’s role within the alliance from a historical perspective. It aims to understand the debates on Türkiye’s role within NATO by focusing on the moments of transformation in relations. The main assumption of this article is that, from the beginning of Türkiye’s membership process, Turkish American relations have been the main determinant of Türkiye-NATO relations. Türkiye’s role, defence, and identity have always been questioned by European members. But these debates on Türkiye had, until as recently as the 2010s, been directed and/or suppressed by the US in accordance withits own interests. The US had been the main supporter of Türkiye in the alliance against the opposition and criticism of Europeans in exchange for Türkiye’s commitment to US policies. While differences on interests and values between the US and Türkiye became more visible after 2010, Türkiye failed to secure the support of the alliance’s European members to fill the gap left by the waning US support. Indeed, the differences between them grew from security-based issues, to wider, more major identity issues.
Author Bölme, Selin M
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Bölme, Selin M
BackLink https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/83426$$DView record in SSOAR (Social Science Open Access Repository)
BookMark eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhepYK29CZ4EwauJ-5H9OpZStVAs2ArelslmI6lpVjbpof_Nm3_MtS09CM5lYHjed-A5R73GNw6hS4JTxrCQ94tJylKKKU35CepTSXTCpMI91CcZVQnJ9NsZGrbtCscRHFOm-ujqebScJ8vvr_BRbd3Ni6uhq3zTXqDTEurWDQ97gF4fJsvxUzKbP07Ho1liWSa6REpqi5JxrXCZKY2BE1YSQqwEqigmQuSgdJlTXUjC84gL64grQBVEcU3ZAE33vYWHlfkM1RrC1niozO7gw7uB0FW2dobnAkArcLaAzGW5ij8E5hhzkDi3Mnbd7rva1kM4lhXebtau6YxiGRWRuttTNvi2Da48ggSbnUmzmBhmfk0aHnH6B7dVt3PUBajq_0LXh5BzvjYrvwlNtBhhSRjn7AciFn96
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_56679_balkar_1232608
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AE2
BIXPP
REL
AAYXX
CITATION
RS5
DOA
DOI 10.33067/SE.3.2022.5
DatabaseName Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)
CEEOL: Open Access
Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals
CrossRef
SSOAR (Social Science Open Access Repository)
DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Government
DocumentTitleAlternate NATO-Türkiye Relations
EISSN 2719-3780
EndPage 116
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5b6aa98aecda4e4b87a2605005a70bc7
oai:gesis.izsoz.de:document/83426
10_33067_SE_3_2022_5
1071355
Genre Zeitschriftenartikel
GroupedDBID 2WC
AE2
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BIXPP
GROUPED_DOAJ
OK1
REL
Y2W
AAYXX
CITATION
RS5
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-772cdf35980f4890a513f111c7a2820166ba89fb29d715b7726ce1eda8d185923
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1428-149X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:27 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 07:02:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:01:15 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 29 20:34:17 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Transatlantic Security
NATO
Turkey
United States
Türkiye
Language English
License Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c346t-772cdf35980f4890a513f111c7a2820166ba89fb29d715b7726ce1eda8d185923
ORCID 0000-0002-8266-4323
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/5b6aa98aecda4e4b87a2605005a70bc7
PageCount 24
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5b6aa98aecda4e4b87a2605005a70bc7
ssoar_primary_document_83426
crossref_primary_10_33067_SE_3_2022_5
crossref_citationtrail_10_33067_SE_3_2022_5
ceeol_journals_1071355
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Studia Europejskie (Warszawa)
PublicationTitleAlternate Studies in European Affairs
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Centre for Europe - University of Warsaw
Centrum Europejskie Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
Center for Europe, Warsaw University
Publisher_xml – name: Centrum Europejskie Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
– name: Centre for Europe - University of Warsaw
– name: Center for Europe, Warsaw University
SSID ssj0000650238
Score 2.1718678
Snippet With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022, Türkiye’s role in NATO has once again become a topic of intellectual discussion, with many observers...
SourceID doaj
ssoar
crossref
ceeol
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 93
SubjectTerms Geopolitics
Military policy
nato
Security and defense
Transatlantic Security
turkey
Türkei
türkiye
united states
Subtitle From Irreplaceable Partner to Questionable Ally
Title NATO-Türkiye Relations
URI https://www.ceeol.com//search/article-detail?id=1071355
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/83426
https://doaj.org/article/5b6aa98aecda4e4b87a2605005a70bc7
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8NAEF7EkxfxifVFDnqSaB67ycZblZYq-AAr9LbMPgJibSTWg__Nm3_MmU2s9SBevCZDsvky7HyzzHzD2IEoEssxcoZSAITcWhlCnkMIZQwyRjoHJfU7X11ng3t-ORKjuVFfVBPWyAM3wJ0InQEUEpyxwB3XMgei4Og8kEfa-D7yqIjmkqlmDxYUjHxrUYJpEi9GTdV7ShT55K53nGJumCTHgqQ5navGP-KSl-_HO4gQ1HPxpr_ClluiGHSbBa6yBTdZY0vfo3HX2eC6O7wJhx_v9ePDmwtmZW2nQb-unoKLuna-4oqao4Jb_NKJq4NpFfgzTjoBpOvd8fhtg933e8PzQdgORghNyrMpMWJjS9Lei0ouiwhEnJa4aRnEhiJ6lmmQRamTwuax0GieGRc7C9JieEZKt8kWJ9XEbbFA2yyPNWZ1JXKJwhEd4SaJrDQ6TjMdddimh0e1rv2iYj_VT3TY0RdeyrRy4jTVYowGyqOs7noqVYSyQuvDmfVzI6Pxi90ZQT-zIfFrfwFdQrUuof5yiQ7b9T9u9hRbmVc_tFimSEi2_-MdO2yJVtwcxuyyxWn96vaQnkz1vvfET6673yE
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NATO-T%C3%BCrkiye+Relations%3A+From+Irreplaceable+Partner+to+Questionable+Ally&rft.jtitle=Studia+Europejskie+%28Warszawa%29&rft.au=B%C3%B6lme%2C+Selin+M&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.issn=1428-149X&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=116&rft_id=info:doi/10.33067%2FSE.3.2022.5&rft.externalDBID=RS5&rft.externalDocID=oai%3Agesis.izsoz.de%3Adocument%2F83426
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1428-149X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1428-149X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1428-149X&client=summon