Within-brain classification for brain tumor segmentation

• Published in: International journal for computer assisted radiology and surgery Vol. 11; no. 5; pp. 777 - 788
• Main Authors: Havaei, Mohammad, Larochelle, Hugo, Poulin, Philippe, Jodoin, Pierre-Marc
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2016
• Subjects: Algorithms; Brain - diagnostic imaging; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Computer Imaging; Computer Science; Health Informatics; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods; Imaging; Machine Learning; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Pattern Recognition and Graphics; Radiology; Surgery; Vision; Within-brain generalization; Brain tumor segmentation; Segmentation; Computer-aided detection; Interactive; Machine learning
• ISSN: 1861-6410; 1861-6429
• DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1311-1

Purpose In this paper, we investigate a framework for interactive brain tumor segmentation which, at its core, treats the problem of interactive brain tumor segmentation as a machine learning problem. Methods This method has an advantage over typical machine learning methods for this task where generalization is made across brains. The problem with these methods is that they need to deal with intensity bias correction and other MRI-specific noise. In this paper, we avoid these issues by approaching the problem as one of within brain generalization . Specifically, we propose a semi-automatic method that segments a brain tumor by training and generalizing within that brain only, based on some minimum user interaction. Conclusion We investigate how adding spatial feature coordinates (i.e., i , j , k ) to the intensity features can significantly improve the performance of different classification methods such as SVM, kNN and random forests. This would only be possible within an interactive framework. We also investigate the use of a more appropriate kernel and the adaptation of hyper-parameters specifically for each brain. Results As a result of these experiments, we obtain an interactive method whose results reported on the MICCAI-BRATS 2013 dataset are the second most accurate compared to published methods, while using significantly less memory and processing power than most state-of-the-art methods.