Regulating Academic Pressure: From Fast to Slow

This paper investigates the impact of publication pressure on the ethics and the scientific integrity in the domain of mathematics and of the arts. Both research fields are specific in their methodology, being that they do not start from a classical hypothesis and researchers in these areas are not...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of philosophy of education Vol. 54; no. 5; pp. 1419 - 1442
Main Authors FRANÇOIS, KAREN, COESSENS, KATHLEEN, VINCKIER, NIGEL, VAN BENDEGEM, JEAN PAUL
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Wiley 01.10.2020
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0309-8249
1467-9752
DOI10.1111/1467-9752.12493

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper investigates the impact of publication pressure on the ethics and the scientific integrity in the domain of mathematics and of the arts. Both research fields are specific in their methodology, being that they do not start from a classical hypothesis and researchers in these areas are not knowing what the outcome will be. The research design is open, and creativity is a main part of the research investigation. Both research fields do not rely on empirical cases nor on data collection or data handling. This could be a reason why mathematics and arts seem to be less subject to scientific misconduct. After presenting the (inter)national regulations on ethics and integrity, we will investigate a philosophical analysis in which we consider possible influences from publication pressure that became widespread over all disciplines. We will clarify if and how mathematics and the arts are sensitive to scientific research misconduct or questionable research practices.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0309-8249
1467-9752
DOI:10.1111/1467-9752.12493