Uptake of Family-Specific Mutation Genetic Testing Among Relatives of Patients with Ovarian Cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation
PurposeThe BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, o...
Saved in:
Published in | Cancer research and treatment Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 207 - 211 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Korean Cancer Association
01.01.2021
대한암학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1598-2998 2005-9256 2005-9256 |
DOI | 10.4143/crt.2020.364 |
Cover
Abstract | PurposeThe BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation.Materials and MethodsData from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing.ResultsThe uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001).ConclusionApproximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men. |
---|---|
AbstractList | PurposeThe BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation.Materials and MethodsData from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing.ResultsThe uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001).ConclusionApproximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men. Purpose The BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation. Materials and Methods Data from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing. Results The uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Approximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men. KCI Citation Count: 0 The BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation. Data from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing. The uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001). Approximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men. The BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation.PURPOSEThe BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific mutation (FSM) is recommended. This study examined factors affecting the uptake of FSM testing among relatives of patients with peritoneal, ovarian, or fallopian tube (POFT) cancer with confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation.Data from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing.MATERIALS AND METHODSData from medical charts of 392 eligible patients and their relatives who had undergone outpatient genetic counseling/testing were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors were compared between family members who had and had not undergone genetic counseling/testing.The uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001).RESULTSThe uptake of FSM testing was 30.5% (129/423) among first-degree living relatives and 53.5% (69/129) within the overall family unit. The average time from genetic testing of the proband to the first FSM test within a family was 168 days (range, 23 to 681 days). Having a living father (33.8% vs. 13.3%, p=0.007) and daughter (79.4% vs. 60.3%, p=0.019) increased the uptake of FSM testing. FSM testing was more likely among female than among male relatives of cancer patients (40.9% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001).Approximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men.CONCLUSIONApproximately one-third of first-degree relatives of patients with a POFT cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation underwent FSM testing. Having a living father or daughter was a factor affecting the uptake of FSM testing, which was higher among female than among male relatives of the proband. This discrepancy might be due to a misconception that the BRCA gene is associated with women rather than with men. |
Author | Jeong, Go Woon Shin, Wonkyo Seo, Sang-Soo Kang, Sokbom Lim, Myong Cheol Park, Sang-Yoon Lee, Dong Ock |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Go Woon surname: Jeong fullname: Jeong, Go Woon – sequence: 2 givenname: Wonkyo surname: Shin fullname: Shin, Wonkyo – sequence: 3 givenname: Dong Ock surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Dong Ock – sequence: 4 givenname: Sang-Soo surname: Seo fullname: Seo, Sang-Soo – sequence: 5 givenname: Sokbom surname: Kang fullname: Kang, Sokbom – sequence: 6 givenname: Sang-Yoon surname: Park fullname: Park, Sang-Yoon – sequence: 7 givenname: Myong Cheol surname: Lim fullname: Lim, Myong Cheol |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32777875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002676784$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNptkk1vEzEQhi1URNOWG2e0RyqxwetvX5BCREulolYhPVter7c12bWDvUnVE38dJ1siQFw81swz73jGcwKOfPAWgDcVnJKK4A8mDlMEEZxiRl6ACYKQlhJRdgQmFZWiRFKKY3CS0ncIGcG8egWOMeKcC04n4OfdetArW4S2uNC9657Kb2trXOtM8XUz6MEFX1xab4fsWNo0OH9fzPqQz4Xtcnhr0y73Nl-tH1Lx6IaH4maro9O-mGtvbBx9nxbzWVWEuL-gg_gZeNnqLtnXz_YU3F18Xs6_lNc3l1fz2XVpMMakpMxyahqCaiokE7VGiFHbICIsbkTuCnONWMOq3BahgrQ1b4y2QkMmmxpJfArOR10fW7UyTgXt9vY-qFVUs8XySknGkeQwsx9Hdr2pe9uY3FjUnVpH1-v4tM_8O-LdQ9bZKi6qPP4qC7x7FojhxyZPTfUuGdt12tuwSQoRjASlktOMvv2z1qHI7x_KwPsRMDGkFG17QCqodgug8gKo3QKovAAZR__gxo2Tzi913f-TfgH5hbOE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000895 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaoncol_2022_4071 crossref_primary_10_1159_000540466 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10689_023_00349_w crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_22_00303 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_34056 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gim_2022_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gimo_2024_101829 |
Cites_doi | 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0003 10.3390/cancers10110424 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2408 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.024 10.3322/caac.21408 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e36 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000529 10.1186/s12885-018-4098-y 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.6314 10.1086/318187 10.1038/d41586-019-02775-2 10.1097/01.GIM.0000144014.91237.A1 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02195.x 10.1186/s13048-019-0594-1 10.1007/s00432-009-0607-3 10.1007/s10897-013-9592-4 10.1007/s10689-013-9624-0 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Cancer Association 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Cancer Association 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.4143/crt.2020.364 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2005-9256 |
EndPage | 211 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9672970 PMC7812001 32777875 10_4143_crt_2020_364 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Cancer Center grantid: NCC-1911274 |
GroupedDBID | --- 29B 5-W 53G 8JR 9ZL AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ACYCR ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. F5P HYE OK1 RPM TR2 C1A CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3334-56e75cd42b58968ba2265ed248e3d843737a26d617784584fb7dcae8a069db293 |
ISSN | 1598-2998 2005-9256 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:53:15 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:09:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:30:49 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:46:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:18:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:40 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Family-specific mutation Peritoneal BRCA Genetic test Pedigree Ovarian or fallopian tube cancer (POFT) |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3334-56e75cd42b58968ba2265ed248e3d843737a26d617784584fb7dcae8a069db293 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7812001 |
PMID | 32777875 |
PQID | 2432855975 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9672970 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7812001 proquest_miscellaneous_2432855975 pubmed_primary_32777875 crossref_primary_10_4143_crt_2020_364 crossref_citationtrail_10_4143_crt_2020_364 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2021 text: 2021-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Cancer research and treatment |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cancer Res Treat |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Korean Cancer Association 대한암학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Cancer Association – name: 대한암학회 |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref5 doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0003 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3390/cancers10110424 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2408 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.024 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.3322/caac.21408 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e36 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000529 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4098-y – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.6314 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1086/318187 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02775-2 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000144014.91237.A1 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02195.x – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0594-1 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0607-3 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9592-4 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9624-0 |
SSID | ssj0064371 |
Score | 2.249301 |
Snippet | PurposeThe BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific... The BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific... Purpose The BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, and genetic testing of first-degree relatives of patients with family-specific... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 207 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged BRCA1 Protein - metabolism BRCA2 Protein - metabolism Female Humans Male Middle Aged Mutation Original Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology 의학일반 |
Title | Uptake of Family-Specific Mutation Genetic Testing Among Relatives of Patients with Ovarian Cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32777875 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2432855975 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7812001 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002676784 |
Volume | 53 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 53(1), , pp.207-211 |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 2005-9256 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064371 issn: 1598-2998 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20120301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2005-9256 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064371 issn: 1598-2998 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVERR databaseName: KoreaMed Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 2005-9256 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064371 issn: 1598-2998 databaseCode: 5-W dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://koreamed.org/journals providerName: Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2005-9256 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064371 issn: 1598-2998 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20040101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELb2ISEuiDflJYPwaZUldeI4PibdrhakBYR2pb1FieNAVdSuSsuBCz-cCzO2E5JqV1q4RKPJ1HE6X5wZZ_yZkDcGgvJImRIfJBnEOqoCxZskEKJKKjU2YaNttcWH5OQ8fn8hLnZ2fveqljbr6lD_vHJdyf94FXTgV1wl-w-e7RoFBcjgXziCh-F4Ix-fX67LuU363f4Vgd1Nvpnpg9ONryJEWmnkZD1DNg2cAbGbC7kSOE84-8lRq_p1bh9_QPYMD_0E4bByuvzzJBtj5ToKvGu8H9h6c88d5JbLdUXsrVfZdMKykCnBphnLI5RBo0CO-yZp3p7JmQqtrWAq7JuoI_gNm-YsPWZKWU3KMjFoJWZqYoUIwmUrpMztRd1Oc_Dx1jSHbXGC1R_TI-ymawCFuNUoK2Rg1h_PFS4y8Y0bq7Pkq4qLwbjttt71IQB34__22yWG2BIgoVdYg8vDw8jxrw9JvLdergMa77meFV-WxXxVQLLyrlAJZDYy3CX7XCYJ3yP7WX6UH7eBBH5SdXS__h7cug3sxdt-HwYR1e5i1VyVLG3X_PaCqLO75I7PfmjmoHyP7JjFfXLr1Nd3PCC_HKLpsqFbiKYt6KhHNPWIphbRtEM0_rZFNEX0Uo9o6iDqdBbRdLmyAu8af0jOj6dnk5PAbxES6CiK4kAkRgpdx7wSqUrSqoRsQpiax6mJ6hRpu2TJkxrCdJliRUBTyVqXJi3DRNUVhLqPyN5iuTBPCNVJZHTdCCmRwlFpVUqlShhoZdyMleAjctD-zYX2_Pm4jcu3AvJodEoBTinQKQU4ZURYZ33peGOusXsNHrPIuB4hI_KqdWgBoz9-0isXZrn5XvA44ilOCogReewc3F0u4hLuGs_Iges7A7zg8Mxi9tUyzEsI-yF-fXqTzj0jt_8-r8_J3nq1MS8gUF9XLz2g_wAketfY |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uptake+of+Family-Specific+Mutation+Genetic+Testing+Among+Relatives+of+Patients+with+Ovarian+Cancer+with+BRCA1+or+BRCA2+Mutation&rft.jtitle=Cancer+research+and+treatment&rft.au=%EC%A0%95%EA%B3%A0%EC%9A%B4&rft.au=%EC%8B%A0%EC%9B%90%EA%B5%90&rft.au=%EC%9D%B4%EB%8F%99%EC%98%A5&rft.au=%EC%84%9C%EC%83%81%EC%88%98&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.pub=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%95%94%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C&rft.issn=1598-2998&rft.eissn=2005-9256&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=211&rft_id=info:doi/10.4143%2Fcrt.2020.364&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9672970 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1598-2998&client=summon |