Calculation of Regurgitant Volume Using Echocardiographic Volumetric Method for Accurate Diagnosis of Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography Vol. 38; no. 8; pp. 671 - 681
Main Authors Kim, Ga Yun, Jo, Ha Hye, Lim, So-Min, Pack, Dayoung, Lee, Hye Soo, Lee, Jong En, Koo, Hyun Jung, Lee, Ji Sung, Lee, Sahmin, Sun, Byung Joo, Kim, Dae-Hee, Song, Jong-Min, Kang, Duk-Hyun, Song, Jae-Kwan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0894-7317
1097-6795
1097-6795
DOI10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012

Cover

Abstract Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculated using volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for diagnosing severe primary MR. A total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume − systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_CMR ≥ 60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR. All subjects had at least moderate to severe MR according to ASE guidelines. CMR imaging confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_TTE and RegVol_CMR (0.809; 95% CI, 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_PISA and RegVol_CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; P < .001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; P = .004). The area under the curve for RegVol_TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that for RegVol_PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .028). RegVol_TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the routine use of RegVol_TTE. Calculation of RegVol using echocardiographic volumetric method for accurate diagnosis of severe primary degenerative MR. This head-to-head comparison of the PISA technique, ASE algorithm, and volumetric TTE using CMR imaging as a gold standard showed that the calculation of RegVol using echocardiographic volumetric method is more accurate than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm, with the largest area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. EF, Ejection fraction; LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricle; VCW, vena contracta width. [Display omitted] •RegVol can be calculated using a 2D volumetric echocardiographic method.•This method was more accurate than the PISA method in diagnosing severe primary MR.•Further investigations are needed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this method.
AbstractList BackgroundRecent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculated using volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for diagnosing severe primary MR. MethodsA total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_ PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume − systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_ TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_ CMR ≥ 60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR. ResultsAll subjects had at least moderate to severe MR according to ASE guidelines. CMR imaging confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_ TTE and RegVol_ CMR (0.809; 95% CI, 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_ PISA and RegVol_ CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_ TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_ PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; P < .001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; P = .004). The area under the curve for RegVol_ TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that for RegVol_ PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .028). ConclusionsRegVol_ TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the routine use of RegVol_ TTE.
To evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume calculated by volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (RegVol_TTE) for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR).OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume calculated by volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (RegVol_TTE) for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR).Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary MR.BACKGROUNDRecent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary MR.A total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume-systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_CMR of ≥60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR.METHODSA total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume-systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_CMR of ≥60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR.All subjects had at least moderate to severe MR based on ASE guidelines. CMR confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_TTE and RegVol_CMR (0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_PISA and RegVol_CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; p<0.001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; p=0.004). The area under the curve of RegVol_TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that of RegVol_PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; p=0.028).RESULTSAll subjects had at least moderate to severe MR based on ASE guidelines. CMR confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_TTE and RegVol_CMR (0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_PISA and RegVol_CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; p<0.001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; p=0.004). The area under the curve of RegVol_TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that of RegVol_PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; p=0.028).RegVol_TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of routine utilization of RegVol_TTE.CONCLUSIONSRegVol_TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of routine utilization of RegVol_TTE.
Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculated using volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for diagnosing severe primary MR. A total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_PISA) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume − systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_TTE). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_CMR ≥ 60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR. All subjects had at least moderate to severe MR according to ASE guidelines. CMR imaging confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_TTE and RegVol_CMR (0.809; 95% CI, 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_PISA and RegVol_CMR (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_TTE for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_PISA (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; P < .001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; P = .004). The area under the curve for RegVol_TTE (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that for RegVol_PISA (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .028). RegVol_TTE showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the routine use of RegVol_TTE. Calculation of RegVol using echocardiographic volumetric method for accurate diagnosis of severe primary degenerative MR. This head-to-head comparison of the PISA technique, ASE algorithm, and volumetric TTE using CMR imaging as a gold standard showed that the calculation of RegVol using echocardiographic volumetric method is more accurate than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm, with the largest area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. EF, Ejection fraction; LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricle; VCW, vena contracta width. [Display omitted] •RegVol can be calculated using a 2D volumetric echocardiographic method.•This method was more accurate than the PISA method in diagnosing severe primary MR.•Further investigations are needed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of this method.
Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for diagnosing severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume (RegVol) calculated using volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for diagnosing severe primary MR. A total of 74 patients with primary MR due to prolapse or flail leaflet were prospectively recruited for both TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. RegVol was calculated using PISA (RegVol_ ) or the volumetric method (left ventricular total stroke volume - systolic forward outflow volume; RegVol_ ). According to the ASE algorithm, patients with four or more parameters were diagnosed with severe MR. RegVol_ ≥ 60 mL was used as the gold standard for diagnosing severe MR. All subjects had at least moderate to severe MR according to ASE guidelines. CMR imaging confirmed that 30 patients (41%) had severe MR. The concordance correlation coefficient between RegVol_ and RegVol_ (0.809; 95% CI, 0.715-0.893) was higher than that between RegVol_ and RegVol_ (0.468; 95% CI, 0.323-0.576). The overall accuracy of RegVol_ for the diagnosis of severe MR was 90.5% (95% CI, 81.5-96.1), which was significantly higher than that of RegVol_ (64.9%; 95% CI, 52.9-75.6; P < .001) and the ASE algorithm (77.0%; 95% CI, 65.8-86.0; P = .004). The area under the curve for RegVol_ (0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) was significantly larger than that for RegVol_ (0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .028). RegVol_ showed better diagnostic performance than the PISA method and the ASE algorithm in diagnosing severe MR. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the routine use of RegVol_ .
Author Kim, Ga Yun
Lee, Ji Sung
Kang, Duk-Hyun
Jo, Ha Hye
Lee, Jong En
Song, Jae-Kwan
Lim, So-Min
Lee, Hye Soo
Song, Jong-Min
Koo, Hyun Jung
Pack, Dayoung
Sun, Byung Joo
Kim, Dae-Hee
Lee, Sahmin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ga Yun
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Ga Yun
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ha Hye
  surname: Jo
  fullname: Jo, Ha Hye
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: So-Min
  surname: Lim
  fullname: Lim, So-Min
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dayoung
  surname: Pack
  fullname: Pack, Dayoung
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hye Soo
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Hye Soo
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jong En
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Jong En
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hyun Jung
  surname: Koo
  fullname: Koo, Hyun Jung
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Ji Sung
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Ji Sung
  organization: Clinical Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Sahmin
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Sahmin
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Byung Joo
  surname: Sun
  fullname: Sun, Byung Joo
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Dae-Hee
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Dae-Hee
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Jong-Min
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Jong-Min
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Duk-Hyun
  surname: Kang
  fullname: Kang, Duk-Hyun
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Jae-Kwan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6469-801X
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Jae-Kwan
  email: jksong@amc.seoul.kr
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40112960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkVtrFDEYhoNU7Lb6B7yQufRmxi-ZZA4iQlnrAVoEa70Nmcw3s1lnkzXJFHrpPzfDrgqCepVA3gN5nzNyYp1FQp5SKCjQ6sW2QL1xBQMmCmAFUPaArCi0dV7VrTghK2hantclrU_JWQhbABANwCNyyoFS1lawIt_XatLzpKJxNnND9gnH2Y8mKhuzL26ad5jdBmPH7DJVaeV740av9hujj8_Rp-s1xo3rs8H57ELr2auI2RujRuuCCUvsDd6hx-zaRK-m3yVL62PycFBTwCfH85zcvr38vH6fX31892F9cZXrsoSYI69qUWHD-7LjqlJcCNWXHFAwVjXIOBOgxaC7tqzbXvelbtJDjQxEhx1ry3Py_JC79-7bjCHKnQkap0lZdHOQaaa2EZzyJkmfHaVzt8Ne7r3ZKX8vf86WBOwg0N6F4HH4JaEgFzZyKxc2cmEjgcnEJpleHUyYfnln0MugDVqNvfGoo-yd-bf99R92PRlrtJq-4j2GrZu9TftJKkMyyJsF_sI-7QIUqjIFvPx7wP_afwDdlMC3
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.echo.2018.07.003
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.007
10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2169
10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.020
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.947176
10.3390/jcm12196347
10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.007
10.1186/s12968-017-0344-8
10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317040
10.1161/01.CIR.74.2.306
10.1016/j.echo.2018.04.006
10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010278
10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047
10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01416-4
10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975623
10.4250/jcu.2018.26.1.33
10.1007/s10554-019-01713-7
10.3389/fcvm.2022.819915
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107724
10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.006
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017888
10.1161/01.CIR.87.3.841
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055111
10.1016/j.echo.2022.03.005
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.064
10.1016/j.echo.2024.01.004
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.045
10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
10.1093/ehjci/jeu091
10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.037
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.045
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029332
10.1136/openhrt-2015-000388
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025
– notice: Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6795
EndPage 681
ExternalDocumentID 40112960
10_1016_j_echo_2025_02_012
S0894731725001063
1_s2_0_S0894731725001063
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-RU
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
0R~
1B1
1P~
4.4
457
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABDQB
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C45
C5W
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
K-O
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OA.
OL~
OVD
P2P
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
UNMZH
UV1
WOW
XH2
Z5R
AAYXX
CITATION
AFCTW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
RIG
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-e46756e84d3b4a6a455ad340e52268e24250c5fcb9379dcd3c82267e205beb293
ISSN 0894-7317
1097-6795
IngestDate Sat Sep 27 21:16:20 EDT 2025
Fri Aug 08 01:51:59 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 05:34:30 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 17:17:15 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 01:30:43 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:32:29 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords PISA
Echocardiography
TTE
MR
CMR
LV
Regurgitant volume
2D
ASE
RegVol
Volumetry
Mitral regurgitation
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Transthoracic echocardiography
Two-dimensional
Left ventricular
Proximal isovelocity surface area
Mitral regurgitant volume
Cardiac magnetic resonance
American Society of Echocardiography
Language English
License Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c330t-e46756e84d3b4a6a455ad340e52268e24250c5fcb9379dcd3c82267e205beb293
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6469-801X
PMID 40112960
PQID 3179854148
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3179854148
pubmed_primary_40112960
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2025_02_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_echo_2025_02_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0894731725001063
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_echo_2025_02_012
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Soc Echocardiogr
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Uretsky, Shah, Lasam (bib9) 2020; 125
Kamoen, Calle, de Buyzere (bib30) 2020; 106
Penicka, Vecera, Mirica (bib8) 2018; 137
Jang, Kang, Yang (bib13) 2018; 26
Dorosz, Lezotte, Weitzenkamp (bib25) 2012; 59
Sachdev, Hannoush, Sidenko (bib20) 2017; 10
Blumlein, Bouchard, Schiller (bib16) 1986; 74
Sköldborg, Madsen, Dalsgaard (bib12) 2020; 36
Uretsky, Aldaia, Marcoff (bib15) 2020; 13
Vahanian, Beyersdorf, Praz (bib14) 2022; 43
Otto, Nishimura, Bonow (bib1) 2021; 77
Uretsky, Argulian, Supraiwala (bib21) 2018; 31
Uretsky, Animashaun, Sakul (bib6) 2022; 15
Enriquez-Sarano, Bailey, Seward (bib17) 1993; 87
Le Goffic, Toledano, Ebbezat (bib11) 2015; 116
Thomson, Basmadjian, Rainbird (bib28) 2001; 38
Altes, Levy, Iacuzio (bib5) 2022; 35
Lee, Om, Lee (bib4) 2020; 33
Shanks, Siebelink, Delgado (bib34) 2010; 3
Uretsky, Gillam, Lang (bib3) 2015; 65
Cawley, Hamilton-Craig, Owens (bib18) 2013; 6
Maréchaux, Le Goffic, Ennezat (bib10) 2014; 15
Pu, Vandervoort, Griffin (bib22) 1992; 92
Altes, Vermes, Levy (bib24) 2023; 10
Lopez-Mattei, Ibraham, Shaikh (bib19) 2016; 117
Rigolli, Anandabaskaran, Christiansen (bib26) 2016; 3
Zoghbi, Adams, Bonow (bib2) 2017; 30
Tomaselli, Badano, Oliverio (bib32) 2024; 37
Shekel, Shuvy, Danenberg (bib31) 2023; 12
Hagendorf, Stöbe (bib27) 2022; 9
Maes, Pierard, de Meester (bib29) 2017; 19
Wu, Kitano, Chu (bib35) 2023; 81
Myerson, d’Arcy, Christiansen (bib7) 2016; 133
Topilsky, Michelena, Bichara (bib33) 2012; 125
Hung, Zeng, Little (bib23) 2018; 31
Cawley (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib18) 2013; 6
Le Goffic (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib11) 2015; 116
Pu (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib22) 1992; 92
Maes (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib29) 2017; 19
Shekel (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib31) 2023; 12
Uretsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib15) 2020; 13
Lee (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib4) 2020; 33
Hung (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib23) 2018; 31
Otto (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib1) 2021; 77
Blumlein (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib16) 1986; 74
Hagendorf (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib27) 2022; 9
Rigolli (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib26) 2016; 3
Sachdev (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib20) 2017; 10
Dorosz (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib25) 2012; 59
Penicka (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib8) 2018; 137
Jang (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib13) 2018; 26
Vahanian (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib14) 2022; 43
Altes (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib24) 2023; 10
Thomson (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib28) 2001; 38
Uretsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib3) 2015; 65
Topilsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib33) 2012; 125
Uretsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib9) 2020; 125
Uretsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib21) 2018; 31
Wu (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib35) 2023; 81
Lopez-Mattei (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib19) 2016; 117
Zoghbi (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib2) 2017; 30
Myerson (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib7) 2016; 133
Kamoen (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib30) 2020; 106
Shanks (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib34) 2010; 3
Enriquez-Sarano (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib17) 1993; 87
Uretsky (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib6) 2022; 15
Altes (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib5) 2022; 35
Maréchaux (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib10) 2014; 15
Tomaselli (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib32) 2024; 37
Sköldborg (10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib12) 2020; 36
References_xml – volume: 13
  year: 2020
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Concordance and discordance of echocardiographic parameters recommended for assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 12
  start-page: 6347
  year: 2023
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Mitral regurgitation severity assessment after transcutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: recommended integration versus volumetric assessment guidelines
  publication-title: J Clin Med
– volume: 133
  start-page: 2287
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2296
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Determination of clinical outcome in mitral regurgitation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance quantification
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 30
  start-page: 303
  year: 2017
  end-page: 371
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 33
  start-page: 64
  year: 2020
  end-page: 71
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Clinical situations associated with inappropriately large regurgitant volumes in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity using the proximal flow convergence method in patients with chordae rupture
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Plausible functional diagnostics by rational echocardiography in the assessment of valvular heart disease – role of quantitative echocardiography in the assessment of mitral regurgitation
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
– volume: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Open Heart
– volume: 43
  start-page: 561
  year: 2022
  end-page: 632
  ident: bib14
  article-title: 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 38
  start-page: 867
  year: 2001
  end-page: 875
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 3
  start-page: 694
  year: 2010
  end-page: 700
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: comparison between three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 137
  start-page: 1349
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1360
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Prognostic implications of magnetic resonance-derives quantification in asymptomatic patients with organic mitral regurgitation: comparison with Doppler echocardiography-derived integrative approach
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 116
  start-page: 1405
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1410
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 10
  year: 2023
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: a practical appraisal
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
– volume: 36
  start-page: 279
  year: 2020
  end-page: 289
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 31
  start-page: 992
  year: 2018
  end-page: 999
  ident: bib21
  article-title: A comparative assessment of echocardiographic parameters for determining primary mitral regurgitation severity using magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 6
  start-page: 48
  year: 2013
  end-page: 57
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1666
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1672
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Usefulness of mitral regurgitant volume quantified using magnetic resonance imaging to predict left ventricular remodeling after mitral valve “correction”
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 35
  start-page: 671
  year: 2022
  end-page: 681
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Comparison of mitral regurgitant volume assessment between proximal flow convergence and volumetric methods in patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation: an echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 87
  start-page: 841
  year: 1993
  end-page: 848
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Quantitative Doppler assessment of valvular regurgitation
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 92
  start-page: 2169
  year: 1992
  end-page: 2177
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Quantification of mitral regurgitation by the proximal convergence method using transesophageal echocardiography: clinical validation of a geometric correction for proximal flow constraint
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 37
  start-page: 408
  year: 2024
  end-page: 419
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Clinical impact of the volumetric quantification of ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation by three-domensional echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 74
  start-page: 306
  year: 1986
  end-page: 314
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Quatitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1719
  year: 2020
  end-page: 1725
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Proportionate or disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation: how to untangle the gordian knot?
  publication-title: Heart
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1643
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1651
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Mitral valve prolapse with mid-late systolic mitral regurgitation: pitfalls of evaluation and clinical outcome compared with holosystolic regurgitation
  publication-title: Circulation
– volume: 117
  start-page: 264
  year: 2016
  end-page: 270
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Comparative assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance using an integrative and quantitative approach
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 77
  start-page: e25
  year: 2021
  end-page: e197
  ident: bib1
  article-title: 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1088
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1133
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1139
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes: a three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic pilot study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 26
  start-page: 33
  year: 2018
  end-page: 39
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Impact of a geometric correction for proximal flow convergence constraint on the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity using the proximal flow convergence method
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Ultrasound
– volume: 10
  start-page: 823
  year: 2017
  end-page: 824
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Are echocardiography and CMR really discordant in mitral regurgitation?
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol Img
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1000
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1001
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Quantifying mitral regurgitation: how much should we lean on PISA?
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 15
  start-page: 747
  year: 2022
  end-page: 760
  ident: bib6
  article-title: American society of echocardiography algorithm for degenerative mitral regurgitation: comparison with CMR
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol Img
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1799
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1808
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 19
  start-page: 37
  year: 2017
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
– volume: 81
  start-page: 19
  year: 2023
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by fully automated 3D echocardiography left ventricular quantification software versus CMR: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Cardiol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1000
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib23
  article-title: Quantifying mitral regurgitation: how much should we lean on PISA?
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.07.003
– volume: 77
  start-page: e25
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib1
  article-title: 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
– volume: 10
  start-page: 823
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib20
  article-title: Are echocardiography and CMR really discordant in mitral regurgitation?
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol Img
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.08.007
– volume: 92
  start-page: 2169
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib22
  article-title: Quantification of mitral regurgitation by the proximal convergence method using transesophageal echocardiography: clinical validation of a geometric correction for proximal flow constraint
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.92.8.2169
– volume: 33
  start-page: 64
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib4
  article-title: Clinical situations associated with inappropriately large regurgitant volumes in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity using the proximal flow convergence method in patients with chordae rupture
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.020
– volume: 3
  start-page: 694
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib34
  article-title: Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: comparison between three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.947176
– volume: 12
  start-page: 6347
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib31
  article-title: Mitral regurgitation severity assessment after transcutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: recommended integration versus volumetric assessment guidelines
  publication-title: J Clin Med
  doi: 10.3390/jcm12196347
– volume: 81
  start-page: 19
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib35
  article-title: Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by fully automated 3D echocardiography left ventricular quantification software versus CMR: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.007
– volume: 19
  start-page: 37
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib29
  article-title: Impact of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity on the grading of aortic stenosis in patients with normal ejection fraction
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
  doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0344-8
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1719
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib30
  article-title: Proportionate or disproportionate secondary mitral regurgitation: how to untangle the gordian knot?
  publication-title: Heart
  doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317040
– volume: 74
  start-page: 306
  year: 1986
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib16
  article-title: Quatitation of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.74.2.306
– volume: 31
  start-page: 992
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib21
  article-title: A comparative assessment of echocardiographic parameters for determining primary mitral regurgitation severity using magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.04.006
– volume: 30
  start-page: 303
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib2
  article-title: Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
– volume: 13
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib15
  article-title: Concordance and discordance of echocardiographic parameters recommended for assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.010278
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1078
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib3
  article-title: Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.047
– volume: 38
  start-page: 867
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib28
  article-title: Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01416-4
– volume: 6
  start-page: 48
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib18
  article-title: Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography
  publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.975623
– volume: 26
  start-page: 33
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib13
  article-title: Impact of a geometric correction for proximal flow convergence constraint on the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity using the proximal flow convergence method
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Ultrasound
  doi: 10.4250/jcu.2018.26.1.33
– volume: 36
  start-page: 279
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib12
  article-title: Quantification of mitral valve regurgitation by 2D and 3D echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01713-7
– volume: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib27
  article-title: Plausible functional diagnostics by rational echocardiography in the assessment of valvular heart disease – role of quantitative echocardiography in the assessment of mitral regurgitation
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
  doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.819915
– volume: 10
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib24
  article-title: Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: a practical appraisal
  publication-title: Front Cardiovasc Med
  doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107724
– volume: 15
  start-page: 747
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib6
  article-title: American society of echocardiography algorithm for degenerative mitral regurgitation: comparison with CMR
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol Img
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.006
– volume: 133
  start-page: 2287
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib7
  article-title: Determination of clinical outcome in mitral regurgitation with cardiovascular magnetic resonance quantification
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017888
– volume: 87
  start-page: 841
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib17
  article-title: Quantitative Doppler assessment of valvular regurgitation
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.87.3.841
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1643
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib33
  article-title: Mitral valve prolapse with mid-late systolic mitral regurgitation: pitfalls of evaluation and clinical outcome compared with holosystolic regurgitation
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055111
– volume: 35
  start-page: 671
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib5
  article-title: Comparison of mitral regurgitant volume assessment between proximal flow convergence and volumetric methods in patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation: an echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.03.005
– volume: 116
  start-page: 1405
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib11
  article-title: Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.07.064
– volume: 37
  start-page: 408
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib32
  article-title: Clinical impact of the volumetric quantification of ventricular secondary mitral regurgitation by three-domensional echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2024.01.004
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1666
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib9
  article-title: Usefulness of mitral regurgitant volume quantified using magnetic resonance imaging to predict left ventricular remodeling after mitral valve “correction”
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.045
– volume: 43
  start-page: 561
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib14
  article-title: 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1133
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib10
  article-title: Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes: a three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic pilot study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu091
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1799
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib25
  article-title: Performance of 3-dimensional echocardiography in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.037
– volume: 117
  start-page: 264
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib19
  article-title: Comparative assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance using an integrative and quantitative approach
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.045
– volume: 137
  start-page: 1349
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib8
  article-title: Prognostic implications of magnetic resonance-derives quantification in asymptomatic patients with organic mitral regurgitation: comparison with Doppler echocardiography-derived integrative approach
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029332
– volume: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012_bib26
  article-title: Bias associated with left ventricular quantification by multimodality imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Open Heart
  doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000388
SSID ssj0005800
Score 2.4668422
Snippet Recent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)...
BackgroundRecent studies have shown suboptimal results of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and the American Society of Echocardiography...
To evaluate the accuracy of regurgitant volume calculated by volumetric transthoracic echocardiography (RegVol_TTE) for diagnosing severe primary mitral...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 671
SubjectTerms Aged
Algorithms
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Cardiovascular
Echocardiography
Echocardiography - methods
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mitral regurgitation
Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve - physiopathology
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Prospective Studies
Regurgitant volume
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke Volume - physiology
Volumetry
Title Calculation of Regurgitant Volume Using Echocardiographic Volumetric Method for Accurate Diagnosis of Severe Mitral Regurgitation
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0894731725001063
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0894731725001063
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40112960
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3179854148
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1097-6795
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005800
  issn: 0894-7317
  databaseCode: GBLVA
  dateStart: 20110101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: Elsevier Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1097-6795
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0005800
  issn: 0894-7317
  databaseCode: AKRWK
  dateStart: 20190601
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELeqTkK8IL4pXzISb1GqNLaT9LGMsWpaEVK3aTxZjuNMnVCL1uZhvPEv8RdyFztuuq7AeImqxB-x75fz2f3dHSHvy0IrBUgIBdcmxP1XmA9UGeYZYwOTJYYx9EaefE7Gp_zoXJx3Or9arKVqlff1j1v9Sv5HqnAP5IpesneQrG8UbsBvkC9cQcJw_ScZ76tv2qXfskFFLqqrixnmBQ7Oaq0TWEbAAeg4XRNP6_jUM-0eY3T-YFLnkK7phiOtKwwdAYqwJuDZWCVTAxMDX_8MD0XWnXiJbpu2LXeVueeFIoVx8z38ab5L6Xyogq-VB-tRfYg7VsH42oPv2BacLsLJzBf8oqxK_6iuUXW1zzFi4Vl0Xt0NeZgy68nZ6GaWtTCYtRRtYhO3uDU7sWlftpYDezJx2TcwvD52WsdndbztjdjbN9ZEz1RsSHCXEtuQ2IaMYhlhYuu9OE2SuEv2Dj8cn43WxKLMOj4143GuWpZVePNNdplDu7Y7tdlz8pA8cEKlIwu-R6Rj5o_JvYljZDwhP1sYpIuStjBILchojUG6hUG6xiC1GKSAQdpgkHoMYrMWg9RikG5g8Ck5_XRwsj8OXVqPUDMWrUIDa7NITMYLlnOVKC6EKhiPDG4FMoN74EiLUudgOQ8LXTANRmySmjgSucnBPH1GuvPF3LwgVDEFxdO4VKrgWgxyPuSGFznTptQiK3okaGZXfrfRW-RuifYIawQgG79kWEkloOmPtdLbapmlUxRLOZBLKCmniAgEBIwPT2JYjwhf09m71o79a4_vGnRIWAzwHz41N4tqKRmGHxR8wLMeeW5h48fNI9xaJdHLO83JK3J__bG-Jt3VVWXegBm-yt863P8GkBPhyg
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calculation+of+Regurgitant+Volume+Using+Echocardiographic+Volumetric+Method+for+Accurate+Diagnosis+of+Severe+Mitral+Regurgitation&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+Society+of+Echocardiography&rft.au=Kim%2C+Ga+Yun&rft.au=Jo%2C+Ha+Hye&rft.au=Lim%2C+So-Min&rft.au=Pack%2C+Dayoung&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.echo.2025.02.012&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_echo_2025_02_012
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F08947317%2FS0894731725X00080%2Fcov150h.gif