Torque expression by active and passive self‐ligating brackets in patients with four premolar extractions: A retrospective study
Objective Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque‐control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether th...
Saved in:
Published in | Orthodontics & craniofacial research Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 509 - 516 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.11.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1601-6335 1601-6343 1601-6343 |
DOI | 10.1111/ocr.12403 |
Cover
Abstract | Objective
Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque‐control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.
Setting and Sample Population
In this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.
Materials and Methods
The study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi‐square test.
Results
Significant differences in the variation of U1‐SN(°), U1‐NA(°), L1‐NB(°) and L1‐FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.
Conclusions
With the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective
Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque‐control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.
Setting and Sample Population
In this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.
Materials and Methods
The study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi‐square test.
Results
Significant differences in the variation of U1‐SN(°), U1‐NA(°), L1‐NB(°) and L1‐FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.
Conclusions
With the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment. ObjectiveAppropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque‐control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.Setting and Sample PopulationIn this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.Materials and MethodsThe study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi‐square test.ResultsSignificant differences in the variation of U1‐SN(°), U1‐NA(°), L1‐NB(°) and L1‐FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.ConclusionsWith the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment. Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque-control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.OBJECTIVEAppropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self-ligating brackets (SLBs) have different torque-control capability in vivo has never been reported. The purpose of present study was to explore whether there was difference in torque expression in active and passive SLBs.In this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATIONIn this retrospective study, 225 patients with four first premolar extractions were enrolled. For each patient, the digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment.The study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi-square test.MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study consisted of 2 groups: 111 subjects were treated with passive SLBs (Damon Q, Ormco) and 114 subjects with active SLBs (Empower 2, American Orthodontics). Measurements to determine skeletal changes and incisor inclination were obtained from cephalometric tracings using Dolphin software (version 11.8, USA). Comparisons in both groups and intergroups were compared using t tests and chi-square test.Significant differences in the variation of U1-SN(°), U1-NA(°), L1-NB(°) and L1-FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.RESULTSSignificant differences in the variation of U1-SN(°), U1-NA(°), L1-NB(°) and L1-FH(°) were found between two groups. More labially inclined maxillary incisors were found in active SLB group, while more labially inclined mandibular incisors were observed in passive SLB group.With the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment.CONCLUSIONSWith the present prescription set in the two brackets, active SLBs achieved more proclined maxillary incisors and retroclined mandibular incisors. Clinicians should take torque expression of brackets into consideration during orthodontic treatment. |
Author | Ren, Xinyi Lei, Lang Zhao, Yunhe Li, Jiao Li, Houxuan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Xinyi surname: Ren fullname: Ren, Xinyi organization: Medical School of Nanjing University – sequence: 2 givenname: Jiao surname: Li fullname: Li, Jiao organization: Medical School of Nanjing University – sequence: 3 givenname: Yunhe surname: Zhao fullname: Zhao, Yunhe organization: Medical School of Nanjing University – sequence: 4 givenname: Houxuan surname: Li fullname: Li, Houxuan organization: Medical School of Nanjing University – sequence: 5 givenname: Lang orcidid: 0000-0003-2892-040X surname: Lei fullname: Lei, Lang email: leilangdental@163.com organization: Medical School of Nanjing University |
BookMark | eNp1kctKAzEYhYMoWC8L3yDgRhdjc5nOjO5K8QZCQep6yGT-0dRpMiaptTvxCXxGn8S_VlyIZpM_4TsnOZwdsmmdBUIOODvhuPpO-xMuUiY3SI9njCeZTOXmzywH22QnhCljggmR9cjbxPmnOVB46TyEYJyl1ZIqHc0zUGVr2im8xTlA23y8vrfmXkVj72nllX6EGKixyEQDFueFiQ-0cXNP0W3mWuXROPqVnbPhjA6ph-hd6GD9QIjzerlHthrVBtj_3nfJ3cX5ZHSV3Iwvr0fDm0RLyWQiKsgyaE5zKPK8aYq8TnVd6FPMpDRnIIRAjPGKKS6ZLopMcKbxAKzihajkLjla-3beYeQQy5kJGtpWWXDzUIqU5yljucwRPfyFTjGUxd8hNUgHUso8Raq_pjRGCh6aUpuoVlExsmlLzspVJyV2Un51gorjX4rOm5nyyz_Zb_eFaWH5P1iOR7drxSf0YqAM |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_12967_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobcr_2024_06_002 crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod22_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13106322 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/ortho/26.2.97 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.016 10.1093/ejo/cjs041 10.4103/jos.JOS_73_18 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.010 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000126 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.016 10.4103/2278-0203.197387 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.020 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70273-7 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.019 10.1093/ejo/cju067 10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.007 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.037 10.2319/033110-181.1 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00375.x 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70131-S 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002444 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.012 10.4103/jos.JOS_65_17 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.10.016 10.2319/080508-352.1 10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8 10.1093/ejo/cjn005 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.012 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024 10.2319/071212-575.1 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.068-074.oar 10.2319/052815-365.1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S – notice: 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7QP K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/ocr.12403 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Dentistry |
EISSN | 1601-6343 |
EndPage | 516 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1111_ocr_12403 OCR12403 |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Nanjing Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases funderid: 2019060009 – fundername: Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation funderid: QRX17081; QRX17025 |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OC 31~ 33P 34H 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WBNRW WIH WIK WOHZO WPGGZ WQJ WRC WXSBR XG1 ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION 7QP AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3303-2be66ef97e877ff87d4cd8c9335ac10e22230301b0a130c886210c0a1e0b182b3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 04:52:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 12:15:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:22:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:20 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:33:19 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3303-2be66ef97e877ff87d4cd8c9335ac10e22230301b0a130c886210c0a1e0b182b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2892-040X |
PQID | 2454533374 |
PQPubID | 1096360 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2417400737 proquest_journals_2454533374 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_ocr_12403 crossref_primary_10_1111_ocr_12403 wiley_primary_10_1111_ocr_12403_OCR12403 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | November 2020 2020-11-00 20201101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: November 2020 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Malden |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden |
PublicationTitle | Orthodontics & craniofacial research |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2019; 8 2017; 6 2015; 37 2015; 148 2015; 147 1992; 101 2011; 81 2013; 83 1999; 26 2006; 9 1997; 112 2013; 144 2008; 30 2011; 14 2010; 80 2012; 13 2003; 30 2017; 9 2016; 77 2018; 7 2019; 80 2010; 138 2013; 35 2015; 20 2007; 132 2015; 42 2010; 137 2005; 127 2016; 86 2008; 24 2008; 133 2016; 27 2019; 156 2014; 145 2014; 146 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 Al‐Thomali Y (e_1_2_8_12_1) 2017; 9 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 Kohli SS (e_1_2_8_23_1) 2012; 13 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 77 start-page: 287 issue: 4 year: 2016 end-page: 295 article-title: Friction behavior of self‐ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems publication-title: J Orofac Orthop – volume: 112 start-page: 50 issue: 1 year: 1997 end-page: 57 article-title: Normal faciolingual inclinations of tooth crowns compared with treatment groups of standard and pretorqued brackets publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 42 start-page: 103 issue: 2 year: 2015 end-page: 113 article-title: Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self‐ligating bracket systems publication-title: J Orthod – volume: 148 start-page: 387 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 395 article-title: Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 37 start-page: 440 issue: 4 year: 2015 end-page: 446 article-title: A comparative experimental investigation of torque capabilities induced by conventional and active, passive self‐ligating brackets publication-title: Eur J Orthod – volume: 14 start-page: 222 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 233 article-title: Transversal maxillary dento‐alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self‐ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT‐scans and digital models publication-title: Orthod Craniofac Res – volume: 9 start-page: e123 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: e128 article-title: Torque expression in self‐ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review publication-title: J Clin Exp Dent – volume: 83 start-page: 691 issue: 4 year: 2013 end-page: 697 article-title: Labio‐lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self‐ligating brackets publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 156 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 209 article-title: Comparison of movement rate with different initial moment‐to‐force ratios publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 101 start-page: 556 issue: 6 year: 1992 end-page: 565 article-title: A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical‐orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 132 start-page: 834 issue: 6 year: 2007 end-page: 837 article-title: Changes in the stiffness of the ligating mechanism in retrieved active self‐ligating brackets publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 9 start-page: 193 issue: 4 year: 2006 end-page: 198 article-title: Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self‐ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial publication-title: Orthod Craniofac Res – volume: 6 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 10 article-title: Comparison of the effect of labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position of maxillary incisors on esthetic profile in three different facial patterns publication-title: J Orthod Sci – volume: 133 start-page: 721 issue: 5 year: 2008 end-page: 728 article-title: Torque expression of self‐ligating brackets publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 138 start-page: 138.e1 issue: 2 year: 2010 end-page: 138.e7 article-title: Efficiency of self‐ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 147 start-page: 654 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 662 article-title: Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: A 40‐year perspective publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 144 start-page: 185 issue: 2 year: 2013 end-page: 193 article-title: Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self‐ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 26 start-page: 97 issue: 2 year: 1999 end-page: 102 article-title: The influence of maxillary incisor inclination on arch length publication-title: Br J Orthod – volume: 81 start-page: 121 issue: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 129 article-title: Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 30 start-page: 262 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 273 article-title: Self‐ligating brackets: where are we now publication-title: J Orthod – volume: 27 start-page: 405 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 409 article-title: Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End‐of‐Treatment Facial Attractiveness publication-title: J Craniofac Surg – volume: 145 start-page: 569 issue: 5 year: 2014 end-page: 578 article-title: Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self‐ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single‐center randomized controlled trial publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 8 start-page: 3 year: 2019 article-title: Comparative evaluation of the maxillary canine retraction rate and anchorage loss between two types of self‐ligating brackets using sliding mechanics publication-title: J Orthod Sci – volume: 30 start-page: 233 issue: 3 year: 2008 end-page: 238 article-title: Torque expression of self‐ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets publication-title: Eur J Orthod – volume: 7 start-page: 13 year: 2018 article-title: Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction publication-title: J Orthod Sci – volume: 24 start-page: 1095 issue: 8 year: 2008 end-page: 1101 article-title: Fatigue failure of as‐received and retrieved NiTi orthodontic archwires publication-title: Dent Mater – volume: 137 start-page: 12.e1 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 12.e6 article-title: Active or passive self‐ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 80 start-page: 201 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 210 article-title: Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 20 start-page: 68 issue: 6 year: 2015 end-page: 74 article-title: Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self‐ligating and conventional brackets publication-title: Dental Press J Orthod – volume: 127 start-page: 333 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 342 article-title: Influence of force systems on archwire‐bracket combinations publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – volume: 86 start-page: 358 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 364 article-title: Influence of second‐order bracket‐archwire misalignments on loads generated during third‐order archwire rotation in orthodontic treatment publication-title: Angle Orthod – volume: 80 start-page: 68 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 78 article-title: Comparison of force loss due to friction of different wire sizes and materials in conventional and new self‐ligating orthodontic brackets during simulated canine retraction publication-title: J Orofac Orthop – volume: 35 start-page: 610 issue: 5 year: 2013 end-page: 614 article-title: Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets publication-title: Eur J Orthod – volume: 13 start-page: e58 issue: 1 year: 2012 end-page: e65 article-title: Patient pain experience after placement of initial aligning archwire using active and passive self‐ligating bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: Orthodontics – volume: 146 start-page: 166 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 174 article-title: Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3‐dimensional finite element study publication-title: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1093/ortho/26.2.97 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.016 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs041 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_73_18 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.010 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000126 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.016 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.197387 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.03.020 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70273-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.019 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju067 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.12.007 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.037 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.2319/033110-181.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00375.x – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2011.01527.x – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.051 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70131-S – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002444 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.012 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_65_17 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.10.016 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.2319/080508-352.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1007/s00056-019-00168-8 – volume: 9 start-page: e123 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 article-title: Torque expression in self‐ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review publication-title: J Clin Exp Dent – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn005 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.012 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0035-3 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.024 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.2319/071212-575.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.068-074.oar – volume: 13 start-page: e58 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 article-title: Patient pain experience after placement of initial aligning archwire using active and passive self‐ligating bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial publication-title: Orthodontics – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.2319/052815-365.1 |
SSID | ssj0020226 |
Score | 2.2541978 |
Snippet | Objective
Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating... ObjectiveAppropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self‐ligating... Appropriate torque expression contributes to ideal treatment outcomes both clinically and aesthetically. Whether active and passive self-ligating brackets... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 509 |
SubjectTerms | fixed Incisors Mandible Maxilla orthodontic appliances orthodontic brackets orthodontic tooth movement Orthodontics Population studies Radiography |
Title | Torque expression by active and passive self‐ligating brackets in patients with four premolar extractions: A retrospective study |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Focr.12403 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2454533374 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2417400737 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1601-6335 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 20020101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1601-6343 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020226 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8QwFA7iRS_u4rgRxYOXDs0k3fQkLoiggih4EEqSSUUcW2k7oJ7EX-Bv9Jf4Xrq4oCDeUpomr0ne8mX5QshGyBIwckI7OoyMIwSolPKldhLwjSrSuNiGE_rHJ_7hhTi69C5HyHZzFqbih2gn3FAzrL1GBZeq-KTkmc67DNnkwP4y7tkl2rOWOgowvb1qjQHgcHzOvZpVCHfxtF9-9UUfAebnMNX6mYNJctVIWG0vue0OS9XVT9_IG__5C1Nkoo4_6U41YKbJiElnyNge7hnCa99myct5loOA1DzUW2RTqh6ptGaRyrRP7yHcxnRhBsnb8-vAcnSk1xQEAYtQFvQmpTVba0FxmpcmUCmF0u4QRkPBZV6dpii26A7NTZlnzXlPatlu58jFwf757qFTX9TgaA4u0Okp4_smiQITBkGShEFfIOVABM0uNXMNxiAIvZQrwWXqEFAUczU8GFcBvlF8noymWWoWCFW-9hmTAuwwE6xnpNf3PMCE3FUiSlTYIZtNl8W6ZjHHyzQGcYNmoFFj26gdst5mva-oO37KtNz0e1xrbxH3BMSVnPNAdMha-xr0DhdTZGqyIeYBLIfrnAGIZDv590ri090zm1j8e9YlMt5DaG-PPS6T0TIfmhWIf0q1agf6O9R9A0U |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFD4q20N5ATZAdCvMQzzwkipunNu0l2qjKrANqWqlvqAodh2EKMmUpBLb07RfsN-4X8I5zoUNgYR4cxTHPrF9Lp8vnwHeBDxBIyeUpYJQW0KgSkkvVlaCvlGGihbbaEL_9MybzMWHhbvowGFzFqbih2gn3EgzjL0mBacJ6Ttanql8wIlO7gFs0vocqeXxtCWPQlRvLlvjCDksz3HcmleI9vG0n973Rr9CzLuBqvE048fwuZGx2mDybbAu5UBd_kbf-L8_8QQe1SEoG1VjZgs6Ot2G7jFtG6Kb357C9SzLUUKmf9S7ZFMmL1hsLCOL0yU7x4ib0oVeJbdXNytD05F-YSgJGoWyYF9TVhO2FoxmelmClTIs7TshaSy4zKsDFcUBG7Fcl3nWHPlkhvD2GczH72ZHE6u-q8FSDnpBayi15-kk9HXg-0kS-EtBrAMhtnusuK0pDCH0Je0YvaYKEEhxW-GDtiVCHOk8h400S_ULYNJTHuexQFPMBR_q2F26LsJCx5YiTGTQg7dNn0WqJjKn-zRWUQNosFEj06g9eN1mPa_YO_6Uqd90fFQrcBENBYaWjuP4ogf77WtUPVpPiVOdrSkPwjla6vRRJNPLf68k-nQ0NYmdf8-6B93J7PQkOnl_9nEXHg4J6ZtTkH3YKPO1fonhUClfmVH_E_edB2E |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bTxQxFD5BSNQXRJG4CFiMD7zMZrrTuenTZmGDctEQSHgwmUy7LSEsM5uZ2UR9Mv4Cf6O_xHM6F5BgYnzrZDrtmbbn8vXyFeBNxA0aOaEcFcXaEQJVSgapcgz6RhkrWmyjCf2j42D_THw4988X4F17Fqbmh-gm3EgzrL0mBZ9NzC0lz1XR58Qm9wCWRIDoiiKik447CkG9vWuNI-JwAs_zG1oh2sbTffqnM7qJMG_HqdbRjJ_A51bEen_JVX9eyb76doe98T__YQWWmwCUDesR8xQWdPYMHu3SpiG6920VfpzmBQrI9Jdmj2zG5FeWWrvI0mzCZhhvU7rUU_Pr-8-pJenILhgKgiahKtllxhq61pLRPC8zWCnD0q4JR2PBVVEfpyjfsiErdFXk7YFPZulun8PZeO90tO80NzU4ykMf6AykDgJt4lBHYWhMFE4EcQ7E2Oyp4q6mIISwl3RT9JkqQhjFXYUP2pUIcKS3BotZnukXwGSgAs5TgYaYCz7QqT_xfQSFnitFbGTUg522yxLV0JjTbRrTpIUz2KiJbdQevO6yzmrujvsybbT9njTqWyYDgYGl53mh6MF29xoVj1ZT0kznc8qDYI4WOkMUyXby3ytJPo5ObGL937O-goefdsfJ4fvjg5fweEAw3x6B3IDFqpjrTYyFKrllx_xv5r0GEA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Torque+expression+by+active+and+passive+self%E2%80%90ligating+brackets+in+patients+with+four+premolar+extractions%3A+A+retrospective+study&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics+%26+craniofacial+research&rft.au=Ren%2C+Xinyi&rft.au=Li%2C+Jiao&rft.au=Zhao%2C+Yunhe&rft.au=Li%2C+Houxuan&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Focr.12403&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_ocr_12403 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1601-6335&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1601-6335&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1601-6335&client=summon |