Reliability of Refraction, Keratometry, and Intraocular Pressure Measurements with an Automated All-in-one Device

• Published in: Optometry and vision science Vol. 98; no. 10; pp. 1169 - 1176
• Main Authors: Tzamalis, Argyrios, Tsiampali, Chara, Prousali, Efthymia, Mataftsi, Asimina, Ziakas, Nikolaos, Kynigopoulos, Myron
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.10.2021
• ISSN: 1040-5488; 1538-9235; 1538-9235
• DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001781

This study explores the reliability of TonoRef II (Nidek, Tokyo, Japan), which represents a simple tool to obtain rapid refractometry and tonometry measurements. The present device demonstrates very high repeatability of refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) readings as compared with subjective measurements and a higher concordance of IOP readings to Goldmann application tonometry (GAT).SIGNIFICANCEThis study explores the reliability of TonoRef II (Nidek, Tokyo, Japan), which represents a simple tool to obtain rapid refractometry and tonometry measurements. The present device demonstrates very high repeatability of refraction and intraocular pressure (IOP) readings as compared with subjective measurements and a higher concordance of IOP readings to Goldmann application tonometry (GAT).This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of measurements acquired with the Autorefractometer/Keratometer/Tonometer TonoRef II and assess their agreement to subjective measurements and readings of other established devices.PURPOSEThis study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of measurements acquired with the Autorefractometer/Keratometer/Tonometer TonoRef II and assess their agreement to subjective measurements and readings of other established devices.In a cross-sectional study, 54 eyes of 54 healthy subjects were enrolled. Each subject underwent five measurements with the TonoRef II, three measurements with the Canon RK-F1 Autorefractor Keratometer (Canon Europe NV, Amstelveen, the Netherlands), three IOP measurements with the Canon TX-F Noncontact Tonometer (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), three measurements with GAT, and a thorough subjective refraction. Repeatability coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate repeatability of readings and agreement to the subjective values.METHODSIn a cross-sectional study, 54 eyes of 54 healthy subjects were enrolled. Each subject underwent five measurements with the TonoRef II, three measurements with the Canon RK-F1 Autorefractor Keratometer (Canon Europe NV, Amstelveen, the Netherlands), three IOP measurements with the Canon TX-F Noncontact Tonometer (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), three measurements with GAT, and a thorough subjective refraction. Repeatability coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate repeatability of readings and agreement to the subjective values.TonoRef II showed high repeatability (ICC >0.9) in all parameters tested (sphere, r = 0.157; cylinder, r = 0.196; IOP, r = 2.653). A strong correlation was found between TonoRef and Canon instruments (P < .001 in all parameters). Mean differences and limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 standard deviation) were -0.01 ± 0.69 D, -0.11 ± 0.7 D, and 2.1 ± 3.4 mmHg for sphere, cylinder, and IOP, respectively. Both autorefractors achieved a very good to excellent agreement to the values obtained with the subjective refraction for most of the parameters tested, without any significant difference to each other (P > .05). Intraocular pressure measurements of TonoRef II showed higher agreement to the GAT values compared with those obtained with the Canon tonometer (ICC, 0.9114 and 0.7002, respectively; P < .001).RESULTSTonoRef II showed high repeatability (ICC >0.9) in all parameters tested (sphere, r = 0.157; cylinder, r = 0.196; IOP, r = 2.653). A strong correlation was found between TonoRef and Canon instruments (P < .001 in all parameters). Mean differences and limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 standard deviation) were -0.01 ± 0.69 D, -0.11 ± 0.7 D, and 2.1 ± 3.4 mmHg for sphere, cylinder, and IOP, respectively. Both autorefractors achieved a very good to excellent agreement to the values obtained with the subjective refraction for most of the parameters tested, without any significant difference to each other (P > .05). Intraocular pressure measurements of TonoRef II showed higher agreement to the GAT values compared with those obtained with the Canon tonometer (ICC, 0.9114 and 0.7002, respectively; P < .001).Intraocular pressure and refraction readings acquired with TonoRef II demonstrate very high repeatability and agreement to the subjective measurements. Regarding IOP evaluation, TonoRef II shows higher concordance to GAT compared with another established noncontact tonometer.CONCLUSIONSIntraocular pressure and refraction readings acquired with TonoRef II demonstrate very high repeatability and agreement to the subjective measurements. Regarding IOP evaluation, TonoRef II shows higher concordance to GAT compared with another established noncontact tonometer.