Pattern recognition for measuring the flame stability of gas-fired combustion based on the image processing technology
This study proposes a diagnostic method for gas-fired combustion based on the image processing technology, for identifying an abnormal combustion situation in a gaseous flame. The proposed algorithm is divided into four aspects: (1) a logarithmic entropy multi-threshold segmentation method for segme...
Saved in:
| Published in | Fuel (Guildford) Vol. 270; p. 117486 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
15.06.2020
Elsevier BV |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117486 |
Cover
| Summary: | This study proposes a diagnostic method for gas-fired combustion based on the image processing technology, for identifying an abnormal combustion situation in a gaseous flame. The proposed algorithm is divided into four aspects: (1) a logarithmic entropy multi-threshold segmentation method for segmenting the flame region utilized to extract image features; (2) 12 typical characteristic parameters representing gas-fired flame images, with five of them extracted for identification; (3) a fuzzy pattern recognition algorithm using an S-type membership function and a maximum-minimum distance function to distinguish between variable flame states; and (4) two statistics, Q and T2, used to evaluate the decision-making results of the fuzzy pattern recognition. The results are also compared to those from several other algorithms, including the self-organizing map, neural network, and support vector machine methods. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method has better performance in identifying different combustion situations in a gaseous flame and is superior to the other algorithms. Through a two-parameter adjustment, normal gas-fired combustion state can be accurately identified; for abnormal combustion, the prediction accuracy can become more than 90%. There can be a slight misjudgment; this may be owing to the relatively less training data for abnormal flame states. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0016-2361 1873-7153 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117486 |