Smaller glenosphere size and increased baseplate retroversion improve postoperative internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with a 135° humeral implant and lateralized glenoid
Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and...
Saved in:
Published in | JSES international |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Inc
2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2666-6383 2666-6383 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004 |
Cover
Abstract | Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA.
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables.
A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (P = .015).
In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA.
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables.
A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (P = .015).
In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes. BackgroundOptimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA. MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables. ResultsA total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine ( P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion ( P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine ( P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter ( P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance ( P = .015). ConclusionIn patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes. |
Author | Habermeyer, Peter Petre, Dirk Lee, Julia Erickson, Brandon Lin, Albert Lichtenberg, Sven Werner, Brian C. Farmer, Kevin Bercik, Michael Lederman, Evan Steinbeck, Joern O'Grady, Christopher Brolin, Tyler Tokish, John Shah, Anup Lutton, David Moroder, Philipp Adams, Joseph Harmsen, Sam Davis, Daniel Lenters, Tim Al-Humadi, Samer Raiss, Patric Burrus, Tyrrell Kissenberth, Michael Miller, Bruce Provencher, Matthew Parsons, Bradford Sears, Benjamin W. Huffman, Russell Bedi, Asheesh Griffin, Justin Denard, Patrick J. Romeo, Anthony Creighton, Robert |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joseph surname: Adams fullname: Adams, Joseph organization: Naples Comprehensive Health, Naples, FL, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Samer orcidid: 0000-0003-0826-6463 surname: Al-Humadi fullname: Al-Humadi, Samer organization: Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Brian C. orcidid: 0000-0002-7956-2123 surname: Werner fullname: Werner, Brian C. organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Philipp surname: Moroder fullname: Moroder, Philipp organization: Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland – sequence: 5 givenname: Patric orcidid: 0000-0003-0489-0365 surname: Raiss fullname: Raiss, Patric organization: Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen, Munich, Germany – sequence: 6 givenname: Asheesh surname: Bedi fullname: Bedi, Asheesh organization: NorthShore University Health System, Skokie, IL, USA – sequence: 7 givenname: Evan orcidid: 0000-0002-1035-6751 surname: Lederman fullname: Lederman, Evan organization: Banner Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Orthopedic Sports Medicine Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA – sequence: 8 givenname: Justin surname: Griffin fullname: Griffin, Justin organization: Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, VA, USA – sequence: 9 givenname: Albert surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Albert – sequence: 10 givenname: Anthony surname: Romeo fullname: Romeo, Anthony – sequence: 11 givenname: Anup surname: Shah fullname: Shah, Anup – sequence: 12 givenname: Benjamin W. surname: Sears fullname: Sears, Benjamin W. – sequence: 13 givenname: Bradford surname: Parsons fullname: Parsons, Bradford – sequence: 14 givenname: Brandon surname: Erickson fullname: Erickson, Brandon – sequence: 15 givenname: Bruce surname: Miller fullname: Miller, Bruce – sequence: 16 givenname: Christopher surname: O'Grady fullname: O'Grady, Christopher – sequence: 17 givenname: Daniel surname: Davis fullname: Davis, Daniel – sequence: 18 givenname: David surname: Lutton fullname: Lutton, David – sequence: 19 givenname: Dirk surname: Petre fullname: Petre, Dirk – sequence: 20 givenname: Joern surname: Steinbeck fullname: Steinbeck, Joern – sequence: 21 givenname: John surname: Tokish fullname: Tokish, John – sequence: 22 givenname: Julia surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Julia – sequence: 23 givenname: Kevin surname: Farmer fullname: Farmer, Kevin – sequence: 24 givenname: Matthew surname: Provencher fullname: Provencher, Matthew – sequence: 25 givenname: Michael surname: Bercik fullname: Bercik, Michael – sequence: 26 givenname: Michael surname: Kissenberth fullname: Kissenberth, Michael – sequence: 27 givenname: Peter surname: Habermeyer fullname: Habermeyer, Peter – sequence: 28 givenname: Robert surname: Creighton fullname: Creighton, Robert – sequence: 29 givenname: Russell surname: Huffman fullname: Huffman, Russell – sequence: 30 givenname: Sam surname: Harmsen fullname: Harmsen, Sam – sequence: 31 givenname: Sven surname: Lichtenberg fullname: Lichtenberg, Sven – sequence: 32 givenname: Tim surname: Lenters fullname: Lenters, Tim – sequence: 33 givenname: Tyrrell surname: Burrus fullname: Burrus, Tyrrell – sequence: 34 givenname: Tyler surname: Brolin fullname: Brolin, Tyler – sequence: 35 givenname: Patrick J. orcidid: 0000-0002-2641-5920 surname: Denard fullname: Denard, Patrick J. email: pjdenard@gmail.com organization: Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR, USA |
BookMark | eNqVUU1u1DAUtlCRWkpv0IUvMMF2Es9EQkioglKpEosWiZ3l2C_EwbEj21M0PRVn4ACciReGBRuEurH9Pr3vR_5ekJMQAxByyVnFGZevpmrK4EKpBBNtxWTFWPOMnAkp5UbWu_rkr_cpuch5Ygw3Od_x9oz8vJu195DoFw8h5mWEBDS7R6A6WOqCSaAzWNrjuXhdgCYoKT5Ayi4G6uZlHegSc4kLJF0cTpgGUtCeplgQwT09IILUlQe0IOxpHuPeW4R1KmOKqJ7LgaLIENOMlt9cGammvG5_fKfjfkZ1vxp6HcrvdGscxDCsPcZ39iV5Pmif4eLPfU4-vX93f_Vhc_vx-ubq7e3G1EI2G9HzmndC8u0gOOjesq3sxJaBZV0DkkOvpe5aIU3DtkwCq2HXcOh61slGClufk-aoa1LMOcGgluRmnQ6KM7XWoiZ1rEWttSgmFdaCtDdHGmC2BwdJZeMgGLAugSnKRvdUAeNdcEb7r3CAPMX9-u9ZcZWFYupubX4tXrTYueCfUeD1vwX-7_8L9OvKjw |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007 10.4055/cios20301 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.039 10.1007/s00402-016-2560-3 10.21037/aoj.2018.12.09 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098 10.1067/mse.2002.127096 10.1007/s12178-019-09585-z 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.014 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.073 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103115 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.015 10.4103/0973-6042.150226 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.024 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.136 10.4055/cios23217 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.013 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.010 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.006 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021 10.1007/s12178-019-09582-2 10.1053/j.sart.2022.01.006 10.1007/s12306-015-0396-6 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.019 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.009 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.032 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.012 10.21037/aoj-23-20 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.043 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.006 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025 The Authors The Authors |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 The Authors – notice: The Authors |
CorporateAuthor | Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Committee (ShARC) Group |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Committee (ShARC) Group |
DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004 |
DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 2666-6383 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004 S266663832500221X 1_s2_0_S266663832500221X |
GroupedDBID | .1- .FO 0R~ 1P~ 53G AAEDW AALRI AAXUO AAYWO ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP EBS FDB GROUPED_DOAJ M41 M~E OK1 ROL RPM Z5R 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3264-2b13192617f21eabd0769270ed094e61eba6a9526c40706e03e841e9b096462d3 |
ISSN | 2666-6383 |
IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 05:36:57 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 17:18:27 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 20 19:11:05 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:11:18 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Level IV Glenosphere positioning 3D software Case Series Patient reported outcomes Humeral inlay component Baseplate retroversion Preoperative planning software Postoperative outcomes Prognosis Study Reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3264-2b13192617f21eabd0769270ed094e61eba6a9526c40706e03e841e9b096462d3 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0826-6463 0000-0002-1035-6751 0000-0002-2641-5920 0000-0002-7956-2123 0000-0003-0489-0365 |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S266663832500221X elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-00-00 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – year: 2025 text: 2025-00-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | JSES international |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Elmallah, Swanson, Le, Kirsch, Jawa (bib3) 2022; 31 Berhouet, Jacquot, Walch, Deransart, Favard, Gauci (bib1) 2022; 108 Raiss, Walch, Wittmann, Athwal (bib27) 2020; 29 Chae, Lee, Han, Kim (bib2) 2015; 101 Sheth, Saltzman (bib34) 2019; 12 Lee, Kim, Kim, Baek, Nakla, McGarry (bib18) 2024; 16 Waltz, Peebles, Ernat, Eble, Denard, Romeo (bib36) 2022; 6 Kozak, Bauer, Walch, Al-Karawi, Blakeney (bib16) 2021; 6 Lilley, Lachance, Peebles, Powell, Romeo, Denard (bib20) 2022; 31 Samitier, Alentorn-Geli, Torrens, Wright (bib31) 2015; 9 Li, Knutson, Choi, Lobatto, Lipman, Craig (bib19) 2013; 22 Helmkamp, Bullock, Amilo, Guerrero, Ledbetter, Sell (bib8) 2018; 27 Langohr, Giles, Athwal, Johnson (bib17) 2015; 24 Sabesan, Lombardo, Shahriar, Petersen-Fitts, Wiater (bib30) 2016; 100 Pak, Ardebol, Kilic, Sears, Lederman, Werner (bib24) 2024; 33 Kim, Rhee, Oh, Yoo, Noh, Shin (bib13) 2022; 14 Werner, Lederman, Gobezie, Denard (bib38) 2021; 30 Klosterman, Tagliero, Lenters, Denard, Lederman, Gobezie (bib14) 2024; 8 Heylen, Van Haver, Vuylsteke, Declercq, Verborgt (bib9) 2016; 25 Mollon, Mahure, Roche, Zuckerman (bib23) 2016; 25 Gruber, Kirloskar, Werner, Lädermann, Denard (bib5) 2022; 2 Gutiérrez, Walker, Willis, Pupello, Frankle (bib6) 2011; 20 Werner, Chaoui, Walch (bib37) 2018; 100-B Rodríguez, Entezari, Iannotti, Ricchetti (bib28) 2019; 4 Thon, Seidl, Bravman, McCarty, Savoie, Frank (bib35) 2020; 13 Pastor, Kraemer, Wellmann, Hurschler, Smith (bib25) 2016; 136 Kohan, Chalmers, Salazar, Keener, Yamaguchi, Chamberlain (bib15) 2017; 26 Saraglis, Singh, Charfare, Olujinmi, Devecseri, Agbaje (bib32) 2024; 16 Keener, Patterson, Orvets, Aleem, Chamberlain (bib12) 2018; 27 Peljovich, Ratner, Marino (bib26) 2010; 35 Liu, Kim, Nakla, Chung, Kwak, McGarry (bib21) 2023; 32 Rojas, Lievano, Jiménez, González-Rico, Salas, Fierro (bib29) 2023; 8 Ingrassia, Nigrelli, Ricotta, Nalbone, D'Arienzo, D'Arienzo (bib11) 2019; 50 Hartzler, Denard, Griffin, Werner, Romeo (bib7) 2021; 30 Hwang, Werner, Provencher, Horinek, Moroder, Ardebol (bib10) 2023; 32 Michener, McClure, Sennett (bib22) 2002; 11 Fourneau, van Haute, De Wilde, van Tongel, van der Bracht (bib4) 2022; 32 Sheth, Heldt, Spell, Vidal, Laughlin, Morris (bib33) 2022; 31 Michener (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib22) 2002; 11 Pastor (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib25) 2016; 136 Samitier (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib31) 2015; 9 Rodríguez (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib28) 2019; 4 Peljovich (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib26) 2010; 35 Gutiérrez (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib6) 2011; 20 Helmkamp (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib8) 2018; 27 Li (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib19) 2013; 22 Sheth (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib34) 2019; 12 Saraglis (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib32) 2024; 16 Lee (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib18) 2024; 16 Mollon (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib23) 2016; 25 Thon (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib35) 2020; 13 Kohan (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib15) 2017; 26 Elmallah (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib3) 2022; 31 Klosterman (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib14) 2024; 8 Hwang (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib10) 2023; 32 Raiss (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib27) 2020; 29 Rojas (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib29) 2023; 8 Hartzler (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib7) 2021; 30 Chae (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib2) 2015; 101 Werner (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib38) 2021; 30 Ingrassia (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib11) 2019; 50 Kozak (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib16) 2021; 6 Kim (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib13) 2022; 14 Gruber (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib5) 2022; 2 Langohr (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib17) 2015; 24 Pak (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib24) 2024; 33 Sheth (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib33) 2022; 31 Heylen (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib9) 2016; 25 Fourneau (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib4) 2022; 32 Werner (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib37) 2018; 100-B Lilley (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib20) 2022; 31 Berhouet (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib1) 2022; 108 Keener (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib12) 2018; 27 Sabesan (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib30) 2016; 100 Waltz (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib36) 2022; 6 Liu (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib21) 2023; 32 |
References_xml | – volume: 108 year: 2022 ident: bib1 article-title: Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res – volume: 136 start-page: 1513 year: 2016 end-page: 1519 ident: bib25 article-title: Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg – volume: 16 year: 2024 ident: bib32 article-title: Mid-term results following reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the role of navigation in the management of glenoid bone loss publication-title: Cureus – volume: 100-B start-page: 1182 year: 2018 end-page: 1186 ident: bib37 article-title: Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Bone Joint J – volume: 32 start-page: 1662 year: 2023 end-page: 1672 ident: bib21 article-title: Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 16 start-page: 303 year: 2024 end-page: 312 ident: bib18 article-title: Biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation based on tilting angle and overhang changes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg – volume: 25 start-page: 763 year: 2016 end-page: 771 ident: bib23 article-title: Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 1238 year: 2017 end-page: 1245 ident: bib15 article-title: Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 22 start-page: 807 year: 2013 end-page: 813 ident: bib19 article-title: Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 25 start-page: 186 year: 2016 end-page: 192 ident: bib9 article-title: Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 35 start-page: 1365 year: 2010 end-page: 1369 ident: bib26 article-title: Update of the physiology and biomechanics of tendon transfer surgery publication-title: J Hand Surg Am – volume: 31 start-page: 2082 year: 2022 end-page: 2088 ident: bib3 article-title: Baseplate retroversion does not affect postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 100 start-page: 115 year: 2016 end-page: 120 ident: bib30 article-title: The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Musculoskelet Surg – volume: 32 start-page: 1654 year: 2023 end-page: 1661 ident: bib10 article-title: Short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient-specific instrumentation publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 29 start-page: 2123 year: 2020 end-page: 2127 ident: bib27 article-title: Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty? publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 8 start-page: 37 year: 2023 ident: bib29 article-title: Preoperative planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed tomography scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality publication-title: Ann Jt – volume: 12 start-page: 554 year: 2019 end-page: 561 ident: bib34 article-title: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implant design considerations publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med – volume: 101 start-page: 421 year: 2015 end-page: 425 ident: bib2 article-title: Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res – volume: 2 start-page: 117 year: 2022 end-page: 124 ident: bib5 article-title: Factors associated with internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review publication-title: JSES Rev Rep Tech – volume: 20 start-page: 732 year: 2011 end-page: 739 ident: bib6 article-title: Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 24 start-page: 972 year: 2015 end-page: 979 ident: bib17 article-title: The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 4 start-page: 12 year: 2019 ident: bib28 article-title: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder replacement: the surgical benefits and their clinical translation publication-title: Ann Jt – volume: 50 start-page: S12 year: 2019 end-page: S17 ident: bib11 article-title: A new method to evaluate the influence of the glenosphere positioning on stability and range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis publication-title: Injury – volume: 27 start-page: 2099 year: 2018 end-page: 2107 ident: bib8 article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 31 start-page: 875 year: 2022 end-page: 883 ident: bib33 article-title: Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 8 start-page: 528 year: 2024 end-page: 534 ident: bib14 article-title: The subcoracoid distance is correlated with pain and internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: JSES Int – volume: 30 start-page: 787 year: 2021 end-page: 794 ident: bib7 article-title: Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 31 start-page: 1073 year: 2022 end-page: 1082 ident: bib20 article-title: What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 33 start-page: 2171 year: 2024 end-page: 2177 ident: bib24 article-title: Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 13 start-page: 11 year: 2020 end-page: 19 ident: bib35 article-title: Advances and update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med – volume: 27 start-page: 339 year: 2018 end-page: 349 ident: bib12 article-title: Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 9 start-page: 24 year: 2015 end-page: 31 ident: bib31 article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes publication-title: Int J Shoulder Surg – volume: 30 start-page: 2498 year: 2021 end-page: 2505 ident: bib38 article-title: Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 6 start-page: 189 year: 2021 end-page: 201 ident: bib16 article-title: An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems publication-title: EFORT Open Rev – volume: 14 start-page: 119 year: 2022 end-page: 127 ident: bib13 article-title: Clinical and radiologic outcomes of small glenoid baseplate in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg – volume: 11 start-page: 587 year: 2002 end-page: 594 ident: bib22 article-title: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg – volume: 6 start-page: 413 year: 2022 end-page: 420 ident: bib36 article-title: Commercial 3-dimensional imaging programs are not created equal: version and inclination measurement positions vary among preoperative planning software publication-title: JSES Int – volume: 32 start-page: 474 year: 2022 end-page: 481 ident: bib4 article-title: 3D preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of different planning software systems publication-title: Semin Arthroplasty – volume: 27 start-page: 2099 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib8 article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007 – volume: 14 start-page: 119 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib13 article-title: Clinical and radiologic outcomes of small glenoid baseplate in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios20301 – volume: 24 start-page: 972 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib17 article-title: The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018 – volume: 50 start-page: S12 issue: Suppl 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib11 article-title: A new method to evaluate the influence of the glenosphere positioning on stability and range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis publication-title: Injury doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.039 – volume: 136 start-page: 1513 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib25 article-title: Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2560-3 – volume: 4 start-page: 12 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib28 article-title: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder replacement: the surgical benefits and their clinical translation publication-title: Ann Jt doi: 10.21037/aoj.2018.12.09 – volume: 29 start-page: 2123 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib27 article-title: Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty? publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098 – volume: 11 start-page: 587 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib22 article-title: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096 – volume: 12 start-page: 554 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib34 article-title: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implant design considerations publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09585-z – volume: 20 start-page: 732 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib6 article-title: Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035 – volume: 35 start-page: 1365 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib26 article-title: Update of the physiology and biomechanics of tendon transfer surgery publication-title: J Hand Surg Am doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.014 – volume: 26 start-page: 1238 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib15 article-title: Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.073 – volume: 108 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib1 article-title: Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103115 – volume: 32 start-page: 1662 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib21 article-title: Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.015 – volume: 9 start-page: 24 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib31 article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes publication-title: Int J Shoulder Surg doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.150226 – volume: 25 start-page: 186 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib9 article-title: Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.024 – volume: 32 start-page: 1654 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib10 article-title: Short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient-specific instrumentation publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.136 – volume: 16 start-page: 303 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib18 article-title: Biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation based on tilting angle and overhang changes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg doi: 10.4055/cios23217 – volume: 22 start-page: 807 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib19 article-title: Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.013 – volume: 8 start-page: 528 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib14 article-title: The subcoracoid distance is correlated with pain and internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: JSES Int doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.010 – volume: 6 start-page: 413 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib36 article-title: Commercial 3-dimensional imaging programs are not created equal: version and inclination measurement positions vary among preoperative planning software publication-title: JSES Int doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.006 – volume: 2 start-page: 117 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib5 article-title: Factors associated with internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review publication-title: JSES Rev Rep Tech – volume: 30 start-page: 2498 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib38 article-title: Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021 – volume: 16 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib32 article-title: Mid-term results following reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the role of navigation in the management of glenoid bone loss publication-title: Cureus – volume: 13 start-page: 11 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib35 article-title: Advances and update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09582-2 – volume: 32 start-page: 474 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib4 article-title: 3D preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of different planning software systems publication-title: Semin Arthroplasty doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2022.01.006 – volume: 100 start-page: 115 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib30 article-title: The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Musculoskelet Surg doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0396-6 – volume: 33 start-page: 2171 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib24 article-title: Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.019 – volume: 100-B start-page: 1182 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib37 article-title: Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: Bone Joint J doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1 – volume: 101 start-page: 421 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib2 article-title: Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.009 – volume: 27 start-page: 339 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib12 article-title: Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011 – volume: 25 start-page: 763 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib23 article-title: Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027 – volume: 30 start-page: 787 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib7 article-title: Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.032 – volume: 31 start-page: 875 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib33 article-title: Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.012 – volume: 8 start-page: 37 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib29 article-title: Preoperative planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed tomography scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality publication-title: Ann Jt doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-20 – volume: 31 start-page: 2082 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib3 article-title: Baseplate retroversion does not affect postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.043 – volume: 31 start-page: 1073 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib20 article-title: What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.006 – volume: 6 start-page: 189 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib16 article-title: An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems publication-title: EFORT Open Rev doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085 |
SSID | ssj0002511815 |
Score | 2.2822149 |
Snippet | Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a... BackgroundOptimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Index Database Publisher |
SubjectTerms | 3D software Baseplate retroversion Glenosphere positioning Humeral inlay component Orthopedics Patient reported outcomes Postoperative outcomes Preoperative planning software Reverse shoulder arthroplasty |
Title | Smaller glenosphere size and increased baseplate retroversion improve postoperative internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with a 135° humeral implant and lateralized glenoid |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S266663832500221X https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S266663832500221X https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2666-6383 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815 issn: 2666-6383 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20170101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2666-6383 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815 issn: 2666-6383 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2666-6383 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815 issn: 2666-6383 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20200101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Pb9MwFMCtMi5cEAgQYzC9AztFqfLHSZojq0DTJLhsk3qz7MaFVm0TJR2Hfio-Ax9gn4n3bCektGKMS9S6tev0_WQ_v7w_jL2PoyCRUo98WSSFz2PJfSVD7adcpXk85WpmEs9__pJe3PDLSTIZDO56Xku3GzWcbg_GlfyPVLEN5UpRsg-QbDcoNuBrlC9eUcJ4_ScZX62oEkrtfV2alN_492uvmW_dE4E1KYQNaZh4rZaoVHq13tTld2siowBJeuNVlFuj0i4F-NyaCJdeXTpHRFtGnFI91Q0V2qDwyeYblcbGZpwVFVpAHRy1-cpGIbQe7dIL4-RsHJ2dB1QLUJsEHyv8rnNrpymRnWWLHcwtzHeqhl7iUt9Ox1osfzsXOAuRe37RNi99eiZRzK2pe9VzPMYxLJvnNa1o42EHWlmXhf3I2paqvh3ERkvbhRJ1jNTHdcQulHq_bW-bsBaLxXDRaLyNIQ1nsrjaSsi7Wbn_2C07H8bWPW4h7CiCRhHGS5A_Yo-jDDWfnvWINANznDNFNbrptdGcxuVwfzqHtaWeBnT9jD11Rxf4YDl8zgZ6_YLdOQahxyAQg4ASho5B6BiEPoPgGIQdBqFlEFoGwTAIjkEwDELLIPQZhI5BIAZBAjL48wc4_sDxZ2bX4w8cfy_ZzaeP1-ML39UI8ad48OB-pELcRKiswCwKtVRFkKV5lAW6CHKu01Armco8idIpx80t1UGsRzzUucKjO0-jIn7FjtblWr9mkBTZKJ_FRSzDgsc8V1E4y_NMjQKd6WwaHDO_lYWobCoY8TcIjlnSCky0Yc64MQuE8J5-2aF-unErTyNC0UQiEFdEEUGExxhUxcNJv6dToK1ifO9vvnngvZ2wJ_TO2iLfsqNNfavfoXa-UafGqnVqwP8FLnP1fQ |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smaller+glenosphere+size+and+increased+baseplate+retroversion+improve+postoperative+internal+rotation+after+reverse+total+shoulder+arthroplasty+performed+with+a+135%C2%B0+humeral+implant+and+lateralized+glenoid&rft.jtitle=JSES+international&rft.au=Adams%2C+Joseph&rft.au=Al-Humadi%2C+Samer&rft.au=Werner%2C+Brian+C.&rft.au=Moroder%2C+Philipp&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=2666-6383&rft.eissn=2666-6383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jseint.2025.06.004&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon |