Smaller glenosphere size and increased baseplate retroversion improve postoperative internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with a 135° humeral implant and lateralized glenoid

Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJSES international
Main Authors Adams, Joseph, Al-Humadi, Samer, Werner, Brian C., Moroder, Philipp, Raiss, Patric, Bedi, Asheesh, Lederman, Evan, Griffin, Justin, Lin, Albert, Romeo, Anthony, Shah, Anup, Sears, Benjamin W., Parsons, Bradford, Erickson, Brandon, Miller, Bruce, O'Grady, Christopher, Davis, Daniel, Lutton, David, Petre, Dirk, Steinbeck, Joern, Tokish, John, Lee, Julia, Farmer, Kevin, Provencher, Matthew, Bercik, Michael, Kissenberth, Michael, Habermeyer, Peter, Creighton, Robert, Huffman, Russell, Harmsen, Sam, Lichtenberg, Sven, Lenters, Tim, Burrus, Tyrrell, Brolin, Tyler, Denard, Patrick J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2666-6383
2666-6383
DOI10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004

Cover

Abstract Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA. A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables. A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (P = .015). In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes.
AbstractList Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA. A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables. A total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine (P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion (P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine (P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter (P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance (P = .015). In patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes.
BackgroundOptimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a subject of ongoing research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between three-dimensional (3D) glenosphere position and orientation relative to anatomic scapular landmarks and postoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM following rTSA. MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted on primary rTSAs performed with a 135° humeral inlay component and a lateralized glenoid component between November 2016 and March 2022. Surgeries performed with a 3D plan and patient-specific transfer instrumentation with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were included. Implant position was extracted from preoperative planning software, focusing on pin position (center of the glenosphere) and glenosphere diameter, version, and overhang relative to scapular anatomic landmarks. ROM and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were assessed at 2-year follow-up, with linear regression models utilized to analyze the relationships between preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes while adjusting for confounding variables. ResultsA total of 75 rTSAs met the study criteria. For every 1 millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter, there was a 0.5 spinal level decrease in internal rotation (IR) spine ( P ≤ .005) and a 2.5° decrease in forward flexion ( P ≤ .005). For every 4° increase in baseplate retroversion, there was a 1 spinal level improvement in IR spine ( P = .009). Superior tilt of the baseplate was associated with a decrease in internal rotation at 90° of abduction (3° decrease per 1° of increased superior tilt, P ≤ .001). ASES scores were also significantly affected, with a 3.5 point decrease per millimeter increase in glenosphere diameter ( P ≤ .001), but improved by a 1 point per millimeter increase in pin-to-coracoid distance ( P = .015). ConclusionIn patients with 3D planning and patient-specific instrumentation, smaller glenosphere diameter, increased baseplate retroversion, and avoidance of superior tilt improve IR after rTSA performed with a 135° humeral component and lateralized glenoid. A smaller glenosphere diameter and increased distance from the coracoid also improved ASES scores. This data suggests that with the use of a lateralized glenoid in rTSA, efforts should be made to increase the glenosphere distance from the coracoid, avoid a superior tilted positioning of the baseplate, and consider a smaller glenosphere when in between sizes.
Author Habermeyer, Peter
Petre, Dirk
Lee, Julia
Erickson, Brandon
Lin, Albert
Lichtenberg, Sven
Werner, Brian C.
Farmer, Kevin
Bercik, Michael
Lederman, Evan
Steinbeck, Joern
O'Grady, Christopher
Brolin, Tyler
Tokish, John
Shah, Anup
Lutton, David
Moroder, Philipp
Adams, Joseph
Harmsen, Sam
Davis, Daniel
Lenters, Tim
Al-Humadi, Samer
Raiss, Patric
Burrus, Tyrrell
Kissenberth, Michael
Miller, Bruce
Provencher, Matthew
Parsons, Bradford
Sears, Benjamin W.
Huffman, Russell
Bedi, Asheesh
Griffin, Justin
Denard, Patrick J.
Romeo, Anthony
Creighton, Robert
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Adams
  fullname: Adams, Joseph
  organization: Naples Comprehensive Health, Naples, FL, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Samer
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0826-6463
  surname: Al-Humadi
  fullname: Al-Humadi, Samer
  organization: Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Brian C.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7956-2123
  surname: Werner
  fullname: Werner, Brian C.
  organization: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Philipp
  surname: Moroder
  fullname: Moroder, Philipp
  organization: Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Patric
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0489-0365
  surname: Raiss
  fullname: Raiss, Patric
  organization: Orthopadische Chirurgie Munchen, Munich, Germany
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Asheesh
  surname: Bedi
  fullname: Bedi, Asheesh
  organization: NorthShore University Health System, Skokie, IL, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Evan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1035-6751
  surname: Lederman
  fullname: Lederman, Evan
  organization: Banner Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Orthopedic Sports Medicine Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Justin
  surname: Griffin
  fullname: Griffin, Justin
  organization: Jordan-Young Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery & Sports Medicine, Virginia Beach, VA, USA
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Albert
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Albert
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Anthony
  surname: Romeo
  fullname: Romeo, Anthony
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Anup
  surname: Shah
  fullname: Shah, Anup
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Benjamin W.
  surname: Sears
  fullname: Sears, Benjamin W.
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Bradford
  surname: Parsons
  fullname: Parsons, Bradford
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Brandon
  surname: Erickson
  fullname: Erickson, Brandon
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Bruce
  surname: Miller
  fullname: Miller, Bruce
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Christopher
  surname: O'Grady
  fullname: O'Grady, Christopher
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Davis
  fullname: Davis, Daniel
– sequence: 18
  givenname: David
  surname: Lutton
  fullname: Lutton, David
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Dirk
  surname: Petre
  fullname: Petre, Dirk
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Joern
  surname: Steinbeck
  fullname: Steinbeck, Joern
– sequence: 21
  givenname: John
  surname: Tokish
  fullname: Tokish, John
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Julia
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Julia
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Kevin
  surname: Farmer
  fullname: Farmer, Kevin
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Provencher
  fullname: Provencher, Matthew
– sequence: 25
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Bercik
  fullname: Bercik, Michael
– sequence: 26
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Kissenberth
  fullname: Kissenberth, Michael
– sequence: 27
  givenname: Peter
  surname: Habermeyer
  fullname: Habermeyer, Peter
– sequence: 28
  givenname: Robert
  surname: Creighton
  fullname: Creighton, Robert
– sequence: 29
  givenname: Russell
  surname: Huffman
  fullname: Huffman, Russell
– sequence: 30
  givenname: Sam
  surname: Harmsen
  fullname: Harmsen, Sam
– sequence: 31
  givenname: Sven
  surname: Lichtenberg
  fullname: Lichtenberg, Sven
– sequence: 32
  givenname: Tim
  surname: Lenters
  fullname: Lenters, Tim
– sequence: 33
  givenname: Tyrrell
  surname: Burrus
  fullname: Burrus, Tyrrell
– sequence: 34
  givenname: Tyler
  surname: Brolin
  fullname: Brolin, Tyler
– sequence: 35
  givenname: Patrick J.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-2641-5920
  surname: Denard
  fullname: Denard, Patrick J.
  email: pjdenard@gmail.com
  organization: Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, OR, USA
BookMark eNqVUU1u1DAUtlCRWkpv0IUvMMF2Es9EQkioglKpEosWiZ3l2C_EwbEj21M0PRVn4ACciReGBRuEurH9Pr3vR_5ekJMQAxByyVnFGZevpmrK4EKpBBNtxWTFWPOMnAkp5UbWu_rkr_cpuch5Ygw3Od_x9oz8vJu195DoFw8h5mWEBDS7R6A6WOqCSaAzWNrjuXhdgCYoKT5Ayi4G6uZlHegSc4kLJF0cTpgGUtCeplgQwT09IILUlQe0IOxpHuPeW4R1KmOKqJ7LgaLIENOMlt9cGammvG5_fKfjfkZ1vxp6HcrvdGscxDCsPcZ39iV5Pmif4eLPfU4-vX93f_Vhc_vx-ubq7e3G1EI2G9HzmndC8u0gOOjesq3sxJaBZV0DkkOvpe5aIU3DtkwCq2HXcOh61slGClufk-aoa1LMOcGgluRmnQ6KM7XWoiZ1rEWttSgmFdaCtDdHGmC2BwdJZeMgGLAugSnKRvdUAeNdcEb7r3CAPMX9-u9ZcZWFYupubX4tXrTYueCfUeD1vwX-7_8L9OvKjw
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007
10.4055/cios20301
10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018
10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.039
10.1007/s00402-016-2560-3
10.21037/aoj.2018.12.09
10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098
10.1067/mse.2002.127096
10.1007/s12178-019-09585-z
10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035
10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.014
10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.073
10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103115
10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.015
10.4103/0973-6042.150226
10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.024
10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.136
10.4055/cios23217
10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.013
10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.010
10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.006
10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021
10.1007/s12178-019-09582-2
10.1053/j.sart.2022.01.006
10.1007/s12306-015-0396-6
10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.019
10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1
10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.009
10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011
10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027
10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.032
10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.012
10.21037/aoj-23-20
10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.043
10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.006
10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 The Authors
The Authors
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 The Authors
– notice: The Authors
CorporateAuthor Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Committee (ShARC) Group
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Committee (ShARC) Group
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList


DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2666-6383
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004
S266663832500221X
1_s2_0_S266663832500221X
GroupedDBID .1-
.FO
0R~
1P~
53G
AAEDW
AALRI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
EBS
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
M41
M~E
OK1
ROL
RPM
Z5R
6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3264-2b13192617f21eabd0769270ed094e61eba6a9526c40706e03e841e9b096462d3
ISSN 2666-6383
IngestDate Wed Oct 01 05:36:57 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 17:18:27 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 20 19:11:05 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:11:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Level IV
Glenosphere positioning
3D software
Case Series
Patient reported outcomes
Humeral inlay component
Baseplate retroversion
Preoperative planning software
Postoperative outcomes
Prognosis Study
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3264-2b13192617f21eabd0769270ed094e61eba6a9526c40706e03e841e9b096462d3
ORCID 0000-0003-0826-6463
0000-0002-1035-6751
0000-0002-2641-5920
0000-0002-7956-2123
0000-0003-0489-0365
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S266663832500221X
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2025
  text: 2025-00-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle JSES international
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Elmallah, Swanson, Le, Kirsch, Jawa (bib3) 2022; 31
Berhouet, Jacquot, Walch, Deransart, Favard, Gauci (bib1) 2022; 108
Raiss, Walch, Wittmann, Athwal (bib27) 2020; 29
Chae, Lee, Han, Kim (bib2) 2015; 101
Sheth, Saltzman (bib34) 2019; 12
Lee, Kim, Kim, Baek, Nakla, McGarry (bib18) 2024; 16
Waltz, Peebles, Ernat, Eble, Denard, Romeo (bib36) 2022; 6
Kozak, Bauer, Walch, Al-Karawi, Blakeney (bib16) 2021; 6
Lilley, Lachance, Peebles, Powell, Romeo, Denard (bib20) 2022; 31
Samitier, Alentorn-Geli, Torrens, Wright (bib31) 2015; 9
Li, Knutson, Choi, Lobatto, Lipman, Craig (bib19) 2013; 22
Helmkamp, Bullock, Amilo, Guerrero, Ledbetter, Sell (bib8) 2018; 27
Langohr, Giles, Athwal, Johnson (bib17) 2015; 24
Sabesan, Lombardo, Shahriar, Petersen-Fitts, Wiater (bib30) 2016; 100
Pak, Ardebol, Kilic, Sears, Lederman, Werner (bib24) 2024; 33
Kim, Rhee, Oh, Yoo, Noh, Shin (bib13) 2022; 14
Werner, Lederman, Gobezie, Denard (bib38) 2021; 30
Klosterman, Tagliero, Lenters, Denard, Lederman, Gobezie (bib14) 2024; 8
Heylen, Van Haver, Vuylsteke, Declercq, Verborgt (bib9) 2016; 25
Mollon, Mahure, Roche, Zuckerman (bib23) 2016; 25
Gruber, Kirloskar, Werner, Lädermann, Denard (bib5) 2022; 2
Gutiérrez, Walker, Willis, Pupello, Frankle (bib6) 2011; 20
Werner, Chaoui, Walch (bib37) 2018; 100-B
Rodríguez, Entezari, Iannotti, Ricchetti (bib28) 2019; 4
Thon, Seidl, Bravman, McCarty, Savoie, Frank (bib35) 2020; 13
Pastor, Kraemer, Wellmann, Hurschler, Smith (bib25) 2016; 136
Kohan, Chalmers, Salazar, Keener, Yamaguchi, Chamberlain (bib15) 2017; 26
Saraglis, Singh, Charfare, Olujinmi, Devecseri, Agbaje (bib32) 2024; 16
Keener, Patterson, Orvets, Aleem, Chamberlain (bib12) 2018; 27
Peljovich, Ratner, Marino (bib26) 2010; 35
Liu, Kim, Nakla, Chung, Kwak, McGarry (bib21) 2023; 32
Rojas, Lievano, Jiménez, González-Rico, Salas, Fierro (bib29) 2023; 8
Ingrassia, Nigrelli, Ricotta, Nalbone, D'Arienzo, D'Arienzo (bib11) 2019; 50
Hartzler, Denard, Griffin, Werner, Romeo (bib7) 2021; 30
Hwang, Werner, Provencher, Horinek, Moroder, Ardebol (bib10) 2023; 32
Michener, McClure, Sennett (bib22) 2002; 11
Fourneau, van Haute, De Wilde, van Tongel, van der Bracht (bib4) 2022; 32
Sheth, Heldt, Spell, Vidal, Laughlin, Morris (bib33) 2022; 31
Michener (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib22) 2002; 11
Pastor (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib25) 2016; 136
Samitier (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib31) 2015; 9
Rodríguez (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib28) 2019; 4
Peljovich (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib26) 2010; 35
Gutiérrez (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib6) 2011; 20
Helmkamp (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib8) 2018; 27
Li (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib19) 2013; 22
Sheth (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib34) 2019; 12
Saraglis (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib32) 2024; 16
Lee (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib18) 2024; 16
Mollon (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib23) 2016; 25
Thon (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib35) 2020; 13
Kohan (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib15) 2017; 26
Elmallah (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib3) 2022; 31
Klosterman (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib14) 2024; 8
Hwang (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib10) 2023; 32
Raiss (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib27) 2020; 29
Rojas (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib29) 2023; 8
Hartzler (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib7) 2021; 30
Chae (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib2) 2015; 101
Werner (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib38) 2021; 30
Ingrassia (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib11) 2019; 50
Kozak (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib16) 2021; 6
Kim (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib13) 2022; 14
Gruber (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib5) 2022; 2
Langohr (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib17) 2015; 24
Pak (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib24) 2024; 33
Sheth (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib33) 2022; 31
Heylen (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib9) 2016; 25
Fourneau (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib4) 2022; 32
Werner (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib37) 2018; 100-B
Lilley (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib20) 2022; 31
Berhouet (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib1) 2022; 108
Keener (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib12) 2018; 27
Sabesan (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib30) 2016; 100
Waltz (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib36) 2022; 6
Liu (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib21) 2023; 32
References_xml – volume: 108
  year: 2022
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
– volume: 136
  start-page: 1513
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1519
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
– volume: 16
  year: 2024
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Mid-term results following reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the role of navigation in the management of glenoid bone loss
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 100-B
  start-page: 1182
  year: 2018
  end-page: 1186
  ident: bib37
  article-title: Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1662
  year: 2023
  end-page: 1672
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 16
  start-page: 303
  year: 2024
  end-page: 312
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation based on tilting angle and overhang changes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 763
  year: 2016
  end-page: 771
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1238
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1245
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 22
  start-page: 807
  year: 2013
  end-page: 813
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 186
  year: 2016
  end-page: 192
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1365
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1369
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Update of the physiology and biomechanics of tendon transfer surgery
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2082
  year: 2022
  end-page: 2088
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Baseplate retroversion does not affect postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 100
  start-page: 115
  year: 2016
  end-page: 120
  ident: bib30
  article-title: The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Musculoskelet Surg
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1654
  year: 2023
  end-page: 1661
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient-specific instrumentation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2123
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2127
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 8
  start-page: 37
  year: 2023
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Preoperative planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed tomography scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality
  publication-title: Ann Jt
– volume: 12
  start-page: 554
  year: 2019
  end-page: 561
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implant design considerations
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
– volume: 101
  start-page: 421
  year: 2015
  end-page: 425
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
– volume: 2
  start-page: 117
  year: 2022
  end-page: 124
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Factors associated with internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review
  publication-title: JSES Rev Rep Tech
– volume: 20
  start-page: 732
  year: 2011
  end-page: 739
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 24
  start-page: 972
  year: 2015
  end-page: 979
  ident: bib17
  article-title: The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 4
  start-page: 12
  year: 2019
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder replacement: the surgical benefits and their clinical translation
  publication-title: Ann Jt
– volume: 50
  start-page: S12
  year: 2019
  end-page: S17
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A new method to evaluate the influence of the glenosphere positioning on stability and range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis
  publication-title: Injury
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2099
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2107
  ident: bib8
  article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 31
  start-page: 875
  year: 2022
  end-page: 883
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 8
  start-page: 528
  year: 2024
  end-page: 534
  ident: bib14
  article-title: The subcoracoid distance is correlated with pain and internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: JSES Int
– volume: 30
  start-page: 787
  year: 2021
  end-page: 794
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2022
  end-page: 1082
  ident: bib20
  article-title: What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2171
  year: 2024
  end-page: 2177
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 13
  start-page: 11
  year: 2020
  end-page: 19
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Advances and update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
– volume: 27
  start-page: 339
  year: 2018
  end-page: 349
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 9
  start-page: 24
  year: 2015
  end-page: 31
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes
  publication-title: Int J Shoulder Surg
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2498
  year: 2021
  end-page: 2505
  ident: bib38
  article-title: Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 6
  start-page: 189
  year: 2021
  end-page: 201
  ident: bib16
  article-title: An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems
  publication-title: EFORT Open Rev
– volume: 14
  start-page: 119
  year: 2022
  end-page: 127
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Clinical and radiologic outcomes of small glenoid baseplate in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg
– volume: 11
  start-page: 587
  year: 2002
  end-page: 594
  ident: bib22
  article-title: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 6
  start-page: 413
  year: 2022
  end-page: 420
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Commercial 3-dimensional imaging programs are not created equal: version and inclination measurement positions vary among preoperative planning software
  publication-title: JSES Int
– volume: 32
  start-page: 474
  year: 2022
  end-page: 481
  ident: bib4
  article-title: 3D preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of different planning software systems
  publication-title: Semin Arthroplasty
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2099
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib8
  article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007
– volume: 14
  start-page: 119
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib13
  article-title: Clinical and radiologic outcomes of small glenoid baseplate in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.4055/cios20301
– volume: 24
  start-page: 972
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib17
  article-title: The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.018
– volume: 50
  start-page: S12
  issue: Suppl 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib11
  article-title: A new method to evaluate the influence of the glenosphere positioning on stability and range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis
  publication-title: Injury
  doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.039
– volume: 136
  start-page: 1513
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib25
  article-title: Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition
  publication-title: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2560-3
– volume: 4
  start-page: 12
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib28
  article-title: Pre-operative planning for reverse shoulder replacement: the surgical benefits and their clinical translation
  publication-title: Ann Jt
  doi: 10.21037/aoj.2018.12.09
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2123
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib27
  article-title: Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.098
– volume: 11
  start-page: 587
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib22
  article-title: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096
– volume: 12
  start-page: 554
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib34
  article-title: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implant design considerations
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09585-z
– volume: 20
  start-page: 732
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib6
  article-title: Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.10.035
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1365
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib26
  article-title: Update of the physiology and biomechanics of tendon transfer surgery
  publication-title: J Hand Surg Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.014
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1238
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib15
  article-title: Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.073
– volume: 108
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib1
  article-title: Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103115
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1662
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib21
  article-title: Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.015
– volume: 9
  start-page: 24
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib31
  article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes
  publication-title: Int J Shoulder Surg
  doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.150226
– volume: 25
  start-page: 186
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib9
  article-title: Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.024
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1654
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib10
  article-title: Short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following three-dimensional planning is similar whether placed with a standard guide or patient-specific instrumentation
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.136
– volume: 16
  start-page: 303
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib18
  article-title: Biomechanical characteristics of glenosphere orientation based on tilting angle and overhang changes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Surg
  doi: 10.4055/cios23217
– volume: 22
  start-page: 807
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib19
  article-title: Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.07.013
– volume: 8
  start-page: 528
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib14
  article-title: The subcoracoid distance is correlated with pain and internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: JSES Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.010
– volume: 6
  start-page: 413
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib36
  article-title: Commercial 3-dimensional imaging programs are not created equal: version and inclination measurement positions vary among preoperative planning software
  publication-title: JSES Int
  doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.006
– volume: 2
  start-page: 117
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib5
  article-title: Factors associated with internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a narrative review
  publication-title: JSES Rev Rep Tech
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2498
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib38
  article-title: Glenoid lateralization influences active internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.021
– volume: 16
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib32
  article-title: Mid-term results following reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the role of navigation in the management of glenoid bone loss
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 13
  start-page: 11
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib35
  article-title: Advances and update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09582-2
– volume: 32
  start-page: 474
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib4
  article-title: 3D preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of different planning software systems
  publication-title: Semin Arthroplasty
  doi: 10.1053/j.sart.2022.01.006
– volume: 100
  start-page: 115
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib30
  article-title: The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Musculoskelet Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0396-6
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2171
  year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib24
  article-title: Posteroinferior glenosphere positioning is associated with improved range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and lateralized glenoid
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.019
– volume: 100-B
  start-page: 1182
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib37
  article-title: Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: Bone Joint J
  doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0264.R1
– volume: 101
  start-page: 421
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib2
  article-title: Inferior tilt fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study
  publication-title: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.009
– volume: 27
  start-page: 339
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib12
  article-title: Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.011
– volume: 25
  start-page: 763
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib23
  article-title: Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027
– volume: 30
  start-page: 787
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib7
  article-title: Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.032
– volume: 31
  start-page: 875
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib33
  article-title: Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.012
– volume: 8
  start-page: 37
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib29
  article-title: Preoperative planning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: plain radiographs vs. computed tomography scan vs. navigation vs. augmented reality
  publication-title: Ann Jt
  doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-20
– volume: 31
  start-page: 2082
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib3
  article-title: Baseplate retroversion does not affect postoperative outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.043
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1073
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib20
  article-title: What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.006
– volume: 6
  start-page: 189
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004_bib16
  article-title: An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems
  publication-title: EFORT Open Rev
  doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200085
SSID ssj0002511815
Score 2.2822149
Snippet Optimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but remains a...
BackgroundOptimal placement of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a key component affecting postoperative range of motion (ROM) but...
SourceID crossref
elsevier
SourceType Index Database
Publisher
SubjectTerms 3D software
Baseplate retroversion
Glenosphere positioning
Humeral inlay component
Orthopedics
Patient reported outcomes
Postoperative outcomes
Preoperative planning software
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Title Smaller glenosphere size and increased baseplate retroversion improve postoperative internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed with a 135° humeral implant and lateralized glenoid
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S266663832500221X
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S266663832500221X
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.06.004
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2666-6383
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815
  issn: 2666-6383
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20170101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2666-6383
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815
  issn: 2666-6383
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20200101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2666-6383
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002511815
  issn: 2666-6383
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20200101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Pb9MwFMCtMi5cEAgQYzC9AztFqfLHSZojq0DTJLhsk3qz7MaFVm0TJR2Hfio-Ax9gn4n3bCektGKMS9S6tev0_WQ_v7w_jL2PoyCRUo98WSSFz2PJfSVD7adcpXk85WpmEs9__pJe3PDLSTIZDO56Xku3GzWcbg_GlfyPVLEN5UpRsg-QbDcoNuBrlC9eUcJ4_ScZX62oEkrtfV2alN_492uvmW_dE4E1KYQNaZh4rZaoVHq13tTld2siowBJeuNVlFuj0i4F-NyaCJdeXTpHRFtGnFI91Q0V2qDwyeYblcbGZpwVFVpAHRy1-cpGIbQe7dIL4-RsHJ2dB1QLUJsEHyv8rnNrpymRnWWLHcwtzHeqhl7iUt9Ox1osfzsXOAuRe37RNi99eiZRzK2pe9VzPMYxLJvnNa1o42EHWlmXhf3I2paqvh3ERkvbhRJ1jNTHdcQulHq_bW-bsBaLxXDRaLyNIQ1nsrjaSsi7Wbn_2C07H8bWPW4h7CiCRhHGS5A_Yo-jDDWfnvWINANznDNFNbrptdGcxuVwfzqHtaWeBnT9jD11Rxf4YDl8zgZ6_YLdOQahxyAQg4ASho5B6BiEPoPgGIQdBqFlEFoGwTAIjkEwDELLIPQZhI5BIAZBAjL48wc4_sDxZ2bX4w8cfy_ZzaeP1-ML39UI8ad48OB-pELcRKiswCwKtVRFkKV5lAW6CHKu01Armco8idIpx80t1UGsRzzUucKjO0-jIn7FjtblWr9mkBTZKJ_FRSzDgsc8V1E4y_NMjQKd6WwaHDO_lYWobCoY8TcIjlnSCky0Yc64MQuE8J5-2aF-unErTyNC0UQiEFdEEUGExxhUxcNJv6dToK1ifO9vvnngvZ2wJ_TO2iLfsqNNfavfoXa-UafGqnVqwP8FLnP1fQ
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smaller+glenosphere+size+and+increased+baseplate+retroversion+improve+postoperative+internal+rotation+after+reverse+total+shoulder+arthroplasty+performed+with+a+135%C2%B0+humeral+implant+and+lateralized+glenoid&rft.jtitle=JSES+international&rft.au=Adams%2C+Joseph&rft.au=Al-Humadi%2C+Samer&rft.au=Werner%2C+Brian+C.&rft.au=Moroder%2C+Philipp&rft.date=2025&rft.issn=2666-6383&rft.eissn=2666-6383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jseint.2025.06.004&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jseint_2025_06_004
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2666-6383&client=summon