(Cautiously) Embracing pro-Palestinian activism in Singapore: civil society in illiberal regimes

• Published in: Asian journal of political science Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 122 - 139
• Main Authors: Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt, Perera, Emily
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Abingdon Routledge 02.01.2025; Taylor & Francis Ltd; 아시아연구소
• Subjects: Activism; Activists; Civil society; Competitive authoritarian regime; Government; Israel-Palestine; Muslims; Objectives; people's action party; Political activism; Public opinion; Singapore; Sophistication; State-society relations; 행정학; Singapore; Israel
• ISSN: 0218-5377; 1750-7812
• DOI: 10.1080/02185377.2024.2416130

This paper explores the rise of pro-Palestine activism in Singapore. In illiberal regimes like the city-state, the political opportunities for activists to assert themselves are limited, though not non-existent. It is thus instructive to witness how the new surge of pro-Palestine activism in the country, and indeed, worldwide, has been dealt with by the government. We make the following claims. First, while the overall thrusts of Singapore's foreign and domestic policies remain the same with regard to the Israel-Palestine conflict, especially on Singapore's special relationship with Israel, the People's Action Party (PAP) government has given clear concessions to the pro-Palestinian camp. Second, this balancing act is done with domestic electoral and political goals in mind. The issue has special resonance among younger Singaporeans and the Muslim community, and the government is well-aware of that. Politically, if not dealt with properly, the matter could also be a potential racial-religious fault-line, which is why political sophistication was needed to appease the various sides in society. The implication is that even in less democratic polities like Singapore, activists can make significant gains in the realm of both public opinion and policy. This study is situated within the literature on civil society-state relations.