A highly efficient ADMM-based algorithm for outlier-robust regression with Huber loss
Huber robust regression (HRR) has attracted much attention in machine learning due to its greater robustness to outliers compared to least-squares regression. However, existing algorithms for HRR are computationally much less efficient than those for least-squares regression. Based on a maximally sp...
Saved in:
| Published in | Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 5147 - 5166 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0924-669X 1573-7497 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10489-024-05370-9 |
Cover
| Summary: | Huber robust regression (HRR) has attracted much attention in machine learning due to its greater robustness to outliers compared to least-squares regression. However, existing algorithms for HRR are computationally much less efficient than those for least-squares regression. Based on a maximally split alternating direction method of multipliers (MS-ADMM) for model fitting, a highly computationally efficient algorithm referred to as the modified MS-ADMM is derived in this article for HRR. After analyzing the convergence of the modified MS-ADMM, a parameter selection scheme is presented for the algorithm. With the parameter values calculated via this scheme, the modified MS-ADMM converges very rapidly, much faster than several typical HRR algorithms. Through applications in the training of stochastic neural networks and comparisons with existing algorithms, the modified MS-ADMM is shown to be computationally much more efficient than the convex quadratic programming method, the Newton method, the iterative reweighted least-squares method, and Nesterov’s accelerated gradient method. Implementation of the proposed algorithm on a GPU-based parallel computing platform demonstrates its higher GPU acceleration ratio compared to the competing methods and, thus, its greater superiority in computational efficiency over the competing methods. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0924-669X 1573-7497 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10489-024-05370-9 |