Intra‐ and Peri‐tumoral Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ‐MRI to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM. To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 60; no. 6; pp. 2669 - 2680
Main Authors Pan, Yi‐Jun, Wu, Sun‐jie, Zeng, Yan, Cao, Zi‐Rui, Shan, Yan, Lin, Jiang, Xu, Peng‐Ju
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.29390

Cover

Abstract Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM. To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA. Retrospective. Two hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51). T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Radiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS. The nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
AbstractList Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM.BACKGROUNDLymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM.To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA.PURPOSETo develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA.Retrospective.STUDY TYPERetrospective.Two hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51).SUBJECTSTwo hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51).T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T.FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCET1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T.Radiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated.ASSESSMENTRadiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.STATISTICAL TESTSReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.The nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS.RESULTSThe nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS.The nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA.DATA CONCLUSIONThe nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA.3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.EVIDENCE LEVEL3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM. To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA. Retrospective. Two hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative-intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51). T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Radiomics features were extracted from intra- and peri-tumoral regions on preoperative DCE-MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best-performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI-reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1-102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The nomogram incorporating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI-reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high-risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low-risk patients. High-risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS. The nomogram integrating intra- and peri-tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA. 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging is not reliable enough for identifying LNM.PurposeTo develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)‐MR images for identifying LNM and prognosis in iCCA.Study TypeRetrospective.SubjectsTwo hundred four patients with pathologically proven iCCA who underwent curative‐intent resection and lymphadenectomy (training cohort: N = 107, internal test cohort: N = 46, and external test cohort: N = 51).Field Strength/SequenceT1‐ and T2‐weighted imaging, diffusion‐weighted imaging and DCE imaging at 1.5 T or 3.0 T.AssessmentRadiomics features were extracted from intra‐ and peri‐tumoral regions on preoperative DCE‐MR images. Imaging features were evaluated by three radiologists, and significant variables in univariable and multivariable regression analysis were included in clinical model. The best‐performing radiomics signature and clinical characteristics (intrahepatic duct dilatation, MRI‐reported LNM) were combined to build a nomogram. Patients were divided into high‐risk and low‐risk groups based on their nomogram scores (cutoff = 0.341). Patients were followed up for 1–102 months (median 12) after surgery, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) were calculated.Statistical TestsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, decision curve, Delong test, Kaplan–Meier curves, log rank test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe nomogram incorporating intra‐ and peri‐tumoral radiomics features, intrahepatic duct dilatation and MRI‐reported LNM obtained the best discrimination for LNM, with areas under the ROC curves of 0.946, 0.913, and 0.859 in the training, internal, and external test cohorts. In the entire cohort, high‐risk patients had significantly lower RFS and OS than low‐risk patients. High‐risk of LNM was an independent factor of unfavorable OS and RFS.Data ConclusionThe nomogram integrating intra‐ and peri‐tumoral radiomics signatures has potential to identify LNM and prognosis in iCCA.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 2
Author Wu, Sun‐jie
Xu, Peng‐Ju
Shan, Yan
Lin, Jiang
Zeng, Yan
Cao, Zi‐Rui
Pan, Yi‐Jun
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yi‐Jun
  surname: Pan
  fullname: Pan, Yi‐Jun
  organization: Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging Shanghai China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sun‐jie
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Sun‐jie
  organization: Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou Zhejiang China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yan
  surname: Zeng
  fullname: Zeng, Yan
  organization: Department of Research Center Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. Shanghai China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zi‐Rui
  surname: Cao
  fullname: Cao, Zi‐Rui
  organization: Department of Research Center Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. Shanghai China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yan
  surname: Shan
  fullname: Shan, Yan
  organization: Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging Shanghai China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jiang
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Jiang
  organization: Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging Shanghai China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Peng‐Ju
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0832-083X
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Peng‐Ju
  organization: Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai China, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging Shanghai China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38609076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkc1u1DAUhS3Uiv7AhgdAltggpLT-S-IsYSgw0hRQBevIsW86HiX21HYWs-MReAYejSfBmSldVF352vc710f3nKEj5x0g9IqSC0oIu9yMwV6whjfkGTqlJWMFK2V1lGtS8oJKUp-gsxg3hJCmEeVzdMJlRRpSV6foz9KloP7--o2VM_g7BJvrNI0-qAHfKGP9aHXEH1QEg73DH3dO5Re88LMuJnzl1srp3My665slTh4vDbhk-x1e7cbtGn_1BvA1pEyraOPho-BvnZ9v1uG9hTVsVZoHr_2g3K31WgVtnR_VC3TcqyHCy_vzHP38dPVj8aVYffu8XLxfFZrTMhVK6Y6CURqaTouyrpRmVBnW6x4kyB5KCZwBgDCEiE7L3BG6rxojOzB1xc_R28PcbfB3E8TUjjZqGLId8FNsOeFSCEqFyOibR-jGT8Fldy2nTLKqFpxn6vU9NXUjmHYb7KjCrv2__Qy8OwA6-BgD9A8IJe0cbTtH2-6jzTB5BGub8sr2QdjhKck_WP2tRA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29478
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2024_09_035
crossref_primary_10_20517_2394_5079_2024_79
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11547_024_01910_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16111946
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2025_110770
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29391
Cites_doi 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.06
10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021
10.1088/1361-6560/ac01f3
10.1371/journal.pone.0229292
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.511
10.1007/s10620-008-0408-6
10.1148/radiol.220329
10.1002/cncr.29936
10.3322/caac.21708
10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6519
10.1002/jso.25450
10.1007/s11605-021-05039-5
10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101215
10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137
10.3389/fonc.2021.585808
10.1245/s10434-014-4239-8
10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055
10.1007/s12072-022-10477-7
10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.021
10.1007/s00330-019-06142-7
10.1038/s41422-023-00831-1
10.1007/s00259-022-05765-1
10.1200/JCO.18.02178
10.1148/radiol.2018181408
10.1097/RCT.0000000000000695
10.1002/bjs.5920
10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1973
10.7150/thno.34149
10.1007/s00330-018-5898-9
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15927
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
– notice: 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jmri.29390
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1522-2586
EndPage 2680
ExternalDocumentID 38609076
10_1002_jmri_29390
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
  grantid: 22Y11910900
– fundername: Shanghai Municipal Health Commission
  grantid: shslczdzk03202
GroupedDBID ---
-DZ
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
31~
33P
3O-
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYXX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABOCM
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CITATION
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HBH
HDBZQ
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M65
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
RYL
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TWZ
UB1
V2E
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
NPM
7QO
7TK
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-aacb1edace9bc4576ac21ad2fcfe8e8fe58e32eee4d004bc82fc4cf69d8bed763
ISSN 1053-1807
1522-2586
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 04:50:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 12:18:57 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:39:20 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:57:03 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords radiomics
cholangiocarcinoma
prognosis
lymph node metastasis
Language English
License 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c315t-aacb1edace9bc4576ac21ad2fcfe8e8fe58e32eee4d004bc82fc4cf69d8bed763
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0832-083X
PMID 38609076
PQID 3128267433
PQPubID 1006400
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3038441144
proquest_journals_3128267433
pubmed_primary_38609076
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_29390
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jmri_29390
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-12-00
2024-Dec
20241201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-12-00
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Nashville
PublicationSubtitle JMRI
PublicationTitle Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
PublicationTitleAlternate J Magn Reson Imaging
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
e_1_2_7_9_1
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.06
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac01f3
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229292
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.511
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0408-6
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.220329
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.29936
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21708
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6519
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1002/jso.25450
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05039-5
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101215
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.585808
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4239-8
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10477-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.10.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06142-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00831-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05765-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02178
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181408
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000695
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5920
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1973
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.7150/thno.34149
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5898-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15927
SSID ssj0009945
Score 2.4895692
Snippet Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative imaging...
BackgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) affects treatment strategies and prognosis. However, preoperative...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2669
SubjectTerms Cholangiocarcinoma
Field strength
Image contrast
Image enhancement
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Medical prognosis
Metastases
Metastasis
Nomograms
Patients
Prognosis
Radiomics
Rank tests
Regression analysis
Regression models
Risk
Risk groups
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Survival
Training
Title Intra‐ and Peri‐tumoral Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ‐MRI to Identify Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38609076
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3128267433
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3038441144
Volume 60
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLWGIiE2qLyHFmQEGzTKMHHeSxiK2orpYtSKtpvIsZ02FZNUM8mirPgEvoFP4xP4Aq4fcWaYIhU2UZTYcZJ7cu51fB8Ivc5YBt-By5xQJrkDfc0cGgAZ0ojyKM8jkccyOHlyEO4e-fvHwXGv92vJa6mpsyH7em1cyf9IFY6BXGWU7D9I1l4UDsA-yBe2IGHY3kjGe_LPrHVX0I7_MnS8PVI3MxWAP6W8kNHHi8F7UFpcLhB80JXoZcQfXGNRD3bKc-0MYHtPpnvSMtWhvPnV4NMVSH5wUHFgAlFDHyqTmZhoA-mvVyjfWnVT5-JSpYIdy6lzeVaAxpyzoqyMFli3hmf0rBQ6n7ScHEi6KWaqglK3yKUI8qR7vP3GIvtzo12MSnvyorCQPRWa0E66L2FM1S_i0-5i06ZY_gNC_CVvEk3aQCSOG-vquUNhiBwm2SQwabYN0-vKBQbRK7Qd6noxxgQgoa4utaZedLrai9m8GIKZpOucrubw_kO3Wo9HnR2apLJvqvreQrdJBPaeNOSnXcqzJFGFte0z2ZS65G037qoR9ZeZkbKQDjfRPSNM_E7j9D7qifIBujMxzhsP0Q-FjJ_fvmPADJZAhX0DUWwhihVEcVViA1HcQhS3EMXQD8CJ6wq34MQKnFiCE3fg1AO14MRFiZfBidfB-Qgdfdw5HO86pkSIwzw3qB1KWeYKTplIMubD3Jky4lJOcpaLWMS5CGLhESGEz4E3MhbDGZ_lYcLjTHDQrY_RRlmV4inCPvcYiwI_yuPIJ65PCQs42Hc8GdF8FCd99KZ95ykz-fNlGZcv6bps--iVbXups8Zc22q7FV1qWGWRemAwEhkZ5PXRS3saOF8u5NFSVA20GXkxTGNc3--jJ1rkdhgvDkfJKAqf3egWttDd7ovaRhv1vBHPwcqusxcKlr8B7HzWdg
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intra%E2%80%90+and+Peri%E2%80%90tumoral+Radiomics+Based+on+Dynamic+Contrast+Enhanced+%E2%80%90MRI+to+Identify+Lymph+Node+Metastasis+and+Prognosis+in+Intrahepatic+Cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+magnetic+resonance+imaging&rft.au=Pan%2C+Yi%E2%80%90Jun&rft.au=Wu%2C+Sun%E2%80%90jie&rft.au=Zeng%2C+Yan&rft.au=Cao%2C+Zi%E2%80%90Rui&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2669&rft.epage=2680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjmri.29390&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_jmri_29390
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1053-1807&client=summon