Accurate detection of coronavirus cases using deep learning with attention mechanism and genetic algorithm

The novel coronavirus disease has caused severe threats to the daily life and health of people all over the world. Hence, early detection and timely treatment of this disease are significant to prevent the coronavirus's spread and ensure more effective patient care. This work adopted an integra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultimedia tools and applications Vol. 83; no. 34; pp. 81477 - 81490
Main Author Kara, Ahmet
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.10.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1573-7721
1380-7501
1573-7721
DOI10.1007/s11042-024-18850-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:The novel coronavirus disease has caused severe threats to the daily life and health of people all over the world. Hence, early detection and timely treatment of this disease are significant to prevent the coronavirus's spread and ensure more effective patient care. This work adopted an integrated framework comprising deep learning and attention mechanism to provide a more effective and reliable diagnosis. This framework consists of two convolution neural network (CNN), a bidirectional LSTM, two fully-connected layers (FCL), and an attention mechanism. The main aim of the proposed framework is to reveal a promising approach based on deep learning for early and timely detection of coronavirus disease. For greater accuracy, the framework's hyperparameters are tuned by means of a genetic algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed framework has been examined utilizing a public dataset including 18 different blood findings from Albert Einstein Israelita Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Additionally, within the experimental studies, the proposed framework is subjected to comparison with the state-of-the-art techniques, evaluated across various metrics. Based on the derived consequences, the proposed framework has yielded enhancements in accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score, registering approximate improvements of 1.27%, 4.07%, 3.20%, and 2.88%, respectively, as measured against the second-best rates.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1573-7721
1380-7501
1573-7721
DOI:10.1007/s11042-024-18850-4