Impact of compensation coefficients on active sequential change point detection

Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSequential analysis Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 153 - 177
Main Authors Xu, Qunzhi, Mei, Yajun, Shi, Jianjun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Taylor & Francis 03.04.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0747-4946
1532-4176
DOI10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819

Cover

Abstract Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is determining how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015), which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from a theoretical point of view to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on the TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are twofold. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if the compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p − q ) , where I(f, g) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if the compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0. Though it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real-world applications, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.
AbstractList Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p - q ) , where I ( f , g ) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0 . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p - q ) , where I ( f , g ) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0 . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.
Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is determining how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015), which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from a theoretical point of view to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on the TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are twofold. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if the compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p − q ) , where I(f, g) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if the compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0. Though it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real-world applications, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.
Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from out of these local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from to for a subset of unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than , where is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.
Author Mei, Yajun
Shi, Jianjun
Xu, Qunzhi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Qunzhi
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2524-2260
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Qunzhi
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yajun
  surname: Mei
  fullname: Mei, Yajun
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Jianjun
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Jianjun
  organization: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41098594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kE1PwzAMhiM0BNvgJ4B65NLhtOma3kCIj0mTdoFzlKYOBLVJSTrQ_j2ptnHkZNl6Xst-ZmRinUVCrigsKHC4hZKVrGLLRQYZW2SMcU6rEzKlRZ6ljJbLCZmOTDpC52QWwicA5RTKM3LOKFS8qNiUbFZdL9WQOJ0o1_VogxyMs7FBrY0yaIeQxD4y5huTgF_bODKyTdSHtO-Y9M7YIWlwQDUGL8iplm3Ay0Odk7enx9eHl3S9eV493K9TlVM2pIwrDWXJkBdSshyKqtZ1U-lG5_GdplaFKnhNC55jDcih1qigkpRned3oKsvn5Ga_t_cunhQG0ZmgsG2lRbcNIs-WlANEERG9PqDbusNG9N500u_EUUIEij2gvAvBo_5DKIhRtjjKFqNscZAdc3f7nLHa-U7-ON82YpC71nntpVUm3vH_il8Y5oZB
Cites_doi 10.1080/07474946.2015.1030971
10.1214/aos/1176350164
10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015733
10.1137/1108029
10.1109/TIT.2021.3074961
10.1080/00401706.2013.844731
10.1109/TASE.2022.3146391
10.1017/CBO9780511754678
10.1214/aoms/1177693055
10.1109/TIT.2008.924647
10.1093/biomet/asq010
10.1214/17-AOS1546
10.1080/00401706.2014.947005
10.1109/TIT.2024.3475394
10.1109/TASE.2013.2287101
10.1287/ijds.2022.00011
10.1017/9781108231596
10.1080/00401706.2017.1317291
10.1080/00401706.2022.2054861
10.1109/ITA.2013.6502987
10.1214/aoms/1177697092
10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3362324
10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
10.1080/07474946.2023.2187417
10.1201/b17279
10.1080/00224065.2019.1681924
10.1080/00207543.2023.2172474
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Mathematics
EISSN 1532-4176
EndPage 177
ExternalDocumentID 41098594
10_1080_07474946_2024_2448819
2448819
Genre Research Article
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institutes of Health
– fundername: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
– fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: UL1TR002378
– fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 TR002378
– fundername: NIAID NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 AI157618
GroupedDBID .7F
.QJ
0BK
0R~
123
30N
4.4
5VS
AAENE
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAJMT
AALDU
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABCCY
ABFIM
ABHAV
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPAQ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACTIO
ADCVX
ADGTB
ADXPE
AEISY
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AFKVX
AFRVT
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AIJEM
AIYEW
AJWEG
AKBVH
AKOOK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AQRUH
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BLEHA
CCCUG
CE4
CS3
DGEBU
DKSSO
EBS
E~A
E~B
F5P
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
H~P
IPNFZ
J.P
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
NA5
NY~
O9-
P2P
PQQKQ
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RTWRZ
S-T
SNACF
TASJS
TBQAZ
TEJ
TFL
TFT
TFW
TN5
TTHFI
TUROJ
TWF
UT5
UU3
ZGOLN
~S~
AAYXX
CITATION
07G
1TA
AAIKQ
AAKBW
ACAGQ
ACGEE
ACTCW
AEUMN
AFFNX
AGCQS
AGLEN
AGROQ
AHMOU
ALCKM
AMEWO
AMVHM
AMXXU
BCCOT
BPLKW
C06
CAG
COF
CRFIH
DMQIW
DWIFK
EJD
IVXBP
NPM
NUSFT
QCRFL
TAQ
TFMCV
TOXWX
UB9
UU8
V3K
V4Q
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-48cf0774e85aa43059bfbd9fdf3024dbc5c58b1583eb0e80bfec09a1823bdf923
ISSN 0747-4946
IngestDate Sat Oct 18 22:56:20 EDT 2025
Sun Oct 19 01:46:18 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 06:02:39 EDT 2025
Mon Oct 20 23:46:51 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords CUSUM
TRAS algorithm
active learning
Change-point
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c314t-48cf0774e85aa43059bfbd9fdf3024dbc5c58b1583eb0e80bfec09a1823bdf923
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2524-2260
PMID 41098594
PQID 3261800417
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 25
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1080_07474946_2024_2448819
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07474946_2024_2448819
proquest_miscellaneous_3261800417
pubmed_primary_41098594
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-04-03
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-04-03
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-04-03
  day: 03
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Sequential analysis
PublicationTitleAlternate Seq Anal
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References Siegmund D. (e_1_3_3_18_1) 2013
e_1_3_3_17_1
e_1_3_3_19_1
e_1_3_3_14_1
e_1_3_3_13_1
e_1_3_3_16_1
e_1_3_3_15_1
e_1_3_3_10_1
e_1_3_3_12_1
e_1_3_3_31_1
e_1_3_3_11_1
Zhang W. (e_1_3_3_30_1) 2021; 22
Basseville M. (e_1_3_3_3_1) 1993
e_1_3_3_7_1
e_1_3_3_6_1
e_1_3_3_9_1
e_1_3_3_8_1
e_1_3_3_29_1
e_1_3_3_28_1
e_1_3_3_25_1
e_1_3_3_24_1
e_1_3_3_27_1
e_1_3_3_26_1
e_1_3_3_21_1
e_1_3_3_2_1
e_1_3_3_20_1
e_1_3_3_5_1
e_1_3_3_23_1
e_1_3_3_4_1
e_1_3_3_22_1
References_xml – volume-title: Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_3_3_3_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_2_1
  doi: 10.1080/07474946.2015.1030971
– ident: e_1_3_3_13_1
  doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350164
– ident: e_1_3_3_29_1
  doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015733
– ident: e_1_3_3_17_1
  doi: 10.1137/1108029
– ident: e_1_3_3_26_1
  doi: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3074961
– ident: e_1_3_3_7_1
  doi: 10.1080/00401706.2013.844731
– ident: e_1_3_3_27_1
  doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3146391
– ident: e_1_3_3_16_1
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511754678
– ident: e_1_3_3_11_1
  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177693055
– ident: e_1_3_3_14_1
  doi: 10.1109/TIT.2008.924647
– ident: e_1_3_3_12_1
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq010
– ident: e_1_3_3_4_1
  doi: 10.1214/17-AOS1546
– ident: e_1_3_3_8_1
  doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.947005
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  issue: 29
  year: 2021
  ident: e_1_3_3_30_1
  article-title: Single and Multiple Change-Point Detection with Differential Privacy
  publication-title: Journal of Machine Learning Research
– volume-title: Sequential Analysis: Tests and Confidence Intervals
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_3_3_18_1
– ident: e_1_3_3_5_1
  doi: 10.1109/TIT.2024.3475394
– ident: e_1_3_3_9_1
  doi: 10.1109/TASE.2013.2287101
– ident: e_1_3_3_6_1
  doi: 10.1287/ijds.2022.00011
– ident: e_1_3_3_21_1
  doi: 10.1017/9781108231596
– ident: e_1_3_3_22_1
  doi: 10.1080/00401706.2017.1317291
– ident: e_1_3_3_31_1
  doi: 10.1080/00401706.2022.2054861
– ident: e_1_3_3_24_1
  doi: 10.1109/ITA.2013.6502987
– ident: e_1_3_3_10_1
  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177697092
– ident: e_1_3_3_20_1
  doi: 10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3362324
– ident: e_1_3_3_15_1
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
– ident: e_1_3_3_25_1
  doi: 10.1080/07474946.2023.2187417
– ident: e_1_3_3_19_1
  doi: 10.1201/b17279
– ident: e_1_3_3_23_1
  doi: 10.1080/00224065.2019.1681924
– ident: e_1_3_3_28_1
  doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2172474
SSID ssj0018107
Score 2.3218777
Snippet Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations...
Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations...
Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 153
SubjectTerms 62L15; 60G40
Active learning
change point
CUSUM
TRAS algorithm
Title Impact of compensation coefficients on active sequential change point detection
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41098594
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3261800417
Volume 44
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAWR
  databaseName: Taylor & Francis Science and Technology Library-DRAA
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1532-4176
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0018107
  issn: 0747-4946
  databaseCode: 30N
  dateStart: 19970101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/title-lists
  providerName: Taylor & Francis
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwELZgucAB8aa8ZCRuVao4jlP7iBBoWYlFaLtSOUW2Y4vdQ7KC5LK_nvGzqXYRr0vUOg-nM18nM87MNwi9qQx1T1VTMGlMURshCwGec9E0hq8rve6s9Vm-x83haX20ZdsdoYKvLhnVSl9eW1fyL1qFMdCrq5L9C83mi8IAfAb9whY0DNs_0vHHXOLoMsMhIA3a1IPxxBC-eM1lG3ubtgxZ06NbIg_lvsuL4awfl50ZfT5WP3dUT3YHy8hbknSznZxevkz95bezrC_jswK-yvMpo-3E9wteHgEA02hcXqiYz0qhGRCbK50-ZgYKQpGiFnEJ0SQDWhU1CT1dkoUNDI8RSdXMXJJAFByfvCQ0dLli1GMWJMzmJoOYvqpX4JVwHo3tPl923HMT3arA0LtuHrQ8zi-WOAkV9OnWU1GXo1u_boI9d2WPzPbXIYl3TTb30N0YU-C3ASD30Q3TP0B3PmVC3h8P0ecAFTxYPIcKnkMFw_cAFbyDCg5QwR4qOEPlETr98H7z7rCIvTQKTUk9FjXXtgRX33AmpaN5E8qqTtjOUvi1ndJMM64I49So0vBSWaNLISH6pKqzEAU8Rgf90JunLhkOjpGWarsGIcFO1tmuUVISocHdYwu0SiJrLwJlSksSE22Ucetk3EYZL5CYC7YdPeZsgFtLf3Pu66SFFgyje9slezNMcF7VEO7o5NYL9CSoJ99OTUrBmaif_cfMz9Ht3f_lBToYv0_mJTioo3rlIfcTYN-MDw
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELZQGYCB96M8g8SakNR2a48IUbVQygISW2Q7toRASQXpwq_nzm4qioQYGK3kEttn--7s7z4TctGxFK2qjbmyNmZWqliC5xx3u1b0OqZXOOdRvuPu4IndPvPnb7kwCKvEGNoFogi_VuPkxs3oBhJ3iaTvTDJEGHRYAgZKCGT-XObg7OMtBjQdz08SRBZSpkEkRpkmi-e3zyzYpwX20t99UG-L-hvENK0IEJTXZFrrxHz-IHj8XzM3yfrMVY2uwtjaIku23CZr93Oe148d8jD0SZZR5SLEpkNI7BUNBeupKRClEUFZ-VU1CrhtWFPeopBwHE2ql7KOClt7RFi5S576N4_Xg3h2RUNsaMbqmAnjUvAgreBKIXuY1E4X0hWOQp0LbbjhQmdcUKtTK1LtrEmlgqCG6sKBc7lHWmVV2gPEWME7ylHjetBUeMgLV3S1Upk04EXwNkkaxeSTwMSRZw3B6ayncuypfNZTbSK_qy-v_RaIC_eV5PQP2fNG1znMNzxEUaWtpiAHIadAlrJem-yHQTCvDstSKbhkh__48xlZGTzej_LRcHx3RFY7eN0wAoXoMWnV71N7Aj5QrU_9IP8Cka_6HA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA6iIHrw_VifFbx2bbdJNzmKuuz6WD0oeCt5gijdxe1e_PXOJO2ignjwGNppk0ySmUm--ULIacdmaFVtzKS1MbVCxgI85zjPLe92dNc451G-w7z_RK-fWYMmnNSwSoyhXSCK8Gs1Tu6xcQ0i7gw536mgCDDo0DbYJ86R-HMhx1MxzOJIhrODBJ6GjGkQiVGmSeL57TPfzNM38tLfXVBvinqrRDWNCAiU1_a0Um398YPf8V-tXCMrtaManYeRtU7mbLlBlu9mLK-TTXI_8CmW0chFiEyHgNirGQrWE1MgRiOCsvRrahRQ27CivEUh3Tgaj17KKjK28niwcos89a4eL_pxfUFDrLOUVjHl2iXgP1rOpETuMKGcMsIZl0GdjdJMM65SxjOrEssT5axOhISQJlPGgWu5TebLUWl3EWEF70iXadeFpsJDZpzJlZSp0OBDsBZpN3opxoGHo0gbetO6pwrsqaLuqRYRX7VXVH4DxIXbSorsD9mTRtUFzDY8QpGlHU1BDgJOjhxl3RbZCWNgVh2aJoIzQff-8edjsvhw2StuB8ObfbLUwbuGESWUHZD56n1qD8EBqtSRH-KfgCj4wA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+compensation+coefficients+on+active+sequential+change+point+detection&rft.jtitle=Sequential+analysis&rft.au=Xu%2C+Qunzhi&rft.au=Mei%2C+Yajun&rft.au=Shi%2C+Jianjun&rft.date=2025-04-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0747-4946&rft.eissn=1532-4176&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F07474946.2024.2448819&rft.externalDocID=2448819
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon