Impact of compensation coefficients on active sequential change point detection
Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired e...
Saved in:
| Published in | Sequential analysis Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 153 - 177 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Taylor & Francis
03.04.2025
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0747-4946 1532-4176 |
| DOI | 10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819 |
Cover
| Abstract | Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is determining how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015), which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from a theoretical point of view to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on the TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are twofold. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if the compensation coefficient is larger than
I
(
f
,
g
)
q
/
(
p
−
q
)
,
where I(f, g) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of
q
=
s
=
1
,
if the compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0. Though it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real-world applications, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p - q ) , where I ( f , g ) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0 . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results.Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p - q ) , where I ( f , g ) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0 . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results. Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from q out of these p local streams at each time instant owing to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from f to g for a subset of s unknown local streams. The objective is determining how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015), which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from a theoretical point of view to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on the TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are twofold. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if the compensation coefficient is larger than I ( f , g ) q / ( p − q ) , where I(f, g) is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of q = s = 1 , if the compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time ν = 0. Though it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real-world applications, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results. Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations from out of these local streams at each time instant due to the sampling control constraint. At some unknown change time, an undesired event occurs to the system and changes the local distributions from to for a subset of unknown local streams. The objective is how to adaptively sample local streams and decide when to raise a global alarm, so that we can detect the correct change as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm constraint. One efficient algorithm is the TRAS algorithm proposed in Liu et al. (2015) which incorporates an idea of compensation coefficients for unobserved data streams. However, it is unclear how to choose the compensation coefficients suitably from theoretical point of view so as to balance the trade-off between the detection delay and false alarm. In this article, we investigate the impact of compensation coefficients on TRAS algorithm. Our main contributions are two-folded. On the one hand, under the general setting, we prove that if compensation coefficient is larger than , where is the Kullback-Leibler divergence, then the TRAS algorithm is suboptimal in the sense of having too large detection delays. On the other hand, under the special case of , if compensation coefficient is small enough, then the TRAS algorithm is efficient to detect when the change occurs at time . While it remains an open problem to develop general asymptotic optimality theorems, our results shed lights how to tune compensation coefficients suitably in real world application, and extensive numerical studies are conducted to validate our results. |
| Author | Mei, Yajun Shi, Jianjun Xu, Qunzhi |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Qunzhi orcidid: 0000-0003-2524-2260 surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Qunzhi organization: Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University – sequence: 2 givenname: Yajun surname: Mei fullname: Mei, Yajun organization: Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University – sequence: 3 givenname: Jianjun surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Jianjun organization: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41098594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kE1PwzAMhiM0BNvgJ4B65NLhtOma3kCIj0mTdoFzlKYOBLVJSTrQ_j2ptnHkZNl6Xst-ZmRinUVCrigsKHC4hZKVrGLLRQYZW2SMcU6rEzKlRZ6ljJbLCZmOTDpC52QWwicA5RTKM3LOKFS8qNiUbFZdL9WQOJ0o1_VogxyMs7FBrY0yaIeQxD4y5huTgF_bODKyTdSHtO-Y9M7YIWlwQDUGL8iplm3Ay0Odk7enx9eHl3S9eV493K9TlVM2pIwrDWXJkBdSshyKqtZ1U-lG5_GdplaFKnhNC55jDcih1qigkpRned3oKsvn5Ga_t_cunhQG0ZmgsG2lRbcNIs-WlANEERG9PqDbusNG9N500u_EUUIEij2gvAvBo_5DKIhRtjjKFqNscZAdc3f7nLHa-U7-ON82YpC71nntpVUm3vH_il8Y5oZB |
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/07474946.2015.1030971 10.1214/aos/1176350164 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015733 10.1137/1108029 10.1109/TIT.2021.3074961 10.1080/00401706.2013.844731 10.1109/TASE.2022.3146391 10.1017/CBO9780511754678 10.1214/aoms/1177693055 10.1109/TIT.2008.924647 10.1093/biomet/asq010 10.1214/17-AOS1546 10.1080/00401706.2014.947005 10.1109/TIT.2024.3475394 10.1109/TASE.2013.2287101 10.1287/ijds.2022.00011 10.1017/9781108231596 10.1080/00401706.2017.1317291 10.1080/00401706.2022.2054861 10.1109/ITA.2013.6502987 10.1214/aoms/1177697092 10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3362324 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100 10.1080/07474946.2023.2187417 10.1201/b17279 10.1080/00224065.2019.1681924 10.1080/00207543.2023.2172474 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2025 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2025 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Mathematics |
| EISSN | 1532-4176 |
| EndPage | 177 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 41098594 10_1080_07474946_2024_2448819 2448819 |
| Genre | Research Article Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institutes of Health – fundername: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: UL1TR002378 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR002378 – fundername: NIAID NIH HHS grantid: R21 AI157618 |
| GroupedDBID | .7F .QJ 0BK 0R~ 123 30N 4.4 5VS AAENE AAGDL AAHIA AAJMT AALDU AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR ABCCY ABFIM ABHAV ABJNI ABLIJ ABPAQ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ACGEJ ACGFS ACIWK ACTIO ADCVX ADGTB ADXPE AEISY AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AFKVX AFRVT AGDLA AGMYJ AIJEM AIYEW AJWEG AKBVH AKOOK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQRUH AVBZW AWYRJ BLEHA CCCUG CE4 CS3 DGEBU DKSSO EBS E~A E~B F5P GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ H~P IPNFZ J.P KYCEM LJTGL M4Z NA5 NY~ O9- P2P PQQKQ RIG RNANH ROSJB RTWRZ S-T SNACF TASJS TBQAZ TEJ TFL TFT TFW TN5 TTHFI TUROJ TWF UT5 UU3 ZGOLN ~S~ AAYXX CITATION 07G 1TA AAIKQ AAKBW ACAGQ ACGEE ACTCW AEUMN AFFNX AGCQS AGLEN AGROQ AHMOU ALCKM AMEWO AMVHM AMXXU BCCOT BPLKW C06 CAG COF CRFIH DMQIW DWIFK EJD IVXBP NPM NUSFT QCRFL TAQ TFMCV TOXWX UB9 UU8 V3K V4Q 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-48cf0774e85aa43059bfbd9fdf3024dbc5c58b1583eb0e80bfec09a1823bdf923 |
| ISSN | 0747-4946 |
| IngestDate | Sat Oct 18 22:56:20 EDT 2025 Sun Oct 19 01:46:18 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 06:02:39 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:46:51 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | CUSUM TRAS algorithm active learning Change-point |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c314t-48cf0774e85aa43059bfbd9fdf3024dbc5c58b1583eb0e80bfec09a1823bdf923 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2524-2260 |
| PMID | 41098594 |
| PQID | 3261800417 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 25 |
| ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1080_07474946_2024_2448819 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_07474946_2024_2448819 proquest_miscellaneous_3261800417 pubmed_primary_41098594 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-04-03 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-03 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: 2025-04-03 day: 03 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Sequential analysis |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Seq Anal |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis |
| References | Siegmund D. (e_1_3_3_18_1) 2013 e_1_3_3_17_1 e_1_3_3_19_1 e_1_3_3_14_1 e_1_3_3_13_1 e_1_3_3_16_1 e_1_3_3_15_1 e_1_3_3_10_1 e_1_3_3_12_1 e_1_3_3_31_1 e_1_3_3_11_1 Zhang W. (e_1_3_3_30_1) 2021; 22 Basseville M. (e_1_3_3_3_1) 1993 e_1_3_3_7_1 e_1_3_3_6_1 e_1_3_3_9_1 e_1_3_3_8_1 e_1_3_3_29_1 e_1_3_3_28_1 e_1_3_3_25_1 e_1_3_3_24_1 e_1_3_3_27_1 e_1_3_3_26_1 e_1_3_3_21_1 e_1_3_3_2_1 e_1_3_3_20_1 e_1_3_3_5_1 e_1_3_3_23_1 e_1_3_3_4_1 e_1_3_3_22_1 |
| References_xml | – volume-title: Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application year: 1993 ident: e_1_3_3_3_1 – ident: e_1_3_3_2_1 doi: 10.1080/07474946.2015.1030971 – ident: e_1_3_3_13_1 doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350164 – ident: e_1_3_3_29_1 doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015733 – ident: e_1_3_3_17_1 doi: 10.1137/1108029 – ident: e_1_3_3_26_1 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2021.3074961 – ident: e_1_3_3_7_1 doi: 10.1080/00401706.2013.844731 – ident: e_1_3_3_27_1 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3146391 – ident: e_1_3_3_16_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511754678 – ident: e_1_3_3_11_1 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177693055 – ident: e_1_3_3_14_1 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2008.924647 – ident: e_1_3_3_12_1 doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq010 – ident: e_1_3_3_4_1 doi: 10.1214/17-AOS1546 – ident: e_1_3_3_8_1 doi: 10.1080/00401706.2014.947005 – volume: 22 start-page: 1 issue: 29 year: 2021 ident: e_1_3_3_30_1 article-title: Single and Multiple Change-Point Detection with Differential Privacy publication-title: Journal of Machine Learning Research – volume-title: Sequential Analysis: Tests and Confidence Intervals year: 2013 ident: e_1_3_3_18_1 – ident: e_1_3_3_5_1 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2024.3475394 – ident: e_1_3_3_9_1 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2013.2287101 – ident: e_1_3_3_6_1 doi: 10.1287/ijds.2022.00011 – ident: e_1_3_3_21_1 doi: 10.1017/9781108231596 – ident: e_1_3_3_22_1 doi: 10.1080/00401706.2017.1317291 – ident: e_1_3_3_31_1 doi: 10.1080/00401706.2022.2054861 – ident: e_1_3_3_24_1 doi: 10.1109/ITA.2013.6502987 – ident: e_1_3_3_10_1 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177697092 – ident: e_1_3_3_20_1 doi: 10.1109/JSAIT.2024.3362324 – ident: e_1_3_3_15_1 doi: 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100 – ident: e_1_3_3_25_1 doi: 10.1080/07474946.2023.2187417 – ident: e_1_3_3_19_1 doi: 10.1201/b17279 – ident: e_1_3_3_23_1 doi: 10.1080/00224065.2019.1681924 – ident: e_1_3_3_28_1 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2023.2172474 |
| SSID | ssj0018107 |
| Score | 2.3218777 |
| Snippet | Under a general setting of active sequential change point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations... Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations... Under a general setting of active sequential change-point detection problems, there are p local streams in a system but we are only able to take observations... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 153 |
| SubjectTerms | 62L15; 60G40 Active learning change point CUSUM TRAS algorithm |
| Title | Impact of compensation coefficients on active sequential change point detection |
| URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07474946.2024.2448819 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41098594 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3261800417 |
| Volume | 44 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis Science and Technology Library-DRAA customDbUrl: eissn: 1532-4176 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0018107 issn: 0747-4946 databaseCode: 30N dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/title-lists providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwELZgucAB8aa8ZCRuVao4jlP7iBBoWYlFaLtSOUW2Y4vdQ7KC5LK_nvGzqXYRr0vUOg-nM18nM87MNwi9qQx1T1VTMGlMURshCwGec9E0hq8rve6s9Vm-x83haX20ZdsdoYKvLhnVSl9eW1fyL1qFMdCrq5L9C83mi8IAfAb9whY0DNs_0vHHXOLoMsMhIA3a1IPxxBC-eM1lG3ubtgxZ06NbIg_lvsuL4awfl50ZfT5WP3dUT3YHy8hbknSznZxevkz95bezrC_jswK-yvMpo-3E9wteHgEA02hcXqiYz0qhGRCbK50-ZgYKQpGiFnEJ0SQDWhU1CT1dkoUNDI8RSdXMXJJAFByfvCQ0dLli1GMWJMzmJoOYvqpX4JVwHo3tPl923HMT3arA0LtuHrQ8zi-WOAkV9OnWU1GXo1u_boI9d2WPzPbXIYl3TTb30N0YU-C3ASD30Q3TP0B3PmVC3h8P0ecAFTxYPIcKnkMFw_cAFbyDCg5QwR4qOEPlETr98H7z7rCIvTQKTUk9FjXXtgRX33AmpaN5E8qqTtjOUvi1ndJMM64I49So0vBSWaNLISH6pKqzEAU8Rgf90JunLhkOjpGWarsGIcFO1tmuUVISocHdYwu0SiJrLwJlSksSE22Ucetk3EYZL5CYC7YdPeZsgFtLf3Pu66SFFgyje9slezNMcF7VEO7o5NYL9CSoJ99OTUrBmaif_cfMz9Ht3f_lBToYv0_mJTioo3rlIfcTYN-MDw |
| linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV07T8MwELZQGYCB96M8g8SakNR2a48IUbVQygISW2Q7toRASQXpwq_nzm4qioQYGK3kEttn--7s7z4TctGxFK2qjbmyNmZWqliC5xx3u1b0OqZXOOdRvuPu4IndPvPnb7kwCKvEGNoFogi_VuPkxs3oBhJ3iaTvTDJEGHRYAgZKCGT-XObg7OMtBjQdz08SRBZSpkEkRpkmi-e3zyzYpwX20t99UG-L-hvENK0IEJTXZFrrxHz-IHj8XzM3yfrMVY2uwtjaIku23CZr93Oe148d8jD0SZZR5SLEpkNI7BUNBeupKRClEUFZ-VU1CrhtWFPeopBwHE2ql7KOClt7RFi5S576N4_Xg3h2RUNsaMbqmAnjUvAgreBKIXuY1E4X0hWOQp0LbbjhQmdcUKtTK1LtrEmlgqCG6sKBc7lHWmVV2gPEWME7ylHjetBUeMgLV3S1Upk04EXwNkkaxeSTwMSRZw3B6ayncuypfNZTbSK_qy-v_RaIC_eV5PQP2fNG1znMNzxEUaWtpiAHIadAlrJem-yHQTCvDstSKbhkh__48xlZGTzej_LRcHx3RFY7eN0wAoXoMWnV71N7Aj5QrU_9IP8Cka_6HA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8QwEA6iIHrw_VifFbx2bbdJNzmKuuz6WD0oeCt5gijdxe1e_PXOJO2ignjwGNppk0ySmUm--ULIacdmaFVtzKS1MbVCxgI85zjPLe92dNc451G-w7z_RK-fWYMmnNSwSoyhXSCK8Gs1Tu6xcQ0i7gw536mgCDDo0DbYJ86R-HMhx1MxzOJIhrODBJ6GjGkQiVGmSeL57TPfzNM38tLfXVBvinqrRDWNCAiU1_a0Um398YPf8V-tXCMrtaManYeRtU7mbLlBlu9mLK-TTXI_8CmW0chFiEyHgNirGQrWE1MgRiOCsvRrahRQ27CivEUh3Tgaj17KKjK28niwcos89a4eL_pxfUFDrLOUVjHl2iXgP1rOpETuMKGcMsIZl0GdjdJMM65SxjOrEssT5axOhISQJlPGgWu5TebLUWl3EWEF70iXadeFpsJDZpzJlZSp0OBDsBZpN3opxoGHo0gbetO6pwrsqaLuqRYRX7VXVH4DxIXbSorsD9mTRtUFzDY8QpGlHU1BDgJOjhxl3RbZCWNgVh2aJoIzQff-8edjsvhw2StuB8ObfbLUwbuGESWUHZD56n1qD8EBqtSRH-KfgCj4wA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+compensation+coefficients+on+active+sequential+change+point+detection&rft.jtitle=Sequential+analysis&rft.au=Xu%2C+Qunzhi&rft.au=Mei%2C+Yajun&rft.au=Shi%2C+Jianjun&rft.date=2025-04-03&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0747-4946&rft.eissn=1532-4176&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=177&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F07474946.2024.2448819&rft.externalDocID=2448819 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0747-4946&client=summon |