Test-retest relative and absolute reliability of knee extensor strength measures and minimal detectable change

• Published in: Isokinetics and exercise science Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 17 - 26
• Main Authors: Ferri-Morales, Asunción, Alegre, Luis M., Basco, Angel, Aguado, Xavier
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2014
• Subjects: reproducibility of results; torque; Rehabilitation; dynamometry
• ISSN: 0959-3020; 1878-5913
• DOI: 10.3233/IES-130522

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the test-retest reliability of the isokinetic strength at 90°/s and the isometric parameters for knee extensors. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of isokinetic and isometric parameters of knee extensors, and to determine the smallest real difference between the test-retest measures. METHODS: Knee extensor strength was measured twice, 4 to 5 days apart, using a Biodex dynamometer in forty subjects (12 men, 28 women). The protocols consisted of 5 concentric contractions at 90°/s and 5 isometric contractions. RESULTS: For women, test-retest reliability was very high for isometric and isokinetic peak-torque (ICC $_{c,1}$ > 0.9), moderate for work (ICC $_{c,1}$ =0.82) and questionable for angle of peak torque (Angle-PT), mean Angle-PT and rate of torque development(RTD $_{0-100 ms}$ (ICC < 0.67). The measurement errors were small for all variables, the SEM% ranged between 3.1% to 7.4%, and SRD% from 8.6% to 19.9%, except for RTD $_{0-100 ms}$ that was the most variable (SEM%=16.4%; SRD=47.5%). No differences were found in Angle-PT and RTD $_{0-100 ms}$ with regard to sex. CONCLUSIONS: The isokinetic values obtained at 90°/s and isometric peak-torque for knee extensors are highly repeatable with a standardized test protocol and the SRD values can be used to detect real changes. Alternative strategies of analysis should be developed to improve reliability of Angle-PT and RTD $_{0-100 ms}$ . Angle-PT and RTD $_{0-100 ms}$ do not appear affected by gender.