Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow or cause symptoms. The aim of this study was to follow patients with fragments after PCNL to identify predictors of stone-related events (re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of endourology Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 28
Main Authors Emmott, Anthony S, Brotherhood, Hilary L, Paterson, Ryan F, Lange, Dirk, Chew, Ben H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information
ISSN1557-900X
DOI10.1089/end.2017.0618

Cover

Abstract The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow or cause symptoms. The aim of this study was to follow patients with fragments after PCNL to identify predictors of stone-related events (re-interventions and complications) after PCNL. Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2013 at our hospital. Patients with fragments of any size on postoperative day 1 computed tomography of the kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (CT-KUB) were included, and patients with planned secondary interventions were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed on subjects with CT-plain X-ray to determine fragment growth or passage. Of the 658 patients who received a postoperative CT-KUB on day 1, 299 patients (45%) had fragments that were 1 mm or larger. From this, 263 patients met the study criteria and were included. The size of fragments, using a 4 mm cutoff, did not predict the passage of fragments (p = 0.173) or growth (p = 0.572). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, previous history of renal stones and size of fragment were found to be predictive for stone-related events (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis identified patients with fragments >4 mm having a shorter survival time before the occurrence of stone-related events (p = 0.044). The true stone-free rate was 55% after PCNL. However, 82.5% were stone free or had RFs 4 mm or less, which correlates with previous studies. Larger RFs had higher rates of stone-related events and shorter time to occurrence of stone-related events. The growth and spontaneous passage of RFs was independent of RF size, emphasizing the importance of obtaining a stone-free status after PCNL.
AbstractList The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow or cause symptoms. The aim of this study was to follow patients with fragments after PCNL to identify predictors of stone-related events (re-interventions and complications) after PCNL. Data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2013 at our hospital. Patients with fragments of any size on postoperative day 1 computed tomography of the kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph (CT-KUB) were included, and patients with planned secondary interventions were excluded. Subgroup analysis was performed on subjects with CT-plain X-ray to determine fragment growth or passage. Of the 658 patients who received a postoperative CT-KUB on day 1, 299 patients (45%) had fragments that were 1 mm or larger. From this, 263 patients met the study criteria and were included. The size of fragments, using a 4 mm cutoff, did not predict the passage of fragments (p = 0.173) or growth (p = 0.572). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, previous history of renal stones and size of fragment were found to be predictive for stone-related events (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis identified patients with fragments >4 mm having a shorter survival time before the occurrence of stone-related events (p = 0.044). The true stone-free rate was 55% after PCNL. However, 82.5% were stone free or had RFs 4 mm or less, which correlates with previous studies. Larger RFs had higher rates of stone-related events and shorter time to occurrence of stone-related events. The growth and spontaneous passage of RFs was independent of RF size, emphasizing the importance of obtaining a stone-free status after PCNL.
Author Paterson, Ryan F
Chew, Ben H
Emmott, Anthony S
Lange, Dirk
Brotherhood, Hilary L
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Anthony S
  surname: Emmott
  fullname: Emmott, Anthony S
  organization: 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hilary L
  surname: Brotherhood
  fullname: Brotherhood, Hilary L
  organization: 2 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ryan F
  surname: Paterson
  fullname: Paterson, Ryan F
  organization: 2 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dirk
  surname: Lange
  fullname: Lange, Dirk
  organization: 2 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ben H
  surname: Chew
  fullname: Chew, Ben H
  organization: 2 Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo1kF9LwzAUxYMo7o8--ir5AHbeJF3TPI7h3GBMmQq-jbRNXKVNSpIO--2NqE-H--Oew-FM0LmxRiF0Q2BGIBf3ylQzCoTPICP5GRqT-ZwnAuB9hCbefwIQlhF2iUZUAOOQZWP0tbRt19SlDLU1_g7vVbIxQbmTMj8E72VQEUtT4Z0MvZMNXtc-WDdgq-O3r6s-spcQm-CVkx9tNHq80DEDPytX9kEaZXuPd6o7OtvU4WiDbYcrdKFl49X1n07R2-rhdblOtk-Pm-Vim5RUsJBkIgorCsEKWkBKKU9BC56lYq5FSgkwEg_NFeiSSlqlIHLN85RoKKWI7im6_c3t-qJV1aFzdSvdcPifgH4DbxJepQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0868
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2024_0452
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_6051_20_04107_7
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0748
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2020_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2021_0253
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2022_06_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_bju_16567
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cvsm_2018_05_008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_04993_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13629_018_0200_0
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2022_0124
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2024_0610
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2024_0435
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2024_0732
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_0056
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolvj_2020_100076
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0049
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_04774_z
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_0255
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_023_03697_9
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0574
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_022_01392_5
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0475
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41581_020_0320_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000571
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0561
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_021_01259_1
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2724_6051_20_04055_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_04872_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2025_02_029
crossref_primary_10_3390_uro2010007
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_0243
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2024_0602
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2018_0695
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_022_04210_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_05365_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_018_2518_x
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2021_0759
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_0626
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2023_0111
crossref_primary_10_2147_MDER_S384823
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0340
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2019_08_026
crossref_primary_10_1097_MNH_0000000000000478
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1089/end.2017.0618
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1557-900X
ExternalDocumentID 29037066
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.GJ
0R~
29K
34G
39C
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
ABBKN
ACGFS
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BNQNF
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
D-I
DU5
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
IAO
IER
IHR
IM4
ITC
MV1
NPM
NQHIM
O9-
P2P
RIG
RML
RMSOB
UE5
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-692933bb93b2b0422740f976495f9421031764f7e0fc2a2d4098f7841f0ca9692
IngestDate Thu Jan 02 23:00:59 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords nephrolithiasis
urolithiasis
calculus
lithotripsy
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c293t-692933bb93b2b0422740f976495f9421031764f7e0fc2a2d4098f7841f0ca9692
PMID 29037066
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_29037066
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-01-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-01-00
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of endourology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Endourol
PublicationYear 2018
References 29160109 - J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):33
References_xml – reference: 29160109 - J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):33
SSID ssj0013613
Score 2.4370847
Snippet The management of residual fragments (RFs) that persist after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been poorly studied. Fragments have the potential to grow...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 28
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Calculi - pathology
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Title Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29037066
Volume 32
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS8MwFA5TQXwR73fJg49GszRrl0cVZYobIg72NposcYJO0Qrq7_GHenJp180L6ktZ23V0-b6dfTk95wtCOyAiaCKUIYomjHCmakSkNCUxjymXvUhJ57bfbMWNNj_r1DqVynupauk5k3vq7cu-kv-gCscAV9sl-wdkiw-FA_Aa8IUtIAzbX2F8VK4H94NFTstFjJdWSeYFmq3Ue2x4Z5BXb0Py5JuxnCe3VbHXvuXtwC0dfqEf1TOoR23rZFsacLfVcv37LO-D-Kxq9aAHOyO5-mMYEP8IKjgVDNOth4-uAawf6n4aN7e2iK_IR1-kmZsQuK_2CpGoKEM-tz0RLl7ehF6jkLmo1kuZCx2ibS0hgtJOORwP050F7UJsrX8Z8mldOPCt7Ws12QN9MvI-QOzhzuHPBI0S6td4-fnsmAN3fmoCTUA0tour2oxQ_qQK9FDwboU72R-5D-s0Ha4dm7U49XI1h2YDQPjAc2geVfRgAU03Q2HFInoZodIuHiMSdkTaxUAjHGiEA43wvcE5jbCjES5ohB2NcJlGeIxGS6h9cnx11CBhUQ6iQBlmJAY9HUVSikgyaQ3kEk4NaFqYaBvBmV01BHZMoqlRLGU9TkXd2IfbhqpUwNXLaHIA97KKMPy1iljF1jCKcx5XpbHODIzDFDfqaZasoRU_Zt0H77zSzUdz_dszG2hmSLVNNGXgp663QDdmctsB9wGzW3A1
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complications%2C+Re-Intervention+Rates%2C+and+Natural+History+of+Residual+Stone+Fragments+After+Percutaneous+Nephrolithotomy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+endourology&rft.au=Emmott%2C+Anthony+S&rft.au=Brotherhood%2C+Hilary+L&rft.au=Paterson%2C+Ryan+F&rft.au=Lange%2C+Dirk&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089%2Fend.2017.0618&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29037066&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F29037066&rft.externalDocID=29037066