Gaussian-kernel c-means clustering algorithms
Partitional clustering is the most used in cluster analysis. In partitional clustering, hard c -means (HCM) (or called k -means) and fuzzy c -means (FCM) are the most known clustering algorithms. However, these HCM and FCM algorithms work worse for data sets in a noisy environment and get inaccuracy...
Saved in:
| Published in | Soft computing (Berlin, Germany) Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 1699 - 1716 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.02.2021
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1432-7643 1433-7479 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00500-020-04924-6 |
Cover
| Summary: | Partitional clustering is the most used in cluster analysis. In partitional clustering, hard
c
-means (HCM) (or called
k
-means) and fuzzy
c
-means (FCM) are the most known clustering algorithms. However, these HCM and FCM algorithms work worse for data sets in a noisy environment and get inaccuracy when the data set has different shape clusters. For solving these drawbacks in HCM and FCM, Wu and Yang (Pattern Recognit 35:2267–2278, 2002) proposed the alternative
c
-means clustering with an exponential-type distance that extends HCM and FCM into alternative HCM (AHCM) and alternative FCM (AFCM). In this paper, we construct a more generalization of AHCM and AFCM with Gaussian-kernel
c
-means clustering, called GK-HCM and GK-FCM. For theoretical behaviors of GK-FCM, we analyze the bordered Hessian matrix and then give the theoretical properties of the GK-FCM algorithm. Some numerical and real data sets are used to compare the proposed GK-HCM and GK-FCM with AHCM and AFCM methods. Experimental results and comparisons actually demonstrate these good aspects of the proposed GK-HCM and GK-FCM algorithms with its effectiveness and usefulness. Finally, we apply the GK-FCM algorithm to MRI segmentation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1432-7643 1433-7479 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00500-020-04924-6 |